Knicks 2015 Free Agency Round Table: Arron Afflalo

True or False: Afflalo is the Knicks second option on offense in 2016.

Fisher-Cohen: True. And that’s gonna bump his stats and guarantee he leaves next summer. That’s the problem with player options.

Kurylo: False. He’s going to be their first option for the 42 games Carmelo Anthony misses, because Coach “Gotta Win’em All” is going to ride that ol’ grey mare until it breaks.

Gibberman: False. The Knicks second option is going to be taking good shots off of ball movement generated by the attention given to Carmelo Anthony.

Cronin: True. Unless the Zinger comes on quicker than expected.

True or False: Afflalo will be over his career ts% of 56.1% in 2016.

Kurylo: True. Afflalo’s true shooting percentage seems closely related to his three point shooting. On the plus side, in 5 of his last 7 seasons, he’s shot 39.8% or better. So I think the odds are in Afflalo’s favor.

Gibberman: He’s been under two of the past three seasons so I’ll guess it continues along that trend. False.

Fisher-Cohen: Afflalo was surprisingly efficient for the Magic even when he was asked to carry a much larger burden offensively than he had in the past. He’s two years older now though and coming off a pretty crappy year. I’ll say false but I wouldn’t be surprised to be wrong.

Cronin: He definitely has the capability of doing it, but I think the odds are against him after his last few seasons, so I’ll go with false.

True or False: Last year in Portland, the Blazers were 5.3 points worse (per 100 possessions) on defense with Afflalo on the floor, and the Nuggets were 0.2 points worse. So probably, he’s a bad defensive player.

Gibberman: True. Afflalo no longer has the foot speed he once did to guard at a high level. The hope is he perks up and can be an average defender. That would be nice.

Fisher-Cohen: True. He was an overrated defender in the past and is worse now.

Kurylo: From these stats [!/201167/tracking/defense/], it would seem he gets burned on the inside. So I’d agree with Gibberman, he’s lost a step & is going to be hurting against speedier players. Maybe against smaller lineups, he can play SF more capably.

Cronin: He’s definitely lost a few steps on defense. I don’t know if he is a bad defender, per se, but he is not much more than mediocre. Sadly mediocre is a huge step up from the likes of THJ, Calderon and Shved.

True or False: Afflalo is worth $16M over 2 years.

Gibberman: I didn’t want the Knicks to sign Afflalo, but I’m fine with this contract. Best case scenario is he plays wells, opts out, and the Knicks move on to a higher level shooting guard next summer with available cap space.

Fisher-Cohen: Absolutely true, but the player option means he’ll almost definitely be gone in a year (unless he falls apart). As the Knicks aren’t going anywhere this year, his only real value to this team is that he inflates their win total, theoretically making them more appealing to next year’s FA class.

Cronin: It’s not an awful contract in a vacuum, as $8 million is about what mediocre players get paid nowadays (see Corey Brewer).I just don’t like the idea of spending $13 million on two mediocre players where the best case scenario is that they have good years and then you lose them after the first year or have to use some of your new cap room to re-sign them and risk losing out on a max-level free agent. If this team is not going to be a contender next season, what is the point of devoting $8 million in cap space to a 30-year-old mediocre player like Afflalo? Forget the fact that Cory Joseph ended up signing long-term for $7.5 million a year, I just wanted to wait period – use the cap room to acquire longterm assets, not short-term “assets” like Afflalo, who, even if you are right about his chances of bouncing back, you’ll then either lose him after one year or have to use some newly found cap space to keep him! It’s just a strange signing. Lopez and O’Quinn were fine signings, as both could theoretically be parts of the next good Knick team. Afflalo and Williams are unlikely to be part of the future (and if you think Williams will be part of the future, why give him a player option so that he can leave after one year? It just doesn’t follow).

Kurylo: Agree with Brian Cronin. What’s the point of giving a player an option in year 2? If he sucks, you’re screwed. If he’s good, he’s gone. Why not save the cash and get some prospects? Cap space can be an asset, especially around mid-season if you’re looking to inject yourself in a trade that needs some extra room.

Comments are closed.