Skip to the content
Iconic New York sports broadcaster Al Trautwig dies at 68 – USA TODAY
02/26/2025 10:59:40
Philadelphia 76ers vs New York Knicks Prediction and Betting Tips | Feb. 26, 2025 – Sportskeeda
02/26/2025 09:43:07
How to watch 76ers at Knicks: Jalen Brunson and New York hosting flailing Philly – The Athletic
02/26/2025 10:06:12
Knicks vs. 76ers prediction: Odds, betting advice, player prop bets for game on Wednesday Feb 26 – Sporting News
02/26/2025 08:50:01
Grizzlies vs. Knicks Preview, Stats, How to Watch | Friday, February 28 – RealGM.com
02/26/2025 09:04:08
76ers vs. Knicks: Start time, where to watch, what?s the latest – Hoops Hype
02/26/2025 08:32:59
NBA Fans React To 76ers Joel Embiid Announcement Before Knicks Game – Sports Illustrated
02/26/2025 07:09:06
NBA picks: Knicks vs. 76ers same game parlay ? Wednesday, February 26 – Sixers Wire
02/26/2025 07:20:10
Long Island Nets defeat Westchester Knicks, 119-117, but lose Dariq Whitehead – Nets Daily
02/26/2025 05:14:55
Knicks vs. 76ers NBA Game Time, TV Channel & Live Stream ? February 26 – The Associated Press
02/26/2025 05:03:00
Banged-up Karl-Anthony Towns may not play for Knicks vs. 76ers – New York Post
02/26/2025 04:46:00
Knicks host Sixers with both trying to snap slumps – KNBR
02/26/2025 04:54:18
Knicks’ Jalen Brunson tries to accentuate the positive, but the reality is that the team does have its negatives – Newsday
02/26/2025 04:20:08
Philadelphia 76ers vs New York Knicks Prediction, Bet Builder Tips & Odds – Sportsgambler.com
02/26/2025 03:53:30
Quentin Grimes Likely To Face The Knicks – NBA News | Fantasy Basketball – RotoBaller
02/26/2025 02:42:02
Nuggets Compared to Knicks in One Key Way, It’s Not a Good Thing – Athlon Sports
02/26/2025 02:50:45
Cavaliers center Jarrett Allen hurts right hand in rout of Knicks, expected to undergo MRI – New Castle News
02/26/2025 03:36:08
Knicks Have to Hope for Ugly Outcome, It Might Make Them Title Favorites – Athlon Sports
02/26/2025 02:59:46
Mitchell Robinson?s imminent return will bring ?critical? boost to Knicks – New York Post
02/26/2025 02:28:00
Tyrese Maxey Reveals Message for 76ers Before Knicks Matchup – Sports Illustrated
02/26/2025 02:20:43
115 replies on “Knicks Morning News (2025.02.26)”
Knickerblogger as an ongoing trademark dispute is an interesting development.
https://x.com/GrantAfseth/status/1894597640966607007?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1894597640966607007%7Ctwgr%5E797523fffb974a1643b811a15188bc5ea9936a86%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fforums.realgm.com%2Fboards%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ft%3D2442583start%3D60
Wonder how Anthony Davis felt sitting on the bench listening to that
https://x.com/DJAceNBA/status/1894557452525252799 the Knicks need to shoot way more threes.
up in the morning before the break of day, I don’t like it no way…
thinking of jules winnfield and how his partner was a vegetarian, so then he was…
can’t wait for later and us stomping on the lifeless corpse of the philadelphia 76’s…
totally meaningless game that I hope to thoroughly enjoy…let’s take a break from measuring ourselves against the top clubs for a while…
Lil’ Pennysays:
February 25, 2025 at 14:05
I fear some kind of “deterrence” idea embedded in the Wemby “challenge,” but let me deter you from that by pointing you to the fact that Golden State has led the league (by a lot over even the number two) in lowest percentage of shots allowed at the rim each of the last two years, and is last in the same category from 3-10 feet this year. Golden State prevents teams who are challenging the rim area from getting to the rim area.
Keeping teams from where they want to go and away from the rim is a critical defensive skill. (*) It has little to do with the fact that teams are “scared” to go in there. Teams get to the rim against the Knicks because they can, not because it’s so juicy once they get there — which it isn’t, because if it was, teams wouldn’t be shooting the fifth lowest percentage in the league once they get there.
yeah none of this is right. the chase center score keeper has a well known bias that makes both teams’ restricted area stats look lower than they are (counted as 4-10 foot shots instead) going back several years. they don’t have a magical way of turning rim attempts into 8 footers. it’s obvious from the home/road splits, but also from comparing the website listed distances to the newer tracking data like sportvu. the biggest thing by far that has made the warriors’ defense what it has been is draymond. since kerr arrived the warriors have allowed 106.62 per 100 with dray on. the best team in the nba over that span allowed 107.48. in 40K possessions without dray, they’ve allowed 112.1 / 100, which is a point worse than average. on the road without dray over that period, they also below average at rim FGM per 100.
https://nbacouchside.net/2022/08/01/nba-court-factors-adjusting-shot-location-data-for-scorekeeper-bias/
https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/1axdj0v/oc_the_chase_center_has_a_tracking_problem_the/
and yes, shot blockers and positional rim protectors do deter rim attempts. that is a sentence that had to be written.
The 76ers have all but thrown in the towel on their injury riddled season. They’ve lost 8 in row. Why do I get the feeling Maxey is going to go for 35, Oubre 20 and Grimes is going to lock someone down?
RJ had 22 points last night. IQ had 10.
Mark Williams, who the Lakers say is too injured to take on as someone playable over Jaxson Hayes, had 12 points and 12 rebounds with 3 blocks. Wish Mitchell Robinson was only as injured as that.
So Draymond Green is good on defense? Do I have that right?
No, they built the right scheme around him.
I have the impression that Mikal injuring himself lightly and losing a game/chance for consecutive appearances record would make him play for wins instead of playing to set the iron man record.
An ankle sprain could be beneficial here!
I’m not sure I’m buying anything the Knicks are selling when it comes to Towns/Mitch.
IMO
The way things shook out with I-Hart and with Mitch being hurt they knew they needed a starting C.
They were not fully satisfied with Mitch as the starting C longer term because of his limitations on offense, FT shooting and injury history. If they could use him as a trade chip were open to that.
They looked around to see who was available at starting C and at what price. They knew Towns was a potential issue on defense at C, but felt they could mitigate that with OG, Mikal and Hart defending. So they made that value plus trade.
Just like Minny and the rest of us, they saw that Towns at C was a bigger problem than they hoped for. That changed the thinking on Mitch. His value to the team went up.
Now Thibs is talking like Mitch was always the starting C and this was always the plan?
Not buying it.
Yeah, I just found out, too.
wait milo, are you saying now we can’t even trust the stats because of human data collection error…
okay then, where is the truth to be found…
are strat’s spreadsheets the only true source for pure data…
Yes, but he has no capacity to stop a player six feet from the rim from getting to three feet from the rim. No player does. It’s all just random.
Unless you have a “rim protector” (TM) in which case teams don’t go to three feet from the rim because they’re scared, in which case it doesn’t matter if you have Draymond Green covering the screen/roll 15 feet from the rim, or Karl-Anthony Towns.
Or something something.
Bringing in Town was a two birds thing if they couldn’t find a stopgap measure or a replacement for Mitch while he was out. They decided not to make a trade while Mitch’s value was depressed and figured they had enough on the court to get them to now.
Thibs did not say this was always the plan only that he has not had a starting center all year because the one the front office gave him is finally just about ready to lace em up.
Hope the Big Kahuna burger and tasty beverage are working for your breakfast, geo.
All of these stats that rely on human observation and discretion, right down to assists have, as a result of such reliance, built in noise and flexibility. The metrics that have them as inputs are even more inherently noisy and flexible.
what’s up KYN…what’s good in greece…
how are the kittys and your 3 pointer doing?
In Thibs’s mind it absolutely always was the plan. Mitch has always been the “starting center” there. Which is why he never changed the game plan out of things like drop coverage by the 5. There’s no evidence he even possesses a set of defensive sets, movements, and principles that incorporate anything but that.
Thibs has never mentally been on board with the five-out, bad “rim protection” idea. Not for a single second. He’s ecstatic to be going back to “Moneyball” — my definition, which goes far beyond offensive rebounding. (There are a whole bunch of 2022-23 posts about said definition.)
So..given all the talk about how our Knicks aren’t even close to the top 3 teams in the league, we need to get back on track to getting closer to them. And that starts with doing our job and beating the teams we’re supposed to beat while keeping them at arm’s length all game. No more OT games against the Bulls or Hawks. No more one possession games against the Raptors(who should be easier for us to defend since they don’t shoot 3’s well). A good start would be handling the broken Sixers tonight. Embiid is out, PG hasn’t been himself, and Maxey has been Hella erratic this season- though he’s still a problem. Something’s got to give as we approach the playoffs. Regardless of how good of defenders KAT and Brunson are perceived to be(I think Brunson’s better than he gets credit for because he’s not a ball hawk or lock down POA defender), the guys just can’t forget to play defense as often as they do. Maybe Mitch returning will help with the way he communicates and rebounds, but these guys have got to remember who the coach is and take pride in playing defense every possession. Sometimes all it takes is consistent efford to get better. As much as I love this team with KAT’s ’emergence, they frustrate the hell out of me sometimes. And come April, there will be no room for ‘looking at the bright side of things’.
ptmilo,
That was very interesting.
I knew there was a subjective element to assists. I even disagree with an occasional official stat on who deserved the steal or TO, but I thought they’d be more accurate with shot location data.
Unless you are obsessed with this kind of statistical data or employed to do the work, you are rarely going to pick up on stuff like that. That makes it hard to trust anything you “think” when you can’t be sure the data is even accurate.
Hi geo!
Kittys are now just 2/Unfortunately Lost one during last summer…and 3p exercise turned to gym.
How are u ? Been to any good concerts?
great E, now i get to worry about AI hallucinating and tripping balls off of inherently corrupt human data…
there is no hope…
I didn’t. Even less so about what an “open” shot is.
This data and the metrics dependent on it give us at best an idea about relative performance, around something akin to a wide confidence interval. Saying Player X is 80th in them and Player Y is 90th so therefore Player X is better is senseless.
It’s not physics, it’s Galileo/Copernicus level astronomy.
awwwww shoot, sorry to hear you lost one KYN…
things are good here, just trying not to fuck up being a: dad, son, brother, partner and dog owner…
sometimes I think it may have been easier locked in and just grinding away at work…
maybe not…
not much in the way of music going…saw a magic show a while back which was cool…feeling like a trip to Vegas to go catch one of the cirque du soleil shows…
I get the sentiment but I don’t agree with any of this. Just get healthy and stay healthy. Play the bench. Lose to shit teams because you didn’t try hard. It’s totally fine.
🙂
Horse racing has way worse data problems than basketball. They can’t even time the races correctly yet.
My views on basketball and racing are similar even though I do way more work on the latter.
I’m not always sure how accurate my data is or how to weigh all the factors. Despite that I am willing to gamble on whatever state of ignorance I am in at the time because I occasionally feel like I know something that everyone else hasn’t caught on to yet. That’s getting rarer and rarer.
Right, opposing teams taking 25% of their shots at the rim vs 31% at the rim when Gobert is on/off the floor is just a coincidence.
I’ve been hearing for years that Draymond Green is good at defense, and it has always sounded odd to me. But I also realize that there are different types and definitions of “defense.”
#things are good here, just trying not to fuck up being a: dad, son, brother, partner and dog owner…#
“Slightly” paraphrasing funkadelic I’d say:
Watch your health and the rest will follow!
PG: Jalen Brunson
SG: Mikal Bridges
SF: OG Anunoby
PF: Karl-Anthony Towns
C: Mitchell Robinson
or
PG: Jalen Brunson
SG: Josh Hart
SF: OG Anunoby
PF: Karl-Anthony Towns
C: Mitchell Robinson
This one gets us back to dominating the boards on both sides and leaves Mikal Bridges as the #1 option on the bench and probably the best 6th man in the NBA!
I’m not sure which of those two starting lineups is better or which scenario would work out better overall, but I was discussing it with someone that suggested one could be better overall but the other better to close with. That’s another interesting thought.
Already happening ….
Good D means making your opponent try harder on every possession.
It heavily depends on energy and proper positioning.
Just by looking at KAT and Brunson you already know that they re lazy mfkrs who mostly care about scoring.
Their bodies are yelling!
Otoh Boston players are gym freaks.
You need a miracle to beat that
Believing that players don’t vary in their defensive ability to prevent offensive players from getting to different spots on the floor that they may want to go is truly one of the dumbest ideas ever posted on KB. It’s entirely beneath the place.
It bespeaks a data marination that has invaded the interstices of the brain, to potentially fatal effect.
I dunno..maybe you’re right. It’s just that the JVG teams always stayed connected on defense, and even the lesser defenders didn’t look so bad. When I watch games, these are the types of things I yell out too often:
“GET UP ON HIM- HE CAN’T FUCKIN DRIBBLE!!”
“WHYYYYY THE FUCK IS THERE SO MUCH OPEN SPACE ON THE SHOOTER’S SIDE??”
“KAT YOU NEED TO DROP NEOWWW”
And a bonus one for the offense:
“THERE IS NO SHOT BLOCKER AND HE CAN’T GUARD YOU! IF YOU DON’T TAKE HIS ASS TO THE RACK!!”
LOL my household thinks I’m crazy cuz I haven’t played basketball in a very long time but I act like I’m a coach or some shit.
I like B, then I like trading Bridges in the offseason for a backup C and a rotation wing (psst… Nico Harrison… wouldn’t you like to give us Max Christie, Dan Gafford, and some picks?).
This summer feels like a big organizational fork in the road. Are we going to pivot and recommit to Thibs-ball the way we did after the Kemba/Fournier season? Or do we like KAT at the 5 so much that we move on from Thibs and trade Mitch for pieces that support that structure? I imagine the playoffs will provide the answer.
I do think Bridges without Brunson and Towns might be a little more in his element. That said, the best version of Bridges was in Pho I think, where he was decidedly a third banana.
If it wasn’t clear, I am Team PT on both difficult issues, whether Dray is good on defense and whether rim protection matters.
I’d really just like to see Mitch back. Might still be my favorite Knick if he could actually play.
The Spurs are 25th in the league in percentage of FG attempts at the rim. No one is “scared” of going in there.
They’re second best at percentage of makes allowed once opponents get there get there — that’s probably mostly the Wemby effect. (The Knicks are fifth best, after two years of second and third.)
Karl-Anthony Towns is a poor defender primarily because of what he does out on the perimeter, not what he does at the rim.
Because it is. One look at Sportrac is a dead giveaway. They have to decide whether to extend a guy who’s been a massive disappointment and avoid the sunk cost fallacy. Tough to navigate.
“I imagine the playoffs will provide the answer.”
Pretty much, yeah.
I imagine the playoffs will provide the answer.
Agree, but my nightmare is that in the playoff 4th quarters, KAT is unplayable because of his defensive woes and Mitch is unplayable because of his FT woes.
I’m definitely not opposed to moving on from Thibs but who are we replacing him with? I’ve wanted Atkinson since before Thibs was hired but he’s in Cleveland now. Not a fan of Jay Wright and it doesn’t appear he’s all that interested in the NBA. Budenholzer and Nurse are probably going to be available this summer.
Wemby opponent rim shot frequency on/off: 28.6% on / 34.4% off
The idea of “Moneyball” in a salary capped league is not something I can say I fully understand. The whole concept of Moneyball was about teams with less in the way of financial resources trying to compete by squeezing lots of value out of undervalued players. I’m trying to parse out what this means in this current context and I feel like the meme where the lady is looking at the math equation in a confused manner.
Moneyball is… offensive rebounds? Playing drop coverage? Related to hustlebunny-ism in some way? I feel I kind of speak fluent E and this one still has me perplexed. Moneyball. Moneyball? There’s a salary cap.
It means E has no concept of what Moneyball is or means because he thinks that:
1. Moneyball failed and that MLB teams left those concepts behind
2. David Eckstein was a Moneyball player
Raw on-off numbers are stupid, but in any event Wemby and Gobert are also good at not letting people get to the rim in the first place. Neither of them play defense by standing in a semi-circle with a three-foot diameter.
This shouldn’t really surprise anyone — they’re both excellent defenders.
potential monkey wrenches
A bunch of electrons were spilled on this a couple years ago, but to try to summarize again — which probably won’t do it justice — “Moneyball” in this context is doing a bunch of things the other teams don’t really do, as opposed to just getting better players than the other teams.
It includes among other things, yes, building your team around offensive rebounds and “rim protection,” but also goes to things like squeezing out wins because the other teams don’t bother preparing for your unique tendencies in the middle of a long, cold regular season and playing every regular season game like its Game 7.
That in turn, shapes the roster and playing time decisions the coach makes — which we’re seeing again. We never really got into the purest version of the idea, which is whether players who do the “Moneyball” things are available more cheaply in the marketplace. That’s certainly possible.
Thibs isn’t getting fired, naturally, but I was sent a list of odds for the next NBA coaches to be fired, and Thibs is in a weird spot…
Jamahl Mosley 100/1
JJ Redick 100/1
Ime Udoka 100/1
Taylor Jenkins 100/1
Erik Spoelstra 100/1
J.B. Bickerstaff 100/1
Tom Thibodeau 100/1
Steve Kerr 125/1
Joe Mazzulla 150/1
Mark Daigneault 250/1
Kenny Atkinson 250/1
Gregg Popovich 500/1
Thibs isn’t being fired, of course, but how do they even come up with some of these odds? None of these dudes are going to be fired! You could make it 1000/1 and it would be a bad bet.
With NYK settling into third seed and Detroit locking in the 6th seed, the 1st round match up is being revealed.
How cool is it that after Knicks send them fishing via a gentleman’s sweep, Leon takes their 1st round pick too?
That’s a first round knockout.
Okay well that at least does make sense. Thank you for that definition, no shade.
I think the team Leon has assembled here is actually kind of an anti-Moneyball team. It’s a starfucker sort of team. Get big names that everybody knows. Mikal Bridges. Karl Anthony-Towns. Those guys are famous, well known players. The team doesn’t really rely on offensive rebounding, instead racking up a high offensive rating mostly through high eFG%. Obviously rim protection or “rim protection” wasn’t much of a concern when KAT was acquired. At least one player seems to have been acquired at great cost because he played on a prominent college team with some of the other guys and it’s a cute story.
It’s like a very good Isiah Thomas team. Emphasis on pointzz and big names. Fit and defense are secondary concerns. The only thing about this team that seems unconventional and that fits E’s definition of Moneyball is the minutes distribution. In most other ways we’re a pretty conventional team.
Leon traded the pick away. Minnesota should enjoy it though.
Don’t know about moneyball but feel that if Mitch and Kat don’t match like a two piece necklace this season we’re gonna be fucked like a bunny hole during the Playoffs!!!!
Leon traded the pick away. Minnesota should enjoy it though.
No way…this cant be true
Yep. The hope was that it would work out and that Thibs would therefore be highly disinclined to go back to “Moneyball” — but it hasn’t. (I consider the shift away from modernity to Mitch, offensive rebounding, a clogged lane and “rim protection” to be that, others’ mileage may vary.)
I’m glad you mentioned Isiah because I’ve wanted to say this for a few days and have held off, but now I’m going to say it:
If Leon maxes Mikal this summer, he be dead square in Isiah territory.
Guess I’ll just repeat it: the Knicks are 19th in the league in DFG% on opposing shots from under 6 feet, and 20th if you measure it by DFG% – average FG%.
I haven’t followed this argument closely enough to understand what exactly E is trying to argue, but the idea that the 2024-2025 Knicks are good, or even not bad, at rim protection is obviously false.
I imagine E’s use of “rim protection” in quotations like that led to many possible interpretations, and I don’t know if my mine was the correct one after reading everything else he had to say.
But it should be clear that there is no “team” that opposes the idea that rim protection is important or that Draymond Green is a great rim protectors of all time.
I am of the opinion that Thibs uses players who are not actually good at protecting the rim (players like KAT and Jericho Sims) as his “rim protector” because he is fixed on the idea that you need someone close to 7 feet tall to protect the rim (or Taj Gibson).
For almost 5 years I’ve been lamenting Thibs’ unwillingness to experiment with small lineups, and I have consistently used defenses built around Draymond Green, Bam Adebayo, and Aaron Gordon as the examples of how you can protect the rim effectively without a 7 footer playing drop.
I would like to see Thibs explore developing something unique with a defensive maestro like OG Anunoby (who seems to contest as many shots as is humanly possible) and Josh Hart (who has the league’s best motor), but it’s too revolutionary for him.
This team just needs the three rookies to develop into elite bench pieces over next two years. When combined with Deuce, Josh Hart + 1 vet minimum, – it could be back to bench mob 2.0 + an elite starting five.
Leon can never be in Isiah territory because he has already assembled some good teams. Isiah’s teams all stunk beyond comprehension. Isaiah took a team assembled by Scott Layden and somehow made it WORSE.
That is an impressive achievement in suck that cannot be dismissed lightly.
56-108 v 215-156. Mismo mismo
#and I have consistently used defenses built around Draymond Green, Bam Adebayo, and Aaron Gordon as the examples of how you can protect the rim effectively without a 7 footer#
Bubble Finals between MIA and LAL showed us the opposite man.
ADavis and LeBron had their time of their lives dancing dirty over Bam’s head….
I literally have no idea what the fuck that means (I know what “mismo” means), in context. Are those supposed to be scores of something? Regardless, they don’t seem to be the same at all, especially since one appears to be a win and the other appears to be a loss.
JVG is an interesting comparison to Thibs because I think they are both geniuses on the subject of defense but Van Gundy has an open-mindedness and appetite for risk that Thibs sorely lacks.
Like yesterday Clarence asked me if I thought Thibs wouldn’t build a defense around Draymond Green. Of course today he would. It’s known to work.
But in 2014, back when Draymond was a 23 year old small forward? I think there’s no way Thibs would have had the temerity to break the NBA’s mold. That’s not his thing.
Not being tall and protecting the rim is definitely brave and admirable.
But making it look normal and piece of cake ain’t exactly the case.
You need special talent to do it AND a Tough team to back you up while doing it.
Otherwise it turns into a Party in the Paint for the opponents pretty quickly.
Wait, Sims was lacking in a lot of areas, but rim protection was definitely not one of them:
https://craftednba.com/player-traits/rim-defense
https://nypost.com/2024/12/02/sports/jericho-sims-is-knicks-under-the-radar-defensive-juggernaut/
Personally, I’d much prefer him being out there while the Luke Kornets of the world are on the floor. Sure, you’re not getting much on offence, but his defensive IQ, switching etc is significantly better than KAT, Precious, or Huk.
But I hold out hope that Huk will improve over the next few years on offence and defence. And that Jericho will get some PT with the Bucks
I asked that because you suggested that all Thibs like to do is play the tall guy who gets blocks at center… Thibs is definitely not a dummy. He does hew very closely to the craft he has learned and not the one he could be imagining so far in his noteworthy career as an NBA head coach.
In fairness, I think Thibs yells those things, too! In fact I’m pretty sure I’ve heard him scream that last one many times.
There’s 13 years of data that suggests it. And the tall guy doesn’t even need to get blocks.
Thibs is a genius. But he doesn’t seem to be flexible or open minded.
Thibs is not a dummy; he’s a tried and true gound and pound guy…but he’s not a creative genius either.
“Isiah’s teams all stunk beyond comprehension.”
Hold it. I saw the Amare signing press conference when Donnie Walsh (the real one) thanked Isiah. And that team made the playoffs!
Uh, I don’t know, man.
“Mitchell Robinson is our starting center” may have been the first sign of an organizational rift.
Results won’t get him fired, but if Leon and Thibs have a different vision of the future, that will do it.
Speaking of coaches, how crazy is it that JB Biggerstaff has gone from being ridiculed for being totally outcoached by Thibs in the 2023 playoffs to a leading candidate for Coach of the Year with the Pistons?
And in the meantime Coach Budz’ reputation is at an all time low, if the Suns can him I can’t see him getting another coaching job.
I agree with the sentiment that Thibs never would have tried Draymond at the 5. And he never will try OG there either. Or some other innovative concept to take advantage of OG’s ability. I mean we’ve never even seen a zone. Like not for minute. Doesn’t Miami play the most zone in the league?
“Biggerstaff” reminds me of Clarence’s newest screen name.
How crazy is it that Frank Layden was Hubie Brown’s college roommate, and they’re both still alive!?!
can we get either of them to replace thibs?
Thibs isn’t getting fired this year unless something crazy happens but I could definitely see it happening next year if we don’t improve.
And how crazy is it that Bickerstaff leaves a team and they immediately take a leap forward and joins another team and they immediately take a leap forward. Coaching may be overrated but hearing a new voice may not be.
What Isiah did to the Knicks was incredible. What he did, apparently behind the scenes, to the Suns, makes him fucking legendary.
The idea that Durant, Beal, and Booker was a good idea is still one of the most batshit things ever to happen in the NBA.
I don’t really understand the argument we are having here and I am not sure I care enough to parse it. If it’s simply that Thibs needs to coach better, you know, whatever. That’s fine. I probably don’t disagree.
But I don’t think there is a coach who could make Towns and Brunson into anything even mediocre on defense.
Despite being a Thibs supporter on his knicks tenure i find him this season quite soft and still expect him to push this roster to go D-Mode All in.
I maybe fooling myself but i feel that a Thibs team wo D intensity is either forced by the FO or Not Yet fully working.
Thibs’ teams in Minnesota — which have a big link in common to this year’s Knicks’ squad — were also great on offense and terrible on defense. (I think even after Jimmy Buckets arrived, right?) His genius on that end is at least somewhat roster-dependent, though he was able to build some excellent defenses here despite giving big minutes to defensively-challenged players like Julius, RJ, and Jalen.
I am quite sure the happiest I will be today is when I opened that link from antipioneer and saw that Taj Gibson and Jericho Sims were third and fourth, ahead of Wemby, Gafford, Isaac, AD, Kessler, etc.
I’m not entirely sure what they were third and fourth in, but I don’t even care.
These teams had Mitch and iHart. This is why pinning our hopes on the return of Mitch is not that far fetched.
Defensive Rating ranking of the Knicks under Thibs:
22nd (woof)
10th
19th
11th
3rd
That’s not exactly a spectacular run of defense. The year where we finished 3rd was the famous ISM year in which opponents seemed to miss a lot of open shots. But whatever, throw that in the average.
On average we’ve ranked 13th in defensive rating since he’s been here. Large sample size.
I think his reputation as a defensive genius is wildly overrated. Maybe those teams punched a little bit above their weight in terms of defensive performance, but you have to squint really really hard to pretend like he’s a major difference maker on that end.
Wouldn’t call him defensive Genius but I’d definitely put him on the D-Oriented coaches of this league.
And when a D-Oriented coach doesn’t care much about D something’s not exactly right imo
Genius and efficacy aren’t always entwined.
Thibs is still living off his reputation as Doc’s defensive coach in 2008 and, most importantly, the Bulls’ great defenses between 2010-11 and 2013-14. The Bulls’ defense faded to 11th overall in his last year, as the three-point and anti-physical-defense revolutions really took hold, and his defenses have been meh ever since in both Minnesota and here.
Twenty-seventh in both of his full seasons in Minny and the data JK posted about his time here that isn’t really that good even with the lucky outlier empty building year.
The game has passed his defensive concepts by. He’s made a lot of bank on his reputation so he guards it very closely, but now that consists mostly of talking up defense and showily benching Kemba Walker because of defense, and making sure everyone knows how very, very importantly he takes defense and how the magic is in the work and look how very, very hard I work and you better damn right believe Tom Thibodeau thinks defense is important says Tom Thibodeau — but there’s really not much substantively there anymore.
I don’t think Thibs is a genius. I think he’s the hardest working dude in the business, massively prepared. He married his job (as did I until I met Lady Raven). You can be hugely prepared if you have zero other distractions.
I tend to put genius and creativity together. Thibs is not ‘not’ creative, but he’s also slow to change if something he institutes is mostly winning him games (which is not only his goal, but a major part of how he is measured professionally).
I respect Thibs. He’s very good at his job. And he has warts that are irritating as fuck. But every coach has warts, I’d argue, so if we switch him out it’s unclear if the new coach’s warts will end up leading to a better or worse team outcome.
#and his defenses have been meh ever since in both Minnesota and here.#
Calling his defenses here *meh* considering the motley crew rosters that he used is at least…unfair.
They do, but they don’t do it very much. They play zone around 10% of the time now and they peaked a couple years ago in the low 20s
He had the “rim protector” nonpareil in Joakim Noah and has been chasing that ever since, to little avail.
Yeah, I don’t really think of Thibs as some kind of Belichikian defensive coach. He gets players to give 100% and they seem to like him. I feel like that’s kind of the extent of what I think his impact is as a coach. And he plays his starters too many minutes.
I am not buying Jericho Sims, defensive centerpiece.
Fair points, Raven. I’ll change it to something like Thibs’ basketball knowledge is extreme.
Yeah that was small sample theater. There’s no way we would have traded him if he was actually that good.
Thibs is a pusher. (Tennis, not drugs.)
In the decade or so since Thibs ground Joakim’s joints to dust, the other coaches in the league have learned to shoot over the top of the Joakims of the world and protect the rim very well without them.
Nevertheless, Thibs persisted.
He lives: Kevin Knox had 12/5/3 (2-of-3 from 2 and 2-of-4 from 3) in 15 minutes off the Warriors bench last night.
I can’t believe we just gave him away for that hustlebunny Josh Hart!
Damn, guess we should just fire Thibs then. He obviously sucks.
Sorry, Joakim Noah is bad because what now?
Laugh of the day! Thanks I really needed that. My next option was to start drinking early.
I’m not sure what’s more impressive. Is it Isiah’s sucktitude or his ability to still convince people he knows what he’s doing when it comes to building teams? There are about 200 regulars here that could easily outperform him. Some of us would do it for free. Hell, I’d pay just to have my name and the title of Special Adviser to the Suns on a legit business card to use as bragging rights when I’m at the bar. I might even get an age appropriate woman to talk to me. 😉 Alright, maybe that’s pressing it.
I’ve been reading some of this rim protector debate.
When I think of “rim protector” my default mental profile is a guy that hangs around the rim and blocks and alters a lot of shots. Many good points were made that there’s more to rim protection than that. I don’t think anyone would disagree with that. So I think the debate has been more about definition and communication with each other than differences of opinion about basketball – other than maybe the debate on what the stats do or do not show about the Knicks and Draymond.
Suns big three has not been worse that Philly’s big three this year. Thats a different level of suck with three max contracts and an MVP. Is it?
It definitively reminds me of Brooklyn’s Pierce, KG, Joe Johnson, Deron Williams and Brook Lopez mismatch roster though.
I think that’s why he was played ahead of Huk and started sometimes for Thibs. Huk probably has better long term potential, but my general impression is that we have worse plus minus in Huk‘s minutes than we did with Sims. I’ve looked at some box scores and it seems like Sims is having good plus minus results with Milwaukee too.
Sims is serviceable on defense but is a complete non-entity on offense to the degree that it makes him a break-in-case-of-emergency tier backup at best.
That’s why Hukporti has more potential.
Maybe we shouldn’t have let Johnnie Bryant go. He’s got the Cavs January knicksing all year long.
Johnnie Bryant is good, but I’m not sure that he’s the “secret sauce” behind the Cavs right now. Could be wrong. They’ve done some great GMing there lately, too.
And now deep thoughts…
Have fun with those…….
Sometimes I think about changing my drag name from Dicksy Chick to Chicksy Dick (if I were a drag queen) but then I think about other things.
—
There was a drag performer in Boston back in the day named Dyke Van Dick, which I must admit is pretty excellent
That’s a good one. I have eclectic drag tastes. I very much like the writings and stylings of Dina Martina atm. Catch her.
https://sny.tv/articles/mitchell-robinson-tj-warren-rknicks
1) sure seems like Warren is getting our 15th spot, which is probably for the best to the extent this matters.
2) sounds like Mitch will be back this weekend. Let’s see how this goes.
This site uses User Verification plugin to reduce spam. See how your comment data is processed.