Categories
Uncategorized

Knicks Morning News (2025.05.24)

  • New York Knicks Explains Karl-Anthony Towns’ Sudden Disappearance – Sports Illustrated
    05/24/2025 11:00:00
     
  • Knicks games were New York?s biggest party ? until the Pacers crashed it – The Washington Post
    05/24/2025 11:06:58
     
  • 2025 NBA playoffs schedule: Games today, complete bracket with conference finals matchups set – CBS Sports
    05/24/2025 09:52:42
     
  • Knicks’ defense is a disaster. To have shot at NBA Finals, they must get more physical – USA Today
    05/24/2025 10:05:59
     
  • Knicks in Six? Ask Fran Lebowitz, Alison Roman, and Spike Lee – The New Yorker
    05/24/2025 10:00:00
     
  • Knicks starters? clear weakness is about to wreck dream season – New York Post
    05/24/2025 08:45:00
     
  • Indiana Pacers vs. New York Knicks: live game updates, stats, play-by-play – Yahoo Sports
    05/24/2025 09:01:12
     
  • The Knicks? starting unit is hurting New York?s chance at an NBA championship – The New York Times
    05/24/2025 08:58:39
     
  • Once again the Knicks have to ‘regroup.’ Can they actually do it in time to beat the Pacers? – Bergen Record
    05/24/2025 08:05:06
     
  • Pacers-Knicks: Siakam-led Indiana go two-from-two NBA East final – Al Jazeera
    05/24/2025 08:15:55
     
  • Knicks fall behind 0-2 in Eastern Conference finals series vs. Pacers – Fox News
    05/24/2025 06:47:00
     
  • Pacers 114-109 Knicks (24 May, 2025) Final Score – ESPN
    05/24/2025 06:53:58
     
  • Colin Cowherd Podcast – Pacers-Knicks Reaction: Jalen Brunson needs help, I – FOX Sports Radio
    05/24/2025 07:20:06
     
  • 2x NBA All-Star Calls Out Tom Thibodeau After Knicks-Pacers Game 2 – Sports Illustrated
    05/24/2025 06:55:43
     
  • Will Tom Thibodeau shake up Knicks’ struggling starting five? Something needs to change as pivotal Game 3 awaits – SNY
    05/24/2025 06:44:34
     
  • NBA: New York Knicks 109-114 Indiana Pacers – Pacers lead 2-0 in Eastern Conference play-off finals – BBC
    05/24/2025 06:31:22
     
  • Indiana Pacers vs. New York Knicks – Final Score – May 23, 2025 – FOX Sports
    05/24/2025 06:39:46
     
  • Pacers vs. Knicks, Game 2: New York’s big problem? Its starters continue to be no match for Indiana – Yahoo Sports
    05/24/2025 06:19:00
     
  • Knicks frustrated as lapses on D cost them again – ESPN
    05/24/2025 05:58:00
     
  • Pacers 114-109 Knicks (24 May, 2025) Final Score – ESPN
    05/24/2025 06:09:35
     
  • 32 replies on “Knicks Morning News (2025.05.24)”

    Thankfully i fell asleep despite putting a 03.00am alarm clock….
    Unfortunately watched it early in the morning wo knowing….

    Biggest Concerns:
    •They score MUCH easier than us which is a recipe for a sooner or later collapse

    •They’re better conditioned than us

    •”all for one and one for all” spirit ain’t present. Body Language ain’t great

    Tomorrow will be a good day to be a Knicks fan. Today, I am licking my wounds.

    Yeah, the body language was bad. In the 4th they looked scared and disjointed.

    I wonder what happened to Hart. I don’t remember him this bad in an important game.

    The Pacers beat the Bucks in 5 without Lillard, they are lucky!

    They beat the Cavs in 5 with without Garland and Mobley in one of those games, they are sooo lucky!

    They go up 2-0 on the Knicks without Shamet and Wright, this team is blessed.

    Slow Saturday..

    Here are the biggest issues

    Thibs – his constant love for a starting lineup that isn’t good. After Mitch bailed the starters out of yet another terrible start to the game and the team was up at half, he goes right back to the starters to start the 3rd and they do exactly what was expected. Maybe don’t have Mitch and Deuce burn energy trying to bail out the starters you constantly let put the team in a hole. How hard is it to try a different lineup to start a game..

    It has now reached the National media

    Tom Thibodeau’s dogmatic commitment to his starting lineup might cost the Knicks a trip to the NBA Finals
    New York’s starters have been miserable all postseason
    Sam Quinn

    By Sam Quinn

    No lineup in basketball has played more than the starting five for the New York Knicks. The group of Jalen Brunson, Josh Hart, Mikal Bridges, OG Anunoby and Karl-Anthony Towns played 940 minutes during the regular season, and only two other lineups played even half as many minutes. It’s a Tom Thibodeau cliché at this point. No coach in the NBA clings as desperately to his best players as Thibodeau does.

    He’s been a head coach for 12 full seasons and one of his players has led the NBA in minutes per game in four of them. Even when they don’t, several are often near the top of their list. His 2018 Timberwolves starters also led all NBA lineups in total minutes. This is perhaps his defining trait as a coach.

    It’s also probably going to cost him his first trip to the NBA Finals.

    Almost every lineup the Knicks are putting on the floor this postseason is working. Of the 18 most-used lineups New York has thrown out there in the playoffs, 12 have a positive point-differential and a 13th is neutral. Of the five negatives, three have only been outscored by single digits. A fourth has only played 11 minutes.

    But the fifth is by far the most-used, and — based on the first two paragraphs — you probably know which group I’m talking about. New York’s starters have played 308 minutes in the postseason and been outscored by 50 points.

    This is basically statistically impossible. The last lineup to go minus-50 or worse was Oklahoma City’s starting lineup in the Orlando bubble back in 2020. Lineup data has been tracked since 2008, and since then only seven lineups besides New York’s starters have reached the minus-50 threshold in a single postseason. Of those groups, only one other — the starters for the 2018-19 Portland Trail Blazers — played more than 200 minutes within that postseason. There’s an easy logic to that fact. Generally speaking, if a lineup is playing that badly in the postseason, the team is smart enough to stop using it. If they aren’t, they’re just eliminated before they can rack up lofty minutes or negative plus-minus totals.

    That’s what’s so maddening here. Every other lineup the Knicks are using is working. But they keep going back to a group that isn’t, and hasn’t for quite some time. New York’s starters dominated December with a plus-63 point-differential in 241 minutes. Otherwise, the group has been pedestrian at best, not going a single month with a better point-differential than plus-15. Entering the Eastern Conference finals, it had been outscored by double digits in four of New York’s first 12 playoff games.

    In Game 1 of the Pacers series, New York won the minutes it played with at least one reserve in the game by 13 points. The Knicks lost the game by three points because the starters went minus-16. Before Game 2, Thibodeau said that “everything is always on the table” when it comes to lineup changes.

    He proceeded to stick with the same group for Game 2. It played the first seven minutes and 18 seconds of Game 1 and was outscored by eight points. The lineups featuring at least one non-starter proceeded to build a three-point halftime lead. Thibodeau went back to the starters at the beginning of the third quarter and gave them seven minutes and 42 seconds of playing time. That three-point halftime lead became a two-point deficit.

    Thibodeau finally seemed to learn his lesson from there, sticking with lineups featuring at least one reserve the rest of the way. The damage was done. Through two games, the Knicks have won the minutes they’ve played without their starting lineup on the floor by 21 points. They’re trailing 2-0 in the series because Thibodeau has refused to make a change.

    When Mikal Bridges was asked about the starters’ struggles following Game 2, he explained that he felt that “maybe we’re just playing too soft at the beginning of the halves.” That is an understatement. This lineup can’t stop a nosebleed. Its 117.6 defensive rating in the playoffs would rank 26th in the NBA during the regular season.

    That’s part of what’s so befuddling. Thibodeau is a defensive-minded coach. The two reserves New York has leaned on all postseason, Miles McBride and Mitchell Robinson, are playing great defensively this postseason. Indiana’s offense works in part because everybody can handle the ball. Hart, while a strong help-defender, does not generate as much pressure on the ball as McBride does. He’s also guarded less on the perimeter, clogging the paint for Towns and Brunson. Hart is an incredibly important player for New York both overall and in this series. It has become painfully obvious during this postseason, however, that he is not best-utilized playing alongside New York’s other starters. His energy is just more powerful off of the bench.

    If McBride doesn’t join the starting lineup, Robinson probably should. Aside from providing necessary rim-protection, New York’s major advantage in this series is rebounding. The Pacers ranked 28th in rebounding rate during the season. When Robinson has been on the floor in this series, the Knicks are pulling in 58.8% of available rebounds. That falls to 50.5% when he sits. The Pacers have been the better team in a number of ways in this series. If the Knicks can’t press the advantages they do have, they can’t win four out of five games to salvage the series.

    By bringing Robinson off of the bench, Thibodeau is limiting how many effective minutes he can play. Robinson played 29 minutes in Game 2, the most he’s played all postseason. But because those minutes came off of the bench, they basically all had to come in succession. Robinson entered Game 1 with 5:19 remaining in the first half and left with 1:42 remaining in the second quarter. That’s 16 consecutive minutes of game time for someone who didn’t debut this season until the end of February and isn’t used to those type of minutes to begin with. He isn’t conditioned to play that many minutes in a row.

    Sure enough, he wore down. New York won the Robinson minutes by 13 in the first half, but lost them by seven in the second. If Robinson were starting, Thibodeau could at least find him more rest between these lengthy stints.

    This doesn’t even need to be a matter of players needing to get substantially more or fewer minutes. It’s the alignment that matters so much. All five Knicks starters are critical for different reasons. As a group, they just don’t work as well as any other combination alongside either Robinson or McBride. But even when Thibodeau finds units that work, he isn’t sticking with them. The Knicks lost the nine minutes Brunson rested by nine points in Game 2. In Game 1, the Brunson-less lineup of Towns, Anunoby, Hart, Robinson and McBride outscored the Pacers by 11 points. Yet Thibodeau didn’t even use it in Game 2 for reasons that remain unclear.

    In most cases, judging coaches so overtly is unfair. A lot of what they do is invisible, and that can blow the visible components of their job out of proportion. A single lineup decision in a single game rarely warrants this degree of scrutiny. But this isn’t just a single decision in a single game. There are months of data at this point screaming that New York’s starting five is not working. It has been the single dominant storyline of their postseason. Fans have been begging him to make a change, and if he had, the Knicks might be two wins away from the Finals right now.

    Instead, they’re two losses away from elimination with three road games in this series still ahead of them. Knowing which players to put on the court is about as straightforward a measure of coaching quality as exists in this sport. Nothing else matters if you’re using the wrong players. And in that regard, Thibodeau is almost empirically coaching the Knicks out of this series.

    Frank Barrett
    @FrankBarrett119
    After Game 2, the Knicks’ starting lineup is officially the worst most played lineup of ANY conference finalist since 2008 at -9.5 per 100 possessions

    Great stuff

    2- Towns- you’re not going to the mountain top with this guy as your back line defender. He is so bad on defense and most times just lost. He has zero idea what to do on that end. He either needs to be the power forward and play next to Mitch or be a trade chip.

    3- Hart. His issue boils down to the coaches reliance on him. Hart is to easy to take out of the game and his effect on the team is huge. The opposing team never guards the guy. His defender is basically a roaming defender on the court. His rebounding doesn’t make up for how he kills the team otherwise. Make this guy a 6th man

    * if you want to after OG for his defense on Siakim last night sure, but the 3 above to me are the biggest issues.

    It was a terrible loss, but we’ll see where we stand after four games. If the Knicks win the next two, you wouldn’t think the series was over, right? So let’s see if they can do that.

    Of those groups, only one other — the starters for the 2018-19 Portland Trail Blazers — played more than 200 minutes within that postseason.

    And IIRC that group was kicking ass for two rounds and then got steamrolled by the Golden State Warriors, accumulating all their negative point differential at the end of a good run. So not really comparable at all.

    If you play a true 5-out lineup with KAT and Deuce on and Hart off, you can deploy it situationally as an offensive superweapon to end games early if you’re hot enough from 3. Boston style.

    But we don’t.

    If you play a true 5-out lineup with KAT and Deuce on

    I will say in defense of KAT on offense with the Knicks is that the refusal to get him into 5 out lineups on offense has been a failure. All I heard was the Knicks will be playing more 5 out. Why not maximize the guy on the side of the floor he’s elite at…

    This team managed to take all the joy away from the first ECF in 25 years, and I fucking hate them for that.

    Why not maximize the guy on the side of the floor he’s elite at…

    What’s maddening is that it’s been 90 games and it’s barely been even tried. Not even dabbled with really.

    I’m still excited for game 3.

    If we start Mitch and swap Payne for Delon it could change the series. The starters would have an answer for Siakim and a bench unit of Hart, Deuce, Delon brings a lot to the table.

    Obviously these are both defensive improvements and you would think Thibs would like that, but keep in mind he’s not really a defense-first coach. He’s a do-the-same-thing-again-first coach. His love of defense does not eclipse his dislike of change.

    The Cam Payne thing is actually worse than sticking with the starters. There was just no excuse for those 4Q minutes.

    i also can’t believe Cam Payne played serious minutes in a critical 4th quarter.

    All I heard was the Knicks will be playing more 5 out. Why not maximize the guy on the side of the floor he’s elite at…

    Because Thibs can’t coach that and doesn’t want to coach that. They’ve now gone from a top-2 offense through like a third of the season to the inevitable Thibs reversion to Moneyball as the other teams adjusted and he couldn’t counter.

    Death, taxes, Thibs reverting to Moneyball — the irresistible trinity of life’s certainties.

    so nice to have our expectations readjusted…

    thanks for sharing that article well educated…

    too funny, what’s happening seems very obvious to everyone except the coach…

    hopefully he’s forced to make a change in game 3…

    oh well, at least we made it to the conference finals, and then got knocked out by the same team 2 years in a row…

    the pacers are just toying with us and the bucks now the last couple of seasons…

    Even my mother was commenting on the coaching this morning. It’s so obvious

    It def feels like series is over but this team bounces back from adversity in odd ways so we will see.

    It def feels like series is over but this team bounces back from adversity in odd ways so we will see.

    If the Knicks had won this in 5, no one would have been shocked, right? So they just need to win the next two in Indy. If they do, it’s a whole new series.

    I’m still excited for game 3.

    If we start Mitch and swap Payne for Delon it could change the series. The starters would have an answer for Siakim and a bench unit of Hart, Deuce, Delon brings a lot to the table.

    Sorry but this doesn’t make sense. You’re excited for game 3 because maybe Thibs will do something his entire career shows he’s definitely not going to do?

    Even if he does it’s a day late and a buck short. We’d need to win 4 of 5 games eith three on the road.

    It’s not Pags doomerism to say let’s be real: Thibs has lost us the series.

    That three-point halftime lead became a two-point deficit.

    Thibodeau finally seemed to learn his lesson from there, sticking with lineups featuring at least one reserve the rest of the way. The damage was done.

    If the simple solution is to add either Deuce or Mitch to the starting lineup, then why did doing that not overcome a two point deficit?

    The real change Thibs should be making is to try to turbo-charge the offense to outscore the Pacers but he has no ability to do that.

    This is an offense-first roster with two ultra-elite offensive guys, both of whom had top-15 seasons. Thibs simply has no ability to maximize that, which means if they intend to run this back, this isn’t the place for him.

    He should be pushing the pace but he can’t do that because he has no ability to develop useful depth to keep guys fresh and rested.

    Knicks and Pacers had an exactly-equal DRat in the regular season and the Knicks actually were two points/100 better in ORat. Pacers upcharged their offense in the playoffs — up something like 6/100 versus the league — Knicks downcharged theirs. End of story.

    Just jumping on to make a point I might be wrong about, but I’m not convinced Delon is our bench super weapon. He played really good defense for some of his limited time during the regular season, but I did not see great foot speed on the guy. I’m all for trying him situationally, but I see him being destroyed by hyper waterbug TJ, so I would be hesitant to play him then.

    Not that playing him at all is in the mix except for maybe one set play on D late in the game. But just sayin’.

    The problem with Thibs is he didn’t play someone like Wright enough in the regular season to know if he could be useful in the playoffs.

    The problem with this roster is that every lineup has things that an elite team can target on one end or the other.

    We can certainly debate the “eliteness” of Indiana…but my read is that they are very well constructed and coached to exploit our weaknesses, which will exist no matter what lineup we throw out there.

    They have weaknesses too, and we can exploit those. But their margin for error seems greater than ours, and losing game 1 the way we did made that margin for error even tighter…so last night became a must win. And they ourplayed us, starting with Siakam, who was pretty much unstoppable without being doubled, and that opened things up for everyone else.

    No one is saying Delon is a super secret bench weapon. But you can get useful bench minutes out of him that aren’t can Payne. In a game of one or two possessions that matters. Why is that not obvious

    This is an offense-first roster with two ultra-elite offensive guys, both of whom had top-15 seasons. Thibs simply has no ability to maximize that, which means if they intend to run this back, this isn’t the place for him.

    It’s only 2 games, but the offense has not been the problem. The team has a 122 ORTG against Indiana, the problem is the Pacers have been even better, or our defense has sucked, or some combination.

    At this point I’m going to choose to believe that this series doesn’t start until the home team wins a game

    JollyRoger, not arguing that point. Mine was just maybe don’t play him against TJ. He’d probably do fine against the others.

    And agree with DRed there.

    But not sure about Z-Man. The argument being made is we actually have lineups that are possibly elite, but we don’t play them very much so who the hell knows, really.

    I do think our holes are deeper and wider than theirs (e.g., KAT’s defense, Mitch’s free throws). But I also think there are ways to minimize them that aren’t being used. I won’t belabor the point as others are doing better than I would.

    This team seems need extreme adversity to play its best. We’re not there yet. They need to lose Game 3 and stare into the abyss. Then do the impossible and win 4 straight.

    KAT likes to say “I’m not here to read history, I’m here to make it.” Well, that would be historical.

    And fitting for a team whose only real identity under Thibs has been dogged stubbornness, grit, and clutch hero balL

    All the lineup data is skewed because the starters pace themselves because they know they’re going to be asked to play absurd minutes. Bridges has pretty much admitted it out loud. Another tell is the perpetually shit transition defense.

    Well, that was bad, but not as horrible as Game 1 at least! Right?

    The French Open is starting tomorrow and I know there are some tennis fans around these parts.

    If you’re keen, check out The Upset Game (upsetgame.com). I built this over the past year or so; it’s a free, just-for-fun thing with no commercial aspirations but I’m trying to slowly grow the community, see how it plays with more than 10 people, etc.

    Basically, you fill out a bracket and pick your favorite upsets – earning increasingly more points for later round picks. So if you want to play, you have < 24 hours before Round 1 of RG begins.

    Let me know if you decide to play by joining our Substack. Thanks for indulging my shameless self-promotion! Knicks in 6!

    Leave a Reply

    This site uses User Verification plugin to reduce spam. See how your comment data is processed.