Statistical Analysis. Humor. Knicks.

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Post Game: Celtics beat Knicks, 128-100

Full BoxScore:
http://www.nba.com/games/20181206/NYKBOS#/boxscore

Score by Period:

Team 1 2 3 4 TOTAL
Knicks 30 28 26 16 100
Celtics 38 31 30 29 128

Four Factors

TEAM eFG TOR ORB FTR
NYK 0.462 0.139 0.265 0.176
BOS 0.604 0.082 0.176 0.185

Simple Box Score

Name min pts fga 3pm ftm or Reb ast stl to blk pf +/-
Hezonja, Mario 18:27 3 4 0 1 0 3 2 0 2 0 2 -7
Vonleh, Noah 34:17 12 5 1 3 2 10 3 2 1 0 0 -13
Kanter, Enes 23:45 14 12 0 0 5 11 1 0 1 1 3 -8
Hardaway Jr., Tim 33:11 22 19 6 2 1 1 2 1 3 0 2 -17
Mudiay, Emmanuel 34:15 17 15 2 5 1 2 6 0 3 1 4 -17
Knox, Kevin 24:45 11 12 2 1 1 4 2 0 2 0 1 -19
Robinson, Mitchell 20:36 7 4 0 1 4 8 1 0 1 2 4 -16
Trier, Allonzo 17:38 6 5 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 3 -12
Lee, Courtney 10:21 3 3 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 -7
Dotson, Damyean 20:00 5 11 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 -19
Kornet, Luke 2:43 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 -5
Baker, Ron 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ntilikina, Frank 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Knicks 240:00 100 91 12 16 14 47 21 4 16 5 23 -28
Name min pts fga 3pm ftm or Reb ast stl to blk pf +/-
Tatum, Jayson 26:01 17 11 3 0 1 5 2 2 1 0 2 10
Morris, Marcus 30:19 10 13 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 2 16
Horford, Al 27:53 19 12 0 3 2 12 3 0 2 4 3 15
Smart, Marcus 23:39 4 8 0 0 1 2 7 2 0 0 2 16
Irving, Kyrie 30:08 22 15 3 1 1 4 8 0 2 1 2 15
Brown, Jaylen 25:12 21 10 0 7 0 3 2 0 2 0 5 16
Hayward, Gordon 25:07 8 6 2 2 0 6 4 0 0 0 1 13
Theis, Daniel 17:24 10 7 0 2 2 3 0 0 1 0 3 8
Baynes, Aron 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1
Rozier, Terry 24:23 11 7 3 2 0 7 4 2 1 1 4 17
Wanamaker, Brad 2:43 3 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5
Yabusele, Guerschon 2:43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5
Ojeleye, Semi 2:43 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Celtics 240:00 128 92 13 17 7 46 32 8 9 6 24 28
Liked it? Take a second to support Mike Kurylo on Patreon!

9 comments on “Post Game: Celtics beat Knicks, 128-100

  1. Brian Cronin

    I really don’t like these games where, like, NOTHING happens to further our understanding of any of the players on the team. Not that they should have won, of course, as this should have been a loss from the start, but just a general “Did anyone develop? Did we learn anything new about anyone? Or was this just a non-descript loss?”

    Robinson had a really cool alley-oop dunk, at least.

  2. Grocer

    Yeah I could have skipped this one. We were bad all around.

    It seems that the coach direction is to play at least 3 chuckers on the court at all times.

    Honestly a lineup without 3 chuckers is, for this squad, a lineup that can’t score at all.

  3. Ingmarrrr

    Did anyone develop? Did we learn anything new about anyone?

    I didn’t watch the game but the minute allocation indicates that the answer is yes. Suboptimal, maybe, but overall sure.

    The future (players signed at least through next year, other than Lee):
    THJ 33 minutes
    Knox 25
    Robinson 21
    Dotson 20
    Total: 99 minutes.

    The future maybe, excluding Mudiay because of his cap hold:
    Vonleh 34
    Trier 18
    Total: 52 minutes.

    Everyone else: 55 minutes.

    Most of the minutes went to players who are, or should be part of the future. All of them other than THJ are young. None of them may become a star, but the roster is what it is.

  4. Ingmarrrr

    My numbers are a bit off. Fixing it:

    The Future: 99 minutes
    The Future Maybe: 52 minutes
    The players we don’t want to keep: 89 minutes

  5. Brian Cronin

    The Future: 99 minutes
    The Future Maybe: 52 minutes
    The players we don’t want to keep: 89 minutes

    Sure seems like it is split pretty evenly, then, no? So does that actually tell us anything one way or the other, if it’s split like that?

  6. slovene knick

    Noah and Mitch are the ideal defensive guys…if defense and athleticism were the values i look for in a player those two’d be untouchable.
    Man and Noah’s feet are so huge it’s a minor miracle he never steps out of bounds.

  7. bobneptune

    Sure seems like it is split pretty evenly, then, no? So does that actually tell us anything one way or the other, if it’s split like that?

    It tells us after 26 games they don’t have a blood clue who is who and Frank got zero minutes. Thanks coach!

  8. Ingmarrrr

    Sure seems like it is split pretty evenly, then, no? So does that actually tell us anything one way or the other, if it’s split like that?

    The 24 minutes to Kanter is silly.
    Hezonja’s 18 are inexcusable.
    34 minutes to Mudiay are probably viewed as a plan b or plan c for a PG of the future.
    Lee’s 10 are somewhere between an attempt to regenerate some interest in him, to waving the white flag on his salary and roster spot.
    So yeah, it’s definitely suboptimal.
    But the bulk of the minutes still go to players that are, or with high probability could/should be part of the future.

Leave a Reply