Categories
Uncategorized

Knicks Morning News (2026.06.29)

News & Blogs

  • Knicks sign St. John’s guard to Summer League deal – Posting & Toasting
  • Knicks’ Mitchell Robinson breaks silence on free agency: ‘Very a possibility’ – Posting & Toasting
  • Why Knicks should go into second apron as they look to repeat next season – SNY
  • NBA free agency: Whom the Knicks can target and 10 players to watch – Newsday
  • NBA free agency 2026: How much all 30 teams can spend this summer – ESPN
  • YT News

  • Knicks New Draft Picks Jack Kayil & Tyler Nickel Feat Ersin Demir – Knick of Time
  • Knicks Free Agency Update | Leon Rose Roomates Podcast Reaction | Knicks Weekly Ep 154 – Knicks Fan TV
  • Knicks Free Agency Preview! | C.R.E.A.M. – Cap Rules Everything Around Me | Knicks Film School – Knicks Film School
  • 2 replies on “Knicks Morning News (2026.06.29)”

    So one more excruciating day before the mystery is solved. At least it seems that way. The mystery? To what degree do the Knicks run it back?

    The smart money right now is on the stupid decision: Mitch is gone. Shamet stays. Anyone who has money on Dolan relenting doesn’t know Dolan. Not that there’s zero chance. Just something close to it, probably along the lines of hitting the lottery at the 14th spot under the outgoing system.

    Assuming he doesn’t relent, what are the chances that Mitch stays and Shamet is the odd man out?

    I’m putting it at about 20%. It would require Mitch to turn down something like $5+M AAV for whatever contract length he is offered.

    First, is there any team with the cap space that is crazy/stupid enough to offer him a long-term deal of “starters” money? Meaning something in the $18-22M range, or alternatively, Josh Hart money? I’m guessing no, but it certainly isn’t impossible. And if that happens, I personally would understand the Knicks not competing with that offer. For me, the absolute max I would pay Mitch is the NTPMLE even allowing for going over the second apron.

    So the question becomes, will Mitch be willing to sign for less than the NTPMLE, meaning like $5MAAV less?

    Obviously it would be an extremely hard sell. Now, if anyone can sell Mitch on the idea, it would be Leon and WWW. But even so, that means means losing Shamet.

    So my question to the board (and hopefully the answers are not loaded with Dolan hate, we’ve covered that ground) is:

    Will Mitch take that discount if offered? And if yes, would you prefer that and losing Shamet over keeping Shamet and replacing Mitch with a combo of Huk and someone like Looney, Diabate, or Richards, to name a few?

    Hearing Shamet talk on that podcast has now made me think maybe I’d rather keep Shamet. He’s a pro’s pro and having a slew of guards off the bench who can all get hot – Shamet, deuce, Clarkson – is a real advantage. And I think while Mitch’s particular skill set can’t ever be fully replaced, we can probably find a back up big who defends and rebounds decently well but is also maybe more reliable, better free throw shooter with a little bit more of an offensive game – and that might offset losing the elite skills Mitch does have.

    Leave a Reply

    This site uses User Verification plugin to reduce spam. See how your comment data is processed.