06/16/2025 11:00:02
06/16/2025 11:00:01
06/16/2025 09:58:43
06/16/2025 08:02:00
06/16/2025 07:30:01
06/16/2025 04:29:23
06/16/2025 01:01:20
06/16/2025 00:51:47
06/15/2025 23:49:22
06/16/2025 00:25:00
06/15/2025 22:56:13
06/15/2025 23:13:33
Categories
Knicks Morning News (2025.06.16)
06/16/2025 11:00:02
06/16/2025 11:00:01
06/16/2025 09:58:43
06/16/2025 08:02:00
06/16/2025 07:30:01
06/16/2025 04:29:23
06/16/2025 01:01:20
06/16/2025 00:51:47
06/15/2025 23:49:22
06/16/2025 00:25:00
06/15/2025 22:56:13
06/15/2025 23:13:33
139 replies on “Knicks Morning News (2025.06.16)”
I think I’m voting for Taylor Jenkins, because if you squint your eyes he looks an awful lot like a Junior Thibs. So we wouldn”t have to struggle quite as much with a completely new look on the bench.
used to have zero interest in john collins now maybe a little interest but ainge
My #1 pick going by resume only, since we don’ thave insight on interview skills, strategies or principles discussed, – is Sam Cassell.
I know it’s been said ad nauseum, and will be all summer, but it struck me again reading some pablum about the Pacers. It’s a team full of holes. Obi is still totally one-dimensional. Mathurin’s an idiot. CJ is a dwarf. And so on.
Yet led by a point guard who loves to run and run and pass and gun, and put in a system by the coach that feels like a washing machine cauldron, and most of those holes are well masked.
The Knicks parts are really damn good, but almost never did I feel like much effort was made to hide holes. Mitch playing center, but only occasionally because… KAT switching everything, against Boston. For moments now and again. Otherwise it was a big pile of misfit toys, lying around.
Maybe they’ll never fit together, but we’ve heard lots of good ideas just out of this forum, and someone who’s actually paid money to figure it out, well…?
How about Josh Hart for Brandon Clarke and either Jaylen Wells or Scottie Pippen Jr? Memphis can flip Hart or we get a third team to give them picks if they don’t want a vet.
Or better yet, if it’s possible, maybe just a sign and trade with Precious & the Washington picks for Clarke?
Bottom line I think Clarke fits very well and it seems like he would be available.
I agree.
The league is full of players with holes in their game (even Giannis can’t shoot from outside and has issues from the FT line).
We dwell too much on what certain Knicks can and cannot do.
(just for the record, not only is Bridges not an elite POA defender against very quick PGs, there are a few Cs he can’t defend either) 🙂
The idea is to build a team with enough defense, outside shooting, shot creation, rebounding, playmaking, depth etc.. so that almost every lineup doesn’t have significant enough weaknesses to be exploited easily and signficantly. If there are some weaknesses, you expect the coach to try to adjust and address them with lineup or strategy changes.
The Knicks have a ton of talent. IMO, they have more talent in their starting 5 than the Pacers, but they do have a couple of combinations that teams have exploited well enough to think there may have to be some changes. The depth is also not ideal.
I think the front office will address some of this in the off season and hopefully a new coach will adjust well before even fans are getting pissed off at the obviousness of the situation. That way he won’t get fired.
clarke is 8 of 51 on 3s over the past four combined seasons cj is on pellies not pacers but yer right we do not need a 6-3 guy next to 6-2 brunson
That first headline feels like the bot is trolling some or all of us.
KDP was a negative asset, so I think the draft assets make more sense when you figure they’d need to attach a pick to dump him.
Bane was pretty much the perfect addition for Orlando, and might make them a legit contender if everyone stays healthy. Still, as we all know, they were desperate to get Bane, and when you’re desperate, you pay a lot.
They have to hope that their desperation works out.
Alan, best line: “Still, Barrett hasn’t been a bust by any means, and he’s made a lot of money in his career, so there’s no way he can be labeled a disappointment.”
By his family…
Who in the fucking world thinks it makes sense to write an article now about how the Knicks shouldn’t have drafted RJ?!
Yeah, that’s why I am much more positive about the potential with a new coach than some (Z-man, Hubert, etc). We saw KAT take over a playoff game with a never-used defensive lineup on the floor with him, for example. It seems eminently possible that a person paid to do this for a living would discover other ways of enhancing our often significant advantages and minimizing flaws. That’s what Carlisle has done very effectively. We can’t do the same?
Hart off the bench is a 6th man of the year candidate, I wouldn’t trade him for Clarke. But if you can turn Precious and the Wash. first for him, or any other legit rotation player, hell yes.
I brought it up yesterday and nobody responded, is Mikal for Naz Reid a fantasy?
Bane’s definitely going to make them better, he’s a very good player, but they still aren’t going anywhere unless some of their highly paid young players figure out how to make 3s
Closest thing we have to Knicks news this morning, from Jake Fischer:
It’s definitely weird that we seem to have beaten Masai pretty badly in a trade, but not sure how anyone could come to any other conclusion at this point.
Sucks that we seem to have proceeded to get taken to the cleaners by Sean Marks.
I can’t imagine watching the NBA finals and concluding “this Pacers team is full of holes”.
What you actually described is a bench full of flawed players, which is what every team in the NBA has.
The Pacers top 5 is solid as a rock. And they complement each other perfectly. They play their flawed guys 12-20 mpg against other teams’ flawed guys, which makes them easy to mask.
Our flawed guys are in the starting lineup playing 36-40 mpg against the other team’s best guys. And not only do they not complement each other but they all exacerbate each other’s weaknesses.
Hart’s unwillingness to shoot makes KAT a worse offensive player.
Brunson’s inability to defend PGs means Mikal has to play the POA all the time, which he’s not very good at, and having to do it all year turned him into a locker room cancer.
OG’s clumsiness on offense forces us to use Brunson as a ball handler much more than we should.
Mikal’s inability to shoot above the break makes it easier for teams to defend Brunson.
KAT’s terrible rim protection makes everyone else’s limitations exponentially worse.
We are a masterclass in bad synergy. Every single player on the court is worse bc of his teammates. Leon needs to fix that, not the next coach.
Before this past season I would’ve said Bridges and Bane were similar in value, maybe even slight advantage to Bridges given his availability and Bane’s injury history.
Now, a season of watching fadeaway jumpers 3 feet from the rim and being informed I was an idiot for thinking Mikal Bridges is good at the POA or against centers (guess his robust defensive reputation was accumulated strictly by guarding other skinny wings), I find myself wishing we held our fire for Bane.
Now Ja is requesting a trade according to Chris Haynes.
Hubert, I find it funny and delightful (although that might be the Covid and pneumonia talking) to see how two people can agree on all the facts and have utterly different conclusions.
I would argue that the Pacers, even the starting five, have flaws, but play in a system that perfectly masks them. Also, their bench, even more flawed as benches are, plays (mostly the same) system that equally hides their flaws against other bench mobs.
Your description of the Knicks’ flaws matches mine almost perfectly. Only I think it’s a failure because it’s been like clay thrown at the wall, rather than sculped into a vase.
Hubs, the pacers starting 5 is not perfect. Come on, dude.
I could go through each one of them and cite a weakness.
They won 50 games this year and got swept in the ECF last year. They are not some unbeatable juggernaut.
Let go of your nihilism dude. Things are fine.
I would have taken Bane before the season, but I would assume Memphis would never trade him, so I would think he would have taken an even bigger overpay than Bridges to pry him away from Memphis before last season.
Bane is pretty much the platonic ideal for a winning secondary player in the modern NBA. Hard nose defender who shoots the three as well as anyone in the league and is almost psychotically competitive. He’s as close to a “plug and play” player that there is in the league.
Bridges, on the other hand, was definitely available once the Nets realized they weren’t getting anyone to come there, so the Knicks just had to sweeten the pot to get Brooklyn to deal with them specifically.
Myles Turner and Siakim are both poor rebounders for PF and Centers. Haliburton often no shows in games after coming up big in previous games.
They have plenty of flaws. If they didn’t, they would have won more than 50 games.
We underrated them, now people on this blog are overrating them because they’re in some weird death spiral with this team since we fired Thibs (even though most agree it was the right move).
It’s weird to say Thibs was super flawed and didn’t use the roster to it’s best capacity but then act like a new coach can’t get more out of them.
Again, the Pacers didn’t blow it up after getting swept in the ECF last year. They stated the course and improved and are now reaping the benefits of that. We can do that same.
I said they are solid, not perfect.
They don’t have multiple weaknesses that can be exploited relentlessly like we do.
We are firmly in the “eliminate your weaknesses” era of basketball, and Leon is swimming the other way.
A forgotten “Knicksy” thing was us being thrilled that Noah went back to college so that the Bulls couldn’t take him with the #2 pick they got from the Knicks for the 2006 Draft, as the pick the Bulls were getting from the Knicks the following season wasn’t likely to be as good (it turned out to be #9 versus #2), and what happens? Noah’s draft stock dropped for some dumb reason, and he ended up being available at #9 the next season.
Grrrr…
Thank goodness the Bulls moronically traded away Aldridge, at least. They could have had Aldridge and Noah at the #4/5 for years.
It’s fair to say that the 2007 Draft had some excellent high end players, so that Noah legit should have fell a bit (he obviously wasn’t as good of a prospect as Greg Oden, Kevin Durant, and Al Horford, and possibly not a better prospect than Mike Conley and Jeff Green), but no way he should have fallen behind Yi Jianlian, Corey Brewer, and Brandan Wright.
A big part of being a Knicks fan is vividly remembering what pissed you off 18 years ago. 🙂
We don’t agree on all the facts.
There is a difference between a flaw and a weakness.
Halliburton disappearing often is a flaw. But OKC can’t go into tonight expecting Halliburton to be invisible and game planning around it.
KAT not being able to defend is a weakness. Opponents can count on weaknesses and prepare to exploit them.
It’s actually really easy, inasmuch as almost every player in the NBA would be traded by their team if it wound up in a “significant roster update.”
I’d advise against us getting back into, “Of course it was Leon’s decision, he would have resigned if it wasn’t” territory.
So is Myles Turner and Siakim’s poor rebounding a “flaw” or a “weakness” cause I’m confused!
Ridiculous take. So he swam the other way when he traded IQ and RJ for OG?
I thought Masai was making a huge mistake to trade OG for players instead of picks. He’s way too obsessed with the “hybrid” method. Just fucking tank for a bit, Toronto, your team sucks.
It’s one thing to have a high level of basketball skill and yet still have flaws (Matheson, RJ, Obi, e.g.). It’s quite another to not really have a lot of basketball skill and be flawed as a very result of that dearth (Wing”Stop”, Josh Hart, e.g.).
(That’s in large measure, the risk with “3 and D” players. They’ve reached that bucket/status typically precisely because of a lack of pure well-rounded basketball skill.)
Raptors back in the heavily-rumored mix for Durant; that’s the likely genesis of the RJ/IQ thing.(*)
The problem with all projections/dreams with TO is that, like AD and Dallas, Ingram is never going to stay healthy other than by some black swan miracle.
(*) Ah, yes, I see that the original poster left out the final, punch line sentence of the quote:
“Sources say that the Raptors would be willing to part with either RJ Barrett and Immanuel Quickley for a significant roster upgrade. Several league figures with knowledge of the Raptors’ thinking have likewise asserted that they could show a willingness to move center Jakob Poeltl as well … provided that the trade in question brought back Durant.”
Including that last sentence, rather than “editing” it out rather changes the entire meaning, no?
They’re not poor rebounders.
Mikal Bridges and OG Anunoby…. those are poor rebounders.
When you talk about how you think Thibs didn’t use the roster well, be prepared to see what he was holding back. When you get your mythical 5 out lineup with Brunson Deuce OG and Mikal, then you will see what poor rebounding really looks like.
Yeah, I don’t think if he winds up turning OG into Durant, the idea that the Knicks “clearly beat Masai badly in the trade” really works.
He swam the other way when he combined Brunson and KAT.
He drowned when he did that.
I’ll concede that if Masai turns RJ and IQ into Kevin Durant, that will be pretty impressive. He still should have tanked.
Myles Turner averaged less than 7 rebound a game this season. That makes him 21st out of starting NBA centers this season. That is clearly in bad territory for an NBA center, who is almost always the highest rebounding position on a team.
I was wrong about Siakim. He only averaged 6.9 rebounds a game this season too, but for PF that isn’t bad (which surprised me).
So to tie it all up in a bow, what the Knicks really need more than anything else is a third starter with a lot of basketball skill. They shouldn’t fall into the trap of thinking, as they appear to have, that “not missing shots” is an actual basketball skill because it isn’t — anymore than “not getting rebounds”(*) is.
Kevin Durant certainly would have met these criteria, as would have, say, Jimmy Butler at last season’s deadline. There are of course other possibilities, some more risky than others.
So there’s the proper offseason diagnosis in a nutshell. We’ll see how it goes. Not real confident that’s the FO’s diagnosis, but maybe they’ll surprise.
(*) And they sure spent a boatload of assets to acquire the “skill” of “not getting rebounds,” but I guess they got their money’s worth because they got the “skill” of “not really being able to guard good 4s” thrown in for “free.”
LOL, the Raptors have done nothing since getting IQ and RJ whereas we have won 3 playoff series in 2 years and made the ECF with OG starting for us.
Get real, dude.
Assumes that wouldn’t have happened without the trade. Given 2023 and typical growth, no reason to assume that and plenty of reason not to.
It was a talent and skill leak on the day the trade was made, and remains so to this day.
Ah, well at least I got the conversation started in a way that seemed relatively benign and honest before our small core of nattering nabobs of negativism came on to start revising the narrative and moving the goalposts and twisting the logic because, well, that’s what they do. Every damn day.
Y’all enjoy yourselves, now.
“Not missing shots” is a weird way to say “making shots”. Also, that quote doesn’t say Toronto is willing to move RJ and/or IQ for Durant it says they’re willing to move them any significant roster upgrade (feel free to try and define what significant means) and that they’ll only move Poetl for Durant.
I’ve come to realize that whenever E & I talk at the same time it’s too much for the blog to handle so if he tags in I’m tagging out.
That being said, there is very little overlap between us other than that we both think this isn’t going to work. Our reasons are completely different.
My feeling that a team featuring Brunson and KAT is structurally flawed is one that is shared by many and hardly warrants inclusion in “a nattering nabob of negativism.”
At the heart of all my alleged “negativity” is always a positive message: we can win, if we correct course preemptively.
The problem is apparent. The solutions are available. I’m only talking poorly about the status quo bc there are far too many who think it can work.
We have nothing in common with last year’s Pacers. That was a structurally sound team with a weighted average age of 25.5 years old. Patience made sense for them.
Obi, Grimes, and RJ seem to have blossomed almost immediately after leaving the Knicks. You have to wonder if this played into Thibs’s firing at all, something that led to internal FO criticism months ago. Each player has proven themselves better than what Thibs could coax out of them.
It’s actually something of a promising sign that a new coach could get more out of our players than Thibs did.
This is definitely not true. Obi is the same basic player in Indy as he was in NYK though he has improved his shooting efficiency. RJ Barrett is getting more assists, while also turning the ball over more, and still sucks at everything else. Grimes might have improved but that might just be a small sample mirage while also playing on a Philly team that had quit on the season. And, for what it’s worth, Grimes’ DEPM tank last year from 75th percentile 15th.
RJ this season:
TS+ 95
eFG+ 96
3PAr+ 74
3PT+ 97
This is with all of his vaunted improvement and “blossoming.”
Yeah I’m fine with that guy not being on my basketball team and hoisting up 19 shots per 36. Squint your eyes at that guy all you want, he ain’t that good.
bane is #28 overall for regular season and #3 sg jjj is #25 overall and #7 pf
grimes #25 sg #160 overall toppin #19 sf #96 overall barrett #14 sg #77 overall
If its true that few/some/many/most of the players thought they should have beaten Indiana and that Thibs getting outcoached was a material reason why they’re not in the finals, – then those players will be 100% locked in next season.
Players will have to prove that they’re better than Indiana but lost the series because of Thibs/Carlyle match up.
This is why I would run it back with this starting lineup & Hart of the bench with Deuce, Kolek, Huk and Daddier until the trade deadline.
Show us.
Yeah, that’s why, while Bane was clearly an overpay, he’s an overpay that fits exactly what Orlando needed. A guy who is just as good of a defender as their other defenders (and is the same type of physical defender as Orlando has been using) and a guy who can shoot from three on a team that can’t shoot from three for shit, and was especially bad in terms of getting offense from the backcourt.
mathurin #15 sg #83 overall i definitely do not want to play daddier even for one minute more he is not an nba player both literally and figuratively
surprisingly little being said about okc coach going back to starting ihart with chet he did wait a little too long to do so after losing game 1 but the point is that he readjusted after making an unforced error
great targets for us are davion mitchell alexander walker santi aldama and malik beasley
naz reid would be awesome but might be overambitious we could trade them back kat for reid and naw
I don’t know this source, but this is not the fist time I’ve seen this.
What can they possibly have to offer for JJJ?
I’ve seen indications going back to last year that the Knicks were interested in JJJ. I’ve seen indications he might be available and others that he’s not. It would probably have to be a 3 team deal and probably involve multiple players. Most likely impossible for us.
I’m not saying I want to undo the trade or that I think these guys are necessarily great players. I’m saying they played better and that’s a referendum on the coach.
RJ has doubled his asts/36 and added only 1 TO/36 from his last half season with the Knicks. That ends up being a 3:1 ast:to ratio. That’s a trade off you make 100% of the time.
We’d have gotten much better trade value for him if he was averaging 6asts/36 instead of 3.
Yes, he has improved his efficiency. Obi went from a .589 TS% in his 3yrs for NY to a .659 TS% in Indy. This is not a small difference.
In his last season with the Knicks he was below league average in TS%. Even his 2p% has jumped .100 points compared to his final Knicks season.
Grimes upped his 2p% and added 2 rebounds/36 even before he went to Philly. His assists were also up, but probably not worth the TOs.
I’m not saying I want them back or that they’re good, but they’ve all been better after leaving the Knicks.
I have no idea what he’s doing.
He had OG, Siakam and VanVleet on the same team with some other decent players and blew it up instead of trying to work with it. Now all 3 of them are key pieces on VERY good teams and show no signs of being close to done. If we had Towns/Mitch, Siakam, OG, Bridges and Brunson I’d make us the favorite to win it all.
LOL
Watch out Doogie, your mask is slipping off.
If you’re not careful you’ll be back to posting random ass stat lines from unrelated players again soon
I’d like to explain my “run it back with some tweaks”. I don’t think we’re a contender, i think we have an outside chance if things go our way. I loved the 90s and we didn’t make it to the championship. We got to the ECF this season, maybe we can surprise and get to the Finals on a run of luck. Or like the Pacers, overachieving. So yeah, if Leon can improve the team, he should do it. I’m just not seeing what to do that would improve our prospects. And trading KAT for KD certainly wouldn’t improve our prospects, except maybe in year 1. I don’t think a championship window of 1 season is a good strategy. So i think we should run it back and wait for a good opportunity to improve. KAT drives us mad watching him play defense, but he’s an All-NBA, he has value, so we have to wait for a team to think he’s a good player to trade for, maybe the player coming our way is flawed too, but in a way that works better for us. Of course, i agree that the clock is ticking, we can’t wait forever. But to make a move this season, unless it’s something not available at the moment, i’m not seeing how we can improve. But the ones who feel otherwise, please feel free to send me the trades you’re envisioning.
They tried to resign VanVleet. He took the Houston offer instead (and it was a pretty big offer, to be fair). Once he was gone, they were going to have to blow that team up, and he tried to avoid doing it. It was silly.
lol, RJ Barrett’s actual AST/TO is 1.9 which is 225th best in the league. He’s ranked right near Tobias Harris, Gui Santos (who?), Goga Bitizde, Alex Len, and Alec Burks.
Who’s that last person you listed, ThisChicanery? Not sure I’ve heard of a player with that name in the Association.
I couldn’t remember how to spell his name so I took a guess. It might be Alex Burcs or Aleck Borks or Alexey Shved.
Rebuilding on the fly around Scottie Barnes only works if Scottie Barnes is good.
I would do the Obi-Wan “That’s a name I haven’t heard in a long time” bit, except that every time the Knicks under Leon/Thibs have hit some major milestone, people on social media will run out the graphic of the lineup with Shved, Lance Thomas, Lou Amundson, et al., to show just how far we’ve come.
Which is a hell of a lot better than the 1.1 ast/TO ratio he had on the Knicks.
Do people not understand the difference between improving and being good?
How about… no, it’s not Vildoza, Alan! 😛 How about Maurice Ndour? 😀
People do understand. But even with improving, he still isn’t good, so the Knicks didn’t “mess up” by trading him.
Let’s all give a round of applause to RJ Barrett for improving from awful (on a good team) to merely bad (on a terrible team) and ruminate on what could have been had we not traded a player with a career 1.3 AST/TO up to that point. Who knows? Maybe we also would’ve traded a useful big, a 1RP, a 2RP, and give a $40M/year extension to a player who plays the same position and the same spots on the floor as RJ.
Speaking of marinating in old Knicks bitterness, what was the draft lottery Ndour messed up for us? Was that the KAT/KP year? If so, funny we eventually had both at different points.
Also not what I’m saying…
RJ Bad.
Trade Good.
Thibs made RJ more bad.
it was not the kp kat draft that ndour messed up it was 2017 so it was the fultz lonzo ball tatum draft
Thibs ain’t here anymore, so irrelevant.
Some players played great under Thibs, others, not so much.
rj aint here anymore either and we keep talking about him no reason to think we would stop talking about thibs plus he is much more recent
probably we can agree that rj’s turnover incidence improved but is still not great. i would say that his actual passing risk reward is pretty similar. his bad pass to potential assist % is in the 16s, same as his last year and a half here, and still very far below average. but his other turnovers have improved relative to his rising scoring, including unassisted creation. i see this as at least partly tied to increased playmaking, transition and sometimes spacing, where he has more options to avoid getting into the sort of tunnel vision trouble we saw fairly often. i’ve given up on his defense improving. i know all this bc i watch a lot of raptors games hoping quick will wink at me from the it. now that we have the thumbs up validator lemme throw in gratis that rj just became the first player ever to shoot at least 5 3s and 5 fts per game while shooting under 65% from the line.
follow up thought after reading rest of thread. the extent to which we can “blame” thibs for the delta is, to put it mildly, thorny. for one an argument can be made that you might need to give rj more responsibility for him to fully avail himself of the playmaking outlet that maximizes his individual efficiency, but those marginal possessions are going to a creator that still isn’t generating the sort of offense a good team covets. now, this is less true for the post trade months in 23-24 when his efficiency rockets and his unassisted self creation actually declined a good bit. but the assist numbers in that period were less gaudy and very transition influence for a bad team with a lot of late season meaningless games. i wouldn’t put a few years of threading the offensive needle between those two years out of reach, but given his defense i don’t think that good case looks all that exciting anyway.
still, if you asked me whether it seemed like thibs was thoughtful or experimental enough in trying to minimize rj’s weakness on offense with lineup choices, and especially with getting rj in with lineups that could run more, i would say maybe not. but that’s pretty much always going to be my answer when asked if thibs was sufficiently exploratory in real game situations. sorry donnie!
Validated
I kinda like that if you squint, at least before the latest iteration, there were two offensive rolls for Thib’s players. For a bunch it was “go stand in the corner until you hear this dog whistle or a pass hits you in the face.”
For the others, it was “Are you Jalen Brunson?” So it was “Julius, are you Jalen Brunson?” and “RJ, are you Jalen Brunson?”
Thank god they got the actual Jalen Brunson or who knows who he’d be asking that question to now.
we have gone back and forth between having the thumbs up validator and not having it several times over the past few days sometimes the thumbs are there and other times only the numbers
ha ha…
i post here now…tested by time:
I don’t think we have. You’ll see the thumbs up, and a number if there’s at least one like, if you are logged in. If you’re not logged in, then you’ll only see numbers, including 0 (zero) if that comment has no likes. But a lot of comments don’t show the 0 (zero), so this one i don’t know how it works.
Yep, knocked the Knicks from the 6th spot into a tie for 6th with Minnesota (the Knicks lost the tiebreaker, making them officially the #7 spot), and then after the Lakers leaped into the lottery, it resulted in the Knicks getting the #8 pick, and thus missing out on Lauri Markkanen by one pick.
I don’t think we would’ve picked Markatten. We had KP and they seemed duplicative. At least this is how i remember things, maybe i’m wrong.
it shows 0 if someone liked and then changed their mind and removed it but if no one ever liked a particular comment in the first place then the 0 does not show up
civilian urban planner for richmond
And this has been the concern with RJ dating back to Duke. To “maximize” him you need to put the ball in his hands a lot, because he’s okay at skills associated with ball dominance like unassisted scoring and playmaking and not very good at off-ball skills like spot up shooting and cutting. But since he’s only okay at the ball dominant skills, your offense probably sucks if he’s dominating the ball. The 2024-2025 Raptors are Exhibit A.
On defense he’s never been able to translate his promising frame into much, because he’s slow and unathletic.
There’s a certain kind of basketball fan that indexes very heavily on who they think would win a game of one-on-one when comparing two players, and that kind of fan will always overrate someone like RJ compared to his impact on winning. But people with jobs and money on the line will continue to value someone like OG a lot more.
i value og a lot more than rj it is not even a momentary thought to do otherwise
He’s a negative OBPM player as a Knick, was a negative OBPM player in the playoffs, has few offensive skills, can barely dribble, was massively oversold as someone who “can guard 1 through 5,” and put up a long series of C+ and D+ playoff performances.
It’s an unfalsifiable article of faith at this point.
Phil really wanted Markkanen. His plan was to trade Porzingis and draft Markkanen. His desire to trade Porzingis was the final straw for Dolan.
Amazing how we won 50 games and went to the conference finals with all of these stinky players
If we had RJ Barrett we prolly would have just wrecked the whole league
Dang so close
Could you imagine JJJ and KAT on the court at the same time for the Knicks?
I can’t, because they’d both be in foul trouble.
Yeah, no. But it’s obvious that’s why he has so many fanboys around here, and that’s because he’s perceived as the kind of player “that kind of fan, you know that kind” doesn’t fully appreciate. And RJ’s the kind of player “that kind of fan, you know that kind” tends to “overrate.”
And if there’s anything a certain kind of fan just can’t be it’s “that kind of fan.”
But in reality, he’s just kind of underskilled and his defense was oversold. Kind of boring really.
If you want to get into actually interesting questions, one is whether he’d even be an NBA player if shots from 23 feet, 9 inches didn’t arbitrarily count as three points. He certainly wouldn’t be a starter. If you have a hard time covering fours and don’t really have a lot of skill on the offensive end, you’d have a very tough time making it as an old school three.
Compare him to somewhat superficially similar older school guys like Anthony Mason and the relative offensive skill level becomes obvious. Modern good coaches like Don Nelson and the Charlotte guy played Mase at point forward because of his court vision, game intuition and perception, and handles. The thought of OG doing that is … well, not really much of a thought.
And in reality, sorry to break it, but imagining that a player who doesn’t do much still manages to do “winning things” is pretty much definitionally the kind of thing “that kind of fan” thinks.
If there were no 3 pointers RJ Barrett’s TS% would’ve been .499 and OG’s would’ve been .515
I like that OBPM is apparently the only thing that matters (since OG actually has a higher BPM than RJ) and that the difference between RJ’s greatness and OG’s ineptitude is 0.5 OBPM.
Plenty of superstars had shooting percentages 16 bp lower than scrubs BITD. Meaningless.
(Same thing today, of course — there are superstars with TS%s well below jabronies. Weird citation.)
They also traded Quickley for OG.
Oh, E is trolling hard today.
Catching the occasional minnow, too, despite the rotten bait he’s using.
i did not see him catching anyone on anything
RJ sucks but that $42.5M for OG ain’t looking good. Will be interesting to see what Dort gets paid since he is really the guy you thought OG was and it probably won’t be close to $42.5. What Lu’s done to Halliburton in this series is the kind of defense we can only dream of.
OKC signing away I-Hart to help them beat the Indiana Pacers has been such a nice silver lining to the Knicks losing him.
og is 3 inches taller and 12 pounds heavier than dort
Pt, in your griz observing experience is JJJ good? I know he can block shots, but outside of that his impact seems kind of hard to correlate. He’s due to get paid a lot and I feel like he is kind of a trap player. (Who do you like more, JJJ or Turner?)
His last name is three letters longer, too, Doogie. And his rising sign is Libra.
Careful, Hubert — the concept of a guy they thought OG was, and the reality of an OG that is different than that imaginary guy overlaps directly with how I’ve been couching things the whole time. Might blow up the blog.
Can someone make richard Jefferson shut the hell up….diarrhea of the mouth
iHart playing well.
Hartenstein got up to fight, saw it was TJ McConnell that threw him down, and was like “oh, cool, good play guy”.
Great hustle block by Matheson there.
The Thunder should be up 20+. This feels like another one of those “Pacers hanging around” games.
Color commentator must be a tough job because just about every one of them seems to annoy a large portion of the audience. I thought Jamal Crawford was great so we’ll have him at NBC next year. And of course there’s Clyde.
OKC is doing to the Pacers what the Pacers did to the Knicks. Lots of live ball turnovers are being converted into fast break points.
Nobody does it better than Clyde
And yeah, Ephus, this is kind of how I expected the series to go….
[response to donnie]
definitely like jjj better than turner but i don’t think he’s that close to the dpoy echelon some people have put him at. he’s an incredible out of position shot blocker and much more versatile in the perimeter than turner but imo not quite enough positionally adept enough to keep people from the rim the way truly elite guys can. throw in the drb and still volatile foul risk and you have a very good but not elite defender.
but you take a guy who can be both a legit efficient shot creator at volume AND spacer on offense and tell me he can be your best rim protector and switch onto line 80 percent of the wings in the league you still have a lot. he even went from being one of the worst passers in the league to merely bad. i guess that puts me either near or a little below consensus on him. but the trade value for fit is going to be through the roof either way.
That is some great defense
Man, Pacers’ sexy offense scored 45 points and had to work like hell for every single one of them. Even Hack-a-Math worked.
Hopefully Hali can dig deep and put something in the basket in half 2.
Thunder aren’t up as much as they should be but Pacers don’t look like they have it in them any more.
(And, pt, that was me that thumbed up your JJJ response:)
Was that Perk who said Halliburton’s scared? Pretty ballsy to say that but I was thinking the same thing.
it shows up as a zero thumb for me so the votes must be weighted for poster quality
i am not rooting for hali but i’m rooting him to be healthy and make a half of it. he definitely looks gimpy at the moment.
To me he looks like a deer in headlights who wants nothing to do with this Thunder defense and is selling an injury to protect his reputation. But I’m a bitter Knicks fan with an axe to grind.
Thunder should put them away now….
Lot of hanging around
I turned down tickets to see Ohtani pitch tonight, which isn’t worth $44,500 or anything, but, still, would be nice to see the Pacers rally.
It’s fine, I realized I was never going to get paid when my guy gave me a shitty cash out offer after game 1 and didn’t return my call after game 3.
I outthought myself. I was thinking if I used a wise guy I wouldn’t have to report it to the IRS if I won. Whereas I should have been thinking about what tools I have at my disposal to make Paulie Walnuts actually pay me (spoiler: I don’t have any).
Looks like the Pacers brought ISM off the bench.
Turned it on to enjoy watching OKC cruise to victory and instead watched TJ score three straight baskets, none of which he should have made, and turned it back off.
TJ doing it again
Pacers might do this
TJ McJordan shall carry us
Jalen Williams has become Scottie Pippen.
Kolek should dream to be as good as TJ lol.
Okc is tightening up….gm 1 memories are lingering
Even the fans look nervous
This site uses User Verification plugin to reduce spam. See how your comment data is processed.