Categories
Uncategorized

Knicks Morning News (2025.05.11)

  • Jayson Tatum offers honest response to critics after Knicks struggles – MassLive
    05/11/2025 10:00:00
     
  • Payton Pritchard shows growing playoff value in Game 3 Knicks win – MassLive
    05/11/2025 10:00:00
     
  • 2025 NBA playoffs schedule: Games today, times, where to watch, complete bracket for second-round series – CBS Sports
    05/11/2025 09:50:15
     
  • Knicks get blown out at home, drop Game 3 to Celtics – amNewYork
    05/11/2025 09:18:19
     
  • Boston Celtics vs. New York Knicks: live game updates, stats, play-by-play – Yahoo Sports
    05/11/2025 08:51:35
     
  • Boston Celtics vs New York Knicks May 10, 2025 Game Summary – NBA
    05/11/2025 08:25:10
     
  • 2025 NBA playoffs: Full schedule and results – NBA
    05/11/2025 08:12:55
     
  • Knicks’ Postgame Behavior Turns Heads After Game 3 Loss to Boston Celtics – Athlon Sports
    05/11/2025 07:29:56
     
  • Celtics vs. Knicks Game 4 prediction, how to watch, TV channel, odds – May 12 – FOX Sports
    05/11/2025 07:22:50
     
  • Knicks take 2-1 lead into game 4 against the Celtics – FOX Sports
    05/11/2025 06:03:45
     
  • Jalen Brunson?s early-game struggles another issue for Knicks – New York Post
    05/11/2025 04:34:00
     
  • Celtics dominate New York, pick up crucial road win in Game 3: Live updates and reaction – The Athletic – The New York Times
    05/11/2025 04:20:00
     
  • MSG continues to be house of horrors for Knicks during playoffs – New York Post
    05/11/2025 04:02:00
     
  • NBA playoff takeaways: Wolves take series lead in Game 3 – ESPN
    05/11/2025 04:00:00
     
  • Knicks Notes: Mitchell Robinson’s free throws, Karl-Anthony Towns’ hand injury – SNY
    05/11/2025 02:28:04
     
  • Payton Pritchard steps up for Celtics in Game 3 win vs. Knicks, and it goes far beyond his 3-point shooting – CBS Sports
    05/11/2025 02:20:18
     
  • Knicks had a chance to be on the right side of NBA history. Now they have questions – The Athletic – The New York Times
    05/11/2025 01:55:08
     
  • Celtics? three-point frenzy may have sparked from this critical Knicks decision – New York Post
    05/11/2025 01:22:00
     
  • Celtics-Knicks: 5 takeaways as Boston rights the ship in Game 3 – NBA
    05/11/2025 01:28:54
     
  • Mitchell Robinson?s horrible free throw shooting wrecking Knicks – New York Post
    05/11/2025 01:32:00
     
  • 193 replies on “Knicks Morning News (2025.05.11)”

    Brown was interviewed after the 1st quarter with the Celtics already leading big, and said with a mocking little smile he’s “enjoying the New York crowd“. I hope this goes on the Knicks blackboard tomorrow night.

    I’ve never been optimistic.

    I’m treating this series as if I was dating a supermodel. How likely is it that it lasts? Is that gonna ruin the present fun?

    Present fun ain’t much fun tbh
    Feels more like trying to see supermodel’s underwear by throwing my spoon under the table!
    Repeatedly

    I don’t know.

    I wouldn’t have bet a dime to win more than one game, and if we get lucky in either one of the next three games we’ll force a game 7, which, given the actual value of these two teams, would be a gigantic overachievement.

    I still we have plenty of reasons to think about our current state as “fun”.

    League playoff ORat down 1.7, Knick playoff ORat down 9.9.

    Song remains the same.

    Tbh i wouldn’t have bet a dime to win even one Quarter and i definitely enjoyed the 2 comeback wins but… the truth is that I’m not feeling our current state as fun.
    More like a lucky streak that ain’t sustainable

    I visualize you in my mind’s eye as Dill in To Kill a Mockingbird. Any truth to that?

    I visualize Pags as post-divorce, post-relapse Stuart Smalley having to wake up every day, look in the mirror, and recite the manta: “we’re bad enough, we’re poorly coached enough, and doggone it, we’re gonna lose”.

    League playoff ORat down 1.7, Knick playoff ORat down 9.9.

    The problem is we made it to the 2nd round and won at least 2 games against Boston. There’s almost no way Thibs is getting fired, but I hope Leon reads this blog. I know a couple of people in the media do.

    How about getting Thibs an elite assistant to help with the offense?

    It’s NOT all defense. I’m not sure we’ve played even one solid game on offense.

    I wonder whether the two wins bought Thibs another year…or whether one more win would make a significant difference.

    If we go out losing 4 straight without putting up more of a fight than we did yesterday, that’s a bad look. You could say tomorrow’s game is the biggest of Thibs’ Knicks career.

    And let’s not forget that I’m a natural born optimist and a Thibs supporter.
    But above all I’m trying to be a fair bball fan and gotta admit that our latest brand of bball ain’t much fun or deserves the championship.

    I’m a relentless optimist (too), but I have struggled all season to see any repeatable plan on offense: rarely do our passes put the recipient in a better position than the passer; our screens are terrible; and all the joyful wins have been the result of playground hero ball. Winning heals all, but someone must see what we’re seeing.

    Nevertheless, Michael Che said “Knicks in five,” so …

    So is KATs hand broken? If so that should wrap season up quickly.

    If it were a break that would keep KAT out, we probably would know by now. Seems like more of a finger thing, which he might be able to play through by taping it up and just dealing with the pain. Last time we played the Celts in the second round, Bernard King played through broken fingers on both hands.

    I don’t get the Game 3 is a must win for the Knicks talk at all.

    I think Al nailed this yesterday. Let’s be honest, that was the most predictable egg ever laid. Knicks social media went overboard. We got way too much hype. And we actually didn’t play well in the first two games. That game was a setup.

    This is where I diverge from Al, though:

    For me Knicks just have to be up 3-1 after Game 4

    I know it seems to make sense but it actually isn’t consistent with the logic of the first part.

    We really just need to get this to a game 7. Brown is hurt. Porzingis is sick. Jrue recently injured his hamstring. Horford is old. And they still shoot a fuck ton of 3s. Get it to a game 7 and there’s a lot of variables that could swing it our way.

    I actually think we’ll get curb stomped again tomorrow. And I think we’ll lose game 5 in Boston.

    Game 6 is where we’re most likely to play our best game, with our backs against the wall and their foot off the gas.

    So it might get pretty dark around here for a while. But save some hope for that 6th game. The two wins we stole in Boston bough us time, and with more time comes more opportunity for luck. We just need to get this series to a 7th game, and hope we get lucky. It worked for Indiana last year, it could work for us.

    I only managed to catch the first half due to being at a birthday shindig at a Dave & Buster’s 1.5 hours away from home. And it’s a good thing I missed the 2nd half because I was completely unreasonable during the 1st half. Honestly- I didn’t expect us to lose, but I knew the Celtics were gonna hit some 3’s at some point of game 3 or 4. Now that bad game for us is out of the way, we can focus on getting 2 more wins. At some point, our shooting has to regress towards the norm. If we can keep our defense from games 1 & 2, we’ll be OK. We can still win this series.

    I did have a bad feeling at tip off though. We don’t normally play at the level we normally do in early games. So fuck the TV deal for sticking us in that spot lol.

    The issue with this current starting 5 especially against an elite team like Bos

    It’s small, so in theory it should be able to take advantage of the opponent on offense, but it can’t. The Knicks play a fake 5 out starting lineup .

    On defense it has holes that gets taken advantage of all the time.

    You can squeak by the Pistons because they aren’t good enough, but it will not get you to the top.

    You either try Mitch to start, or you basically are throwing in the towel.

    I have struggled all season to see any repeatable plan on offense:

    That’s because there hasn’t been one since the league adjusted to the KAT-Brunson pnr. We just give it to someone (usually Brunson) and ask them to create. We’ve done nothing to get KAT going since then and it’s embarrassing.

    No matter what happens in this series, Thibs has dug his grave, and it’s incumbent on Leon to put him in it. Our offense is statistically worse than it was in ‘23 when Randle was hurt, Hart had the yips, and RJ Barrett was clanking. It’s almost as bad as it was in ‘21 when it was Randle vs everyone. There’s only one common denominator and he’s out of excuses.

    “The starting lineup doesn’t work. Thibs needs to try something else”

    I doubt that Thibs will change the starting lineup. It wouldn’t be a good look. Maybe he’ll sub guys out earlier and mix it up a bit more, but what you see is probably what you’re gonna get for the duration.

    I’m also not expecting much change in the offensive game plan. It’s gonna be lots of iso with varied high pnr actions, not a lot of passing. The Celts are excellent at creating tough passing angles and jumping passing lanes. They also don’t have to full-out double a whole lot because the Knicks don’t really have anyone who has repeatedly burned them 1-on-1 no matter what switch they get. Even Brunson’s iso success has mostly been about late-game heroics, and that has been spotty as well. Sadly, Mikal seems to be able to get good looks off but isn’t cashing in, save the 4th Q of game 2.

    You can see that the Celts are going to live with whatever Josh Hart gets, and will continue to lay way off of him and dare him to either pull up or attack the rim. They are also going to overplay KAT and OG on the perimeter and dare them to drive into traffic. And it seems like they are content to force Mikal and Brunson into tough pull-ups in 1-on-1 situations.

    And that’s the rub. They don’t really present a mismatch that the Knicks can attack time after time. And as we see, they can get their good looks from 3 pretty consistently, so it all comes down to whether they are missing or making.

    Which is what I said going into the series. It will come down to 3pt variance and health. In games 1 and 2, we benefitted immensely from the first and somewhat from the second (I think Hauser being out is a pretty big deal, especially with KP being sick.) Seems like Brown’s knee, Jrue’s hammy, and Tatum’s wrist are not presenting problems, so advantage Celts going forward on the injury front. It’s gonna be all about 3pt variance, and again, advantage Celts.

    Well, in game 4 Boston will probably settle in somewhere between their awful 3 point shooting in games 1 and 2 and their ridiculous percentage yesterday. And we should improve on our 20% 3 point percentage also.

    I think tomorrow’s game will be a nail biter all the way through, and I still think the winner wins the series.

    I don’t know if it was an adjustment or not, but the offense did look a bit different to me last night. It looked like Bridges was being used more, at leastin the first half. It didn’t work great, but it probably wasn’t worse than our offense in the previous game.

    Lots of blame to go around , but let’s start with our costliest acquisitions.

    Towns through much of the 2nd half of the season and nine games of the playoffs has been largely underwhelming and mind bogglingly inconsistent. KaTs the 8th highest paid player in the league with zero defensive value and inconsistent offensive value.

    Bridges – has had some strong moments in high leverage spots, but has had maybe 1 or 2 consistently good offensive games the entire playoffs. He not only disappears but adds negative value for large swaths of games. 5 1R picks ….

    I really love OG on D, but his offensive game is not fluid or sophisticated enough to have any sort of consistency. That could be ok , but he’s making more per year than Donovan Mitchell and Jayson Tatum.

    The above all results in too much Brunson and makes us too easy to guard. He’s the only player on the team that can credibly create offense consistently — and even he is having a down series.

    If at least two of OG, Towns or Mikhal don’t play great we have no chance…. Can they do that in 2 more games, who knows

    Bridges – has had some strong moments in high leverage spots, but has had maybe 1 or 2 consistently good offensive games the entire playoffs. He not only disappears but adds negative value for cast swaths of games. 5 1R picks ….

    Bridges basically saved the Knicks in game 2 in that 4th qtr. He was 6-10 yesterday, but was invisible in the first half. Maybe get him to take more shots to start the game,

    The problem is this coach who has no offensive system

    Towns- post ups

    No 3s?

    All of which raises a disquieting proposition: Was game 2 the high water mark for this regime? In order for the answer to be “no,” one of two things has to happen:
    -we win a third game in this series, although we’d really have to win the series to move the mark much higher than it was.
    -something unanticipated/unpredictable happens this coming offseason (or beyond) that make us significantly better.

    The Celtics are going to break up their roster, so Leon may not feel he needs to do anything.

    Ok but our offense has also been hot garbage against the Pistons. Oh, and just about every other playoff opponent too in the Thibs era. There is zero reason to believe the same thing wouldn’t ve happening against CLE unless we had Pacers level injury luck.

    If we don’t fire Thibs it’s an admission that all we care about is making the playoffs.

    If you look at Boston’s 3s in games 2 and 3, it seems like the difference is not between open shots and contested ones, and it’s also not random variance. My eye test says it’s that extra step the Knicks were lacking yesterday, allowing Tatum and White and Pritchard a bit more time to get their shots off. “Play harder” may be accurate here.

    The Celtics are going to break up their roster

    The Celtics aren’t going to trade Tatum, Brown, and White for draft picks. They might break up their roster and get better. That’s exactly what happened when they broke up their roster in 2023, isn’t it? They traded Williams, Brogdon, and Smart for Holiday and Porzingis and became a juggernaut. What makes you think they won’t trade Jaylen Brown for a package of cheaper players and picks that makes them deeper and more unstoppable ?

    Pags, I was talking player personnel. Thibs definitely needs to go if he can’t properly utilize this roster.

    It looked like Bridges was being used more, at leastin the first half. It didn’t work great, but it probably wasn’t worse than our offense in the previous game.

    To my eye, Bridges has the familiar Alec Burks role in Thibs’s offense. Basically, “Let me cook for five minutes while the other guys sit.” In game two it happened when Burks usually happened. In game three it happened a bit earlier. Can Bridges cook throughout? IDK. Either way, it seems like more iso, like Brunson is iso, like KAT is iso, like OG is iso.

    On the mic’d up last game, all our guys were shouting “push the ball, no matter what, push push push!” going for “easier” points in transition, before Boston is set on D, and b/c we don’t run any type of half court offense.

    Unfortunately, our guys are often sloppy ball handlers in transition, except maybe the requisite Hart coast to coast each game. The turnovers are demoralizing, and the alternative — to slowly chip away with successful half court sets — is not available to us.

    I agree with darules. The extra effort on closeouts wasn’t there. Offensively, we will only go as far as Brunson can take us. I would force feed 1/5 pnr and live with the results.

    Boston is a better team. It should not be seen as a catastrophic loss, if we don’t beat them.

    I’ll just mention 16 assists in that last game. I know, it’s the playoffs, and as Z-Man points out Boston is very good at playing the passing lanes. And you have to actually make baskets to get assists. But Minnie had 28 in their comeback win. Just sayin’.

    Seems a decent proxy for stagnant vs. free flowing. Over-iso + disappearing vs. Towns + Mikal + OG getting involved. Ugly vs. beautiful. Maybe even winning vs. losing.

    Hell, Julius Randle had 12 last game. Almost as many as the entire Knicks team.

    The biggest problem I have with the way we play on offense is the fact that we give KAT the ball on the perimeter way too often. He’s not that kind of creator. Great passer and shooter, but get his early touches in the paint. That is what makes his game so dangerous. Get teams used to trying to defend him inside, then he goes off from everywhere else because most bigs can’t guard him. On this team, I hate his trailing 3’s because we have no one to rebound outside of he and Hart. And Hart is usually out on the perimeter when he takes those shots. Like Shaq says, play like a big man. Then the rest will come easy.

    Great passer and shooter

    I even have vague memories of KAT dishing well to cutters for easy layups earlier in the season, like the plays were “leftover” iHart actions completely forgotten now since … January? Did I hallucinate that?

    Instead, KAT’s stumbling giraffe move to the hoop from waaaaaay outside on the perimeter is giving me Randle dervish vibes (with due deference to how in control real dervishes are by comparison).

    But Minnie had 28 in their comeback win. Just sayin’.

    You can’t really compare Boston to a Steph less Warriors team.

    You can’t really compare Boston to a Steph less Warriors team

    You can, however, compare us to the 2025 Orlando Magic, who just played Boston and put up about the same Ortg as we have thus far while starting the immortal Cory Joseph at PG.

    You know, the same Orlando Magic who boasted the 27th best offense this season.

    Thibs’ pants are so far down they are embedded in the floor

    And other than for a brief couple of water breaks, the elephant in the room has been hanging out in the room pretty much non-stop since early December and that’s Wingstop’s aggregate negative offensive production.

    Both are deeply into negative OBPM territory in the playoffs, and are TSing 534 and 511 on usage in the 17s. Neither creates anything offensively, neither passes, neither drives and kicks, neither rebounds. Their floors are *way* too low, their off games way too off.

    They occasionally turn up the defensive dawg especially within the area of the camera’s immediate perspective and occasionally have their offensive moments (*), but net-net, in the bright light of day, they simply aren’t good enough.

    (*) As would potentially like 400 other guys in the association.

    BUT — all complaints noted — this season has given us some amazing highs and may yet do so again.

    What should/could Thibs and our guys be doing to prep for tomorrow besides resting? Is there a fix to be made? That’s prolly more fruitful inquiry than endless “I told you so” — myself included.

    Basically what Hubert said. The recipe to win the series is one more Celtic variance brickfest and one really outstanding Knick two-way game. It’s doable.

    KAT has his flaws as a player, but the way we use him seems to maximize those flaws. He’s the best perimeter shooting big in NBA history but we just don’t seem to make creating that shot for him any kind of priority.

    We’re playing 2008 basketball with 2025 personnel. It works okay sometimes but there’s a hard ceiling to that approach which we seem to be bumping into.

    The last minute craziness of Games 1 and 2 do not make up for the soulless, unwatchable garbage recycling through this series. Thibs has 2 of the most potent offensive weapons in the league and we maintain a mid-1990’s scoring trajectory. Dump Thibs and inject life into this sad, also-ran franchise.

    Dump Thibs and inject life into this sad, also-ran franchise.

    Dude I agree with the Thibs part but this is far from sad and also-ran

    Sorry, Farfa. It feels like the team is drifting towards a sub-championship level.

    I didn’t like this year either (I have a thing for hard trying people, not bored-ass talented guys just roaming around) but let’s give credit where it’s due. This could be a nice roster if somebody else coached it.

    PJ Tucker please save our souls

    Farfa, it really isn’t. We had the most fantastic luck possible in this series and still have minimal chance to win because our coach plays an offensive strategy that has us performing near identically to one of the worst offenses in the league. This is eith ys being completely all in with more future assets mortgaged than the very teams we’re getting dogwalked by.

    What else can you call it? We should be diwn 3-0 and may as well be

    Maybe the double whammy of watching the Rangers fall apart, then the Knicks continually get behind by 20 points to these Boston brats is getting to me.

    “He’s the best perimeter shooting big in NBA history…”

    I don’t know why folks keep saying this as if it means something beyond “he’s a great 3pt shooter when he’s open and happens to be a big.”

    I mean, the fact that he’s a big is kind of irrelevant to his 3pt shooting, isn’t it? In fact, doesn’t it kind of suggest that if you have him out on the perimeter, your “big” is not where bigs are supposed to be, i.e. where bigness is actually is a benefit?

    Who are we comparing him to when calling him the “best perimeter shooting big in NBA history?” Who are the other “perimeter shooting bigs?” Does Dirk qualify? Larry Bird? Myles Turner? Arvydas Sabonis? Kristaps Porzingis? Bob McAdoo? Patrick Ewing? Rasheed Wallace? Sam Perkins? Steve Novak? Brook Lopez?

    I just don’t get what a coach is supposed to do to generate more high percentage looks for KAT while sacrificing all of the things that a “big” is supposed to do, especially given that you are already inherently sacrificing things that bigs are supposed to do on the defensive end when he’s your primary big. If you play him alongside Mitch, then you bring in the Hack-a-Mitch conundrum, which is designed to keep the ball out of KAT’s (and everybody else’s) hands.

    And that’s the problem with the way that this team is constructed. There is no one who can pull consistently KAT’s man away from him. Brunson is obviously great in iso, but rarely do teams throw doubles at him, they just take their chances with a defensive small wing (you could argue that all of White, Brown, and Jrue are the equivalent of defensive small wings) and live with the occasions where Brunson gets a switch and iso’s vs. Tatum, KP, or Horford, and if you are going to hard double off of anyone, don’t let it be KAT’s man unless he is near the paint.

    We need someone who can consistently punish a smaller defender to open things up for KAT. None of Hart, OG, or Mikal are able to do that. Short of that, KAT’s best alternative is to be “that guy.” Get in the post and either draw doubles or get into the paint and score or get fouled.

    Many of us have been pointing this out for months, but I’ll share something I heard on a national NBA podcast today to illustrate that it’s not just a few commenters on KB seeing this stuff:

    “Can I say something about the Knicks offense?”

    “We must.”

    “I hope one day they realize that they should run stuff for Karl Towns, your $60M player.

    Everything he does on offense is self generated. They’re not running any sets to set up Towns at a spot he likes, or to get Towns on the move, or to get Towns a certain matchup. [slowly and with emphasis] They don’t do anything for him . It’s just like ‘here’s the ball, Karl, figure it out, against one of the best defenses in the league, by yourself.’ *

    And I get it, defenses have decided they’re going to guard him a certain way to mute the impact of the pick and pop. But that doesn’t mean you just ignore him. There are other ways to get your dynamic offensive weapon involved, and they do none of it, dude. Like, nothing.
    They do absolutely nothing with him and it’s really frustrating to watch.”

    “Very occasionally they’ll do a cross screen in the post. But that’s as complex as it gets.”

    “Yeah and that’s like the first play we put in at CYO basketball in the 7th grade btw.”

    “There’s always so much low hanging fruit with the Knicks. Whether it’s pick and roll, whether it’s setting up Towns, whether it’s feeding into anything that resembles preamble offense, rather than just ‘give it to someone and make them do something’. You have more at your disposal than this.”

    * and boy doesn’t that sound just like the offense they made Julius Randle run when he took the fall for Thibs?

    And then they want on to talk a little bit about how little OG and Bridges can do to help.

    The Noble Fiancé Humper was the first to point out the abundance of low hanging fruit that can be picked by a new coach. Now it’s gone national.

    The idea that Thibs deserves to come back next year bc the Celtics missed all their shots a couple times when this has been going on every single spring is just crazy. Move on already.

    “KAT has his flaws as a player, but the way we use him seems to maximize those flaws…We’re playing 2008 basketball with 2025 personnel”

    We can agree to disagree on this, but I see it as a personnel problem rather than an offensive system problem.

    Yes, KAT has his flaws, and his gifts. I think that aspects of our personnel mix exacerbate his flaws and minimize his gifts.
    -having a fellow superstar who is undersized and defensively challenged
    -having a fellow big who can’t shoot beyond point blank range or hit a FT
    -having a bunch of wings who are not able to punish mismatches

    It should be pretty evident now that the Wolves did not lose very much in swapping out KAT for Randle. That’s partly because the fellow superstar there is Anthony Edwards, who can’t be single-teamed when he gets it going, and fellow big Rudy Gobert, who is able to hit FTs and stay on the floor (and is significantly better than Mitch).

    On the current team, the only guy who might be able to take defensive pressure off of KAT is Mikal, and other than that spurt in the 4th Q of game 2, he’s been as easy to single-team or help off of as anyone.

    So if Leon decides to keep KAT, he needs to find another guy (actually two guys) to open up his game….a defensive big who can make him a scoring PF, and a scoring wing/big who demands consistent double-teams. Given the paucity of the asset chest, that’s a tall order.

    Looks like the Mets third base platoon has turned into Aaron Judge.

    I’d like to see more action run for Mikal and OG to generate more looks in the midrange. They are pretty good in that space when there isn’t a lot of traffic there.

    Look! Look! A mid-game adjustment!!!

    As Edwards detailed, the Warriors’ traps made it pointless to keep using ball screens. He was being neutralized in those settings, forced to pass into unproductive spaces because the actions were so high on the floor. So the Wolves leaned into the two-man game with Edwards and Randle instead, with Edwards finally finding space to fire away down the stretch (he hit 3 of 5 3s in the fourth quarter).

    Well I’m gonna be the guy who says defense will be the difference.

    We won the steals and turnover battles in the first two games… last game, not so much.

    Creating offense off turnovers is a much better look for us (like Andre 3000 wearing a piano good) than our halfcourt offense (Lizzo wearing a big condom bad).

    I know the 3 game losing streak during the final week of the regular season broke me and the frustrating nature of the playoffs series vs Detroit didn’t change that but shit the 2 wins at Boston was fucking amazing no matter how they achieved it.

    Knicks are still up 2-1 against Boston and we’re guaranteed at least another week of intense playoff games. The time for threads like today will come once the Knicks are officially eliminated but for now I’m honestly excited for tomorrow night and the rest of this series. It was probably fool’s gold but the 2 wins in Boston have salvaged my belief in this team.

    “I feel like I just got a lot of different tools, you know what I mean?” Randle said. “It’s really about using my mind and taking what the defense gives me. If they don’t double-team me, score. If they double-team me, find my guys.”

    One would think KAT can do this as well…

    “…and boy doesn’t that sound just like the offense they made Julius Randle run when he took the fall for Thibs?”

    You mean the offense they ran between when they acquired OG and Randle blew out his shoulder and never played again? Seemed like a pretty good offense to me…

    So Randle was bad here but is good now in Minnesota and KAT is bad here but was good in Minnesota and this definitely isn’t an issue with the coach.

    I just don’t get what a coach is supposed to do to generate more high percentage looks for KAT

    The definition of insanity says hi. How about running an offense with some motion in unison and passing?

    Just maybe Brunson pounding the ball for 15 seconds probing the defense with the 3 other guys standing around and then calling Hart up hi to set a screen for him isn’t such a great idea.

    Maybe, just maybe running some sort of motion and “passing the ball” or curling the guy who shoots 40% from three over 2780 career attempts around a couple of Hart/OG staggered screens might work (or at least put Boston’s defense into cardiac arrest from shock).

    Playing the Lakers and a Curry less Warriors isn’t exactly the same as playing the Celtics. Not to mention how much better KAT played during the regular season than Randle.

    So Randle was bad here but is good now in Minnesota and KAT is bad here but was good in Minnesota and this definitely isn’t an issue with the coach.

    Don’t you know, TC? Thibs can’t fail, he can only be failed. Part IV.

    “So Randle was bad here but is good now in Minnesota and KAT is bad here but was good in Minnesota and this definitely isn’t an issue with the coach.”

    I presume you are only talking about the playoffs because last I checked, Randle was all-NBA twice and an all-star three times when he was here. Not to mentioned that he was either badly injured or out for our last two playoff runs.

    Personally, I don’t think that Thibs is either failing or being failed. I think that there are posters with agendas who predictably and tediously grind their axe every time the coach doesn’t do what they think he should do. Those posters aren’t capable of actual analysis, just anger, arrogance, and vapidity.

    So Randle was bad here but is good now in Minnesota and KAT is bad here but was good in Minnesota and this definitely isn’t an issue with the coach.

    In all fairness Randle’s 24 and 25 seasons are virtually identical with him shooting a little more efficiently on much lower usage and less rebounding and a lower BPM

    Everyone is making good points.

    On defense, there are long term issues with the fit between Towns and Brunson. However, IMO that hasn’t been a huge problem in the playoffs. I don’t even want to blame the fit for yesteday because it looked more like lack of effort.

    There’s a term in horse racing called the “bounce”. The theory is that an extreme effort can take so much out of a horse, it needs more time than usual before its next race to recover physically and mentally from it or he’ll run poorly next time. IMO the Knicks “bounced”.

    On offense, no one is going to convince me that our starters aren’t as talented as any team in the league or that there is a major fit problem. Of course top defenses are going to make adjustments to take some things away. You are supposed to adjust back. We don’t. Our coach essentially accepts that they’ve taken something away and doesn’t change anything. But on a higher level, good offense comes from a fast pace and purposeful MOVEMENT of the players and ball. We play way too slow and have close to no movement at all. It’s comical. This is 85% Thibs and maybe 15% Brunson’s tendecy to hold and dribble. Thibs has to either be fired or we need an assistant to take over the offense. He’s a great motivator and I’m sure he prepares in many ways, but he’s a sh$t offensive coach that’s coaching a team designed more to be an offense first team.

    I challenge anyone here to find a post where I a) was happy that we hired Thibs in the first place or b) expressed anything other than ambivalence about moving on from him. I’ve said many times, and will repeat again, that I would welcome a coaching change to a younger, more happening coach rather than keeping Thibs or hiring any of the available retreads.

    Again, I have compared him to Mike D’Antoni many times. Great coach with some infuriating tendencies. Not my cup of tea, but right up there below the top coaches…Spo, Kerr, etc. He’s done a heck of a job here, but probably time to move on unless we win this series.

    My regards to the minutes police.

    Personally, I don’t think that Thibs is either failing or being failed. I think that there are posters with agendas who predictably and tediously grind their axe every time the coach doesn’t do what they think he should do. Those posters aren’t capable of actual analysis, just anger, arrogance, and vapidity.

    +1

    Plus, the Dunning-Kruger effect. Plus, emotions clouding judgement. And so on.

    “On offense, no one is going to convince me that our starters aren’t as talented as any team in the league or that there is a major fit problem.”

    Well that’s a “you” problem.

    The question is not whether are starters are elite offensively, the question is whether they are fucking terrible. Because that’s how Thibs has them performing. If they aren’t then he has to go because he is not a viable NBA coach in 2025.

    We are all in against a pair of Aces and They bs chooses to play A9 offsuit instead of 89 suited. No other coach would be as sure to blow this 2-0 lead as he is. I wish we lost those games because the risk that thru saved his job is catastrophic.

    They’re as talented as any starters in the league and they’re playing the wrong way to take advantage of their skills.

    We saw it when Brunson was out. It was top-notch 2020s professional basketball. The ball moving, everyone involved.

    My lean is 60% Thibs, 40% Brunson on this. They both saw the same things the rest of us saw. Neither has changed things up even a little bit to take advantage of that.

    I hate agreeing with BPL on anything, but his second-to-last post (‘definition of insanity’) feels spot-on.

    The score in this OKC/Denver game is 7-5 with over 5 minutes left in the 1st..

    In the 65 games Brunson played Knicks had a 120.3 offensive rating, in the 17 games he missed the Knicks had a 116.8 offensive rating.

    Just maybe Brunson pounding the ball for 15 seconds probing the defense

    To be fair Brunson also usually spends 6-8 seconds working very hard to get the ball across the midcourt line by himself.

    curling the guy who shoots 40% from three over 2780 career attempts around a couple of Hart/OG staggered screens might work

    I don’t watch all the games, but I don’t believe I’ve ever seen this happen for the Knicks.

    The score in this OKC/Denver game is 7-5 with over 5 minutes left in the 1st..

    Denver just scored 8 points in the 1st qtr

    +1

    Plus, the Dunning-Kruger effect. Plus, emotions clouding judgement. And so on.

    Maybe…. for myself, I admire “keep the grind on your mind” types like Thibs. However this inflexibility of ideas has another side of the coin. Adaptability is the hallmark of great coaches.

    TaKe Bill Walsh. A Clear offensive genius. However when he played the Giants even in the early 80’s before they were good, he had a big problem… blocking LT to keep Montana alive.

    He didn’t throw up his hands and say, “Oh shit, my left tackle sucks so there’s nothing I can do!” Nope… he went to his drawing board and thought up the unheard of strategy of pulling his left guard (John Ayers) on passing downs and had him meet LT 3 yards deep in the backfield after he beat the SF left tackle and slid the rest of the protection to the left. It worked.

    The standard Knick Brunson ball dominant offense isn’t putting enough points on the board to beat Boston (save incredibly outlying shooting). Averaging 97 ppg likely won’t win 2 of the next 4. They need to be more flexible offensively and the most obvious way is to scheme the ball in the hands of the best 3 ball shooting starting big man in the history of the NBA and their most efficient scorer. Yes… his 40% is better Larry Bird, Dirk and anyone else you can think of.

    Maybe some of you should go to Nuggetsblogger and complain about their offense scoring 8 pts in the 1st quarter…

    In the 65 games Brunson played Knicks had a 120.3 offensive rating, in the 17 games he missed the Knicks had a 116.8 offensive rating.

    A 116.8 ORtg would be 8th in the NBA.

    If a collection of players can post the 8th best offense in the NBA without their starting PG, that is one offensively talented group.

    So raven’s thesis is supported by this data.

    In the 65 games Brunson played Knicks had a 120.3 offensive rating, in the 17 games he missed the Knicks had a 116.8 offensive rating.

    And what was their record versus over .500 teams (11-18) and what was their record vs the two elite teams in the east (0-8)?

    And Jesus, I am hoping I am dead wrong but I believe the chances of them winning 2 of the next 4 is rather slim without some adjustments to the offensive offense.

    Afternoon games should be banned after this fiasco.

    Not sure why the NBA wouldn’t want a back to back in the evening, but seriously wtf knuggets?

    Maybe some of you should go to Nuggetsblogger and complain about their offense scoring 8 pts in the 1st quarter…

    I didn’t see the first quarter, but if Adelman ran an offense that was designed to minimize Jokic’s impact on the offense, I would be pissed. 🙂

    We all know this is a players’ league. Thibs is conservative and careful. Kerr is creative and a gambler, and the other night went 14-deep in the first half trying to find something that works against Minnesota. Not a thing he didn’t try! Nothing there. He lost the game anyway. The roster is what the roster is.

    Often our KB pundits point to those few minute lineups with positive plus minus to criticize the stubborn, blind, non-creative, dated, etc., coach. However, those charts for the most part show good in-game adjustments that give you an advantage for a few plays, until the opposing coach counter-adjusts and the advantage is taken away. They give credit to the coach! Unless you seriously think that Payne, for instance, should be playing thirty-five minutes a game.

    The same with 3-pointers. If they go down, the team keeps shooting them. There are games when the team takes 35 or more. Yesterday, alas, we went 1 for 9 to start, then, if I remember correctly, 3 for 16, and finally 5 for 25. All good shots. They were just not falling. Why should we have pushed to take 35-40 three pointers?

    Finally, almost nobody here is talking about how miserable our defense in the first half yesterday was. This is the main reason we lost. We reverted back to drop coverage a lot, communication on switches was not there, and so on. The Celtics were getting almost anything they wanted. Open in-rhythm shots. This is very important. I would question Thibs strategy here. He probably opted for better rebounding and paint protection in order to limit second chance opportunities and kickouts. It backfired.

    I mean can we wait till the series is actually over to do a postmortem on a team that is up 2-1 on the defending champs?

    “They need to be more flexible offensively and the most obvious way is to scheme the ball in the hands of the best 3 ball shooting starting big man in the history of the NBA and their most efficient scorer. Yes… his 40% is better Larry Bird, Dirk and anyone else you can think of.”

    For his career, KAT is 186th in 3pt makes per 36 minutes. He is barely in the top 100 among active players.

    In these playoffs, he is averaging 1.4 makes, slightly below his career average of 1.6, and 0.7 below his career high of 2.1 that he achieved last year, although it came at a steep price in efficiency. In last year’s playoffs, he averaged 1 full 3pt make more per 100 possessions on 3.4 more attempts than this year. And that was in a situation where he played the majority of his minutes at PF.

    Seems like Thibs is not the first coach to have trouble finding more 3PA for the greatest shooting big of all time without a drop-off in efficiency. And let me state for the record….he won’t be the last.

    Maybe some of you should go to Nuggetsblogger and complain about their offense scoring 8 pts in the 1st quarter…

    I’m actually heading there right now to blame it on KAT.

    I mean can we wait till the series is actually over to do a postmortem on a team that is up 2-1 on the defending champs?

    This isn’t a postmortem on the team. Just the offensive strategy we’ve used through the first 9 playoff games.

    I think all of us discussing the need to change the offense actually believe we can win this series.

    KAT has his lowest 3PAr since the 2018-2019 season and the Knicks as a team are 28th in the league in 3PAr.

    I mean, come on with this bullshit. Nobody is picking on poor Tom Thibodeau here. His offense is ass and it’s playing like ass. We won a couple of games because the other team also played like ass. They stopped playing like ass and now we’re probably fucked.

    We’re trying to beat 3’s with 2’s. At the end of the series let’s ask how that was goink.

    The larger point is, unless you can run a true 5-out offense with more than one of the 5 being able to take it to the rim unless double-teamed, and have KAT in the KP role with the Celtics, the “greatest 3pt shooting big ever” thing doesn’t help all that much.

    OTOH, if you can get him more attempts from 2 and get him to the line more, he’s pretty good at that too. Maybe that’s where the focus on Thibs should be: how can he generate more mismatches for KAT closer to the basket where he can both score and open up the floor and get better looks from 3 for OG and Mikal, and for that matter, Josh and Jalen?

    “KAT has his lowest 3PAr since the 2018-2019 season”

    The actual bullshit is that you left out that his TS% and usage% were both above his career averages. Or that the years when he shot the most 3’s, his team won 19 and 23 games. Or that this year he averaged 4 more rebounds per 36 than he did last year, as well as more points per 36.

    The question is not whether are starters are elite offensively, the question is whether they are fucking terrible. Because that’s how Thibs has them performing.

    Succinct and true.

    KAT has his lowest 3PAr since the 2018-2019 season and the Knicks as a team are 28th in the league in 3PAr.

    Kinda highlights how underrated Donte was. His quick trigger, unlimited range, and ability to get 3PAs off without any plays run for him was the perfect elixir for a Thibs offense. Probably not a coincidence last year was the only time Thibs’ offense didn’t crater in the playoffs here.

    For his career, KAT is 186th in 3pt makes per 36 minutes. He is barely in the top 100 among active players.

    That just shows he is underutilized.

    The fact remains he has shot more than a handful 3’s in his career (2780) and shot them at a higher percentage than any starting big in the history of the game.

    That is a pretty elite skill that is being underutilized.

    And by the way, I was screaming in the Detroit series they should post KAT up more. Those points aren’t mutually exclusive.

    “We won a couple of games because the other team also played like ass. They stopped playing like ass and now we’re probably fucked.”

    Right, brilliant analysis as usual! We are up 2-1 on a team that was 20-4 in playoff games coming in and have won 5 straight games on the road because they are worn out from playing too many minutes. Oh wait, that was your last bit of brilliant analysis about Thibs that we had to endure all fucking year.

    By the way, guess who shot fewer 3’s than us this year…the Denver Nuggets. Maybe that’s why they fired their championship-winning coach. Have they increased their 3PAr in the playoffs with their new coach? Nope. Still seem to be doing pretty well, though. Go figure.

    With the way some of these teams are shooting 3s we are overdue for a Phil tweet like “How is is goink?”.

    The actual bullshit is that you left out that his TS% and usage% were both above his career averages. Or that the years when he shot the most 3’s, his team won 19 and 23 games. Or that this year he averaged 4 more rebounds per 36 than he did last year, as well as more points per 36.

    Teammates matter. He had horseshit teammates on those teams that won 19 and 23 games. One of those years he had a 7.8 BPM. That wasn’t enough to lift Andrew Wiggins and Robert Covington to greatness.

    His rebounding went up this year because he’s not playing next to Rudy Gobert. Your analysis is about as ass as Tom Thibodeau’s offense. Maybe take the rest of the day off, you’re stinking the joint up today. Not one of your stronger efforts.

    And by the way, I was screaming in the Detroit series they should post KAT up more. Those points aren’t mutually exclusive.

    And I was teasing you about that but only bc I thought the 3PAs were more important. KAT posts are pretty effective and I’d like to see more of them, too.

    Who plays for the Denver Nuggets that might make them them not need to shoot so many threes? I think they have a center who is very good. Maybe, just maybe, if you have a center with a 13.3 BPM who can score at will you don’t need to rely so much on 3 pointers. Crazy thought.

    Do the Knicks have such a player? I can’t recall

    OKC is 5-28 so far on threes

    Knicks were 5-25 for the entire game

    Will OKC stop shooting them..

    Nobody is picking on poor Tom Thibodeau here. His offense is ass

    Gem! 😂😂😂

    It’s not picking on somebody to point out an objective fact about their work. That offense has fully earned the title “ass.”

    Yesterday, alas, we went 1 for 9 to start, then, if I remember correctly, 3 for 16, and finally 5 for 25. All good shots. They were just not falling. Why should we have pushed to take 35-40 three pointers?

    Ah, the delicious irony of someone who gratuitously name drops the Dunning-Kruger effect to appear smart not comprehending the independence of events in probability theory.

    My brother belongs to a private golf club in Westchester. After playing 9 I was walking by the men’s room in the locker room and who’s taking a leak? Adam Silver. I said that KAT was getting a bad whistle and no Scott Foster tmrw. He said “oh cmon!” Poor guy.

    not to complain or anything (lie), man, wasn’t it just like easter or something the other day…

    pretty sure someone i know just had a birthday…

    what is this human obsession with filling in every freaking day on the calendar…

    okay, I feel better not…just had to get that out…

    Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.

    Attributed to Mark Twain

    “Teammates matter.”

    Brilliant, why didn’t I think of that?

    “His rebounding went up this year because he’s not playing next to Rudy Gobert.”

    His rebounding is higher than any year but one. Hmmm, who was he coached by that year?

    “Who plays for the Denver Nuggets that might make them them not need to shoot so many threes?”

    Some guy named Jokic shot over 41% from 3. Aaron Gordon shot 43% from 3. Christian Braun shot 39.7% from 3. MPJ shot 39.5% from 3.

    Did you bother even looking at those stats before posting your stupid rebuttal? I doubt it, because you love raging at me and others no many how many times you stink up the joint with stupid shit like the minutes police stuff.

    “Your analysis is about as ass as Tom Thibodeau’s offense. Maybe take the rest of the day off, you’re stinking the joint up today. Not one of your stronger efforts.”

    I’d have to go on a cold streak that would put the Celtics 25-100 from 3 to shame to catch up to your incessant hot take nonsense. But hey, rage on!

    Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.

    Attributed to Mark Twain

    True that’s why I haven’t been responding to Z-Man.

    Also why I will now stop responding to the guy who keeps sharing his quote-of-the-day toilet paper on Knickerblogger.

    My dude. Jokic shoots .627 on 2-pointers and converts about 9 of them per game. He has a .663 TS% on 29 USG%. He is better at basketball than any player on the planet. The Nikola Jokic 2 point attempt is a pretty solid basketball play.

    You have that guy, you don’t have to worry a whole lot about taking lots of threes. The Nuggets were #2 in eFG%. It works for them.

    Unfortunately we do not have Nikola Jokic. If we DID have Nikola Jokic I can guarantee you I would not give a single shit how many threes we took.

    Fascinating challenge here by OKC. Good thing ABC went directly to commercial for a major play in the game so we can’t see the replay.

    The love NBA players have for step-back threes late in games is just hilarious. SGA bricks one, OKC gets the rebound, he then bricks another.

    Jokic 2 for his last 17 from three

    He’s been taking some fugly shots, too.

    Does OKC have no other play outside of an SGA iso in the clutch

    Knicks scored 93 points yesterday they could’ve won this game

    Agree about Bilas. Mark Jones not so much.

    I don’t hate him, but yeah, he’s not great, either. Bilas, though, is just absurdly good. I’m not used to hearing analysis this good during games.

    Maybe that’s where the focus on Thibs should be: how can he generate more mismatches for KAT closer to the basket

    Sure, but then we would need the other four Knicks to 1. Be out at the 3pt line 2. All be able (and willing) to shoot threes and 3. KAT needs to be able to find shooters on his drives when he gets doubled.

    KAT is a good passer but not necessarily while being doubled in the post. In fact, I don’t remember seeing him kick from the post much if at all (aside from the give&go) probably because it was either Hart or Mitch being left open.

    I think it boils down to a disagreement as to whether it’s more that Thibs’ offense is ass or whether the Knicks’ players are playing like ass on offense. And even there, we can argue about how much is on the Knicks’ players and/or Thibs and how much is on the Celtics’ elite defense.

    I mean, the Knicks had the 5th best ORtg in the league. The 4 teams above them are the three teams that won 60 games and the team who shot even fewer three’s than they did.

    Seems pretty weak sauce to blame this all on KAT not making another couple of 3’s a game because Thibs isn’t running enough stuff for him. Or to blame Brunson’s .460 eFG%, KAT’s .436 eFG%, OG’s .471 eFG%, and Mikal’s .415 eFG% on whatever schemes Thibs has them running. So pardon me if I’m not buying the “this is 90, or 80, or 70, or 50% about the offense we are running.

    BTW, the Celtics blog community was going berserk after the first two games about how shitty their offense is. The same offense that had them at 20-4 in playoff basketball coming into this series. There is no offense ever invented that would result in a ton of good looks from 3 by our slow-footed bunch vs. this defense, especially from KAT, who continually is going to have a smaller, quicker player in his grille even on switches.

    “Sure, but then we would need the other four Knicks to 1. Be out at the 3pt line 2. All be able (and willing) to shoot threes and 3. KAT needs to be able to find shooters on his drives when he gets doubled.

    KAT is a good passer but not necessarily while being doubled in the post. In fact, I don’t remember seeing him kick from the post much if at all (aside from the give&go) probably because it was either Hart or Mitch being left open.”

    KAT is a good enough passer if he keeps his head up and sees/feels the doubles coming. The problem is, he doesn’t have great feel or great judgment in those circumstances. Even in game 2 when he bullied Horford on 2 consecutive possessions, there were possessions after that when he could have passed but didn’t and wound up taking an ill-advised weak shot. The other problem is that the double is often coming from whoever is on Hart, who they will let shoot from 3 all game long. They are not going to help hard off of OG or Brunson, so it’s really on Mikal to knock down those 3’s but thus far he’s 4-15, even worse when you consider that 2 of those 3’s came in the 4th Q in game 2 and 1 came in OT in game 1. By and large, he’s missed a ton of critical good looks.

    And that’s the problem with our offensive personnel that transcends our schemes…there is no one that can consistently draw doubles in the paint other than KAT, and that means that no one is going to be open from 3, especially KAT (really, what defense is going to leave him open, either on a PnR or to help off of him?)

    And if KAT can’t draw doubles vs. elite defenses and punish them, we need someone who can. And that can’t be Brunson because he’s too small, and therefore most teams (see: Celtics, Pistons) will take their chances by gluing a defensive wing to him. We need someone like KD or Jimmy or Giannis or LeBron or Tatum or Luka….heck, even Julius…to unlock KAT. The closest we have is Mikal, and well, let’s just say that he’s clearly not up to the job at this point.

    The Celtics fans had every right to complain about the offense those first two games. The only team that played worse than the Knicks those two games was the Celtics, thank god. You may remember that the game thread both games were filled with comments like “WTF is he doing!” and “Keep doing that hahaha!” aimed at various Celtic players.

    I don’t think my complaint is aimed at KAT per se, or KAT’s lack of this or that. He’s an example. It’s that our players aren’t being utilized well overall. KAT is an example, but it holds true for pretty much everyone.

    Jalen taking 9 seconds to get across half-court, then dribbling for 9 more before initiating an action, leaving everyone frozen. Mitch playing when the Knicks are in the penalty, and not playing when they are not (like say starting off the game…). KAT yadda yadda see many previous posts. Pull up a player, and it’s weak sauce.

    OKC went 10-41 from 3. Denver went 11-45. That’s a combined 21-86. The final score was 92-87. But hey, at least they are jacking em’ up!

    I wonder if it is going to take us getting behind in a series before thibs puts mitch in to the starting lineup and moves josh to the bench…

    “Jalen taking 9 seconds to get across half-court, then dribbling for 9 more before initiating an action, leaving everyone frozen. Mitch playing when the Knicks are in the penalty, and not playing when they are not (like say starting off the game…). KAT yadda yadda see many previous posts. Pull up a player, and it’s weak sauce.”

    I think these are all legitimate points, but not the main reasons why our offense is gummed up. And if we play faster when not in transition, but shoot as poorly as we have, or pass more but start turning it over at a higher clip, that just increases the chance that the Celts will go on one of their unstoppable transition runs.

    I think our fatal flaw is on the defensive side. We haven’t been good at defending the 3-pt line all year, and that was on full display in game 3 and to a degree in games 1 and 2, although your going to have to concede some open 3’s to the champs, they are among the best in the NBA at generating looks but only shot 36.8% from there on the year, so as dmar pointed out, there’s a happy medium in there somewhere.

    They are also killing us on the offensive boards, which is limiting our transition game. I think they scored a ton of their points either off of turnovers or on ORebs.

    “I wonder if it is going to take us getting behind in a series before thibs puts mitch in to the starting lineup and moves josh to the bench…”

    This what I hoped would happen when I thought Mitch would be back by Christmas, but by the time he came back he was on a minutes restriction. But I agree with the point that at least have him in for the beginnings of quarters rather when the team gets near the penalty or is already in it.

    I believe Strat about the bounce effect. Per my eye-test the Celtics were more open and/or less rushed on their threes this game than the last two. That’s what made the game so uncompetitive. As for our offense, the Celtics have so many good one on one defenders that it’s hard to scheme against. You try motion and they can just switch if they want to.

    One small wrinkle we could try is to run actions for KAT when he is defended by Tatum. Tatum is an excellent defender but KAT is a load and making Tatum expend a lot of energy on defense might slowdown his offense.

    I think the most realistic change they could make is to have Brunson play more offball and have somebody else (Hart?) bring up the ball faster.

    Part of the reason why their offense was good in the fourth quarter of the first two games is that they were in a hurry (also, getting stops) and had to get up court fast. The slow buildup sucks for them.

    I think it boils down to a disagreement as to whether it’s more that Thibs’ offense is ass or whether the Knicks’ players are playing like ass on offense.

    This is not an either/or proposition. There is no question Thibs has to figure out something to improve the flow of the offense, and there is no question that in terms of execution the buck stops with the players and their skills or limitations. One can peacefully and rationally debate both sides. This often is the case. Alas, here comes the simplistic mindset of some posters who can neither control their emotions nor understand the complexity of the situation. For them it’s Thibs, Thibs, Thibs, and more Thibs. As if there is a magic wand that a coach has and when a new one comes in we will suddenly become the showtime Lakers but with an impenetrable defense. KAT will have six three pointers and a triple double every game, and so on and so forth. People have every right to disagree with the coach and express it. However, pushing aggressively this same and same and same explanation on every occasion becomes unbearable, provokes equivalent reactions, and makes threads like today depressing. It was last season, in the post season, at the beginning of the season, it then became the minutes police issue, now the bad offense issue, and the list goes on and on and on. Man, can you think of anything else than Thibs to comment on?

    I believe Strat about the bounce effect.

    I do, too. I don’t think it’s a rule that determines outcomes or anything, but it’s real. Clyde always says the same thing whenever a team is making a comeback.

    It’s also why I won’t lose hope if the Knicks lose the next two games. The Celtics will have put an extreme amount of effort into picking themselves off the mat, and we’ll be in a good position to win game 6.

    For them it’s Thibs, Thibs, Thibs, and more Thibs. As if there is a magic wand that a coach has and when a new one comes in we will suddenly become the showtime Lakers but with an impenetrable defense. KAT will have six three pointers and a triple double every game, and so on and so forth.

    Please stop punching the straw man. He’s in the gutter and he is bleeding out of his ears

    Please stop punching the straw man. He’s in the gutter and he is bleeding out of his ears

    This is another gem. Thanks for making my point though.

    Wouldn’t it nice if a 22-10 start like the Pacers just had was in the range of possible outcomes for us on Monday?

    Instead we’ll play a starting lineup that is DOA and it’ll be like 21-8 halfway through Q1

    What did Mathurin do and how did he get ejected while the guy that Will Smithed him merely got a T? (And how did benches not clear?) (watching with sound off)

    (As someone who has come to love Benedict, and as someone who can’t stand D’Andre Hunter, I find this to be a travesty of justice!)

    I didn’t realize Donnie watched so much basketball as to have strong feelings about Benedict Mathurin and DeAndre Hunter. Not gonna lie, man, it kinda hurts. I was ok with you not having feelings for us when I thought you were too cool to have feelings. But learning that you hate someone as obscure as Deandre Hunter has sent me into a tizzy. Ugh, I can’t believe Thibs did this!!

    Mathurin apparently punched Hunter in the mid-section prior to the ball being inbounded. Hunter reacted by walking up to Mathurin pointing his finger and suddenly shoved Mathurin to the floor. Myles Turner then ran over and bumped Hunter. Both Hunter and Turner received techs, but Mathurin was ejected as his punch was ruled a flagrant 2.

    This is another gem. Thanks for making my point though.

    The fuck are you even talking about.

    Go show me the part where any Knickerblogger said we’d be the Showtime Lakers with unstoppable defense if we fired Thibs, or anything in that universe.

    If you can’t find such a comment, then you’re making stupid ass straw man arguments. I’ll go ahead and wait for you to find the post that says the Knicks would be a totes great team if they fired Thibs. Go ahead and track that down for me. I’ll wait.

    One nice thing about the Knicks-Celts series is that there aren’t any trash-talking punks or fake tough guys on either team. Good, clean, high character basketball. At least, that’s how I see it.

    Count the amount of isos you see from Indy

    Very hard team to defend

    Cavs imploding.

    Indy’s energy and confidence leads to shots going in. It’s the opposite with the Cavs. Boy are they in trouble! Where’s the fire Atkinson squad? 😂

    Donnie Pacers Fan caught Pacers Fever sometime in April by watching a game Mathurin dominated on both ends of, and after the game was interviewed and he cane off as highly intelligent; it kind of reminded me of when I fell in love with Sprewell back in the day, and it just sort of stuck, viscerally.

    As for Hunter, he’s ugly.

    Rick Carlisle knows how to use Turner. Wonder if he could help Towns

    Cavs should just go back to Cleveland rather than play the second half.

    Knicks did go 2-1 vs Indiana this season winning at home by 25 and at Indy by 13.

    I can’t believe how poorly prepared Cleveland was for this game.

    Of course, they did choke away a lead in game 2 in horrific fashion, so maybe it’s not all that surprising.

    Or maybe they are so banged up that they just can’t keep up. Mobley and Garland are pretty invisible.

    Giannis might be a Cav

    The have the pieces Garland and Allen for Giannis

    “Rick Carlisle knows how to use Turner. Wonder if he could help Towns”

    Carlisle is an excellent coach.

    Carlisle is an excellent coach.

    Agreed, and I think that it is a great thing to remember, since Carlisle has had a number of major lapses himself over the years in the playoffs.

    Let’s go …. cavs? Do we want to play the pacers?? 🙂

    I definitely still want the Pacers if I’m the Knicks.

    After hearing the Cavs quotes following their Game 1 loss I’m not surprised by this, they complained about Indiana of all teams playing too physical and dirty in Game 1. Great record this season but still a soft ass team.

    “Good, clean, high character basketball.”

    Well, except for the Horford NFL pulling guard thing… with elbows akimbo…

    I actually appreciate Horford, but he’s been a bit reckless. He’s even embarrassing the refs who aren’t allowed to call him on it.

    other than the whole spending time with loved ones, which is a very fortunate thing – one of the more enjoyable aspects of holidays/celebrations is that food is normally a focal point…must eat…today’s holiday menu included wings and a meatball sandwich…oh yeah…

    It’s crazy they are able to lead by 41 without their franchise player. #ewingeffectisreal

    Indy is very good. Seems like they’ve been playing possum all season, somewhat due to injury, but they went into the playoffs on a 15-4 run and haven’t looked back. At full health like they are right now, they are very hard to stop. Maybe not as hard as it looks right now against a mortally wounded Cleveland team, but still…

    And as much as I don’t like Hali’s big mouth and swag, he is a damn good offensive player, and that “overrated” stuff was total nonsense. That pass into the post to Turner after feinting a look to the corner was elite.

    I don’t understand why the Cavs haven’t even attempted to slow the pace down. They play right into Indy’s hands.

    When I’m googling worse playoff loss in NBA history not a good sign ….. 56 point margin, Lakers over Warriors, 1973

    When I’m googling worse playoff loss in NBA history not a good sign ….. 56 point margin, Lakers over Warriors, 1973

    OKC came very close to breaking that record vs. Memphis in Round 1 this year. The were up by 58 or even 60 at some point late in the fourth.

    Cavs down but I wouldn’t count them out of the series quite yet.

    Just like if we win tomorrow night it’s far from over.

    And why would we wanna play the Pacers anyway? We’d have the dreaded home court advantage

    We really need to take advantage of this opportunity. Get by the Celtics and we might end up with a great shot to reach the finals. Tomorrow is so key for us.

    If we get past the Celtics it’s probably the Pacers who have a great shot at the finals.

    I don’t see any way the Cavs can beat this Pacers team 3 straight, especially now that Spida’s ankle is barking.

    It’s funny I remember when we couldn’t score points against Atlanta and Miami in the playoffs there was someone here who kept saying there was no other coach who could make a player out of Obi Toppin, either. He seems to be doing just fine now.

    Pacers proved they were good last year and finished this season very well after a slow start.

    The Cavs are very good, but they are not as good as their regular season record. They aren’t as good as Boston or OKC. They are somewhere between us and those top teams.

    So this series was probably closer than perceptions to begin with, but the Cavs are very banged up. They gave away 2 games to injuries and probably have a couple of players only out there now because it’s the playoffs. If they were healthy, they’d have a huge shot to win 3 in a row, but it’s going to be tougher from here.

    There are rumblings that Atklinson is getting badly outcoached and is just a regular season coach. I’m not buying it. The Cavs are very good and coached very well. They are just hurt and this series was always going to be close.

    “…there was someone here who kept saying there was no other coach who could make a player out of Obi Toppin, either.”

    I know that someone wasn’t me, unless you are stupidly distorting my opinion that Obi’s best role was energy guy off the bench, which has turned out to be about as spot on as one could be. Going into this game, he was averaging 15.9 mpg in these playoffs…the exact same amount he averaged in his last playoff run under Thibs!

    I had small bets on the Pacers and Cavs to win it all from the start of the season but cashed both out at a profit before the game. Too bad I wasn’t smart enough to hold onto the Pacers. I recently concluded the Cavs were too banged up to win it all so I should take that money and run given how much the odds dropped, but that the Pacers weren’t good enough to win it all. I should have waited 1 more game with Indy. I probably would have gotten a better price.

    For them it’s Thibs, Thibs, Thibs, and more Thibs. As if there is a magic wand that a coach has and when a new one comes in we will suddenly become the showtime Lakers but with an impenetrable defense. KAT will have six three pointers and a triple double every game, and so on and so forth.

    Everyone knows our issues on defense. That’s not even a debate.

    I think everyone understands that a big part of our underperformance on offense in the playoffs is that both Detroit and Boston have excellent defenses.

    But it’s possible to look at the offfensive skillsets of each player and the overall skill of the starters and conclude they are drastically underperforming that talent/skill level. That’s my view.

    If I thought they were choking, I’d say it. IMO they are not.

    If I thought they had a good plan but it was being ineffective I’d say it. I don’t.

    You can visually see the total lack of organized player and ball movement.

    You can visually see them walk the ball up unless Boston misses and Hart gets the rebound and tries to push.

    Everything is a struggle on every possession because there is no offensive plan other than give it to Brunson and see what happens.

    That has to be coaching.

    red
    @bluelemxnade

    Out of every top 25 RS team ever, three lost in the second round. The 2016 Spurs and two teams captained by the Spider himself

    This account is tearing into Mitchell

    Idk I think the Pacers are getting lucky again. Cleveland was banged up and Spida didn’t play the 2nd half.

    Also, don’t forget Hali had a wretched shooting slump for about half the season… that’s where the overrated stuff comes from.

    It would be an epic rematch if we faced them in the ECF, but Boston will probably have something to say about that.

    Shit on Mitchell all you want but at the end of the day isn’t he just a slightly better version of Brunson?

    Obi is the same player but now he’s on a team that is offense first instead of defense first so he fits in better.

    Comments are closed.