What to make of the ESPN front-office rankings

If you’re in the habit of discussing the New York Knicks with a friend, family member, coworker or even the occasional stray cat, like sports-centric subset of Godwin’s Law, eventually the conversation will turn to James Dolan.

Typically, if casual fans know who a team owner is by name that’s probably not a good sign. Quick, without Googling, who owns the San Antonio Spurs? We can wait. Yeah, I couldn’t pick Peter Holt out of a lineup, either. There are many ways to classify failure in basketball, but by any measure, Dolan checks off all of them. So, when the ESPN Forecast panel ranked current NBA front offices this week it wasn’t stupefying to find Dolan ranked dead last.

It’s a crowdsourced list, and there’s no objective measure (aside from wins and losses, of course) to rank ownership. It’s a subjective mainly emotional evaluation, and the fact that Dolan’s a punching bag/punch line throughout the league means that even the smart NBA writers at ESPN are going to rank him badly. I could go back through all the basketball-related decisions Dolan has made since taking over the Knicks, but that’s no longer necessary after this shocking  proclamation.

To be fair, most owners probably aren’t experts in the sport they’re involved in because their area of expertise is in an entirely different realm. And that’s okay, but only if they acknowledge that and leave the basketball personal to somebody who actually is an expert in basketball, football, soccer, etc. There will always be hands-on owners in sports, and some will find success, while others will not. Dolan is on the latter end of this. But hey, he’s making progress. Maybe.

When you’re ranked behind Donald Sterling in any aspect of life, that’s a major concern. However, if this listicle returns next year around this time Dolan could be significantly higher if things stay the course, and more importantly, Dolan sticks to his word. Owners often get credit for the work their general manager’s do. Sure, they deserve credit for hiring successful GM’s, but that’s typically where the credit should cease.

Clay Bennett being ranked 11th on the list is a perfect example of this odd phenomenon. You could make the case Sam Presti, Oklahoma City Thunder’s GM, is the best general manager in the NBA today. Not definitively of course, but he’s in the conversation. The Thunder have become a model organization, but how much of that is really due to Bennett’s oversight? There isn’t an easy answer because we don’t really know the inner-workings of the organization. The fact remains, ranking owners is an onerous task because who really deserves the most credit for a team’s success; the owner or the general manager? Or even the head coach?

It’s a difficult and complicated task to accurately and fairly rank the owners. Mikhail Prokhorov and Jerry Reinsdorf both found themselves in the top-10 on the list when you could make the case that neither are truly deserving of that spot. Prokhorov has what appears to be an unlimited bank account, along with having no regard for the salary cap, and it’s led to back-to-back playoff runs. Reinsdorf operates in a more conservative approach, but thanks to his hire of Tom Thibodeau the team has over-achieved. Prokhorov and Reinsdorf are bizarre individuals, like Dolan, but the team franchise hasn’t been the circus the Knicks have been under Dolan through the years. Sure, things have been rocky at times in Brooklyn and Chicago, but they can continue to get away with it because the bottom hasn’t fallen out. To prevent that, you have to hire the right people.

Phil Jackson reportedly has complete control of basketball-related decisions for the Knicks. Dolan relinquishing that power is manifestly a good thing, but we already established that. What hasn’t been established is the assumption that if Phil turns things around for the Knicks sooner rather than later. Dolan’s public image will probably start to shift into a much more positive light. If things go poorly, at least early, the easy target will be Dolan.

If Phil isn’t able to right the ship he most likely won’t get blamed for it because the narrative will be something to the tune of, “things were just too far gone to be appropriately fixed.” It’s a win-win situation for Phil because he’s seen as the hero Gotham has needed (Donnie Walsh anyone?) for years to save the citizens from Dolan’s wrath. It would take Phil trade four first-round picks for JaVale McGee or something of that sort for the fans to really turn on Phil. And even then most would probably expect it was Dolan meddling or something of that nature. If Phil succeeds Dolan looks a little better to the fans because he finally got out of his own way. If Phil fails, Dolan is the fall guy and falls right back into that villain role. If he still doesn’t occupy that role for most fan’s, of course.

What the 2013-14 Knicks’ season looks to have shown Dolan is that the only way for him climb out of being ranked dead last in these types of rankings is by simply doing less. Less is more is a tired cliche, but it’s one that holds true for owning a sports franchise. Employ great basketball minds beneath you, stay out of their way, and good things will come. Just ask Clay Bennett, Peter Holt, Micky Arison, Wyc Grousbeck and Herb Simon. If Dolan sticks to his word and lets Phil work his magic (or is it Zen), maybe he can join this list of successful NBA franchise owners.

Liked it? Take a second to support Chase Thomas on Patreon!

Chase Thomas

Chase Thomas is new to KnickerBlogger but has written about the Knicks for years now. Was in attendance for Nate Robinson's 41 point night versus the Hawks. Successfully annoyed Allan Houston's assistant for talking his ear off while sitting next to him at a Knicks game 3 years ago. Follow him on twitter: https://twitter.com/cuttothechaset

16 thoughts to “What to make of the ESPN front-office rankings”

  1. It’s hard to take these rankings seriously when they rank Woodson as high as they did. 28 out of 30 is a joke.

    And did they really rank Prokhorov in the top 10? I would think he and Dolan are at least neck and neck.

  2. I would have ranked Woodson 60th., behind every head coach and the chairs that they sit in. Because I truly believe this team would have won more games this year with an empty chair instead of Woodson. And I’m serious. Not remotely exaggerating. If no one had been in charge of this team, the players would have figured out themselves who the best lineups were. And the late game execution couldn’t have been worse and might have been better. And I don’t anyone else you can say that about.

  3. Completely agree with you Hubert (as I’ve been saying for more than a month). I think the absolutely moronic decision to keep Woodson along for the last 20 games has cost us the playoffs. Not much else (we would have probably been steamrolled by Miami), but it’s still something. This lost season, and maybe next one, is all on Dolan and his stupefying Mills hiring and Woodson late not-firing.

  4. Our owner is a bozo, but there’s a new sherif in town, so who knows? Maybe we’re on the come up. Subjectively, I think Dolan is a better owner than Dan Gilbert, although he may be a bigger asshole. So hey! We’re not dead last. And the Buss kid running the Lakers seems like a poor man’s Dolan in some respects. But yeah-it’s a very tough thing to do. If you credit the OKC owners for hiring a good GM and letting him do his thing you also have to ding them for being too cheap to pay a luxury tax. Is purposefully not putting out the best team possible to save money that much better than being a meddling idiot? At least Jimmy is trying his hardest to win a title.

  5. What’s funny is not only did Dolan come in last, he came in a DISTANT last. 29th-place Sterling was closer to coming in 21st than he was to slipping behind Dolan for 30th.

    Dolan stands alone. Now if only we can make sure he stands alone without any communication to anyone involved with the Knicks.

  6. Dolan can go from #30 to #1 very easily. He just needs to sign checks and not ask questions.

  7. I hate Jim Dolan. But he can’t rank last among owners in a year where he shelled out $60mm to coax Phil Jackson out of cushy retirement to take over operations of the team from him. That’s a power move, and that move alone should get him ahead of 10 owners.

    Prokhorov is a joke. Dolan mortgaged two future NBA seasons (this year and next year) for last year’s 54 win team, which was legitimately good, reinvigorated the fan base, and was the best team we’d had in 13 years. Prokhorov mortgaged FOUR future NBA seasons for this year’s Nets team, which is a mediocre 46 win team that’s going nowhere fast and who no one gives a shit about.

  8. The best thing about Prokhorov being ranked No. 8 is that he didn’t just mortgage the future, but also literally made Hawks’ fans giddy for taking on JJ’s contract and giving up draft picks for the honor.

  9. @9 how were you able to find any Hawks fans to know that they were giddy? (-:

    You should watch more Hawk games. There are so few people in the stands that it gets easy to recognize the few that are there.

  10. Re: the discussion in the last thread about ESPN’s new proprietary metric

    Glad to see that the posters on the board are still on top of their “respect the smell test” game. Where would I ever be without you guys?

  11. To directly respond to the headline, Dolan has created a high profile as a bad, meddlesome owner. Media have been inundated with tales of his controlling tactics.

  12. There is at least one possible objective measure of sports ownership effectiveness that I’d like to see: playoff wins/payroll dollar spent, both adjusted for the playoff format and pay scale of the sport, over say a ten year period. By this measure the Knicks might just rank dead last among all sports franchises, not just the NBA.

Comments are closed.