Categories
Uncategorized

Knicks Morning News (2023.09.25)

  • James Dolan Says MSG Won’t Sell New York Knicks or Rangers – Barron’s
    [news.google.com] — Monday, September 25, 2023 6:16:39 AM

    James Dolan Says MSG Won’t Sell New York Knicks or Rangers  Barron’s

  • Jeff Van Gundy on attempting to break up fights: “I know how criminals plead temporary insanity” – Basketball Network
    [news.google.com] — Monday, September 25, 2023 5:36:14 AM

    Jeff Van Gundy on attempting to break up fights: “I know how criminals plead temporary insanity”  Basketball Network

  • A Trade The New York Knicks Must Make – BVM Sports
    [news.google.com] — Sunday, September 24, 2023 7:49:19 PM

    A Trade The New York Knicks Must Make  BVM Sports

  • A Trade The New York Knicks Must Make – Sports Illustrated
    [news.google.com] — Sunday, September 24, 2023 7:40:50 PM

    A Trade The New York Knicks Must Make  Sports Illustrated

  • Knicks take two steps back in Bleacher Report All-Star trade proposal – Daily Knicks
    [news.google.com] — Sunday, September 24, 2023 5:00:53 PM

    Knicks take two steps back in Bleacher Report All-Star trade proposal  Daily Knicks

  • Knicks Trade For Raptors’ OG Anunoby In New Bold Proposal – NBA Analysis Network
    [news.google.com] — Sunday, September 24, 2023 4:43:03 PM

    Knicks Trade For Raptors’ OG Anunoby In New Bold Proposal  NBA Analysis Network

  • Knicks could have a real shot at signing the Greek Freak – Empire Sports Media
    [news.google.com] — Sunday, September 24, 2023 4:18:14 PM

    Knicks could have a real shot at signing the Greek Freak  Empire Sports Media

  • Knicks Aren’t Just Keeping Tabs on 76ers’ Joel Embiid – Sports Illustrated
    [news.google.com] — Sunday, September 24, 2023 2:31:00 PM

    Knicks Aren’t Just Keeping Tabs on 76ers’ Joel Embiid  Sports Illustrated

  • When is the 2024 NBA trade deadline? – Daily Knicks
    [news.google.com] — Sunday, September 24, 2023 10:00:44 AM

    When is the 2024 NBA trade deadline?  Daily Knicks

  • ‘Very Deliberate’ New York Knicks Must Soon Make Immanuel … – Sports Illustrated
    [news.google.com] — Sunday, September 24, 2023 8:39:24 AM

    ‘Very Deliberate’ New York Knicks Must Soon Make Immanuel …  Sports Illustrated

  • Ranking 3 superstar trade targets by urgency Knicks should have – Daily Knicks
    [news.google.com] — Sunday, September 24, 2023 8:00:24 AM

    Ranking 3 superstar trade targets by urgency Knicks should have  Daily Knicks

  • 79 replies on “Knicks Morning News (2023.09.25)”

    Re-post:
    I’m going to make a bold prediction:

    In 2023-24, Julius Randle is going to have the best year of his career.

    I am basing this prediction on the premise that his career trajectory has been upward for the last 4 years, and that 2021-22 was an outlier. He is in the midst of his physical prime and has enough experience to have figured out how to be efficient at high usage. He will be playing with the best supporting cast of his career. He’s overcome the enormous obstacle of being pilloried by both Knicks fans and the NY media. He has a bigger chip on his shoulder than ever because even with him being compromised by injury and largely terrible in the playoffs, he saw how far the team might have gone if he played like he did before getting hurt. Jalen Brunson is the perfect PG for him, Josh Hart is another role model, and all of the young players inproving around him will bring out the best in him as a player and teammate. And the nonsense about Obi not getting enough minutes will not be a distraction.

    The benchmark: surpassing last year’s OBPM of 3.9

    What we need for next season is:
    (1) RJ having the best season of his career
    (2) Julius having the best post-season of his career.

    Not that these are my predictions, nor even the keys to next season’s ceiling but boy would they be nice to have. But I do think both are possibly achievable with a better minutes allocation. And a side benefit may very well be Julius having the best season of his career.

    In his newsletter, Macri mentioned among his 10 things he’s most looking forward to is Mitch hitting the 80 game mark this season. While that would be awesome, it’s probably not happening.

    What could happen though is Mitch getting even better than he was last year. He should continue to lead the leage in OReb%, but there is still substantial room for improvement in his DReb%. Last year, even though he was at a career high of 20%, he was only tied for 44th in the league, on a par with guys like John Collins, Lauri Markaten, and below guys like KP and Deni Avdija. There is no way that iHart and Randle should have more DRebs per 36 than him. Hopefully it’s a point of emphasis for him this offseason. That and taking 5000 FTs a day.

    IMO the Knicks had to make a bigger move than just signing DDV to take the next step this year. I’m not holding it against them for not doing that. A trade has to be available and the deal has to make sense. If there’s nothing out there, you kick the can down the road. That’s what they did. They still have until the trade deadline to do something more meaningful. Right now though, I’m still expecting this to be a disappointing season unless one of either RJ, Grimes or Quickley takes a big step forward or there is a trade later. I’m expecting them all to be a bit better (Mitch too), but we needed a significant upgrade somewhere like Anunoby instead of RJ to take that next significant step to start this year.

    If everybody is healthy it seems like this team has a fairly narrow bandwidth. Low 40’s floor, high 40’s ceiling with low 50’s probably representing an absolute best case scenario.

    That ain’t bad! We’ve hit that benchmark where we’re a lock for the playoffs unless something goes horribly wrong. Been a long time since we could say that.

    Right now though, I’m still expecting this to be a disappointing season unless one of either RJ, Grimes or Quickley takes a big step forward or there is a trade later. I’m expecting them all to be a bit better (Mitch too)

    This seems contradictory.

    So you think the season will be a disappointment but you expect them to be a bit better?

    They lost to Miami in the second round in 6 games (with game 6 coming down to the wire).

    If they’re a bit better, they win 50 games and go to the ECF. That would be a disappointment for you?

    There’s a fluff piece in The Ringer: “The Knicks Are Finally in Position to Land a Star Again”

    https://www.theringer.com/nba/2023/9/25/23888170/new-york-knicks-trade-rumors-joel-embiid-donovan-mitchell

    It’s true. But no one talks about the major fly in the ointment: the Nets are in a slightly better position to land a star.

    It’s incredibly unlucky. Three times this century the Knicks were in this position, and all three times the Nets were, too.

    The first time (Melo), we won, but it was a pyrrhic victory because we had to outbid them.

    The second time (Durant), we lost because they had done a better job than us.

    This third time, I think we have the leg up in team competitiveness, but they have the leg up in assets (their draft pick haul is everything you guys make believe Leon’s is). They also have a major leg up in player lifestyle and amenities, which is something that was important to Durant.

    So let’s say Giannis or Embiid does want to come to NY. Don’t be surprised if they end up playing with Mikal Bridges instead of Jalen Brunson. And even if we do win, we’ll definitely have to pay a major price in player depth in order to outbid our rival.

    I think the best thing we can do is the opposite of what we did in 2011, which is let the Nets win the first trade sweepstakes (whether it be Giannis or Embiid), and be in position to win the next one when there’s less competition.

    “What we need for next season is:
    (1) RJ having the best season of his career
    (2) Julius having the best post-season of his career.”

    The problem with prediction #1 is that RJ could have the best season of his career and still be lousy. His best season’s BPM was -1.2, and that was on the back of an unsustainable 40% from 3. He has yet to post a positive OBPM or DBPM.

    As to Randle’s postseason, I think the sample size is still pretty small and most of that sample is tainted by a lousy supporting cast (2022) and an ankle injury (2023.) But hey, let’s get to the playoffs and worry about that later!

    But I do think both are possibly achievable with a better minutes allocation.

    I don’t know how we can have a better minutes allocation regarding Randle, we don’t have a proper backup so he’ll continue to play heavy minutes.

    Draft assets (first rounders only)
    BKN:
    2025 PHX 1st (unprotected)
    2027 PHX 1st (unprotected)
    2027 PHI 1st (top-8 protected)
    2028 BKN 1st
    2029 BKN 1st
    2029 PHX 1st (unprotected)
    2029 DAL 1st (unprotected)
    2030 BKN 1st

    That’s 7 unprotected firsts and one protected 1st

    NYK:
    2024 NYK 1st
    2024 DET 1st (top 18 protected with descending protections)
    2024 DAL 1st (top 10
    2024 WAS 1st (top-12 protected with descending protections)
    2025 NYK 1st
    2025 MIL 1st (top-4 protectsd)
    2026 NYK 1st
    2027 NYK 1st
    2028 NYK 1st
    2029 NYK 1st
    2030 NYK 1st

    That’s 7 unprotected and 4 protected

    One can theorize about the value of the 2029 unprotected picks from DAL and PHX, but I wouldn’t bet on Mark Cuban tanking in years when he doesn’t own picks and probably the same with PHX.

    They also have a major leg up in player lifestyle and amenities, which is something that was important to Durant.

    Since we’re listing pros and cons, what about MSG? Is that a tie with Barclays Center? I know players don’t come here just because of MSG, but let’s not pretend like it won’t make any difference at all. And also the fans, everybody was talking about how crazy the atmosphere was at the Garden during the playoffs. Players notice this, and want to play on those games.

    The problem with prediction #1 is that RJ could have the best season of his career and still be lousy

    Agreed but the RJ problem is that he really hasn’t improved. If he improves that is a big big step if not for his on court value but the trade value narrative.

    This seems contradictory.

    So you think the season will be a disappointment but you expect them to be a bit better?

    I think the most likely scenario for our young players is to inch forward as a group. But as I’ve said several times, I think the rest of the league as a whole will improve more than we have/will as a whole.

    I see higher quality upside on some of the teams below us where someone will likely make a really big leap forward and I think some of the really bad teams added quality via the the draft and a couple of those players will make noise this year.

    So it would not shock me if at the end of the year I think several of our own players have improved their skillsets but we are fighting for a playoff spot in the .500 range because we lost some extra games against improved teams that are just beginning their turnaround or ready to fight for play-in or playoffs.

    I see very few teams where I can say “This team is clearly going to take a step back”.

    My expected range is between 44-48 wins this season. This is the type of team that I’ve previously said I would be happy with, so I won’t complain. I think they have between now and next years offseason to make a big move or their window on adding a real superstar to this group will be closed by salary cap constraints.

    I don’t think MSG vs Barclays matters as much as we’d like it to, Cyber.

    But when I gave Brooklyn the leg up in lifestyle and amenities, I was referring to the fact that the Nets’ facilities are Brooklyn based whereas the Knicks are Westchester based.

    If you play for the Nets, you probably live in the city and practice two minutes away from Barclay’s in a penthouse basketball court with floor-to-ceiling windows. Whereas if you’re a Knick, you probably live in the burbs (or White Plains next to CGreene, apparently) or commute there to practice at a SUNY school.

    (This was something that came up when Durant chose the Nets, by the way.)

    They also have a major leg up in player lifestyle and amenities, which is something that was important to Durant.

    Do you think none of the players around the league noticed what a dysfunctional mess Brooklyn was the last few years and that every one of the 3 stars that went there eventually wanted out?

    I like their current young core. I think they are going to be a competitive team and are positioned very well, but I also think almost no one wants to play for Brooklyn over the Knicks right now.

    There’s been a lot of smoke in the past few days about Toronto as a potential Dame destination, which obviously comes with the strong possibility that Anunoby would be on the move. Portland may well prioritize picks and/or younger players over a pending UFA like Anunoby, so we might be able to get involved as a third (or fourth) team.

    Raptors get: Dame

    Knicks get: OG Anunoby

    Blazers get: Gary Trent Jr., Evan Fournier, 2026/2028/2030 FRPs from TOR, 2024/2026 FRPs from NYK

    You can of course play around with the specific draft compensation and if Portland actually views RJ as an asset (questionable), he’d likely have to be involved. The framework more or less checks out though, IMO.

    This was something that came up when Durant chose the Nets, by the way

    To be clear, it was probably overblown when it did come up. Lots of NBA teams have practice facilities in the burbs. Brooklyn unfortunately has what is considered to be one of the best in the league. How much it matters is up for debate, but that it’s much better really isn’t.

    Do you think none of the players around the league noticed what a dysfunctional mess Brooklyn was the last few years and that every one of the 3 stars that went there eventually wanted out?

    Honestly, no. I think they noticed that three of the biggest alphas in the sport chose to play there, and that’s it.

    Call it the Pete Davidson effect. Once you start reeling them in, it gives you a level of credibility that someone who’s never reeled them in doesn’t have. That makes it easier to reel the next one in.

    Also the Nets were a toe away from a championship. I’d hardly call them a dysfunctional mess for years. Kyrie was a mess, yeah. But Joe Tsai runs a good ship.

    Hubert, I do not doubt you are right about the physical allure of the Net’s practice facility versus ours, but I cannot fathom a top player opting for that and the Barclays over whatever we have and MSG. If you are a star at MSG….look who will be in the front row…

    To be clear, my comment on the practice facility was all else being equal other than where they are on court. The Net’s facility besting the Knicks’ is clearly an advantage.

    In my opinion, there is zero comparison between MSG and the Barclay Center in terms of prestige. The difference is immense. Virtually every sophisticated New Yorker knows it, and even most non-sophisticated NYers.

    There is also the fact that in any arena that the Knicks travel to, there are ample Knicks fans, even to the point where they seem to outnumber the home team’s fans. And nowhere is that more true than in the Barclays Center.

    This is a Knicks town and will probably always be. The Nets had one opportunity to make significant inroads with the Durant-Kyrie caper, and it exploded in their faces.

    Of course, that doesn’t make a bit of difference to opposing GMs, and players aren’t going to lining up to take massive discounts to play at MSG. But everyone around the league saw both what happened to the Nets and how the Knicks upstaged them in 2020-21 with a far inferior team, to the point where the Nets had to offer incentives to sell playoff tickets, while the Knicks fans were blocking 7th Avenue after 1 measly playoff win.

    Also the Nets were a toe away from a championship

    Statements like this always make me laugh. So if The Nets beat The Bucks then they for sure win the next 2 rounds? I get that Atlanta was kind of a flukey team for the conference finals that year but The Nets would still have to win 2 more rounds to win a title.

    This is like people saying the 76er’s were a Kawhi buzzer beater away from winning it all when they lost in the second round. Still would have had to win 8 more games.

    If you are a star at MSG….look who will be in the front row…

    Google search celebrities at Nets games: Jay-Z, Beyonce, Bad Bunny, Rihanna, Bill Clinton, David Beckham, Olivia Rodrigo, Paul McCartney, Trevor Noah, Mary J Blige… not exactly slouches.

    When Durant said the Knicks aren’t a cool thing any more, it was part of a larger thought process that he was explaining: most of these players didn’t grow up seeing anything good happen in MSG. They don’t have those memories. They don’t know MSG as the mecca of basketball. They know it as the place where a shitty basketball team played for most of their life. It doesn’t sell the way you want it to.

    You’re right, Swifty. I take that back.

    “The Nets were a toe away from beating the champs,” is what I should have said.

    It’s still quite far from “a dysfunctional mess.”

    “If you play for the Nets, you probably live in the city and practice two minutes away from Barclay’s in a penthouse basketball court with floor-to-ceiling windows. Whereas if you’re a Knick, you probably live in the burbs (or White Plains next to CGreene, apparently) or commute there to practice at a SUNY school.”

    The Knicks have their own practice facility in Tarrytown and haven’t practiced at SUNY Purchase in years.

    Really, this is one of the most bullshit narratives ever. Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving did not choose the Nets because of the location of the practice facility.

    Many players prefer to live outside the city, in a giant house in the ‘burbs with lawns, butlers, pools, etc. Purchase, Scarsdale, Rye, Greenwich, Chappaqua, etc. has some of the most exclusive real estate in the country.

    And living in Brooklyn isn’t the same as living on Park Avenue. If a player preferred to live in Manhattan’s swanky areas, the commute to the Brooklyn practice facility is hardly a 15-minute affair. The drive from Tarrytown to MSG during reverse commute time is not much of an issue. Furthermore, players really don’t have to practice in the team facility except for official team practices. There are a bunch of first-class gyms in Manhattan, including this one.

    I seriously doubt that the location of any team’s practice facility bothers the players very much and is hardly a consideration in their decision-making, especially in a place like New York. They might gripe about aspects of it, but that’s just human nature. Durant talked the shit that he did because he likes to talk shit.

    “Statements like this always make me laugh. So if The Nets beat The Bucks then they for sure win the next 2 rounds?”

    The larger point is, what’s the fucking difference? The Nets had Durant, Kyrie, and James Harden all in their primes and never got out of the second round. And the minute things started going south, every one of them couldn’t get out of Brooklyn fast enough, despite management going to the ends of the earth to find a way to keep them aboard without destroying the future of the franchise. Those stars dropped Brooklyn like a bad habit. In other words, it took a couple of years of premature playoff exits for those guys, especially Durant, to conclude that the Nets weren’t cool. Yet even after decades of dysfunction and losing, guys like Donovan Mitchell think it would be pretty cool playing for the Knicks. I didn’t hear much about him wanting to play in Brooklyn.

    We can quibble as to who can put together the best pick package. There’s been a lot of discussion in NBA circles about how suddenly our MIL 2025 pick looks very intriguing, but those far out Phoenix picks might be better than anything we have to offer. You could go either way on that one.

    I think the more pertinent question is whether the Nets are in a good position to make an all-in type of trade right now. Is their current team + [superstar X] – [superstar trade package] a contender? I’m not so sure.

    They were under .500 (12-15) after the mega trades last season, and that’s with Mikal Bridges playing like a bonafide superstar himself. You also have to think any team is going to insist on Bridges being a part of the deal. I don’t think Giannis or Embiid are champing at the bit to play with Cam Johnson.

    I mean the Nets have been mostly horrible most of my life and I’m in my mid-40s.

    They were great for a few years in the early aughts, right around the time we started our horrible slide to irrelevance. Then they were trying to compete with us around the STAT/Melo era and had one decent season where they got to the 2nd round with the Garnett/Piece trade. They admirably rebuilt a fun, up and coming team out of that and then traded all of that away and fired a great young coach for the big three that ended up doing nothing and exploded in their faces. They’re thirstier star fuckers than we are right now.

    I really don’t see how a player RIGHT NOW could look at them and look at us and choose them. I mean, they don’t even sell out playoff games and when they play us most of the fans are Knicks fans!

    How come it never comes up that the Lakers practice in El Segundo which is over an hour or worse in traffic from downtown LA? Kobe lived in Orange County. Yeah Westchester sucks. Lol. I’ll take some pictures of the houses I drive by every day and send them over. The golf here sucks too. You know how NBA guys hate golf. Winged Foot, Sleepy Hollow, Quaker Ridge, Fenway, Westchester CC. Those courses suck. It’s a terrible place to live. A real turnoff I’m sure.

    By the way I used to work in Sunset Park where the Nets facility is. I was right across the street in fact. Nice facility. Shitty area that’s hard to get to. From manhattan it’s 40 mins. Isn’t this a Knicks blog where people are supposed to know stuff about the area?

    When Durant said the Knicks aren’t a cool thing any more, it was part of a larger thought process

    Jeez. A rebuttal premised on KD’s larger thought process….

    I think the more pertinent question is whether the Nets are in a good position to make an all-in type of trade right now. Is their current team + [superstar X] – [superstar trade package] a contender? I’m not so sure.

    The very overlooked thing, though, is that this applies to us, as well.

    You want to roll with Brunson, Hart, Randle, Giannis, and Mitch? Cuz that team can’t shoot for shit.

    There would have to be a whole second level of moves to build a team that fits Giannis better.

    cgreene that was nice…putting in a little extra work for the westchester public relations department…

    i’m gonna have to google that spot now and see what it looks like…it’s been so long since i was in the area…

    Edit:
    okay, i landed in white plains some years ago, and dated someone in connecticut when I lived by highland falls…

    the hudson is a crazy scenic area, feels old…roads are kind of scary though…skinny roads with trees everywhere…

    add in the kamikaze deer…pretty place though…

    Jeez. A rebuttal premised on KD’s larger thought process….

    I do think when a superstar chooses the Nets over the Knicks and takes time to tell you why, it is pertinent to a conversation about why a superstar might choose the Nets over the Knicks.

    KD and Kyrie hated management in Brooklyn. I’m not sure players are lining up to go there, then again it’s Kyrie & KD so I’m not sure how much that says

    Players probably have a place in the city and the burbs, probably a couple others too

    Beyond the obvious “go where the most money is” stuff, there are actual legitimate reasons why players might prefer one team over another. One is “home town” kind of stuff. Another is a team’s storied history. Another is marketing opportunities. Another is lifestyle preference. Another is financials above and beyond salary figure, e.g. no state income tax. Another is competency of management. Another is fit with the current team. Another is potential of short-term team success. Another is coach and playing style. Another is family considerations.

    My guess is that the quality of the practice facility and the type of windows it has and the location relative to the arena is down at the bottom of the list of dealbreakers. All of the facilities have state of the art equipment. It’s right there with the quality of the food served at team meals, which I would guess is at least pretty good everywhere. Or the color of the team’s uniform. Or it’s mascot.

    From manhattan it’s 40 mins. Isn’t this a Knicks blog where people are supposed to know stuff about the area?

    40 mins for you, maybe. But I don’t think Kevin Durant took the A/C/E and transfered to the B37 express bus.

    It’s a 15 minute drive from Durant’s home in TriBeCa. Most of the Nets players live in Brooklyn, anyway. Several at the Olympia in DUMBO, others at the cluster of luxury buildings surrounding Barclays.

    I do think when a superstar chooses the Nets over the Knicks and takes time to tell you why, it is pertinent to a conversation about why a superstar might choose the Nets over the Knicks.

    Fully agree. But this thread and your comments are on why a star would choose the Net’s over the Knicks today. KD is pretty much exhibit A in poor career choices for a superstar in any sport

    KD hated management in Brooklyn.

    “I was trying to prove that the Nets are a great organization, that they care about their players, want the best for their players. Certain s— just didn’t work out. I understand that. I’m not here trying to prove that the Nets was wrong, I think they did amazing by me the whole time I was there, not just with the trade. Coming off the Achilles injury, get back into playing — they made sure they were there for me every step of the way. And I appreciate that for life. I feel like we’ll be tied as family members for life regardless of how it finished.”

    – Kevin Durant on March 30, 2023

    But this thread and your comments are on why a star would choose the Net’s over the Knicks today.

    No, my point is that we’re virtually the same now. We have some advantages, they have some.

    So no one is gonna say “I want to come to NY, but only to the Knicks. Don’t ever trade me to the Nets.”

    If Giannis wants to come to NY and the Nets offer more assets, he’ll come to NY and play for the Nets. And they’re flush with assets, which means we have to compete with that.

    That was it.

    You want to roll with Brunson, Hart, Randle, Giannis, and Mitch? Cuz that team can’t shoot for shit.

    Yes, I do. That’s a fuck ton of talent. Filling out a roster with ring chasing shooters is the easiest part of building a contender.

    ESPN Sources: The Knicks promoted Gersson Rosas to Senior VP of Basketball Operations. Rosas — who had been a team consultant for past year — will be among organization’s elder decision-makers now. He was previously Timberwolves’ president, Mavericks’ GM and a Rockets executive.— Adrian Wojnarowski (@wojespn) September 25, 2023

    Seemed like things were headed in this direction for a while. FWIW, I’m not particularly bothered by, Rosas’, um, character issues. Consensual marital affairs are not great, but I mean, pretty low on the list of indiscretions we’ve been forced to sit with.

    I mostly like Rosas’ record in Minnesota, though he had his misses.

    the only person who’s had a problem with nets management was kyrie.. and i wouldn’t defer to his judgment on anything…. for the most part… the nets org as a whole have a pretty good rep around the league and from the top down… it’s a real top notch operation from how they treat their employees to how they reach out to the community…. and it’s starting to pay dividends… going to a net game now even after all the deals… it’s not empty… it’s actually a pretty decent young crowd…

    the knicks do not have that… despite having to burn picks and cap space and employing people’s brothers… in favor of ‘greasing the wheels’ and get people to warm up to the knicks… dolan and how he runs his org is one matter… but having your basketball guy be the face of one of the agent spheres is not a plus…. CAA and klutch and bartelstein and excel.. these guys are not friends at their best and blood enemies at their worst…. it’s not a coincidence that we haven’t had a klutch client on our roster…

    and being successful as a sports star in ny is one thing… but anything short of that is a miserable experience … just look at how the fans and media treated ewing and he was the best player we’ve had ever… and that’s besides the fact that new york being the media capital doesn’t matter anymore… giannis has as much magnification in milwaukee as he would in ny…

    all the top 8 or so cities are mostly fungible… with the warm weather cities having an advantage…. our state/city taxes don’t help either… all those things along with organizational competence and team structure all play more of a role than who or who isn’t sitting in the stands…. there’s also like 25 years of the knicks being the most well known laughing stock of the league that you’re working against… the nets have flat out been better than us during that time….

    Isn’t this a Knicks blog where people are supposed to know stuff about the area?

    by my estimates … there’s like 3 people who actually live in nyc on this blog…

    We probably have about as many people out of the country as in the city, except for when Jowles goes barhopping

    At the time of the KD-Kyrie thing, I think there were a number of factors that led to them choosing the Nets over the Knicks. The biggest factor by far was probably that it was later reported that the Knicks (i.e. Dolan himself) would not offer a max deal to KD due to concerns about his injury. A distant second to that was the fact that the Nets had built a more talented roster than the Knicks had at the time. Third was the fact that even beyond the hesitancy to max KD, the Knicks has been and still had the aura a clown show, starting with Dolan and extending to the FO and coach. The Nets had an aire of competence about them, having pivoted skillfully into an intelligent rebuild after the Pierce-Garnett era.

    Everything after that was just beckground noise in comparison. I’d agree that some of those secondary considerations didn’t help, but KD was not going to go for getting nickeled and dimed on a deal when the Nets offered him a full max with no conditions.

    Finally some Knick-related debate!
    Good points on both sides. Winning is usually the determining factor, though, and we seem to have that edge rn.

    The biggest Knick negative is and will probably always be Dolan. Yes, he has backed off lately, but you never know when he’ll say or do something ridiculous.
    Aside from those factors, I think a player would choose his NY team based on personal preferences.

    As for Brooklyn, I’m curious if they consider Mikal a 1A or see him more as a 2nd star… They’ve got a decent group, but it’s hard to predict how they’ll shake out.

    Oh, and why aren’t the Jets looking into Carson Wentz?? Wilson is dogshit.

    But in terms of today’s discussion, we’re talking about trades, and it is certainly fair to conclude that opposing teams aren’t just going to roll over to a player’s demands to be traded one place or another. I would agree that if the offer from the Nets tops the offer from the Knicks, and the player considers both of them equally in terms of a landing spot, that the Knicks don’t have any sort of built-in advantage. It would probably come down to how the team would look after a trade in terms of getting a deal done. Case in point: Donovan Mitchell made no secret about the fact that he preferred the Knicks. Ainge simply didn’t care and demanded his price. The Cavs met it because they felt they had enough left over post-trade to build a contender. The Knicks would not meet it because they would not had enough left. The same is true for Cronin and the Lillard situation, and for Harden and the Clippers situation.

    As such, the only leverage Giannis has in pushing for a trade to a specific location is to make it clear that he will not extend with the acquiring team no matter what unless it’s his preferred team. And there is no reason to believe that the Knicks are his preferred team right now.

    But beyond that, we have not only been reasonably successful on the court and competently managed during the Leon regime, we have a deep roster without any long-term albatrosses and a nice enough portfolio of future draft picks to entice a superstar that wants a strong post-trade situation. A player like Giannis is not going to want to come here if we are stripped to the bone after a trade Thay goes for us and for the Nets. Without that leverage of Giannis expressing a strong preference, either situation is likely enough. Where the team practices will have zero to do with it.

    What could happen though is Mitch getting even better than he was last year. He should continue to lead the leage in OReb%, but there is still substantial room for improvement in his DReb%. Last year, even though he was at a career high of 20%, he was only tied for 44th in the league,

    Don’t know the actual data but Randle feels like a defensive rebounding vacum cleaner. Our guards rebound well too. Not too many left for Mitch.

    Last year, including playoffs, the team was 53:40. What a fun season!!

    We fixed the Fournier and Cam issues; added Hart and DDV to play an entire season…they’re very young and players are individually significantly getting better; team is developing intuition/chemistry and they actually like each other; coaching staff is improving…even if we only get slighlty better…it’s going to be a lot of fun…

    Why tamper the exitment? – LETS GO!!

    It’s still quite far from “a dysfunctional mess.”

    Kyrie and Harden have been difficult almost everywhere they’ve been, but part of how bad it gets is how players are handled and communicated to behind the scenes. Brooklyn has been a disaster from Harden, through the vaccination, claims of anti-semitism, handling Simmons, straight through the ultimate exit of Durant. The players had difficult times, made comments that made it clear it was a mess, and management got bad press. They were what the Knicks used to be.

    I do think when a superstar chooses the Nets over the Knicks and takes time to tell you why, it is pertinent to a conversation about why a superstar might choose the Nets over the Knicks.

    The Knicks were terrible at that time and run by Mills (lmao).

    No star in their right mind was going to pick the Knicks back then. I thought by now we all understood that opening cap space to attract stars is a bad idea unless the team is actually good and management respected around the league by players and agents.

    I think that all four of Durant, Kyrie, Harden and Simmons are massive head cases. Durant probably the least, and that’s saying something.

    I don’t think the Nets did anything wrong by building that big three. I remember the dread I felt that they were going to win multiple championships the moment they acquired Harden and had a good supporting cast around him, KD and Kyrie, while we seemed destined for a long, painful rebuild run by incompetent boobs.
    Then lo and behold, COVID! The pandemic was the main reason why things blew up because it brought out the worst in Kyrie and that rankled Harden.

    At the same time, enter Leon and a steady hybrid rebuild with zero wait time for the Knicks to make the playoffs and take back the city.

    Still, any attempt to second-guess what the Nets did, or to blame it on the way management handled it, rings hollow to me. I did think it was a joke, a massive blunder, that they hired Steve Nash to be their head coach. Aside from that, even with the personalities involved, they did mostly the right things and fate, including Durant’s long toe, just kicked their ass.

    lol, karma’s a bitch!

    Everyone knows Dame is going to Miami. I hate all this posturing and bullshit coming from the press. Who is going to trade for Dame knowing the first thing out of his mouth is going to be to ask for trade to Miami at the deadline? I don’t see it unless privately Dame is OK with a few other cities and we don’t know about that.

    The much bigger story is Harden because he’s the kind of guy that could show up fat and out of shape to camp. Last we heard from him he had some pretty harsh words about Morey. I’m not sure if he’s stubborn enough to lose money, but he’s stubborn enough to only give 80% or claim an injury until he gets what he wants.

    Hey Jets fans, you guys can have Jimmy Garoppolo if you want. Or as I call him, Janeane Garofalo.

    I’ll even throw in Josh McDaniels AND his visor

    “Hey Jets fans, you guys can have Jimmy Garoppolo if you want. Or as I call him, Janeane Garofalo.

    I’ll even throw in Josh McDaniels AND his visor”

    Anything is better than what we have.

    not sure how anyone sits down with josh mcdaniels and comes away thinking that guy can lead others…

    that’s some weird stuff with chandler jones…if he was even a little sane gotta believe they’d have him playing…

    i’ve read stuff about CTE issues…don’t know if it’s true though…didn’t realize he was jon jones’ brother…

    I am wondering if Mitch doesn’t do great in defensive rebounds because he defends shooters aggressively and goes for blocks too, so that he’s not perfectly positioned for a rebound. If so, that seems fine to me since we have other guys who can pick up the rebounding slack.

    I am sorry to see Keels go. I have been beating the drum for him and was disappointed with the Knicks signing what’s his name instead of Keels. Keels was much better in summer league this year than last year and was still only 19. I think he’s going to come back to haunt the Knicks.

    “I am wondering if Mitch doesn’t do great in defensive rebounds because he defends shooters aggressively and goes for blocks too, so that he’s not perfectly positioned for a rebound. If so, that seems fine to me since we have other guys who can pick up the rebounding slack.”

    In looking at the defensive rebounding leaderboard, I see the big, burly, non-shotblockers like Jonas V, Jokic, Vuc, Sabonis at the top, but Giannis is tied with Sabonis, and other shotblockers like Gobert, Capela, Kessler, Turner, Claxton, and Allen have higher DReb%s than Mitch. It’s true that Mitch plays with good rebounders like Randle and Hart, but 4.9 DRebs per game (6.5 per 36) seems hella low to me for a guy with his size, strength and athleticism. It’s not like he’s getting out in transition like Obi or anything.

    Also, we were 2nd in OReb% and 9th in DReb%. Seems like a reason for that differential has a lot to do with Mitch being so great on the offensive boards and not so much on the defensive boards.

    And if Julius is leaving his guy to pursue DRebs, maybe that’s a problem as well.

    I try to ignore broad takes about whether “stars want to play for the Knicks.” There’s just way too much nuance that gets lost. In the past we’ve capped ourselves out and/or blew through too many assets, so the question was basically entirely hypothetical.

    That didn’t stop people from positing that the reason we didn’t have star players was something endogenous to the Knicks, because “we did too much stupid shit for it to even be possible” was the true but boring answer.

    In the rare instances we’ve actually been in position to get star players (who had other equally lucrative options i.e. not Amar’e), the record is too mixed to draw some broad conclusion. Melo wanted to come here, as did Mitchell. There was a lot of credible reporting that Chris Paul wanted to be here in his prime. We were on Jimmy Butler’s shortlist when he demanded a trade. Same with Anthony Davis.

    We were also of course spurned by LeBron and Wade, as well as the KD/Kyrie package deal. Those are the most notable examples, but I’m sure there are others.

    Every player is a different human being with some idiosyncratic preferences. The safest assumption is that if the money is equal and we can offer a star player(s) a compelling basketball situation, we have no better or worse a shot at getting them than anyone else. There are no shortcuts or roadblocks. Do a bunch of smart stuff and then make your case.

    “I am sorry to see Keels go. I have been beating the drum for him and was disappointed with the Knicks signing what’s his name instead of Keels. Keels was much better in summer league this year than last year and was still only 19. I think he’s going to come back to haunt the Knicks.”

    I get that Keels is young but he just lacks the critical skills that a player his size needs to have. If the FO feels that he’s at best 3-4 years out, I personally feel no reason to be all that attached to him.

    We have pretty much arrived at a place where the Knicks are considered to be a competent basketball team. If we have another season similar to last one, the LOLKnicks label should be mothballed for a while. That matters, I think. The Knicks have been a notable sad sack franchise for a long time, and the players are well aware of that. If that perception can be changed, which it looks like it will, that’s a pretty big feather in Leon’s cap and should make his job easier going foward.

    The edit button is gone fir some reason, so I can’t fix the accidental Chinese character in “lack”

    That’s funny! May I ask what that character means? (or maybe I shouldn’t…)

    I don’t think Keels is particularly adept at ball-handling (he has no left hand whatsoever), or creating (strictly a straight-line driver) or shooting, or high-level passing. Defensively, he gets caught up on screens and can’t stay in front of quicker players. He’s big and tough for a guard, but the skill development is nowhere near where it needs to be to have a shot at playing meaningful minutes on a NBA playoff-level team any time soon.

    The fact that he was in terrible shape at Duke with a ridiculously high percentage of body fat kinda turned me off as well. Even now he doesn’t look particularly cut…which would be less of an issue if he was a better shooter, driver, or ball-handler.

    i think i may be more cut than keels…

    saw he pulled in 58.4k last year, yikes, living in westchester that’s gotta be tough…

    hopefullu he’s got his passport ready to go…

    I thought Keels’ shooting was ok in summer league. It wasn’t great, but if you look at his three point percentage it was not horrible and clearly could improve. He didn’t show off high level passing, but he orchestrated the offense pretty well and the other players were clearly looking for him to do so. On defense I agree he wasn’t good. He didn’t seem to have much of an impact, but I thought that was because he seemed a little lost, not because of some physical inability. He is bigger than a lot of guards and not as quick as some, which means he will be better at certain defensive assignments than others. This is true for many successful players. The Timberwolves were willing to trade for him so he could be in their training camp so maybe they agree with me.

    Keels couldn’t beat his man off the dribble the first couple games I watched. The offense as a whole was atrocious because he couldn’t run the point

    The Timberwolves were willing to trade for him so he could be in their training camp so maybe they agree with me.

    The Iowa Wolves traded for him.

    Let’s be real though, even if he could hack it he’s somewhere behind Brunson/IQ/Grimes/Donte/Hart/Deuce/Windlar/Jaylen Martin

    Technically the Timberwolves G league traded for him, but the article says he’s being invited to the actual Timberwolves training camp. To quote:

    According to Jon Krawczynski of The Athletic, the Minnesota Timberwolves will sign Trevor Keels to a training camp deal.”

    And it’s true the Knicks have a lot of guards, but I was just thinking he might be good long term, not right away.

    Comments are closed.