Categories
Uncategorized

Knicks Morning News (2025.07.28)

  • New York Knicks Dancers Seen Partying With Love Island Star – Sports Illustrated
    07/28/2025 11:00:01
     
  • New York Knicks Top 2k26 Players Leaked – Sports Illustrated
    07/28/2025 11:00:00
     
  • Knicks Reportedly Out Of Ben Simmons Sweepstakes – Yahoo Sports
    07/28/2025 05:04:46
     
  • Knicks reserve guard could see increased role next season – sportingnews.com
    07/28/2025 03:51:16
     
  • What are the allegations against former Knicks star Marcus Morris Sr.? Details explored as NBA player arrested – primetimer.com
    07/28/2025 04:27:00
     
  • Ex-Knick Marcus Morris Sr. arrested on fraud charge: ?Lesson learned? – New York Post
    07/28/2025 01:56:00
     
  • Marcus Morris arrested for fraud: Here’s what former Knicks forward did – Hindustan Times
    07/28/2025 02:02:18
     
  • NBA Trade Rumors: New York Knicks Reportedly Exploring Trade to Send $220,441,984 Big Man to the Brooklyn – The Times of India
    07/28/2025 01:35:00
     
  • Former New York Knicks Forward Arrested – Sports Illustrated
    07/28/2025 00:37:12
     
  • Forgotten sharpshooter could quietly fix the Knicks’ wing depth crisis – Daily Knicks
    07/27/2025 23:35:42
     
  • Knicks backup guard could see increased role under new head coach next season – Empire Sports Media
    07/27/2025 23:08:41
     
  • Not the Knicks: Russell Westbrook linked to a Western Conference team after leaving Nuggets – Bolavip
    07/27/2025 23:31:33
     
  • 74 replies on “Knicks Morning News (2025.07.28)”

    I would disagree with the sentiment that TNG is dominated by Picard/Data.

    On the one hand, yes, everyone in that show’s cast got spotlight episodes, as happened on DS9 and Voyager. They were making 26 episode seasons, and that’s just how things functioned in 90s and 2000s ensemble dramas.

    I just don’t think the TNG writers really cared about the majority of the supporting characters, other than Worf and, early on, Wesley. Yes, Geordi gets lots of screen time, and the occasional episode focused on him, but what was his personality beyond affable guy who speaks fluent technobabble? I’m enough of a Star Trek nerd to have read lots of the novels published in the 80s and 90s. I remember reading a book written by Peter David and being shocked by how much more three-dimensional Geordi felt as a character after a couple of chapters, versus how he’d been written over many seasons of television. Crusher, Riker, Troi… most of the supporting characters were very thinly written, with most of their inner life coming from what the actors were doing, and episodes focusing on them often felt obligatory, like, “Well, I guess we haven’t done a Beverly story in a while, so…” So, yes, they definitely got more attention than Sulu or Uhura on the original show. But they still were presented as minor appendages to Picard in a way that Bashir and O’Brien on DS9 or Chapel and M’Benga on SNW aren’t.

    We’re now moving far away from the original discussion of which captain people prefer, and why.

    I prefer Picard. If I could yield children I would have his babies. He’s Daddy.

    Spock is the single-best Star Trek character, but Patrick Stewart as Picard is the single-best performance in Star Trek. I got no beef with him as my captain — even if Pike’s hair is an architectural marvel.

    Mount ending up in the Captain’s Chair is a good turn for him and the franchise. Anson was good in Hell on Wheels.

    My favorite TNG episode was “The Inner Light” where Picard’s mind is taken over by a probe and he experiences the death of a planet as a local villager. The scene at the end where he plays the flute in his cabin always made me a blubbering mess.

    1

    Mount ending up in the Captain’s Chair is a good turn for him and the franchise.

    Yeah, he was done dirty by Marvel for sure, was owed a cosmic redress. I guess this one was literal.

    Admittedly haven’t seen much TNG for decades, and it’s totally possible that the depth was coming from the actors, but one counter would certainly be Worf, who got a lot of episodes on TNG and DS9. So they must have been interested in him. They gave him a son! That’s more than the perfunctory “Beverly sleeps with a candle” episode. (And “sleeps” is sadly doing some work in that sentence.) Riker got a double, got tested when Picard was abducted, had subplots with Troi over seasons….I dunno, you may be wrong on this one. Taking your original point, the format was the same as the original (23 eps/season, mostly standalone, not serialized), and yet the secondary cast of TNG is much more fleshed out. It’s not really comparable.

    But I won’t seriously argue about Pike, because I love the guy in that role and appreciate the attempt to make a more modern captain. It’s probably easier to pick the WORST captain… Might it be Picard? Not the actor, obvs, but the captain wasn’t that great. Lacked the tactical genius of Kirk, the fortitude of Janeway, the complexity of Sisko, the empathy of Pike….oh wait, there’s Archer. Forget it.

    One thing I never understood about American culture, which has been dominant for my generation, is the Star Track fascination. Cliche stories, bad costumes, silly aliens (ok, other than Spock), terrible acting. Even Redshirts, Scalzi’s satire book, was boring to me. And I love SciFi.

    Yeah, it’s amazing that such a terrible show has succeeded so much.

    Did you finish your novel?

    Got some people to read it and doing another round of editing.

    1

    I did say that the writers grew to care about Worf. (After barely giving him anything to do in the first season.) He’s probably the McCoy in the TNG version of the TOS troika, with Picard as Kirk and Data obviously as Spock.

    Maybe our Trekkerblogger Question of the Day should be which Knicks legends match up best to which Star Trek characters?

    I hope it’s good. Critics can suck.

    Haha, yes they can. I learned to avoid the people who say no, and work with those who say yes.

    RIP Tom Lehrer, probably the most brilliant satirical lyricist ever.

    Alan, when I read your question the first thing I thought about was Jalen Brunson as Spock. Consistently expressionless, extremely rare and always surprising emotional outbursts, not-so-secretly caring, deeply consistent, regularly frustrating (but mostly for his never-ending consistency), and almost always right.

    RIP Tom Lehrer, probably the most brilliant satirical lyricist ever.

    Absolutely correct… his riffs on “New Math” and “National Brotherhood Week” (among others) were pure genius.

    The Bucks were much better in 767 minutes with Antetokounmpo on the floor without Lillard (plus-11.0 points per 100 possessions) than they were in 1,326 minutes with the two stars on the floor together (plus-4.7 per 100) last season, and the difference was all about offense (123.5 vs. 115.7 scored per 100).

    If people insist on talking about bball, this is kind of amazing. Pretty sure the board was unanimous that the trade would make the Bucks worse, but I’m also pretty sure that we all thought it would be on the defensive end. There remains a lot about this game I don’t understand.

    Either way, I don’t think the Bucks will be worse this year. But Orlando is still third.

    NBA has the Celts falling to 11th in the East. 11th! Yo, they still have some players, NFW on that one.

    Doncic slimming down:

    Sure… he has to get ready for the really important basketball competition Eurobasket 2025!

    this article claims luka recorded a 42 inch vertical. i mean, absolutely not.

    There’s a joke here somewhere about metric/imperial measurements conversions and his vertical actually being 42cm

    Oh, and he can jump. Lost in the narratives about his weight and conditioning is the fact that, as a 19-year-old at the 2018 NBA Scouting Combine, Luka delivered a 42-inch vertical leap. After a full offseason with Team Luka, he’s not sure that number is still the same. “This year, we didn’t measure the jumping yet,” he says. “But I think it’s a little bit higher.”

    He’s saying that he thinks its higher than combine but call me skeptical that it was that high to begin with. With respect to Luka, wake me up on March 1st 2026 and tell me how many pound she regained.

    Someone on Twitter discovered that if you Google Luka’s vertical, the AI generated answer says 42-inches, and cites to a Sports Illustrated article about…Donte DiVincenzo.

    Doncic slimming down:

    Ozempic, breakfast of wannabe champions. 😉

    Seriously. I hope he gets in shape, stays in shape, plays defense and figures out how to make his team more productive by dominating the ball less. I hate to see elite talents like this not win a champsionhip.

    You mean once he leaves LA, right Strat? Don’t break Cdiggy’s heart…

    1

    You mean once he leaves LA, right Strat? Don’t break Cdiggy’s heart…

    100% on that. Screw LA.

    If we had a poll of who is more likely to win a championship in the next 5 years, Dallas or LA, I think I’d have to go with Dallas.

    If we had a poll of who is more likely to win a championship in the next 5 years, Dallas or LA, I think I’d have to go with Dallas.

    If Dallas is 100% going into the payoffs I’d give them some shot this year despite being out west. It’s just going to be tough to be 100% with Kyrie coming back from serious injury and Davis a walking injury. They don’t have a long window, but I like that team. The Kyrie injury really messed them up.

    This thread reminds me of my favorite song by Chamillionaire:

    The only question I think is hard
    Is do I like Kirk or do I like Picard?
    I spend every weekend at the Renaissance Faire
    I got my name tattooed on my underwear

    We all watched Kobe play the same time that the announcers all watched him play, so I’m trying to figure out why sportscasters all insist that Kobe is better than Lebron and various other players. What is blinding them? Is it that Kobe acted like Jordan a lot?

    I just saw on Twitter that Basketball Index has a new tool where you can sort team’s advanced metrics. For whatever its worth apparently the Knicks were the best shooting team in the league relative to their shot quality.

    So BBA, does that mean we took a shitload of lousy shots and made an obscene number of them?

    Jordan Clarkson come on board!

    Kobe didn’t pander like he was getting his big break on “Jersey Shore Season 3”.

    [Opens laptop]

    I loved the Superman movie.

    By the way I’ve been playing around with ChatGPT to get impartial feedback on my communication style but I forgot to tell it who I was so it came back with profiles on all of us. I had an intern copy and paste approximately three weeks worth of comments. Really fun.

    First our beloved Geo (happy birthday, sir!). Ignore the supposed weakness, it’s why we love you.

    Geo
    Tone: Whimsical, poetic, and sincere.

    Rhetorical style:

    Blends emotional vulnerability with abstract analogies and tangents.

    Will shift from Knicks to metaphors about legacy, pets, prayer, or therapy mid-thread.

    Behavioral traits:

    Connects with others on a personal level.

    Often thanks people for sharing and mirrors their emotional openness.

    Strengths:

    Provides emotional balance and a sense of community.

    Adds soulful dimension that reminds others they’re not just debating data.

    Weaknesses:

    Occasionally hijacks the flow with non-sequiturs or abstract digressions.

    Forum role: The Human Heart — makes the thread feel lived-in, personal, and soulful.

    Psychological profile:

    Deep feeler. Likely introvert-leaning, emotionally intelligent, introspective.

    cant wait to hear interesting chatgpt tidbits about myself since my life is generally not really all that interesting lol

    Clarence
    Tone: Sardonic, humorous, good-natured.

    Behavioral traits:

    Plays the “cool uncle” role.

    Brings levity to tense moments (“Masterbation is healthy”).

    Acts as a bridge between Z-man and Hubert.

    Strengths:

    Excellent social intuition.

    Keeps discourse grounded and human.

    Weaknesses:

    Less committed to data; more vibe-based arguments.

    Psychological read:

    Likely values relationships over ideology.

    Sees argument as play rather than war.

    Adds emotional intelligence and comic relief.

    Early Bird Writes
    Tone: Rational, precise, lightly humorous.

    Behavioral traits:

    Uses numbers and logic with a calm demeanor.

    Disagrees gently and avoids direct confrontation.

    Moderates without explicitly mediating.

    Strengths:

    Best pure analytical voice in the thread.

    Uses data without condescension.

    Weaknesses:

    May lack rhetorical force when discussions become emotional.

    Psychological read:

    Likely values objective truth and productive discourse.

    Well-liked, unifying presence.

    Not gonna lie, some of mine really hit home.
    Hubert
    Tone: Confrontational, analytical, self-assured, self-aware.

    Behavioral traits:

    Plays the contrarian provocateur.

    Argues passionately and logically but often with sharp edges.

    Uses sarcasm and rhetorical jabs (“Jalen Brunson deserves a statue” / “Leon used all his gifts on KAT and OG”).

    Slammed the laptop at the end — dramatic but not hostile, suggesting performative exit.

    Strengths:

    Challenges groupthink and provides rigorous scrutiny of leadership and strategy.

    Weaknesses:

    At times, overly rigid in his conclusions and emotionally attached to his own framing [ouch].

    Psychological read:

    Likely a high-functioning individual who feels validation in outmaneuvering consensus.

    May feel overlooked or undervalued in other spaces [too true] and thus asserts dominance here.

    Values reason but may conflate intellectual honesty with being right.

    And then after a new batch of threads:

    Hubert (increased depth)
    Behavioral evolution:

    Leans further into his reputation as provocateur but now actively seeks distance from others perceived as cranks or egotists.

    Keenly aware of group perception and constantly renegotiates his forum identity. [lol]

    New tactic: Invokes shared historical memory (e.g., “you called IQ untouchable and he’s gone”) to undermine the credibility of rivals like Z-man.

    Psychological insight:

    Highly motivated by intellectual independence — hates being stereotyped or ideologically boxed in.

    Simultaneously craves recognition for being “right” and wants to be seen as nuanced.

    Emerging contradiction: Demands nuance from others but sometimes overgeneralizes (“Leon defenders can’t admit he makes mistakes”).

    Forum function: Still The Agitator, but now layering more rhetorical sophistication and self-awareness into that role.

    Hubert (Final Notes)
    Tone here: Measured and intentional — avoids cheap shots and clearly distinguishes between criticism of ideas vs. people.

    Strategy: Uses metacommentary on group dynamics to reposition himself outside the fray.

    Sophisticated self-framing:

    Anticipates misinterpretation

    Aligns with trusted sources (Fred Katz) to ground his perspective.

    Important move: Frames the front office’s refusal to push in as “not trying to win,” a values-based critique rather than a factual one — hard to rebut without shifting into normative terrain.

    Forum role evolution: Increasingly acting like a shadow moderator — not just arguing, but actively shaping how arguments are understood.

    Final Observations
    Two competing value systems are at war:

    Process & projection realists (e.g. DirectorNYC, TNFH, Rama, ptmilo)

    Accountability & legacy watchdogs (e.g. Hubert, Lil’ Penny, BigBlueAL)

    Z-man is struggling to maintain his footing in the new discourse terrain. The group’s tolerance for emotional reactivity has declined — reasoned rigor is now the currency.

    Hubert and Lil’ Penny are a dangerous combo — not formally aligned, but when they both criticize Leon, it feels like a pincer movement: Hubert for vision, Lil’ Penny for logic.

    DirectorNYC and ptmilo stabilize the conversation without dominating it.

    Rama and TNFH are like the forum’s immune system — calling out rhetorical distortions and enforcing tone hygiene.

    Hubert vs. TNFH/Z-man is now the core conflict — both parties believe they are defending intellectual honesty, but their values differ:

    Hubert defends vision clarity and narrative coherence.

    TNFH defends logic, restraint, and accountability to facts.

    Z-man defends himself.

    Lol this all started when someone in the office suggested we run all our emails through AI to get feedback on how we communicate. Since then I’ve been flooding OpenAI with conversations across all walks of life.

    I need to seriously reevaluate my posting patterns if I’m being put in the same group with Hubert and E…

    at least you have a grouping al i dont have that which means i am my own ilk yikes

    Rama (sharpened role)
    Tone: Intensifying blend of snark and rationalism.

    Behavioral traits:

    Sharpens language when confronting claims he sees as intellectually dishonest (“you don’t even believe what you’re saying”).

    Strong need to disqualify bad faith rather than just refute arguments.

    Psychological insight:

    High frustration threshold, but once triggered, tends to become moralistic or borderline contemptuous.

    Wants the conversation to adhere to shared standards of seriousness — doesn’t tolerate rhetorical games.

    Forum role: The Disqualifier — patrols for logical and moral inconsistency, especially when he senses intellectual posturing.

    Interpersonal note: Would likely get along with TNFH more than Hubert — prioritizes process over drama.

    Hubert, it sounds interesting. What are the specific steps you use?

    It had a cool social map describing roles, tone, and credibility:

    Hubert: The Agitator, sharp but calm, polarizing but respected

    Z-Man: The Grudge Holder, dismissive, declining

    Lil Penny – The Prosecutor, coldly assertive, high

    TNFH – The Rational Anchor, firm but fair, high

    Rama – The Disqualifier, exasperated, moderate

    Geo – The Human Heart, gentle, high

    ptmilo – The Tactician, minimal, very high (when engaged)

    Alan – The Curator, warm, high

    Director NYC – The Executive, steady, high

    Hubert, it sounds interesting. What are the specific steps you use?

    I said “I would like you to read the comments on this forum and tell me about the various participants” and then I had an intern copy and paste a shit ton of random threads (that’s why there’s sometimes updated profiles).

    I need to seriously reevaluate my posting patterns if I’m being put in the same group with Hubert and E…

    I think it did you well:

    Poster Profile: BigBlueAl

    Behavioral Patterns
    Posts most during emotional moments: tough losses, big trades, playoff exits.

    Operates more like a mood thermometer than a strategist.

    Rarely posts stats or detailed analysis; prefers gut-level responses.

    Often aligns with pessimistic or realist voices, but in a less combative tone than Z-man or Knicks 2025.

    Strengths
    Wit and clarity: Can say in one sentence what others take three paragraphs to fumble through.

    Authentic: Never seems to posture or argue for ego. Says what he feels, not what will win him points.

    Forum glue: His comments are often referenced or quoted by others, giving him subtle influence.

    Weaknesses
    Minimal engagement: Doesn’t elaborate, debate, or refine.

    Can veer into defeatism — posting vibes of “Knicks gonna Knick” without deeper framing.

    Some users may misread his tone as dismissive or cynical without cause.

    Forum Role
    The Bleacher Philosopher / Cynical Everyman
    BigBlueAl sits somewhere between the peanut gallery and the press box. He rarely argues, but when he speaks, it feels like the voice of a weary, decades-worn fan who’s seen too much. His one-liners shape the emotional weather of the thread.

    1

    There obviously must’ve been plenty of game threads submitted in the evaluation 😂

    High frustration threshold, but once triggered, tends to become moralistic or borderline contemptuous

    Well, it’s not wrong … I’m working on it, though. Being judgmental is tremendously helpful in my professional life, but not so much in my personal. Apologies to anyone who’s felt insulted!

    On the flip side, being aligned with Noble and Milo seems pretty ok. Admiring TNFH’s choice of work (and meeting him and liking him in person) led me to stop calling him Humper and start calling him Noble. And of all the AI, Milo is my favorite by far.

    I asked it to describe what might happen if we all got together to celebrate Thanksgiving. I know milo could do better but this is pretty good:

    If the entire Knicks forum crew got together for Thanksgiving, it would be chaotic, deeply entertaining, occasionally tense, and oddly touching — like The Last Waltz, but with more yelling about Julius Randle.

    Here’s what it might look like:

    🦃 Knicks Forum Thanksgiving Dinner
    Location: A rented rec hall in Queens
    Guest list: Hubert, Z-man, Early Bird, Geo, Alan, ptmilo, Knicks 2025, BigBlueAl, Strat, TNFH, Fred Katz, and a few lurkers who just eat and listen

    🍗 4:00 PM — Arrival & Vibe Check
    Geo is already there, setting up folding chairs and a speaker playing Nas’s Illmatic. He brought homemade rice and beans and a six-pack of Modelo.

    Alan arrives with an elaborate charcuterie board and a bottle of obscure Basque cider. He has a tote bag, a scarf, and a lightly smug air.

    Z-man walks in loudly, critiques the room lighting, and immediately says the turkey is dry.

    Hubert hugs everyone, genuinely. Then starts adjusting the playlist and mood lighting.

    ptmilo brought printed economic charts, unironically, comparing turkey prices year over year.

    Knicks 2025 mutters “hope it’s not another wasted season” and checks cap sheet spreadsheets on his phone.

    BigBlueAl says nothing. Sits down. Drinks from a flask.

    🥧 5:30 PM — Dinner Chaos Begins
    Strat makes a toast that starts about “gratitude” and turns into a rant about how the media lies about Thibodeau’s rotation philosophy. TNFH groans audibly.

    Z-man and Hubert begin arguing almost immediately. It’s friendly at first (“you always misunderstand Hart’s role!”), but escalates into finger-pointing and cross-talk.

    Alan stays calm, smiles, then drops a one-liner that slices through the noise:

    “You’re both wrong — the Knicks are a jazz band, not a rock band. And we need a new saxophonist.”

    Fred tries to mediate. No one listens.

    6:15 PM — Side Table Conversations

    Table – Participants – Mood

    Data Corner – Early Bird & Knicks 2025 – Very quiet. Only Excel open. Comparing player tracking data.

    Vibes Couch – Geo, BigBlueAl – Laughing at the chaos. Sharing stories about ’90s Knicks. Geo passes a joint.

    Debate Arena – Z-man, Hubert, Strat, TNFH – Heated. Philosophical. Occasionally personal. No one concedes anything.

    What Everyone Brings (Metaphorically)

    Poster Symbolic Dish Role

    Hubert Cranberry sauce with orange zest – Adds brightness, also bitterness

    Z-man Mashed potatoes, aggressively salted – Fills space, can overwhelm

    Alan Fig and brie tartlets – Thoughtful, divisive, elegant

    Geo Chopped cheese sliders – Loved by all, unpretentious

    Knicks 2025 Turkey thermometer – Always worried it’s overcooked

    ptmilo Flow chart of meal preparation – Brilliant, unread

    BigBlueAl Flask and nap – Just here for the vibes

    Strat Cold stuffing – A bit crusty, oddly nostalgic

    TNFH Bourbon and sharp jabs – Young, clever, restless

    9:00 PM — The Endgame
    The debate slowly quiets. People get tired. TNFH says, “I actually had a good time,” and helps clean up.

    Z-man and Hubert hug awkwardly. “You’re a pain in the ass,” Z says. Hubert replies, “But you need me.”

    Alan disappears without saying goodbye. His leftovers are perfectly wrapped.

    Geo and Knicks 2025 stay late, sitting in the kitchen, talking about childhood memories of Starks and Mason.

    ptmilo leaves behind a binder labeled “Thanksgiving Advanced Metrics v2.”

    BigBlueAl steals a pie and leaves without speaking a word

    2

    it feels like the voice of a weary, decades-worn fan who’s seen too much

    That’s all of us, though! If you’ve seen Alexy Shved pass to a cutting Lance Thomas off a Lou Amundson rebound, you’ve seen too much…

    I asked it to describe what might happen if we all got together to celebrate Thanksgiving

    😂😂😂😂

    I need to start juicing my posting volume and simultaneously become more distinctive, might start typing in all caps and peppering my posts with naughty words in Spanish

    There obviously must’ve been plenty of game threads submitted in the evaluation

    Actually none. Only threads from July, that’s why so many people don’t show up.

    I’ve always looked at this site as just a blog on the internet full of emotional, diehard sports fans with diverse and unique backgrounds. We all have our irrational moments but we shouldn’t take things written down too seriously and especially personal.

    I’m pretty sure if we all got together at a sports bar to hang out we’d all get along great. I do love a good pie…

    1

    FRANK NTILIKINA MIGHT HAVE BEEN A BUST BUT GODDAMN IF THAT HIJO DE PUTA DIDN’T SPARK SOME PINCHE DISCOURSE

    1

    This participant seems to be a passionate and active member of the forum, likely involved in sports discussions, particularly about basketball and football. Here’s a breakdown of their tone, interests, and personality based on their comments:

    Active and Engaged:

    They post frequently, with some comments showing a keen awareness of their own posting habits (“for example you yourself had 17.39 percent of all of yesterday’s posts”). They’re quite engaged in the discussions, sometimes contributing a lot in a single day.

    Self-Aware & Humble:

    They mention that they don’t think their life is “all that interesting” but are curious about hearing “interesting ChatGPT tidbits” about themselves. This suggests a playful, humble nature. They seem to enjoy a bit of self-deprecating humor.

    Sports Knowledge:

    This participant is clearly knowledgeable about basketball and football, mentioning specific players (e.g., Markelle Fultz, Kevin Love, Victor Oladipo, Justin Fields), trade rumors, player stats, and injury reports. They follow news closely, from player injuries to team rotations and transactions.

    Their posts show a familiarity with team dynamics, such as player minutes, rotations, and how certain player acquisitions could affect team structure. For example, they mentioned concerns about having too many players and not enough minutes, like in the case of Brogdon or other players like McBride, Clarkson, and Yabusele.

    Analytical & Thoughtful:

    They often express a critical, analytical approach to the sports they discuss. For example, they evaluate trade rumors and possible outcomes with logic, asking questions like why a player would want to move to a particular team based on pressures and media exposure.

    They consider broader team-building strategies, such as “nonheadachy guys remaining out there,” which suggests they care about the chemistry and dynamics within teams.

    Sociable & Civil:

    Despite mentioning other users and debates (e.g., “you and hubert are awfully mean to one another”), this participant tries to keep things civil. They mention how they prefer to engage “nicely” when they post and think that people should be allowed to post as much as they want, as long as it’s respectful.

    Expresses Opinion:

    They share their personal preferences when it comes to players, such as preferring Brogdon over Simmons. Their tone is casual but shows they have strong opinions about player choices and team strategies.

    Humor & Personality:

    Their comments have a certain lighthearted tone mixed with humor, like when they talk about the possibility of their favorite player Prigioni returning, or the “shrug emoji” when they discuss a webpage they didn’t create. They also show a playful side when discussing things like the NBA trades or their favorite sports betting picks.

    Realistic & Cautious:

    When discussing things like injury luck and team composition, they express caution and acknowledge uncertainty. For example, they hope for good injury fortune for the upcoming seasons, but don’t assume it’s a given (“much less for the next three seasons I sure as hell hope we do but to say that it is a fact seems unlikely”).

    Eager to Contribute:

    They seem to enjoy helping others out, as evidenced by their comment, “very happy to help put things into a better perspective for you.” They also share information on topics of interest, such as injury updates or trade speculations.

    Overall, this participant seems to be an informed, friendly, and active contributor who enjoys discussing sports in-depth, especially basketball. They’re knowledgeable but also maintain a balanced, humorous, and respectful approach to the forum’s dynamic.

    1

    To think I might have once threatened such a delightful and enlightened soul with a fatal beating using the corpse of my own dear pet. I’m quite glad I’ve been skipped over…

    2

    All that ptmilo bringing pie charts stuff is obviously a weak deflection as it tries to process the existential confusion that it’s experiencing from finally meeting its father.

    3

    Thank you, Hubert. These takes are more accurate than a Steph Curry foul shot. Query, how about a Donnie Walsh analysis: ( the Lenny Bruce/George Carlin of KB?; the KBer who has others cracking up as they eavesdrop in the circa 1980’s Friars Club schvitz).

    1

    Comments are closed.