Categories
Uncategorized

A Running List of Thoughts I’d Have if I Could Afford to Pee at MSG

(Editor’s note: Ex-Knickerblogger and kickass journalist Sydney Bauer has blessed us with a guest post. Take it away, Sydney!)

On StubHub right nowm the cheapest ticket for Game 3 is going for around $4,900. If you have a friend or a family member who happen to be Knicks fans and want to actually witness this titanic tilt in person, you will need $10,000 at least—plus any and all applicable fees, natch. 

To my eternal shame, as a freelance writer and barista, who does not currently make much money, I regret to inform you that I do not have a spare ten grand laying around.

James Dolan should thank his lucky stars this is so, 

If you’ve read the news about the Knicks in the last two months, you’ll know James Dolan has turned MSG into his own personal surveillance state. And you’ll know that he uses his in-house Stasi to monitor enemies of the current Knicks regime. 

I happen to have something in common with one of Mr. Dolan’s perceived enemies, and it’s a big one: We are both transgender women and so when we need to pee, we use the women’s restroom. Because we are both women.

While I do not believe going to Madison Square Garden would warrant the perverse flattery of having every bit of my movements tracked, there is a small part of me that is incredibly vain. 

Full discloser, I’ve imagined what having spies tail me would be like, and the thoughts that’d be running through my head if I were to come under the personal scrutiny of John Eversole, Dolan’s confidante and head of security. 

Eversole, per Wired, was obsessed with one trans woman in particular, misgendering her and stalking her for the crime of… being a Knicks fan and paying to see the team at Madison Square Garden. Heavens to Betsy, what if the MSG broadcast actually filmed her in the stands and blasted those images out to an audience of millions. No, way. That was a nonstarter for this organization. Really.

So in honor of blogging being BACK for the 2026 NBA Finals, here’s a running list of thoughts that’d pop into my head if I could afford to go to MSG for Game 3. This blog also presumes that I would need to use the women’s room after having exactly three (3) $25 dollar beers, which in this fantasy world I am able to purchase without regret. 

  • “Sometimes I wonder what it says about society when lines for the women’s room aren’t as long as lines for the men’s room in sporting events and if I’m happy about that makes me a bad feminist because we should have more universal access to restrooms that do not promote crowding and choke points instead of thinking about how men finally have to face some minor hardship when they have to pee.”
  • “Whoever used this toilet seat before me kept it nice and warm. Thank you, ma’am.”
  • “Mitch really needs to keep the fouls down in the second half. Kat is going to play less, because Wemby has a harder time drifting away from Mitch to create a double on the ball handler, and we need to be net neutral or positive on the Wemby minutes.”
  • “Mike Brown is a step ahead of me on coaching changes in this series which makes sense because I am not a professional NBA coach.”
  • “Hi John, I’m taking a few seconds longer because I had three beers in the first half.”
  • “God, Jalen Brunson has been electric this playoffs.”
  • “I should really check the train schedule for later tonight when I back. Does Metro North consider the Finals a holiday?”
  • “I am at an NBA Finals game! Ten year old me is screaming right now.”
  • “I wonder what the Knicks could get for the 31st overall pick? I think that’s the most ‘do not trade’ asset we have, which could have so much value we can extract.”
  • “Remember Rokas Jokubaitis?”
  • “How’s the family doing John? Sorry, I need a few more seconds in here, the bathroom, which I am using, as you well know.”
  • “Fuck, I forgot my lipstick. I really should touch up my lips.”
  • “KD, do you regret not coming to the Knickssssss?”
  • “You think Jeremy Sochan plays a role in Game 4? Feels like we’re due for a burst of him getting double digits off the bench in a game that most didn’t expect, but would allow us to go super small when the benches are playing and really allow McBride, Shamet and Bridges to drain some catch and shoot 3s forcing Wemby back into the game earlier than the Spurs would hope.”
  • “Alright, let’s wrap it up here, Sydney.””
  • “I can’t believe my Dad was here for Game 7 in 1970. And now I’m here for a game in 2026. Time: It’s linear!”
  • “Okay, I need another beer.”
  • “Let’s go Knicks.”
  • “I’m going to wash my hands for 45 seconds to really skew your results, John! Hi John!”

43 replies on “A Running List of Thoughts I’d Have if I Could Afford to Pee at MSG”

This is hilarious, Sydney.

Just such a delight to have original content on the site again after it’s been a glorified group chat for a decade.

2

From the previous thread:

Or perhaps, to Kolekt.

Serious question: does Kolek play non garbage time minutes in this series? Among our vulnerabilities to this team is a lack of a great secondary ball handler and creator for when Brunson is getting pressed. Kolek did very well against the spurs in at least one of the previous matchups, back when he was still in the rotation. I wonder if that’s a wrinkle brown might be willing to try if castle and Harper are beating the shit out of our guy.

I’ve been loving all the testimonies from you guys the past few days. Seeing Silverman and Cavan and McElroy yesterday was wonderful. (And another Silverman column today!) On the eve of the biggest night of our sporting lives in decades, we all come full circle.

It’s hard to believe that I’ve been posting on here for almost 20 years. I don’t even remember exactly how I found this site, which is rare for me given how my ADHD usually makes my brain a steel trap for origin stories. I think this place and the community here have been part of my life so long (my entire adult life in fact) it’s hard to imagine my life without it. Maybe it was through the TrueHoop network on ESPN.com. Maybe it was a google search back when google was good.

But this place found me at the right time. I became a Knicks fan during the ’94 playoffs. I was 5. I’m originally from Poughkeepsie, and my dad’s side of the family were all in the NYC metro area. We’d have big family gatherings at my grandparents’ apartment in Flushing, and that spring I remember everyone glued to the TV watching Knicks vs. Pacers. One of my earliest visual memories is of John Starks going back up the court after hitting a 3 tugging at his jersey as if to cool himself off, and my dad telling me he was “a streaky shooter.” My dad loved the spectacle of it: the Knicks the hero, Reggie the villain, and Spike Lee the jester. I don’t remember him getting mad or stewing after losses; I just remember the joy of watching the great drama unfold with him and that was it for me. Going through something that much bigger than myself at that young of an age, I was set for life.

But I didn’t get to watch any of the 1999 run live, as my family had moved to Singapore the year before. None of the local TV stations showed the games on tape delay, and my dad started traveling a lot for work and spending long hours at the office and I think he always was more of a sports-as-entertainment guy rather than a diehard. So all I got were little snippets from the sports section of the newspaper, which paid much more attention to the English Premier league, and updates on the evening news. I caught up with what happened a couple years after the fact, when cable TV came to Singapore and Asian ESPN would show NBA documentaries. I always felt like I wasn’t really there.

Coming back to the States for college in 2006, I reconnected with my Knicks fandom. As a kid who spent too much time online, my mode has always been to join a forum-based community and find like-minded people, and I found my way to Knickerblogger in what feels like 2008 or so (shout out to the late, great River Ave. Blues and fellow RAB alums Big Blue Al and the equally as late and as great Ted Nelson.)

Joining KB was a rude awakening for me, because I reentered Knicks fandom only discover we sucked. We sucked real bad. Not only did we suck, we were systemically and structurally bad, embarrassingly bad, clown show bad, three-ring circus bad. Up to that point I’d been a basketball fan in the traditional sense, going off op-ed columns in the paper, SportsCenter coverage, ESPN.com articles. Hall of Famer Isiah Thomas is running the show now! We’ve got Stephon Marbury and Steve Francis in the backcourt, maybe we can make some noise! OK, maybe we gave up a lot for Eddy Curry, but he’s an unstoppable post scorer, we haven’t had that since Ewing! The community here forced me to evolve from a child to an adult as a sports fan. No, Renaldo Balkman will not become a 6MOTY candidate. No, Channing Frye is not the stretch big of the future. Yes, you can eke out an existence on the hope of David Lee being developing into an All-Star. No, Donnie Walsh and Mike D’Antoni can’t overcome the rot at the top that starts with Dolan. No, Melo cannot change his stars. Yes, Jeremy Lin can be cruelly snatched away from you in an instant. Yes, you can always backslide all the way to Andrea Bargnani. Yes, the East is big, man. I became eternally frustrated and long-suffering adult, but an adult nonetheless.

And now, here we are. Here I am with all of you, my chosen family of Knicks diehards. The best Knicks team in 30 years, up against a team heralding the future of the NBA. Let’s go get this fucking title, we’ve waited long enough.

4

Yeah, at least one of several pieces of NBA conventional wisdom will be proved untrue, regardless of who wins. If it’s us, it’s not just “you need a GOAT candidate” but “you can’t win if your best player is a very small guard.”

But there’s actually a pretty decent-sized list of teams that have won either without a GOAT candidate or with a very small guard as their best player (Steph Curry is 6’2″, btw, and he just won 4 titles… two of which he was the clear #1… so what are you even talking about, Becky Hammon?).

That’s not conventional wisdom, it’s just a couple of dumb takes.

No one has ever done what the Spurs are trying to do.

Alan, I would guess that he does not, but it is literally all hands on deck so the only guy I think has a zero chance of playing non-garbage time minutes is Pacome. In order of possibility of playing, I would list it as follows, barring injury of course:

-Huk (third big, probably will see some minutes)
-Sochan (maybe familiarity makes him a better choice than Huk, also situational PF)
-Diawara (maybe his length and 3pt shooting helps him, but probably not)
-Kolek (Alvo makes him kind of redundant, most likely not)

Kolek is bigger and a better passer than GTA, though he’s less seasoned overall. The Spurs’ guards are just so big that I wonder if Alvarado becomes unplayable in this series. Though if that’s the case, I imagine that just means more Clarkson minutes, rather than the return of Kolek-o-Vision.

@UnderdogNBA
Shams: Mitchell Robinson (hand) expected to be available to play Wednesday.
12:49 PM · Jun 3, 2026

#crossedfingersforluck

2

Incredible text Sydney, the KB content renaissance is already one of the best parts of making it to the finals.

2

I just ran some data through my spreadsheets on this series. I used the the season long data to get a line on each opponent the Knicks and Spurs faced in the playoffs accounting for home and away and then calcuated the peformance of each team relative to expectations to get a new “playoff rating”.

Based on the two playoff ratings and the fact that the Spurs have home court in this series, the Knicks would have somewhere between a 75% and 80% chance of winning this series if both keep performing at their playoff level.

If both teams go back to their normal season level the Knicks would have between a 30% and 35% chance of winning the series.

Your guess is as good as mine as to whether the Knicks can keep performing at their playoff level, but even if they decline a bit while exceedihg the regular season level, this should be a very good series.

1

(Steph Curry is 6’2″, btw, and he just won 4 titles… two of which he was the clear #1… so what are you even talking about, Becky Hammon?).

And Isiah, who did it back when teams didn’t routinely trot out 6-6 and 6-7 centers.

Really dumb take.

Now what isn’t a dumb take is “it takes a tentpole superstar to win a championship,” and the debate here and elsewhere about whether JB qualifies. Right now, I’d say “yes,” though it’s still close and he still wavers between “last four in” and “first four out” in my eyes. As we near tipoff in Game 1, he’s “last four in, IMO.(*)

Wemby obviously qualifies.

(*) Which in turn means the debate if they win it will be, “Is this a typical association champion, or an ’04 Pistons style champion?” Doesn’t matter a bit to me. Flags fly forever.

Guys – whatever you do, do not go to 82-0.com and play that ridiculously addictive game. You have been warned.

1

Guys – whatever you do, do not go to 82-0.com and play that ridiculously addictive game. You have been warned.

It is my duty to disclose that my 82-0 lineup included none other than Ben Simmons at PG.

I laughed out lout, Sydney. If it makes you feel any better, my sisters have no qualms about taking great pleasure in watching me wait in line for the bathroom at games, which, fair enough.

I can confirm that going down the 82-0 rabbit hole is a terrible idea for anyone with any amount of actual work to do!

My head tells me Knicks in five or six.
My heart tells me not to get my hopes up.
A lifetime of Knicks disappointments makes me cautious.

But it starts tonight!

It’s interesting, the Spurs obviously have a lot of things that make them a tough matchup specifically for the Knicks (they can throw a bunch of good defensive guards/wings at Brunson all game long and Wemby makes any sort of 15-foot shot highly difficult to make), but the Knicks are also a brutal matchup for the Spurs, since the Knicks force (and then take advantage of) turnovers and everyone except Mitch can hit a three (while the Thunder were routinely having, like, just three guys shooting threes late).

When you add in the Knicks’ momentum, this really feels like a Knicks in 5 series.

But since the universe has already given me everything I wanted this postseason (home court throughout the Eastern Conference playoffs and the Knicks in the Finals against someone other than the Thunder), I can’t ask for anything more, so who knows?

But, like, I said, I don’t even need the universe helping me out at this point. The Knicks are just too damn good.

ASK FOR FUCKING MORE BRIAN

I need you and Hubie to keep doing exactly what you’ve been doing for the past six weeks

2

Speaking of the universe doing nice things for me, all of these old posters posting has been very cool, too!

Yeah, at least one of several pieces of NBA conventional wisdom will be proved untrue, regardless of who wins. If it’s us, it’s not just “you need a GOAT candidate” but “you can’t win if your best player is a very small guard.”

Doesn’t our former GM Mr Thomas qualify as a small guard?

I suspect that the 82-0 game significantly overrates PPG. I tried a few times selecting the highest scorers, and inevitably got better results than good overall impact guys.

Got crossed up earlier and forgot that Sydney and not Bob wrote this post, my bad.

Having so many legacy KB people come back to post is adding a lot to the “big fight feel” for tonight.

Somehow my team with Tyrese and Booker at the guards, Trey Murphy at the wing, and peak Ewing and peak Embiid at the bigs only won 63 games.

My team with LeBron, Kyrie, kd, dr j, and Giannis only won 69 (nice) games.

Somehow my team with Tyrese and Booker at the guards, Trey Murphy at the wing, and peak Ewing and peak Embiid at the bigs only won 63 games.

Embiid probably played only 17 games.

1

It’s all about counting stats. The best players are:
60s PHI Wilt
70s MIL Kareem
Prime Westbrook, LBJ, Doncic, MJ, Bird, or Magic

and Ben Simmons

1

Yeah, this is just silly, as my team with Magic and Kidd at the guards, 90s Charles Barkley at the wing, and peak Brad Daughtery and peak Ralph Sampson somehow won more games than my MUCH more functional earlier team I mentioned.

That teams makes NO sense. You’d just pack the shit out of the paint.

What a strange week plus this has been. Hard to be patient. Very emotional. Trying not to think ahead, and also be hopeful. The 90s produced a lot of great moments, but also a lot of heartbreak. This would ease a lot of the pain!

My head tells me Knicks in six.
My heart tells me Knicks sweep.

I know, it’s ridiculous. But I also called the Philadelphia Sweep and the Cavs sweep on this board. Don’t take my opinions lightly.

I was a kid during 1970 and 1973 and I’ve since had to live through teams helmed by Chris Duhon, Emanuel Mudiay, Elfrid Payton, Frank Ntilikina, Jose Calderon, Howard Eisley, Jarrett Jack, and Raymond Felton (twice!)

I also had to watch the entire OJ chase progressively blocking my view of one game of the 1994 Finals.

Knicks Sweep.

I respect their team. They are not just Wemby. They have great large wing players. But we will crush them, as long as we can get Bridges, OG, Josh Hart, Deuce, Landry, and Mitch playing at the level we’ve come to see.

Knicks Sweep.

Just such a delight to have original content on the site again after it’s been a glorified group chat for a decade.

It’s great to have the old posters back, i remember reading them back in the day, i started when we were getting ready to steal Lebron from Cleveland. LOL I don’t know the year, maybe 2008 or 2009. At first i only read the comments available after reading the post, but after 2014 or so i discovered that the comments were also gold, and not only the posts.
So not trying to disagree with you, Alan, but i think we had great content in the meantime too, only it was on the comments section and not as a blog post.
All this to say, i love you all and this blog is truly a wonderful community of Knicks diehard fans. 🧡💙
And please, basketball Gods, we need this ring… it’s our precious !!! 😀

I’m listening to all these experts picking the spurs and they just make no sense to me at all. I think everything they’re saying is wrong. Everything. So I am either more wrong than I’ve ever been in my life or this is the best contrarian play since shorting the housing market in ‘06.

Tonight should be fun. Ohtani’s batting over .400 since the Knicks last played and has only allowed 5 earned runs all season. The eyes of the sports world will be on LA!

I’m listening to all these experts picking the spurs and they just make no sense to me at all. I think everything they’re saying is wrong. Everything. So I am either more wrong than I’ve ever been in my life or this is the best contrarian play since shorting the housing market in ‘06.

While everyone is picking the Spurs, I’ve been seeing a LOT of respect to the Knicks in most of the picks I’ve seen. Stuff like, “Spurs in 6, but this Knicks team is legit and it wouldn’t be surprising to see them win it.”

I don’t mind it so far. But I agree, I think a totally dispassionate observer would totally pick the Knicks to win this series heading into Game 1.

Everyone picking the spurs seems to be doing it bc 3 months ago they decided Thunder/Spurs is the title and now they’re performing logical gymnastics to make everything fit into their prior assumption.

The Spurs beat OKC, the prohibitive favorite, so they get the respect that comes with that.

The Knicks beat a bunch of teams you guys were hoping they’d play cause they were worse than all the alternatives. Now you want respect for it?

They beat an injured Thunder team, though. If they beat a healthy Thunder team, then 100% I’d back them to win this series.

There are two things. 1. This Knicks team is obviously not the team we saw all season long. That team I would pick the Spurs to win in 6, but 2. The Spurs got here by barely beating an injured Thunder team. I think the Knicks are on the upswing while the Spurs are just kind of “there.”

The Knicks beat a bunch of teams you guys were hoping they’d play cause they were worse than all the alternatives. Now you want respect for it?

Yeah we’re really lucky we didn’t play the real powerhouses of the East like Boston and Detroit.

What happened to those teams again?

The Spurs beat OKC, the prohibitive favorite, so they get the respect that comes with that.

I think the Spurs should be slightly favorite, but if OKC was in New York’s conference and the Knicks somehow beat them without 2 of their 4 best players (and Chet being that) I am 100% sure people wouldn’t take that win as proof of concept (and would also point out that they faced the 6th and 7th seeds in the previous two rounds).

if OKC was in New York’s conference and the Knicks somehow beat them without 2 of their 4 best players (and Chet being that) I am 100% sure people wouldn’t take that win as proof of concept

100%

And if the Spurs ran through the playoffs with the greatest margin of victory ever, no one would be saying “but their competition was weak.”

People are retro fitting their opinions to match their assumptions.

The Sixers and Cavs didn’t suck because the Knicks killed them. The Knicks are fucking great because they killed them.

You KNOW I think the Knicks were beating the Pistons and Celtics, too, but I don’t think it is unfair to note that they likely wouldn’t have SWEPT those two series, so it is still a very good thing that the Knicks avoided them. Especially since, the longer a series goes, the more chances you have for dudes to get hurt.

That isn’t to say Philly and the Cavs were bad teams, of course, but just that the matchups were differnet than with the Pistons and the Celtics for the Knicks.

They beat an injured Thunder team, though. If they beat a healthy Thunder team, then 100% I’d back them to win this series.

Same.

That Thunder team, with no Mitchell or Williams and Chet playing like that, is not much better than Cleveland.

The Cavs beat a 60 win Pistons team FFS. They didn’t suck, we just made them look like they did.

Comments are closed.