Categories
New York Knicks News

ESPN.com: Sources: Knicks to acquire Mikal Bridges from Nets

Talk about a Woj bomb!

The New York Knicks agreed on Tuesday to a trade that will see them acquire Mikal Bridges from the Brooklyn Nets, sources told ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski.

The Knicks will send Bojan Bogdanovic, four unprotected first-round picks (2025, 2027, 2029, 2031), a 2025 protected first-rounder via the Milwaukee Bucks, a 2028 unprotected pick swap and a 2025 second-rounder to the Nets, sources said.

The Knicks also will acquire a 2026 second-round pick from the Nets to complete the deal.

Well then. That’s a fine “How do you do?,” right?

We’ve been saying for a while now that if the Knicks wanted Bridges, they had to give up a haul, and a haul is, in fact, what they gave up, but fuck, the dude is a perfect fit for this team, and they were able to hold on to Deuce McBride, which was very nice, considering he’s one of their only young players left.

The annoying thing, though, is just as soon as this blockbuster deal was announced, the word comes down that the Knicks believe they’re not going to be able to re-sign iHart, which, well, that sucks.

I guess we’ll have to see where the team stands after the draft finishes, perhaps they plan on dealing picks for another center? Or something else? Bridges apparently asked to be traded here. His desire to play with his ‘Nova buddies was one of the worst secrets in the NBA.

I’m just stunned right now, I am happy…but then the iHart thing pisses me off. Hopefully the iHart thing is a smokescreen somehow. Also, if OG doesn’t want to be behind the ‘Nova triumvirate, what about the quartet? So much drama!

But good drama! I think.

69 replies on “ESPN.com: Sources: Knicks to acquire Mikal Bridges from Nets”

Love getting Bridges. But if the iHart stuff is true, we need to get a playable center. Also, if iHart can’t be re-signed, what does this mean for OG?

Wowzers.

That really is all I can think right now. It’s just…wow.

I deeply hate losing Hartenstein if it comes to pass but we are going to be able to play some incredible small ball lineups now so I actually don’t think it will hurt as much as we think.

Also, does this mean we can re-sign Arcidiacono to complete the Villanfinity Gauntlet?

Also, if iHart can’t be re-signed, what does this mean for OG?

It sounds like it isn’t that he literally can’t be signed, but more that other teams are making him offers too rich for the Knicks to match.

Goga & a draft picks at C. Fuck it, bring back Precious for depth while we’re at it.

If iHart leaves it’s not cause the Knicks can’t sign him after the trade, it’s cause they can only offer 4yr-72m which seems like will be on the lower end of offers iHart will be getting.

It sounds like it isn’t that he can’t be signed, but more that other teams are making him offers too rich for the Knicks to match.

If that happens, then I’m kinda pissed we gave up IQ for that trade.

It really is a shame that they don’t have Bird rights for IHart, because the money is now meaningless. They could pay him whatever and it wouldn’t make a huge difference.

If that happens, then I’m kinda pissed we gave up IQ for that trade.

No, I was referring to iHart in terms of the Knicks not being able to match other teams’ offers. The Knicks can match any offer for OG. Which I imagine they will. The only way OG doesn’t return is if OG doesn’t want to, and you’d hope that a guy would want to play for a very good team that will pay him $40 million a year.

Porting over comments from the old thread, starting with:

@FredKatz
A little tidbit: Bogdanovic for Bridges would mean the Knicks taking on money in this trade, which would hard cap them at the first apron. If they found a way to guarantee Diakite and Jeffries and include them in the deal to Brooklyn, they would not be hard capped.

It really is a shame that they don’t have Bird rights for IHart, because the money is now meaningless. They could pay him whatever and it wouldn’t make a huge difference.

Yep. It is definitely unfortunate.

Okay, so if we trust Ian — and we should always trust Ian — and if the team re-signs OG, then our rotation at the moment is something like this:

STARTERS
C: Mitch
PF: Julius
SF: OG
SG: Mikal
PG: Jalen

BENCH
PG: Deuce
SG: DDV
SF/PF: Josh Hart
Big: TBD, with Precious, Sims, a draft pick, a free agent, or a veteran we acquire with one of this year’s picks all in contention.

We almost certainly have to make at least two picks this week, just to make the salary structure manageable at all.

That is just a massive, massive haul of draft picks we gave the Nets, with high potential to blow up in our faces down the road. But holy shit, that rotation!

it seems like the first apron cap might be the thing causing us to suddenly expect to lose ihart as opposed to other teams bidding above early bird

I assume the Knicks will do anything they can do to avoid being hard-capped, so whatever that is, it will happen.

Are there any teams we can move Mitch to that have cap space and won’t have to send money back?

I think If we can open up some money, we can keep I-Hart. I don’t think the issue is that we are getting outbid. It’s that we need to move some money off.

By the way, not having I-Hart would not a disaster if Mitch was able to stay healthy. Maybe our new hire Casey Smith in medical/training can help with that.

I like him as a player, but when I think of an all in move I’m not thinking Mikal Bridges.

Guys with Bridges Hart and OG we can play five out lineups around Brunson and Randle that will still be very good defensively.

GUYS WITH BRIDGES HART AND OG WE CAN PLAY FIVE OUT LINEUPS AROUND BRUNSON AND RANDLE THAT WILL STILL BE VERY GOOD DEFENSIVELY!

Repost

I’m not sure the Knicks are done.

1. They had to know Bridges was possible.

2. if they got him, keeping I-Hart would be way more difficult.

3. They were talking to teams about Mitch.

4. If you think you have a shot at Bridges and may lose I-Hart, you don’t talk to multiple teams about Mitch.

IMO something else is brewing and it may involve moving Mitch and keeping I-Hart.

Just a reminder, we still need a backup PG unless Rokas is the guy.

My big question is, assuming we re-sign OG and iHart, what does our offense look like next year? Is Thibs able to design and is the team able to run an offense that spreads the shot attempts around and keeps everyone happy. If Brunson and Randle are taking a combined 40 FGA that leaves about 50 FGA for DDV, OG, Mikal, Deuce, Mitch, iHart, and Josh Hart.

Regardless of whatever else happens, I feel like we’re gonna sign Mo Bamba because blood in the soil!

Just a reminder, we still need a backup PG unless Rokas is the guy.

I think Mikal runs the 2nd unit, who can hopefully take some pressure off Randle too.

Whatever you do, the 2nd unit has a lot more punch with Mikal & Donte likely playing minutes there.

I should point out that I still have not finished reading what we actually gave up in this trade. I started to read it, I saw it was a really long sentence and there were a lots of years in it, and I decided to save it for tomorrow. Tonight I’m just happy we got Bridges!

Bananas!!

As for I-Hart, he was definitely a catalyst on both ends of the court this year, but let’s not get nuts. He can’t shoot or extend the defense. He has a chronic Achilles issue which is not going away. I guarantee that there will be a draft pick in the Knicks range who can replicate 85% of I-Hart.

Thibs ain’t playing Randle at Center lineups.

No, he playing OG at Center lineups.

So what’s the dollar difference between what we can pay I-Hart and what other teams can? Because maybe I’m being naive, but why would I-Hart leave a great situation in NY with a now bona fide contender and go elsewhere for more $$? Is it really life changing money?

And of course there’s the model wife consideration too, you know she wants to stay in a major city.

I’m hopeful that he stays put.

we actually made this trade so Thomas ‘Mengele’ Thibodeau can test whether the human body can withstand 70 straight minutes of basketball in a quintuple ot game

I hope we keep iHart but honestly right now I only care about resigning OG, keep him and I don’t give a fuck what else they do rest of the offseason.

I would rather have IHart and picks than Mikal.

I like Mikal but I love centers.

I hope we keep iHart but honestly right now I only care about resigning OG, keep him and I don’t give a fuck what else they do rest of the offseason.

The crazy thing for me about this OG situation is that they obviously have to re-sign him now, and, like, don’t they have to pay him a gazillion dollars now?

As a guy who, frankly, enjoys watching the Knicks lose more than win these days, I have to say this trade makes the Knicks a serious presence next year. The rest of the offseason is still tbd, but today I am kind of worried that Dolan could have a happy 2025. That stinks.

I’d like to say that I am ecstatic right not. But I just can’t wrap my head around the number of picks going out.

The most valuable of the picks are the 2029, 2031, and the Milwaukee 2025. If any of the 2025, 2027 or the pick swap amount to anything but two bottom-10 firsts and a swap that is not exercised, that would suck.

But no matter what, this is making me queasy.

They really have to resign OG, this was a huge overpay for a guy who probably fits this team really well but isn’t even an all star caliber player

I mean if we compete for a title the next 2 years an overpay is worth it, but we can’t let OG walk

OG and Mikal guarding Tatum and Brown.

The Knicks vs. the Celtics is going to be epic.

Leon,

I know you are not done. We need one more rabbit pulled out of the hat to bring back I-Hart or bring in someone to replace him that can give us as much.

Yeah it’s hilarious how differently I’d view this trade if OG walks. You have to pay him whatever it takes now.

They should be able to compete for a title for the next few years, I mean the oldest player is Randle who turns 30 in November. I’m not worried about a 1st rd pick 7 years from now, I’m going to enjoy watching this team the next few years just like I’ve enjoyed the past 2 seasons.

Bridges was tanking last year. He’s better than that. He’s more like the player from the year before. His usage won’t be as high, but he plays both sides really well and will be rejuvenated for the KnIcks.

We can’t move both 2024 picks until after the draft. I expect another move to happen immediately after the draft.

I mean if we compete for a title the next 2 years an overpay is worth it, but we can’t let OG walk

@DRed is Leon. The singularity is upon us.

Anybody have any idea what NYK can still do after presumably signing OG? We’re going to need a center

Mikal may not be an all-star, but he has all-star level impact on winning. The Jazz and Rockets were pursuing Bridges, and they had good young players and picks to send out. We only had to shell out picks…a lot of them, for sure, but still, you can’t look at it in a vacuum.

Honestly if your core four guys are Brunson-Bridges-OG-Randle, how can you possibly justify not playing them with Donte or Hart?

There’s NO WAY we’re not going small next year.

You play Mitch for 28 mpg, you use a backup C for 8*, and then you unleash hell for the other 12.

* Just bring back Precious for this. He started 18 games last year, played 40+ mins in a lot of them. He’ll be perfectly serviceable when Mitch goes down. And we should hang onto just for the way he can play Embiid.

Brandon Ingram was an all star, Bridges is not. That means virtually nothing. You’d rather the Knicks trade 6 picks for Bridges than trade even half that many for Ingram, right?

Love that Leon held on to Deuce but need to shed salary and sign iHart. What is Mitch + 2 first worth tomorrow night?

wow, it would appear as though the new york knicks have a fully functioning front office…

can’t trade with the raptors, can’t trade with the nets…

not true…

OK… question…

is this still technically part of the 2023-24 season?

Because Bojan is at $20MM. Bridges is at $23MM. And teams over the first apron can’t take back more money.

is this still technically part of the 2023-24 season?

I believe that is the point of contention here, yes.

I find it extremely hard to believe that they’ll agree to be hard-capped. How can you make this deal and not avoid being hard-capped?!

I suspect there’s forthcoming details. Something like Sims or DaQuan Jeffries being included to avoid the hard cap.

OK… question…

is this still technically part of the 2023-24 season?

Because Bojan is at $20MM. Bridges is at $23MM. And teams over the first apron can’t take back more money.

it’s not clear whether it’s for 23-24 or 24-25, but either way bojan would have to be guaranteed and count at his 24-25 post-guarantee figure. the idea floated above of guaranteed our two back bench min guys to stay under the apron isn’t possible.

given the mitch trade rumors, i could imagine a situation where they tried to fold in a third team to take mitch (for something cheaper) and avoid the hard cap and, if possible, keep ihart. could be they are still trying to.

mikal is a fantastic fit but the price is shocking.

If it’s a 2024-25 trade, then we could have just added Deuce to avoid taking back more money.

Surely we wouldn’t choose Deuce over a hard cap. Right?

I mean, to get a 2-way star iron man stud in his prime that fits the team perfectly for a washed up scrub and a million picks? Seems like an overpay, but the kind of overpay that makes sense at this point in time

I agree with everyone that the price is steep. It’s the same number of first rounders traded for Gobert (but we didn’t give up as much in players). I think Gobert was a higher profile target, but he was three years older at the time of the trade than Bridges is now. All I can say is that if the fit is right and it makes you a contender, you do what you have to.

The Knicks may have to bring back OAKAAK Omari Spellman next year. He seems to have been the closest that Villanova team had to a center.

I think Gobert was a higher profile target, but he was three years older at the time of the trade than Bridges is now.

Gobert also couldn’t be played at certain times during the playoffs, and has been made into a dance .gif more than any other NBA player, living or dead.

Now all we need is to bring back Eric Paschall to the league and re-sign Arcidiacono to complete the Villanova team!

A bit shocked at the price and I share everyone’s feelings in wondering where do we go from here, but it definitely excites me that we’re getting a premier defensive player who never misses games, can shoot and create a bit for himself and has obvious immediate chemistry with our core.

Leon has finally made his big move and I’m very excited to see where we go next. If he manages to somehow solve the Center situation adequately, I’ll be very excited to watch this team.

Begley says Bridges requested a trade

Fischer says that’s not true

Unless I’m missing something, I don’t think the hard cap is an issue. Of we make the trade this season, we’re only hard capped for the remainder of this season. Obviously all the other first apron restrictions will be in force next year but we were going to be a first apron team anyway, so I’m not sure this is a massive deal other than making more deals this month harder?

Anyway – I’ve been meaning to post for weeks that in my view we should try to prioritise a trade for a very good player making a lower salary cs a slightly better one earning the max because it would allow us to keep the core and just trade bogey, vs having to trade Mitch and/or Julius. That’s worth a lot – Mitch, julius and a new good player, while also shifting donte and Hart down a slot in the pecking order, is to my mind a better upgrade than almost anyone other than giannis if sending out 1-2 rotation pieces.

The George chatter really rammed that home for me. I went to bed last night convinced with all the chat about trades this week that we were going to end up with George or Ingram and messing up the whole plan.

Bridges was pretty much the peak version of my preferred approach so I’m pretty thrilled. Yes it’s expensive but we have a legit contention window now and that’s something not a lot of teams get to say. I’m excited.

I’d be very tempted to do it, especially if you can keep McBride out of it and retain everyone else

I said this 2 days ago so I’m all in on this trade. We now must keep OG, and solve the center puzzle, and we’re a legit contender in Leon’s year 5.

If he can continue performing at this level, I don’t even worry about the end of the decade picks. We’re good and going to stay good.

Also, does this mean we can re-sign Arcidiacono to complete the Villanfinity Gauntlet?

This was my first thought also…just kidding. But also, let’s get Archie.

If he can continue performing at this level, I don’t even worry about the end of the decade picks. We’re good and going to stay good.

A very good point that I had not thought of

New York Knicks grade: B

The Nova Knicks are complete and reuniting in pursuit of adding an NBA championship to the NCAA title they won in 2016 with Bridges, Brunson, DiVincenzo and Hart all on the roster. (Bonus points if New York manages to bring back a fifth member of that team in Tom Thibodeau favorite Ryan Arcidiacono, who spent much of 2023-24 on the Knicks’ roster before being traded in the deal to acquire Bogdanovic at the deadline.)

Adding Bridges gives New York unparalleled wing depth, so long as the team can re-sign forward OG Anunoby as an unrestricted free agent after he declined his $19.9 million player option Tuesday, per multiple reports. In Anunoby and Bridges, the Knicks will have two of the league’s most versatile perimeter defenders paired with DiVincenzo and Hart, both of whom might end up coming off the bench when Julius Randle returns — barring an additional move involving Randle.

Much like the reigning champion Boston Celtics, New York will have multiple strong individual defenders to contain star-laden teams. Both teams are also similarly balanced on offense. Bridges should benefit from having more scoring around him after chafing under the strain of a key offensive role in Brooklyn.

Bridges thrived in that spot after being dealt to the Nets as part of the return for Durant at the 2023 trade deadline, averaging 26.1 points per game on above-average efficiency (.607 true shooting percentage) the rest of the season. He couldn’t maintain that pace last season, averaging 21.7 PPG on .573 true shooting before the All-Star break and sliding all the way to 15.6 PPG on .529 true shooting thereafter, per Basketball-Reference.com.

Bridges’ scoring will take some of the pressure off Brunson, who saw his usage skyrocket to 38% after the break with Randle sidelined. Brunson handled it well, but did see a slight dip in efficiency as the focal point of defenses. With so many other shooters and ball handlers on the court, teams will have to think twice about trapping Brunson so aggressively.

Down the road, adding another scoring threat could make it easier for the Knicks to move on from Randle, instead opting for a player who better fits their vision of spacing the floor for Brunson and playing defense.

For now, New York has plenty of additional business to handle this summer. Besides Anunoby, starting center Isaiah Hartenstein is also an unrestricted free agent. Just how much flexibility the Knicks have to re-sign both players will depend in part on how this trade is structured. If New York takes back even one dollar more in salary, that would trigger a hard cap at the lower luxury-tax apron.

The Knicks could sidestep that restriction by adding additional players to the deal to send out more salary than they take back with Bridges. Adding players would still hard cap New York at the second apron, but that’s nearly $11 million higher than the first apron. If this deal is strictly Bogdanovic for Bridges, the Knicks would be limited to about $33.5 million in first-year salary for Anunoby and Hartenstein while staying below the first apron. (Trading a player under contract, like center Mitchell Robinson, would create additional cap space for New York.)

Hard-cap restrictions could help explain why the Bridges trade makes it less likely for Hartenstein to return — as reported by ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski — although that may simply be a function of the potential for the Knicks’ payroll to explode in future years when Bridges and Brunson sign new contracts.

Like Brunson, Bridges will command a sizeable raise from his current contract, which pays just $23.3 million in 2024-25 and $24.9 million in 2025-26. That deal was signed when Bridges was a low-usage role player with the Phoenix Suns and now substantially undervalues his contributions, which, along with unparalleled durability, is why he was so in demand in the trade market.

Consider that New York will pay Bridges and Brunson a combined $48.3 million in 2024-25, less than Suns guard Bradley Beal ($50.2 million) will earn by himself. It’s those bargain salaries that enable the Knicks to maintain one of the league’s deepest top-seven rotations after this trade. And the Villanova ties for Bridges and Brunson figure to help New York’s chances of signing both players to extensions rather than having them wait on the potential of making more money in free agency.

The main cost of acquiring Bridges was a bounty of draft picks. New York can no longer trade any of its own draft picks after making the No. 24 and No. 25 picks in Wednesday night’s first round, though the Knicks did hang on to protected picks they’re owed by the Detroit Pistons and Washington Wizards as lower-value trade chips.

By going all-in for Bridges, New York has foregone the possibility of bidding for a bigger star, such as Philadelphia 76ers center Joel Embiid, should one ever become available down the road. It seems likely Brunson’s emergence as a top-five finisher in MVP voting changed the Knicks’ thinking on waiting for the best player available in trade.

Not only does Brunson’s development mean New York has less need for a primary shot creator, it also produces urgency for the Knicks to win now while Brunson (who turns 28 in August) is in his prime and not being paid like the star he is. Time will tell whether adding Bridges can allow New York to legitimately challenge Boston in the Eastern Conference. It certainly suggests the Celtics’ path back to the Finals will be far more challenging next spring.

I like Mikal a lot and will enjoy watching him as a Knickerbocker … but this really wasn’t a very good trade. No one being honest would say that they envisioned Leon’s asset horde going out for someone at Mikal’s level, as opposed to someone at the Tier 1/Very High Tier 2 level. It’s hard to believe they didn’t slap some protection on the outer years’ 1s, and draft picks are even more valuable in an aproned world.

It’s a huge overpay.

Kudos to Leon for seeing strategically that the time is now, but a C-minus/D-plus on tactical execution.

Nor do I like the thought/reasonable suspicion that the Nova cutesy “chemistry” thing was part of this.

Thibs hasn’t been extended yet ….

Comments are closed.