News & Blogs
Knicks’ Karl-Anthony Towns: Iffy for Friday – CBS Sports
Knicks Bulletin: ‘Jordy McClarkson’ – Posting & Toasting
Mike Brown explains Knicks’ three areas of concern after loss to Lakers – SNY
Knicks’ Josh Hart: Iffy for Friday – CBS Sports
Knicks’ offense wakes up too late as they fall to Clippers on second night of back-to-back – SNY
I don’t know how to feel about Bam Adebayo’s 83-point game – Posting & Toasting
Knicks Beat Pacers To Wrap Up Long Road Trip | Post Game Show EP 708 – Knicks Fan TV
Knicks at Pacers – Recap & Reaction | POSTGAME SHOW | Knicks Film School – Knicks Film School
KNICKS at PACERS | FULL GAME HIGHLIGHTS | March 13, 2026 – NBA
YT News
53 replies on “Knicks Morning News (2026.03.14)”
Mitch is getting his flowers and as I alluded to, it’s a bit bittersweet for long time stans.
It’s clear what’s going to happen in the offseason.
Just going to enjoy him while I can.
And certainly enjoy not losing to the Pacers for once.
Mitch has always seemed like kind of a novelty act to me. I’m not gonna get all hot and bothered about a superb game against a tanking team missing its two best players, but will admit that when he gets it going and becomes a 1-man wrecking crew on the boards, he is a lot of fun to watch, especially when he has 0 FTA.
I certainly enjoy the Mitch Freak Show at $15M AAV way more than the KAT Follies at $60M AAV, but count me in among those who will not miss his many glaring flaws when he is gone.
I love Mitch but you can’t pay a guy that amount who can only play in half the games and shoots 35% from the foul line. Huk isn’t the answer either. I hope they keep Mitch at something reasonable.
If you ask me, if it wasn’t for Mitch the Knicks would be still be in the “avoid the play in” battle. He was cleary worth a few games compared to last year.
Guys, focus, there will be time to think about the offseason. 😛
The question now is are we ready to fight for a place in the Finals? I think we are, but Brunson needs to rest, he’s clearly tired of the long season and we need him to be at his best in the playoffs.
I love Mitch, but without him the Knicks being a play-in team is hilarious.
We barely beat two teams aggressively trying to lose. No one gets any flowers!
Look at the standings, subtract a few wins and then get back to me. If you don’t think Mitch’s OREBs leading to extra shots (especially made 3s) and his defense accounts for a few wins, then you don’t understand how to value him on a team with several very good scorers that just needs boards and defense from him.
I don’t think it’s out of the question that he will be back next year. His market might not be robust, and assuming the Knicks don’t trade for Giannis (unlikely), they might as well go into the second apron.
Mitch has only played 950 or so minutes but they’ve been some massively impactful minutes. Even at the limited minutes he’s easily one of the most impactful bang-for-buck players on the roster.
He’s not gonna be replaced so easily.
Good morning/afternoon, all! There are very few players on our roster that I would want to lose in a getting-old-quickly, only-good-for-60-games-per-season Giannis trade, and Mitch is definitely among them.
Ready for someone to point out that Mitch also only plays 60 games per season, but when Giannis does it these days it’s because he’s actually injured. When his team was in the playoffs, he missed the past several years of them because he was injured. If he’s never around for the playoffs, then what good is he?
Obviously Mitch’s Bird rights make it all the more difficult to think about replacing him. For me, it will all come down to what he does in the playoffs. Playing 31 healthy, destructive minutes last night was a great sign. Maybe we’ll finally see the version of Mitch we all hoped for.
But anything short of peak Mitch being fully available in these playoffs and I’m officially out on him. There should be some very good defensive bigs to nab in the 20’s in this supposedly loaded draft.
Mitch pretty much won the Cleveland series a few years ago by himself, and we don’t win against Boston last year without him.
If the rumors about Isaiah Hartenstein being available from OKC are true I would take him as a Mitch replacement. But cyber is right, focus should be on this season.
Glad Clarkson is providing some solid minutes the past few games, especially with Bridges going MIA, but still think he needs to ride the bench during the playoffs. He’s too much of a cone on defense and is still liable for a dumb shot on offense. But kudos to being a pro and staying ready
Yeah, no, I usually agree with Z-Man but not on this one, you don’t replace what Mitch brings with a big in the 20s. Even the best rookie bigs normally take a year, even two, of seasoning to stop fouling and being out of position on D, much less learning all the really subtle parts of the role. Wemby being a bit of an outlier (but even he took a few months…).
This is certainly a hot take, but outside of Wemby and Joker, and on the odd days when Embiid is functional, I’m not sure there’s a center with greater on-the-floor impact than Mitch right now. Watching people turning away and refusing to go to the hole when he’s in there is a weird visceral thrill. Not to mention watching him pluck rebounds like he’s picking apples with a third-grade class.
We’re a win-now team, so I don’t think you can realistically count on just replacing Mitch with a defensive big that you draft at 26 overall. Our window of contention doesn’t seem to be very wide.
I’d love to have Hartenstein back though if that’s a thing.
Clarkson might be useful in the playoffs if a game is going sideways and no player is getting points, as a microwave scorer off the bench to get things going, and then sit him as quick as you can because like you say he’ll start doing dumb stuff if he stays on the floor too much time. But yeah, if you need to do that in a playoff game, you’ll probably lose, let’s put it in the desperation options available. LOL. And although i’m not saying that i think MB is doing a great job, one area where i think he’s being really good is at giving time to everybody and getting everybody ready for the playoffs. Well, as much as he can get them ready of course, dumb players will still be dumb. 😛
Congrats on the music, JK. 😉 Yesterday i didn’t catch it in time to reply.
Yeah, me too. I just don’t think it is possible given our cap situation.
Clarkson does only one thing relatively well, and that’s a 5-10-foot floater. He’s made some splashy threes but is shooting at 33.7%, which is terrible, and right around his career rate. He’s a decent passer but doesn’t much, instead putting his head down and driving into traffic to try and often fail to get off his floater. And his defense is excretable.
Would love to see Deuce back and able.
Definitely with Strat and others on Mitch. I dont think the impact of defense, shot blocking and offensive rebounds are ever fully credited. If there were a stat for team demoralizition, those aspects would captured. They are almost the opposite of turnovers, demoralizing in the opposite way. I also just love watching him play.
“Mitch pretty much won the Cleveland series a few years ago by himself, and we don’t win against Boston last year without him.”
By that logic, Mitch lost us the Miami series and both Indiana series. Not to mention that he was so-so at best in the Boston series and had very little to do with why we won the series compared to the rest of our rotation players.
Every perennial contending team has a bench player or two that steps up in a particular series. Those kinds of players are eminently findable.
OKC might dump Hartenstein partially because they have Jaylin Williams — a big who can now defend well in space and shoot threes at a very good clip. Next to Chet, that’s enough rim protection in a real 5-out lineup.
We all love Mitch, but that’s where teams are trending, and I’m sure we would too if we could.
You guys think these guys are fragile. He will have 6 complete days off between the end of the regular season and the first round. he could get a weekend in Aruba and then come back for 3 days of practice, FFS
The only important thing is not to put Thibs like 44 minutes on anyone from here to the end of the season. If anyone turns an ankle the last week of the season after playing 33 minutes the previous night, its just bad luck.
“Those kinds of players are eminently findable.”
Gee, not in my experience. Just recently the Knicks got Yabu, Clarkson, Sochan, and Jose. They all looked eminently findable (and were), but turned out to be utter trash and largely unplayable, with only Jose seemingly able to find a role due to his ability to dribble and be a pest (sure would be nice if he could, you know, shoot).
Seems “players off the scrap heap” are exactly that. Scrap.
And let’s be clear, Clarkson has a 43.9 FG% and a 33.7 3PT%. Jose has a 41 FG% and a 34 3PT%. All those numbers are right on their career averages, so they’re very not likely to get better.
League AVERAGE is 46.9 and 35.8.
And if the argument is they’re bench players so of course they’re below average, our actual bench guard, a certain Deuce, was at 43.4% (hmm) and 42% (fantastic) before going down.
“Yeah, no, I usually agree with Z-Man but not on this one, you don’t replace what Mitch brings with a big in the 20s.”
If we’re talking about the idealized version of Mitch (healthy, not vulnerable to smart coaching and deep talented rosters in later playoff rounds) on an AAV that begins with a 1, sure. And that’s what I mean by this being it as far as I’m concerned. Either (a) he that version this year for the entirety of the playoffs, then bring him back at any salary that doesn’t put us into the second apron(*), unless we win a championship in which case I don’t care, or (b) he is not that version, in which case we should let him go, period, or (c) he is something in the gray area, in which case Leon should re-sign him to no more than 10% of the salary cap (he’s at 8.38% of the cap this year at $12.9M).
“This is certainly a hot take, but outside of Wemby and Joker, and on the odd days when Embiid is functional, I’m not sure there’s a center with greater on-the-floor impact than Mitch right now.”
I think it’s an extremely hot take, but hey, that’s me.
“Gee, not in my experience.”
Maybe not in your experience as a Knicks fan, but lots of teams have these kinds of players. Take the Celtics, for example. They have exactly 3 guys who are not either off the scrap heap or taken late in the draft, and have a better record than us after losing their best player for the vast majority of the season. Mazz is a very good coach, but no coach is that good.
(*) I don’t believe that Leon will go into the second apron with this roster if it doesn’t win a chip this year. There will be some big moves, and that might allow Mitch to be offered a bit more, but even there I expect that they have a “reasonable ceiling” on his value, and I think that ceiling is somewhere less than $20M AAV.
Yeah, I hate the Celtics.
Somehow the Celtics found Luke Kornet on the so-called scrap heap, then replaced him with Neemas Queta, another scrap heap guy. Kornet is now kicking ass with San Antonio at a contract that starts at 7.5% of the cap and descends.
Beyond the Bird rights conundrum, the hype over our oft-injured and deeply flawed backup center here seems pretty extreme to me. I personally can’t wait until Leon can figure out how pivot to a better C rotation combo than KAT-Mitch for his $80+M in cap space (assuming that folks around here seem to be itching to spend $20+M AAV on a Mitch extension.)
then i guess it will be the podzemski game
When Mitch is on the floor we score 121.8 PTS/100 (would be the best figure in the NBA) and have an overall net rating of +8.6.
I guess you could try to argue this is all totally coincidentally noise, even though it’s a multiyear pattern, that has nothing to do with things like “he has the highest offensive rebound percentage of all time.” I am not remotely convinced by that argument, and think the Ariel Hukporti experience has changed the way we should thing about the 80/20 theory–you can get 0.80% of Mitchell Robinson for 20% of the cost.
I don’t have the energy to engage in much of a back-and-forth about this because we’ve been having some version of the argument for years, during which time Mitch has so clearly been essential to our success both via the eye test and the numbers that if anyone is unconvinced at this point I can only assume it is a position from which no amount of evidence can budge them.
But if “he’s a replaceable novelty act” is one pole and “we’d be in danger of the play-in without him” is the other, I am much, much, much closer to Strat on this one.
You don’t need many hands to count the number of genuine scrap heap guys who are arguably in the Mitch realm of production. You’ve got Ryan Rollins, Queta, OAKAAK Ajay Mitchell, Collin Gillespie…am I missing anyone else? Of course, among these guys literally only Queta actually fits the specific “Mitch replacement” bill.
Dunno, I think “I would simply make an immensely valuable signing or 2nd round pick instead” is not a great strategy.
I’m pretty sure that we collectively decided here a while ago that in order to achieve OAKAAK status, someone has to have been on the floor in a game that counts in the standings (i.e., not Summer League or preseason) in a Knicks uniform for at least a few seconds. Ajay Mitchell doesn’t qualify. 🙂
On another note, only Dadiet, Huk, Kool Moe D, Kolek, Deuce, McC, and Mitch are “homegrowns.” Those are extra reasons why I would hate to lose either Mitch or Deuce.
Many people wasted money on those very expensive Warrior MSGTickets.. to see a summer league game
I think he’s probably in the middle of this. He’s great and a beast on the boards, which we would miss greatly. And like Owen i have a plot on Mitch island since the beginning, add to this that he is our longest tenured homegrown talent, so i want to keep him forever if we can.
He also has his flaws like Z-man pointed, hack-a-Mitch is a serious problem with the way he’s been shooting FTs, and he can’t shoot at all, it’s all dunks and putbacks.
All this to say that if the money is right, of course i’d be ecstatic keeping him on the team, but if he costs more than he should, we’ll have to search for a replacement.
That is totally lame by the Warriors, sitting one or two guys, even three, is one thing, sitting 9 of your top10 guys is absurd.
I have an estate on Mitch Island located on Three Point Block.
What TNFH said. Mitch is special.
The idea you can find a guy like him off the street is crazy. Very few players in NBA history can match his particular set of skills.
“I don’t have the energy to engage in much of a back-and-forth about this because we’ve been having some version of the argument for years, during which time Mitch has so clearly been essential to our success both via the eye test and the numbers that if anyone is unconvinced at this point I can only assume it is a position from which no amount of evidence can budge them.”
So clearly to our team success, if you purposefully ignore all of the evidence to the contrary.
Let’s look at a few things since he signed his extension:
-2022-23: Missed 23 games (fwiw we went 12-11 with Jericho Sims as his backup) Then, after being totally dominant against the Cavs overratted front line, he was hardly a factor against the Heat, a team whose backup C’s were the corpse of Kevin Love and the great Cody Zeller.
-2023-24: Missed 51 games and then put up a 0.0 BPM in the games he played. Then after a promising game 1 vs. PHI, got hurt (thanks, Joel!) and was totally ineffective after.
-2024-2025: Missed 65 games. Knicks were 38-20 when he returned, with our backup C role being filled by Sims and Precious. we were 10-7 after he returned. At the same point this year, the Knicks were 37-21. Then in the playoffs: he was pretty meh against undersized DET, with his only impactful game being the game 5 loss. Then vs BOS, he went 3-10 from the line in Game 1 and 4-12 in Gamw 3. The only game where he was significantly impactful to winning was game 2, where for some reason Mazzulla went away from the hack-a-Mitch strategy. His best game was game 5 which we happened to lose. Then he was a total non-factor (at best) vs. Indiana.
I don’t know how anyone that has the least bit of objectivity can conclude that Mitch has been “essential to our success.” He’s been better than Jericho, Precious, and Huk, so there’s that! Still, we’ll never know whether things would have been different if Mitch signed with one of the many teams lining up to sign him in summer 2022. Maybe we rethink passing on guys like Jalen Duren and Mark Williams in the draft.
But hey, maybe come playoff time he lives up to the sanitized version of Mitch we continually get from his apologists and he “essentials” us into the finals. If that happens, no one will be happier than me. I was among the very first to be hyped about him at draft time, and it would be nice for him to finally live up to the promise he showed in his rookie year. But to me, he’s been a disappointment on balance. To each his own!
–
What Pitinos done with St John’s is dope
Zuby Ejiofor Is an interesting player – interested to see him in the NBA
i am mitchell robinson 🫡
couple more seasons and it’ll be patrick and mitch as the 2 longest tenured knick players…
I like that…never saw willis and clyde play, enjoyed most of allen houston’s time here…
for some reason i always think of herb williams as a forever knick…
mitch is a lot of health related unfulfilled potential…on the court maybe a one or two trick pony (rebounding and defense)…
but oh what a couple of tricks…
before the season started, sort of foolishly believed mitch was due for a healthy season, where he would start at center and not be load managed throughout…
credit to the medical team and mitch for being available in as many games as he was…
even with his poor free throw shooting, as a starting center saw him at around a low 20’s million aav type player…
for his current role though, yeah 14 to 16 million aav seems very fair…
hopefully the med staff team and mitch’s reps have built a good level of trust…
do it mitch: knick for life (a whole career at least)…
I remember how pissed he sounded all the time his first season there…73 years young, so remarkable…
https://x.com/thecapcrunch/status/2032918204272570373?s=46&t=0wqff4cNt-sCGcDs-uMExw
Someone explain this to me like I am a golden retriever
seems like the main point is that mo may get paid next season, and it may not be in new york…plus, mitch, landry and jose may walk too…
mo may go from 1.8 million a year to 8 million…may be worth it…
If the team clearly falls short of expectations (and Dolan spelled out in no uncertain terms what those expectations are), then Leon should move some of the bigger contracts and pivot…like the Celtics just did. The first guy on the way out should be KAT, even if we get nothing but freed-up cap space in return. That would make it possible for him to do whatever he wants with Mitch, Landry, Diawara, and Deuce. Or go all in for Giannis and fuck it. In any case, I’m already queasy about it…so let’s hope we defy the odds and go all the way!
Yup it is super hard to find a guy with zero offensive game, range and shoots 38% from the line 🙂
More seriously, he is a fine defender and a Moses Malonesque offensive/ total rebounder.
They will need a significant upgrade from huk if he leaves.
Mo was shouting hoops with Mamdani tonight…
That’s disappointing, that he might leave. I love Mo.
Not sure how good he will be long term, 8 million seems a reasonable gamble
Players I think I would miss most if they were not here next year, in order:
Tier I Total Devastation
Brunson
Tier 2 Would only understand if he was the centerpiece of a Giannis deal
OG
Tier 3: Irrationally attached, what can I say?
Diawara
Deuce
Tier 4: Like them a great deal, but maybe it’s time to cut bait, even if tough to replace
Hart
Mikal
Mitch
Tier 5: Just not my cup of tea, never has been. Would leave a significant void that would be hard to fill, but not worth the cap space in this era of aprons.
KAT
Tier 6: Decent rotation filler, but top GMs can find replacements for these guys.
Shamet
Alvarado
Tier 7: meh young players who seem to have limited upside.
Huk
Dadiet
Kolek
McCullar
Tier 8: Glad he is on a one-year deal
Clarkson
The WBC ranks very very high for me on a list of the best sporting events in the world.
It’s a good post Z
I can’t have Mitch and Mikal in the same tier.. Mitch has been here a long time. He was the first real defender we had after Ewing and I guess Camby. He will be a Knicks legend if he stays
But enough about Mitch
Other than that, Shamet is having a career year, he really has been unbelievably good. I’d worry he won’t have this season again if I were a GM but he has been a season highlight for me.
I do miss Deuce.
homegrown just hits different…
Owen and geo, I agree with the sentiments about homegrown talent, especially when its a guy who was picked well outside the lottery or in the second round. Mitch is endearing, and as I have made clear, his great games are astounding…there’s just not enough of them for my tastes…and not only due to injury.
I like Mikal more than many/most, even though I thought at the time that the price paid for him was beyond idiotic, and feel even more so today. But even with his latest doldrums he’s still posting a 3.0 BPM, and as they say, the best ability is availability. But I have no issue with folks feeling otherwise, he clearly polarizing, and in that sense, he’s similar to Mitch. Hart is also polarizing. So in that sense, I still think they all belong in the same tier, although I might waffle on the order.
Shamet is indeed having a good year, maybe his best, and he’s a really good guy and smart player. I just don’t feel like I’d miss him in the big scheme of things, especially if he leaves because he gets paid. The shoulder issue feels like a time bomb. I think I would miss having a good back-of-rotation player on a minimum deal more than I would miss him in particular. There is definitely a gap between him and Alvarado, yet I am hesitant to put him above KAT in his own tier.
Anyway, this his only how I feel today, things can definitely change depending on how the playoffs go.
I had no idea Mitch really was so close to being in the top three longest tenured Knicks.
This site uses User Verification plugin to reduce spam. See how your comment data is processed.