Categories
Uncategorized

Knicks Morning News (2023.10.25)

  • New York Knicks vs Boston Celtics preview: Prediction, odds and … – Sportskeeda
    [Sportskeeda] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 7:20:07 AM

    New York Knicks vs Boston Celtics preview: Prediction, odds and …  Sportskeeda

  • Boston Celtics vs New York Knicks EN VIVO: ?c?mo ver transmisi?n TV online en NBA 2023? – VAVEL.com
    [VAVEL.com] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 7:00:00 AM

    Boston Celtics vs New York Knicks EN VIVO: ?c?mo ver transmisi?n TV online en NBA 2023?  VAVEL.com

  • Immanuel Quickley, Knicks already moved on from extension talk – Posting and Toasting
    [Posting and Toasting] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 6:56:02 AM

    Immanuel Quickley, Knicks already moved on from extension talk  Posting and ToastingImmanuel Quickley now playing for payday as deadline passes without Knicks contract extension  New York Post BREAKING: Immanuel Quickley, New York Knicks Fail to Reach Contract Extension  Sports Illustrated

  • There’s no waiting for Knicks’ first test – New York Post
    [New York Post ] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 6:30:00 AM

    There’s no waiting for Knicks’ first test  New York Post

  • The Knicks and Nets both have the look of winners this NBA season – Newsday
    [Newsday] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 6:01:00 AM

    The Knicks and Nets both have the look of winners this NBA season  Newsday

  • ‘Living in the moment’: Obi Toppin embracing move to Pacers after … – IndyStar
    [IndyStar] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 5:17:06 AM

    ‘Living in the moment’: Obi Toppin embracing move to Pacers after …  IndyStar

  • Knicks Player Preview: Isaiah Hartenstein Expands the Interior – Sports Illustrated
    [Sports Illustrated] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 5:00:00 AM

    Knicks Player Preview: Isaiah Hartenstein Expands the Interior  Sports Illustrated

  • Boston Celtics vs New York Knicks Oct 25, 2023 Game Summary – NBA.com
    [NBA.com] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 3:54:45 AM

    Boston Celtics vs New York Knicks Oct 25, 2023 Game Summary  NBA.com

  • Celtics vs. Knicks NBA Player Prop Bet Odds & Picks (Wednesday) – BettingPros
    [BettingPros] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 3:40:39 AM

    Celtics vs. Knicks NBA Player Prop Bet Odds & Picks (Wednesday)  BettingPros

  • Celtics vs. Knicks: Start time, where to watch, what’s the latest – Hoops Hype
    [Hoops Hype] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 3:33:04 AM

    Celtics vs. Knicks: Start time, where to watch, what’s the latest  Hoops Hype

  • How to Watch the New York Knicks Online, 2023-24 Schedule, TV … – Sports Illustrated
    [Sports Illustrated] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 2:39:21 AM

    How to Watch the New York Knicks Online, 2023-24 Schedule, TV …  Sports Illustrated

  • New York Knicks Officially Sign 2-Year NBA Player – Yardbarker
    [Yardbarker] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 1:08:35 AM

    New York Knicks Officially Sign 2-Year NBA Player  Yardbarker

  • New York Knicks Officially Sign 2-Year NBA Player – Sports Illustrated
    [Sports Illustrated] — Wednesday, October 25, 2023 12:57:09 AM

    New York Knicks Officially Sign 2-Year NBA Player  Sports IllustratedDuane Washington Jr. Signs Two-Way Deal With Knicks  hoopsrumors.comJacob Toppin signs two-way deal with the Knicks  A Sea Of Blue

  • Knicks Rumors: Mitchell Robinson Trade Asking Price Is ‘Multiple 1st-Round Picks’ – Bleacher Report
    [Bleacher Report] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 9:52:57 PM

    Knicks Rumors: Mitchell Robinson Trade Asking Price Is ‘Multiple 1st-Round Picks’  Bleacher Report

  • NBA 2023: James Harden trade updates, Philadelphia 76ers, New … – Fox Sports
    [Fox Sports] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 9:52:43 PM

    NBA 2023: James Harden trade updates, Philadelphia 76ers, New …  Fox Sports

  • Celtics vs. Knicks Prediction & Picks – October 25 – Live 5 News WCSC
    [Live 5 News WCSC] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 8:54:00 PM

    Celtics vs. Knicks Prediction & Picks – October 25  Live 5 News WCSC

  • Celtics vs. Knicks Prediction & Picks – October 25 – Western Massachusetts News
    [Western Massachusetts News] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 8:54:00 PM

    Celtics vs. Knicks Prediction & Picks – October 25  Western Massachusetts News

  • Monica McNutt becomes Knicks’ main radio analyst, will stay with MSG and ESPN – Awful Announcing
    [Awful Announcing] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 8:24:00 PM

    Monica McNutt becomes Knicks’ main radio analyst, will stay with MSG and ESPN  Awful Announcing

  • Boston Celtics vs. New York Knicks Prediction, Preview, and Odds – 10-25-2023 – Winners and Whiners
    [Winners and Whiners] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 6:47:55 PM

    Boston Celtics vs. New York Knicks Prediction, Preview, and Odds – 10-25-2023  Winners and WhinersCeltics vs Knicks Prediction, Picks for Season Opener  The Action NetworkKnicks vs. Celtics prediction, odds, line, spread, time: 2023 NBA picks, October 25 best bets by proven model  CBS Sports

  • Knicks to wear jersey patch from James Dolan’s Sphere Entertainment for 2023-24 NBA season – CBS Sports
    [CBS Sports] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:45:24 PM

    Knicks to wear jersey patch from James Dolan’s Sphere Entertainment for 2023-24 NBA season  CBS Sports

  • Denver Nuggets, New York Knicks Announce New Jersey Patch … – SportsLogos.Net News
    [SportsLogos.Net News] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 4:52:27 PM

    Denver Nuggets, New York Knicks Announce New Jersey Patch …  SportsLogos.Net News

  • Monica McNutt Named New York Knicks Lead Radio Analyst – Barrett Sports Media
    [Barrett Sports Media] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 3:45:56 PM

    Monica McNutt Named New York Knicks Lead Radio Analyst  Barrett Sports Media

  • New York Knicks tickets: Where to buy 2023 Madison Square Garden seats cheap online – syracuse.com
    [syracuse.com] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 2:58:00 PM

    New York Knicks tickets: Where to buy 2023 Madison Square Garden seats cheap online  syracuse.com

  • Knicks to wear patch from owner James Dolan’s Sphere after seeking $30M deal – New York Post
    [New York Post ] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 2:51:00 PM

    Knicks to wear patch from owner James Dolan’s Sphere after seeking $30M deal  New York Post

  • NBA rumors: Embiid is Knicks No. 1 priority, Donovan Mitchell wants … – FanSided
    [FanSided] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 1:57:04 PM

    NBA rumors: Embiid is Knicks No. 1 priority, Donovan Mitchell wants …  FanSided

  • The Vegas Sphere has a strange connection with the New York Knicks – The Albany Herald
    [The Albany Herald] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 1:18:30 PM

    The Vegas Sphere has a strange connection with the New York Knicks  The Albany Herald

  • Knicks sign jersey patch deal with owner James Dolan’s Sphere Entertainment – CNBC
    [CNBC] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 1:10:09 PM

    Knicks sign jersey patch deal with owner James Dolan’s Sphere Entertainment  CNBC

  • Three bold predictions for the Knicks’ 2023-24 season – New York Post
    [New York Post ] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 12:30:00 PM

    Three bold predictions for the Knicks’ 2023-24 season  New York Post

  • Knicks Rumor Joel Embiid Trade: Can’t Refuse? – Sports Illustrated
    [Sports Illustrated] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 12:25:27 PM

    Knicks Rumor Joel Embiid Trade: Can’t Refuse?  Sports Illustrated

  • The Vegas Sphere has a strange connection with the New York Knicks – TheStreet
    [TheStreet] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 12:13:21 PM

    The Vegas Sphere has a strange connection with the New York Knicks  TheStreet

  • P&T Round(ball) Table: 2023-24 Knicks Predictions – Posting and Toasting
    [Posting and Toasting] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 12:00:00 PM

    P&T Round(ball) Table: 2023-24 Knicks Predictions  Posting and Toasting

  • Knicks season preview: Jalen Brunson must prove he’s the man – New York Post
    [New York Post ] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 11:40:00 AM

    Knicks season preview: Jalen Brunson must prove he’s the man  New York Post

  • What the Knicks are willing to offer 76ers in potential Joel Embiid trade – New York Post
    [New York Post ] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 11:14:00 AM

    What the Knicks are willing to offer 76ers in potential Joel Embiid trade  New York Post Knicks interested in trading for Joel Embiid if he becomes available, per report  CBS SportsKnicks Rumors: Joel Embiid Trade Package Would Include Julius Randle, Picks, More  Bleacher Report

  • James Dolan’s Sphere to Appear on New York Knicks Jerseys – Sports Illustrated
    [Sports Illustrated] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 11:05:04 AM

    James Dolan’s Sphere to Appear on New York Knicks Jerseys  Sports Illustrated

  • Sphere in the Square: Arena, NBA team ink partnership deal – Las Vegas Review-Journal
    [Las Vegas Review-Journal] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 10:58:00 AM

    Sphere in the Square: Arena, NBA team ink partnership deal  Las Vegas Review-Journal

  • Monica McNutt to be Knicks’ lead radio analyst – Newsday
    [Newsday] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 10:32:29 AM

    Monica McNutt to be Knicks’ lead radio analyst  Newsday

  • New York Knicks Sign Jersey Patch Deal With Las Vegas Sphere – Variety
    [Variety] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 10:06:00 AM

    New York Knicks Sign Jersey Patch Deal With Las Vegas Sphere  Variety

  • New York Knicks 2023-24 Player Preview: What Does Donte … – Sports Illustrated
    [Sports Illustrated] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 10:00:00 AM

    New York Knicks 2023-24 Player Preview: What Does Donte …  Sports Illustrated

  • New York Knicks Joel Embiid Philadelphia 76ers trade rumors – Audacy
    [Audacy] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 9:17:40 AM

    New York Knicks Joel Embiid Philadelphia 76ers trade rumors  Audacy

  • Sphere, the Next-Generation Entertainment Venue, Named the New York Knicks Official Jersey Patch Partner – NBA.com
    [NBA.com] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 9:00:00 AM

    Sphere, the Next-Generation Entertainment Venue, Named the New York Knicks Official Jersey Patch Partner  NBA.com

  • NBA.com writer perfectly sums up heated Knicks-Nets NYC rivalry – Daily Knicks
    [Daily Knicks] — Tuesday, October 24, 2023 8:00:20 AM

    NBA.com writer perfectly sums up heated Knicks-Nets NYC rivalry  Daily Knicks

  • 73 replies on “Knicks Morning News (2023.10.25)”

    Okay, so we’re all agreed we’ll keep the game threads here, barring a site outage?

    I’m annoyed that I’m going to miss seeing the game live, because this is the only night this week that I can plausibly get out to see Killers of the Flower Moon, which I want to do before I go to watch a panel with Martin Scorsese on Friday night. And also because it’s an ESPN game, which means I could easily watch it even as the MSG/Comcast feud enters its umpteenth year. Oh, well.

    Never mind! My schedule has been moved around, and I’ll be seeing Killers tomorrow night, which means I get to watch our guys hopefully kick some Boston butt tonight.

    Definitely game thread here. And in two days we will also have Alan’s short review of Killers of the Flower Moon here — right, Alan?

    Should be an interesting game. Trying to gear up for a loss so I don’t over-react if that happens (it is against many people’s preseason favorite). If Porzingis goes off for a revenge 30 that will piss me off.

    I was very impressed with Denver (shocker!) last night. Teams are going to need size to compete with them. Their bench is somewhat weaker than last year, but their starting lineup is just impossible to stop with that monster running the show. And KCP looked phenomenal last night.

    Meanwhile, the Lakers are clearly a work in progress. At least LeBron and AD looked healthy for now. But I just don’t see them beating the Nuggets in the playoffs because they had absolutely no answer for Jokic. Maybe they should just put LeBron on him…

    In a weird way, we might match up better with them than most teams in the NBA because Mitch is at least a physical obstacle for Jokic and our bench is better than theirs.

    The problem, Z-man — not just for us, but for every team in the league — is that Joker can do so much of his damage (as both shooter and passer) from far outside the restricted area. That pulls Mitch away from the basket where he’s most valuable on defense. Mitch can do great things on the perimeter, but that’s not where we need him most. So if Jokic is consistently pulling him out to the elbow, to the top of the key, or to the three-point line, it’s going to really open things up for Gordon, Murray, and others to get to the rim.

    Had Boston made the finals last year, I think they could have been a good matchup with a Horford/RWIII frontcourt. Ditto Milwaukee with Lopez and Giannis. And maybe Horford/KP will also work. But you need two big guys who can both protect the rim and also get out on the perimeter as needed. Randle can be a pretty good one-on-one defender when he’s engaged, but he’s not a deterrent to drivers as a help defender, and he’s the only non-center in the rotation with genuine size.

    Fournier has been playing with the 2nd unit just for this game. Certified Celtic killer Evan “Never Google” Fournier goes off for 20pts in 15min.

    which I want to do before I go to watch a panel with Martin Scorsese on Friday night.

    Is he on a 10-day or a 2-way? I can’t keep track anymore

    Yeah Alan, its sort of a pick your poison. But we beat a full-strength Nuggets team in March mainly because we outrebounded them 47-33. In particular, our bench outrebounded their bench 20-8. Other than Jokic, even though they can go “big” they don’t seem to be a particularly good rebounding or rim-protecting team. So if you keep Jokic out on the perimeter, that sort of plays to our strengths, even with Mitch not being there to protect the rim. Jokic had a great game except for committing 6 turnovers, which I think is part of our strategy against him. At the end of the day, if guys like KCP and Gordon are hot, no one is beating them. But those are the guys I would make beat us.

    Even though we have continuity right now, I think it’s pretty clear that the Knicks are not going to keep all of IQ, Grimes and DDV past this season. The first half of the season might be an audition as to who stays and who goes. DDV’s contract probably makes him the strongest candidate to stay, although he could be outgoing salary in a deal for a wing. If Grimes improves a lot, maybe that makes IQ expendable, although that creates a void at backup PG that DDV and Deuce are not ideal answers for

    So is it Grimes that goes out? I would say only if they are committed to IQ, meaning that they would match any offer he receives as a RFA as last resort.

    It’s really a murky problem, but probably a good problem to have.

    If you have to trade one of them, it’s hard to get a good return. Look what we got for Obi. I hope some good trade opportunity comes along.

    What happened to AD in the 2nd half? I saw the box score at half time and he was doing ok, but then he did this – FG 0-6, 3P 0-1, FT 0-0 !? 😮 He had 7 reb, 3 ast and 1 blk, but man, he has to do more than that!

    KnickFan, we’re not trading away Grimes or IQ like we did Obi. We’ll only trade them if it’s a very good player coming in. And just one of the two. To trade both we’d need a superstar coming our way.

    Obi was probably a case where Leon did a solid for him and his agent. Let him be happy, and have playing time, elsewhere. To then be able to sign for the most money that he can.

    If we can’t get a true star, it wouldn’t surprise me if we go after OG again or a similar long wing who could play some 4 with the bench.

    The Celtics may be the worst matchup in the league for the Knicks.

    If anyone can slow down Brunson it’s going to be Jrue Holiday. If he can get the ball out of Brunson’s hands or hold him to a rough night shooting, we are already in big trouble.

    One the other side we have no one big/long enough to match up against Tatum. If he’s on, we are in bigger trouble.

    If KP is hitting 3s it’s over. We have to hope KP has a rough night from outside, gets frustrated and starts throwing up some trash.

    Knickfan, what we got for Obi was most likely depressed because we were unwilling to take any salary back.

    DDV’s contract probably makes him the strongest candidate to stay

    Not to mention he’s friends with the star and another important role player on the team who I am sure want him to stay and are one of the reasons he came here to begin with.

    That’s another reason I didn’t really like this signing other than imo it’s superfluous. I like both Grimes and Quickley more than DDV and they are both younger, but politics could be part of who stays and who goes.

    Grimes was fine against Tatum last year, I’m not too worried about it. Tatum didn’t get shutdown or anything, and he can always get hot, but I’m not too worried about him. We also have Hart to throw at him or Brown to boot.

    Boston’s bench took a big hit this offseason, so we should also be able to take advantage of them there.

    But yeah, KP dragging Mitch & Hartenstein out of the paint is a concern.

    Jets 3-3. Knicks 0-0. David Stearns in the fold and Craig Counsell apparently on the way for the Mets (and Braves and Phillies not in the WS).

    I’m feeling pretty good, all things considered, even better if the Knicks knock off the hated Celtics tonight.

    The only thing that concerns me about OG is the enormous price Masai would need to extract for trading him to the organization that is currently suing the Raptors. It is simply not going to happen unless OG opts out and goes the free agency route with specific designs on the Knicks. There is zero possiblilty that Toronto does any business with the Knicks unless it is an absolute steal for them.

    I keep forgetting about the lawsuit… obviously settling that would be part of the deal 😉

    There were a number of considerations in the paltry return for Obi…salary cap space and staying below the first apron, extension eligibility, playing time vs. fit on team in Thibs’ schemes…I think it really was viewed as a “trade” of DDV on a market-value deal plus two shitty seconds for Obi on his current $6.8M expiring way more than “Hey, let’s do Obi a favor.” Meaning that if they kept Obi, had a team offered them the equivalent of DDV on his new deal plus 2 shitty seconds for him, the Knicks would have made that trade.

    Jokic is an unsolvable problem the likes of which I’ve honestly never really seen, with the normal caveat that all of my basketball viewing has taken place since the mid aughts.

    Their play styles are obviously pretty different, but the most comparable player I can recall just in terms of pure “there’s literally nothing you can do” status is LeBron circa 2012-2013.

    The rest of the Nuggets are…fine? I don’t think they make the play-in without Jokic, but they’ve done a good job of finding players with skillsets that maximize Jokic’s strengths.

    The Vassell and McDaniels contracts really gummed up the works with IQ, I believe. He has a better resume than either of them. And even though switchable big wings are at more of a premium in the current NBA than small guards who may or may not be suited to play the point full time, you can’t blame Quickley and his agents from looking at those deals and saying that he’s been better than them so far, and at minimum should be paid as much.

    At this point, a trade unfortunately seems likely, whether at midseason or in the summer. But as Katz and Macri talked about on yesterday’s pod, the arrival of DDV could cut into IQ’s minutes and/or usage, which in turn could depress his value going into restricted free agency, and make it easier for him to come to terms with the Knicks. The flip side is that IQ would be a good fit several of the teams with lots cap space next summer, including Spurs, Pistons, Magic, and Hornets. So they could just throw a big offer sheet at him without bothering to try a sign and trade.

    Blech.

    “fred the axe says he thinks offer to quick was in the $16-20mm range. too low.”

    Unless we know what the minimum Quickley was willing to accept, this is not all that useful. In other words, let’s say the Knicks were willing to offer the top of that range…5yrs/$100M, player option 5th year. Was the counter-offer $22M ($110M), $25M ($125M) or $27M ($135M, Jaden McDaniels money)? If option 1, the Knicks were stupid. If option 3, then they did the right thing. Even option 2 seems high enough for the Knicks to balk, given the poison pill consideration.

    My guess is that the gap was $5M+ AAV ($25M total) That’s probably to far of a gap to bridge. But maybe there were some reassurances that it was more of a cap-space/flexibility thing and IQ’s patience will be rewarded….just like it was Josh Hart and Mitch.

    Or maybe IQ doesn’t want to play behind Brunson and wants to test restricted free agency for a starter’s spot…and set the bar artificially high for that reason. In other words, he thinks he can not only get starter money, but a starting role, which he is unlikely to get here. If that’s the case, what is Leon supposed to do?

    I

    My guess is if we need to deal with the Raptors the lawsuit won’t be a barrier. There’s probably an unspoken “sorry about my insane boss” message regularly being conveyed by Leon.

    Hoping we can at least make it competitive tonight. The Celtics are a fascinating team to me this year. On one hand, there is absolutely no denying the amount of talent they’ve accumulated. They have six players in the top-100 by EPM from last season. This is the simple reason the models love them, and they probably should.

    On the other, given that Tatum’s production, while excellent, has never quite matched the hype generated by the Boston media machine, they would be an outlier among champions in terms of truly elite talent. There are perfectly conceivable playoff brackets in which they don’t have the best player in any series. Against Milwaukee, they probably wouldn’t have one of the best two.

    My guess is they’ve finally surrounded Tatum with enough talent for this to not matter much and the truism that the team with the best player should be favored in a given playoff series can be overcome by stockpiling depth this impressive. But it would worry me as a Celtics fan, given how much they have invested in this team.

    “Jokic is an unsolvable problem the likes of which I’ve honestly never really seen”

    I don’t think anyone is “unsolvable” in the team context….all of the greatest players…Wilt, Kareem, Jordan, Shaq, LeBron….were largely unsolvable but still needed the proper supporting casts. But he is #6 in the line of truly unsolvable players, individually speaking. I personally would not take Jokic over any of those 5 in an all-time draft…maybe Shaq…but would not feel like I had a mismatch against him either.

    I struggle to consider whether Durant belongs in that group…at his peak, he has been pretty unsolvable as well…he’s just so unlikeable, and sharing an era with LeBron has hurt him.

    If that’s the case, what is Leon supposed to do?

    be willing to offer more. so even a large gap wouldn’t inhibit a larger offer. even if iq was at jaden’s 135/5 (actually 131 guaranteed) i would have offered at least 120/5. make him say no to $120mm guaranteed. this is only 15pct of the average salary cap during the life of the deal. iq is a good bet to be worth it during is prime imo, and while they are protected by rfa, this still leaves plenty of salary upside from a bad case where he gets rookie max’d by a team like sas or utah with no pg and plenty of money.

    Interested in seeing how Grimes and RJ play on D tonight again Brown, White, and maybe even sometimes Tatum. KP being on the perimeter will hurt our inside defense, with Mitch being further away from the basket. I am hoping our bench helps carry us to victory tonight!

    I would rather have IQ at $27 million a year and no DDV than try to lowball IQ to the tune of $16-20 million a year with DDV making $12 million a year.

    I think signing DDV was the front office showing their hand. I think Leon is perfectly okay moving IQ and he signed DDV for when that happens. The fact that his presence lowers the chance we will have both IQ and Grimes resigned to long-term contracts means it was a bad signing. He is worse than both and older.

    Am I the only one worried about DDV’s shooting? He shot well last year but that was for a Warriors team whose system always seems to inflate their players shooting numbers. Before that, the only time he shot over 34% from 3 was during the COVID season when everyone shot lights out.

    The solution for Curry was “let him shoot from 30 feet away and hope he misses”. It led to a 73-9 record.

    Not that I am looking to get rid of IQ, but could an IQ and other parts/picks work for OG? Maybe IQ would work for Raps. Both restricted free agents next year too.

    Shaq was easily solvable: roster 4 large men and have them alternate wrapping their arms around him and pulling him to the ground every time he touched the ball.

    If the issue is salary, I half hope RJ sucks again so that we decide to dump him just to keep IQ

    I definitely would’ve gone over $20M to keep him. Probably $20-22M

    I wouldn’t give him a McDaniels or Vassell deal, of for no other reason I’d gamble that RFA would be more favorable to us.

    Just to agree with things that other people said….

    AD was completely AWOL in the second half. It was bizarre.

    Jokic really is so freaking good. Twitter was discussing it and it’s quite true, you basically have to win the game when he is on the bench.

    I would put a vote in for Shaq too. He was unstoppable unless you fouled him.

    IQ deserves as much as RJ. At least. Captain Obvious I know….

    Re: IQ – I highly recommend the KFS podcast with Fred Katz this morning, explaining how players like IQ may get squeezed in the new CBA, and why a bunch of mid-tier guys took what look like pretty team-friendly extensions…

    Is the FO/Thibs really comfortable running the 2nd unit with Deuce/DDV/RJ/Hart/iHart?

    There’s not much scoring there.

    Is it possible they’re actually looking to move RJ?

    Vonsider that the last 2 players the FO brought in were both wings and Deuce gets listed at PG but can’t run an offense. Hart and IQ were both taking crunch time minutes from RJ towards the end of last season.

    On another topic, is Fournier actually in the rotation?

    I think people are making just a bit too much of us not coming to a deal with IQ. It’s been widely reported that we were negotiating, and Katz said we weren’t making insulting offers. So it’s not that we simply did not want to extend him.

    Ultimately, the most likely scenario IMO is that Leon thinks we have serious roster overhaul coming down the pike in the not-so-distant future and didn’t want to sign IQ to a contract that might get in the way of that one way or the other. He may well be included in a trade, but I don’t think the lack of an extension makes it inevitable or indicates we want to trade him.

    I’ve already said the contrast with how we handled RJ’s extension bothers me, but it seems like that was just a failed negotiating tactic so the comparison might not be useful.

    I get the impression the Knicks value Quickley highly. Thibs was openly saying he hoped we extended him. He played 32 MPG during the 51 games last season in which he wasn’t sucking. I concur with everyone who wishes we would just start him over RJ, but that seems like more of a problem with the RJ situation than anything else (and there are some valid-ish reasons to not love the idea on the merits–that would be a very small backcourt and our bench units would be decimated).

    “be willing to offer more. so even a large gap wouldn’t inhibit a larger offer. even if iq was at jaden’s 135/5 (actually 131 guaranteed) i would “have offered at least 120/5. make him say no to $120mm guaranteed. this is only 15pct of the average salary cap during the life of the deal. iq is a good bet to be worth it during is prime imo, and while they are protected by rfa, this still leaves plenty of salary upside from a bad case where he gets rookie max’d by a team like sas or utah with no pg and plenty of money.”

    The new CBA requires teams to ask a different question: Is this the player you want to put you into the second apron?

    I’m not sure there is a non-starter on a “close but not contender” team in the NBA that the answer to that question is definitively “yes.” IQ is about as close as it gets, but there is still a compelling argument that the answer, while not a definitive “no,” is rather “not at this time.” Once you start upping the offer to $20M AAV and above, you are doing so at the cost of flexibility, especially with the poison pill consideration. If IQ gets an especially sweet (and probably dumb) offer from SAS or UTA, then either match it and risk overpaying him or let him go. At least you have one more year of data on him on which to base your decision.

    So I think there are compelling arguments on both sides, enough so that I can’t be all that upset by the decision to stay well below the bar set by Vassell and McDaniels at this time. The circumstances of those teams are quite different than the Knicks.

    I don’t think the front office doesn’t value IQ. I think they do, I just don’t think they value him enough.

    Other than Brunson and Robinson there is no player we should be trying to keep out of trades more than IQ. If it comes down to moving IQ or missing out on a superstar of course you trade him but in my opinion, you offer anything else to try and keep him out of the trade.

    We should also do what we can to keep Grimes but if one has to go I move him over IQ.

    Everyone else should be totally on the table for a big trade no questions. Barrett and Randle should be the first out the door as centerpieces for whatever trade we do. Hart, DDV, and IHart are all salary fillers that would be okay to move if necessary and no one else on the roster has much value. I would try and keep McBride and Rokas but I wouldn’t try that hard.

    “I would rather have IQ at $27 million a year and no DDV than try to lowball IQ to the tune of $16-20 million a year with DDV making $12 million a year.”

    This is fair. But we have both right now, so I’ll defer my judgement until I see how the year plays out. A lot can happen between now and restricted free agency.

    BTW what is the absolute max that an opposing team can offer IQ? Is it the rookie max extension? Is that lower for a player not on your roster?

    Re: IQ – I highly recommend the KFS podcast with Fred Katz this morning, explaining how players like IQ may get squeezed in the new CBA, and why a bunch of mid-tier guys took what look like pretty team-friendly extensions…

    i don’t know what they argued but i am very unconvinced of this very popular claim. the second apron will be a problem for only a few teams and it’s the marginal team who bids. if they think that iq is on the level of josh green or cole anthony (just guessing), then this is really a player valuation conversation being masked in cba folklore.

    Everything about the way IQ has been handled as a player and now in negotiations has convinced me my optimism about this management/coaching staff has been misplaced.

    It’s certainly possible I’m the one that’s wrong in my appraisal of Quickley, but this not one of those cases where we are dealing with a very young player and I’m projecting improvement I know is less than 100% to come. I’m talking about the current Quickley.

    “I would rather have IQ at $27 million a year and no DDV than try to lowball IQ to the tune of $16-20 million a year with DDV making $12 million a year.”

    100% agree.

    DDV is a good player, but he added almost nothing that we didn’t already have and he’s not as young or imo as good as Quickley or Grimes.

    The new CBA requires teams to ask a different question: Is this the player you want to put you into the second apron?

    no it really doesn’t. iq at 15pct of the cap is a very alienable asset unless he take a terrible turn. the second apron of the second year of a hypothetical iq extension is estimate at $199 million. this is far less of a handcuff relative to current rookie scale extension numbers than people seem to think.

    Another team could offer Quickley 25% of the cap with 5% raises. Assuming a cap of ~$143M for 2024-2025, that could theoretically be in the neighborhood of 4/~$153M.

    I don’t see any team doing that, but pretty sure that’s more or less the max another team could offer.

    “if they think that iq is on the level of josh green or cole anthony (just guessing), then this is really a player valuation conversation being masked in cba folklore.”

    That would be true, but I doubt that they think of IQ in that way. Cole extended for 3/$39M, Green for 3/$41M. Those are both well below even the lower numbers being floated for IQ, both in years and AAV.

    However, I do think that already having Brunson as a long-term starting PG is a factor. Can IQ be a viable starter on a contending team that starts Brunson? Maybe they feel that the answer is no. So if he’s going to be a backup combo guard, it’s hard to justify paying him starter’s money, and considerably more money than a guy like Josh Hart…at least not without more evidence.

    Does anyone think that IQ can be a well-paid starting PG on a contender? Does SAS or UTA believe that? If yes, well, they have every right to pay him like one and pry him away from us. But do we really want to pay IQ more than Brunson at any point, and then have him making $27M when the time comes to extend Brunson, just so he can be Brunson’s back-up?

    These conversations sort of have an undertone of questioning whether IQ might actually be better to keep than Brunson, especially if Brunson gets overpaid on his next deal…does anyone feel that he is?

    “I don’t see any team doing that, but pretty sure that’s more or less the max another team could offer.”

    That seems logical. Teams do tend to overpay RFAs out of fear of being matched…so I wouldn’t be surprised if he gets offered something like 4years/$120-130 (maybe descending if that’s possible?).

    I still think that the most likely outcomes are that a) IQ is traded before the deadline, b) the Knicks work out an extension for him after the season.

    IQ is 6’3″ with a 6’8″ wingspan and is considered a good defender. His size shouldn’t be a huge factor and frankly even giving up size he is a better defender than RJ so starting him next to Brunson shouldn’t be viewed as a problem.

    Plus you start him at the 2 and then also use him as Brunson’s backup so he only plays next to Brunson for 12-18 minutes a game.

    The idea that he is only useful to the Knicks off the bench is probably why they undervalue him so much and why our management is really messing up here.

    On a side note, we should sign Darius Bazley. We can waive either Windler or Jeffries. If possible we should even try and lock him up on a 2-3 year non-guaranteed deal.

    no it really doesn’t. iq at 15pct of the cap is a very alienable asset unless he take a terrible turn. the second apron of the second year of a hypothetical iq extension is estimate at $199 million. this is far less of a handcuff relative to current rookie scale extension numbers than people seem to think.

    IQ’s entire outsized value hinges on whether or not he is a pg… as a sg.. his value plummets and probably not playable as a starter….

    most people thought at the fournier signing that he would be highly moveable asset even if he didn’t work out… just because you can trade people doesn’t mean that you will get equal value or the value at the time he got traded… many used this same logic that donte and hart will always be tradeable… yea.. but if josh and donte perform worse you’re not getting their current value! if there comes a point where you would rather have someone else his value has already plummeted….

    people are good until they’re not.. and IQ’s entire perceived value comes from hot shooting from a very volatile part of the court…. and actually hides some worrying regression in other areas…. so he’s got a lot to prove this year and if he does then he’ll get his bag.. if not… well you can give some other bench player 25mm and see how that works out…

    and actually hides some worrying regression in other areas…. so he’s got a lot to prove this year and if he does then he’ll get his bag.

    Yeah, this is kind of my thinking now that I’ve had time to think about it. IF he was asking for more than 20 million a year and closer to 25 million, I don’t know if he’s earned that yet. He was bad the first 30 games of last season and then was amazing the last 2/3 of the season. But then he was REALLY bad in the playoffs.

    He’s streaky as hell but he’s also on his current rookie salary a great trade chip. Doesn’t seem like the team over or under values him per say. Just that they didn’t want to commit to him long term at a huge number when we already have an all-star starting PG.

    iq is a fantastic help defender despite his stature and his anticipation and recognition on defense has improved every year. he is a good bet to shoot well enough be a spacer and a threat off the dribble from 3 and he’s an above average passer for a very good help defender who can who can shoot. he excellent at avoiding turnovers even when his usage rises.

    he has risks including his floater luck regressing, but he’s the kind of player who is a decent bet to find other, offsetting ways to improve. he absolutely does not have to be a conventional point guard to be worth 15pct of the cap on his prime unless you don’t believe in his defense. he played 1000 minutes with jalen last year at just under +9/1000. while that’s still noisy enough to worry about, and a small backcourt like that can be a concern against some opponents, i think he’s a highly workable fit next to jalen and many other point guards types. he did suck in the playoffs but i do not think he ever becomes a platonic point guard yet i would still instapay him 15% for his prime.

    IQ finished 10th and 11th in ft% his first two seasons. He’s an elite shooter.

    Not everyone at the top of the FT list is an elite shooter from 3, but a lot of them are. Chances are he’s a 37%+ shooter and the 34.6% the year before was the outlier.

    IQ has had the best +/- of any Knick playing over 1000 minutes in each of his three seasons. If you drop the threshold to 500 minutes it is better than anyone except Hart last year and Rose and Gibson in his rookie year.

    +/- is noisy but that is pretty amazing evidence that he has a lot of value.

    Heyptfuimonmyway2mygreatseatatmsgandidontneedurlowercaseonlybsfnwmyvibesostfubtwwhrerfarfaatwmyperoni

    and IQ’s entire perceived value comes from hot shooting from a very volatile part of the court….

    I understand what you’re trying to say, but this is ridiculously overstated.

    I’m assuming you’re talking about his success from “floater range” or thereabouts, and it’s true that last year he had a career year from there.

    FG% from CTG’s “short-mid” category:

    20-21: 40% (45th percentile among combo guards)
    21-22: 41% (50th percentile among combo guards)
    22-23: 50% (78th percentile among combo guards)

    But to say his “entire perceived value” comes from this is frankly absurd. These shots only made up 30% of his overall shot diet. IQ’s “entire perceived value” does not hinge on a slight outlier performance (that may well just reflect genuine improvement) on less than a third of his shots.

    In fact, if EPM is to be believed the bulk of his value comes from his defense anyway (+1.6 DEPM, +0.6 OEPM last year).

    In any event, even if you regressed his 2022-2023 performance on all midrange shots to his career figures it wouldn’t change his overall efficiency much.

    Using BRef’s numbers, only ~40% of his shots were between the rim and the 3PT line. I don’t have time to do the math, but I’m fairly certain if you gave him his career 45% rate on shots from 3-10 (as opposed to his 22-23 50% rate), his career 42% rate on shots from 10-16 (as opposed to his 22-23 47% rate, and his career 34% rate from 16<3 (as opposed to his career…34% rate) it would barely budge his TS%. These shots accounted for 21%, 13%, and 6% of his total shots.

    I don’t have time to do the math,

    it takes 2 minutes…the difference is 20 shots and his ts would be .550… which is exactly in line with his career TS….

    ZMANILLBEBEHINDWHOEVERREPLACEDTHESYNERGYTHIEFONFRIDAYANDRESTASSUREDIAMBRINGINGTHEFWYVIBESANDACHECKFORIQ

    The 2023 New York Mets had the same Pythag record, and almost the exact same run differential, as the 2023 Arizona Diamondbacks, despite the fact that the Mets traded away many quality MLB players at the deadline for prospects.

    it takes 2 minutes…the difference is 20 shots and his ts would be .550… which is exactly in line with his career TS….

    I’ll take your word for it.

    So you think the difference between IQ’s .578 TS% and a theoretical .550 TS% (presupposing the improvements from the midrange were a mirage as opposed to, well, improvements) accounts for his “entire perceived value?”

    Oh goody — tonight we get to hear Doris Burke call grown-ass men by their first names 85% of the time, like she’s their preschool teacher and they’re doing a good job playing with their blocks and crayons.

    I am expecting to get asses kicked tonight, but then, since we won our opener against them a few years ago and had a terrible season, maybe this will be reverse luck

    IQ has had the best +/- of any Knick playing over 1000 minutes in each of his three seasons.

    Yep.

    I also agree that it’s a noisy stat, but when you start looking at multiple years and lineup combos it seems way less noisy.

    By way of comparison, take a look at RJ’s on/off.

    Nothing is noisy enough to account for the difference between the two.

    So you think the difference between IQ’s .578 TS% and a theoretical .550 TS% (presupposing the improvements from the midrange were a mirage as opposed to, well, improvements) accounts for his “entire perceived value?”

    considering that’s driving his entire improvement from his prior years despite regression in other areas like assist rate .. usg and ftr…

    yes…

    and if you give him his ts from prior years… with last years secondary numbers… that would be his worst season… which yes he’s very much in danger of having the bottom drop out….

    i mean look we’ve always looked at big midrange and floater improvements as highly volatile and candidates for regression…. for whatever reason this has gotten completely handwaved and totally ignored for IQ… it bears mentioning because people are going absolutely bonkers on what he deserves on an extension….

    and we’ll see where it ends up… future isn’t written yet…. but people are pounding the under on the knicks wins total… and there’s two big regression candidates on the knicks and he’s one of them….

    Comments are closed.