Knicks 2007 Season Preview

For the most part, the Knicks are starting off the 2007 season with the same roster that they ended the 2006 season. So instead on dwelling on each player or position, I’d like to concentrate on how the Knicks are going to be different in 2007.

The New Guys

Although the same lovable group that lost a whopping 59 games will be back, there are a few new cast members. Isiah Thomas sought to revamp the small forward position in the offseason. Thomas signed Jeffries from the Washington Wizards and grabbed Renaldo Balkman with his first pick in the draft. Both players are lanky perimeter defenders that can play a variety of positions. Neither are a threat on offense, although Balkman can move without the ball and finish close to the hoop. In case you’ve been in a coma since June and have never seen Renaldo Balkman, you can identify him by looking for the skinny version of Brian Grant. Jeffries will start the season on the IR, which means that the rookie will see a little more playing time early on.

The Knicks also drafted Mardy Collins. With the depth they have at guard and Collins’ lukewarm preseason, he’ll have first row seats to all 82 Knick games. Just last week the Knicks signed Kelvin Cato. The 6-11 big man will attempt to push Jerome James to the bench which should be easier than actually pushing Jerome James to the bench.

The Class of 06

The Knicks only improvement won’t just come from their new acquirees. The Knicks trio of Frye, Lee, and Robinson look to improve in their sophomore season. In the future, if any of the three are going to the mid-winter classic, it will be Frye. Last year Frye started off hot, but lost confidence on his jumper mid-season, passing on wide-open shots. He looked healthy this preseason, physically bulking up and adding a post up game to complement his outside touch. But Frye also added a mental aspect to his game, taking a bigger role in the on the court leadership of the Knicks.

While Lee & Robinson will likely be role players this year, both have shown improvement over the summer. The Knicks have found a good use for Lee’s strong rebounding skills, even letting him man the center spot in the small & quick lineups when possible. With Frye’s ability to shift to center, expect to see David Lee as the Knicks primary big man off the bench. Meanwhile Robinson’s lessons over the summer (pass the ball more) seem to have finally sunk in. For Nate to succeed at this level, he has to learn that he can’t take the ball to the hoop with two (or more) guys on him. In the preseason Robinson passed out of double teams more, and his assist/minute ratio showed improvement.

The Quick

Setting aside the tabloid stories surrounding Madison Square Garden, the most frequent topic about the Knicks new season is Isiah Thomas’ offense. Isiah is going to institute his own invention called “The Quick”, which is a combination of Tex Winters Triangle Offense, Bob Knight’s Indiana Offense, John Wooden UCLA Offense, Bill Walsh’s West Coast Offense, Jacques Lemaire’s Neutral Zone Trap, George Washington’s crossing of the Delaware, General Patton’s Operation Fortitute and every successful strategy ever used.

Zeke’s offense does has some advantages with this roster. Taking the ball out of the point guard’s hands will mean that Marbury & Francis won’t be fighting over point guard duties. Additionally it’ll mean that the two shooting happy PGs won’t be able to dominate the ball. Unfortunately, it can’t hide all of New York’s roster flaws, especially when looking at the starting 5. Between Marbury, Francis, and Jeffries the Knicks don’t have a reliable jump shooter to stretch defenses. While Crawford and Robinson can provide that role, Isiah will have a tough decision to make in the fourth quarter of tight games. Will he sit Francis (or Marbury) in order to keep a sharp shooter on the court? Richardson will start the season at SF, but he still isn’t the shooter he was on the West Coast. Quentin shot a paltry 40.4% eFG this preseason with a cheek slapping 13% from beyond the arc. If Richardson can find his stroke he’d be an integral part of the Knicks’ offense, but if he’s going to shoot like that, the Knicks would be better off with Balkman getting the major minutes in Jeffries’ stead.

The Defense

At one point this was the core of the franchise, but you haven’t heard much regarding how the Knicks are going to improve on defense in 2007. Due to Jeffries’ injury, the Knicks starting 5 on opening night will be Marbury, Francis, Richardson, Frye, and Curry. Not exactly the 1994 Knicks. The backcourt is undersized and the frontcourt doesn’t offer much help, which is a recipe for disaster. On defense, the small forward spot should see an improvement with the additions of Balkman and Jeffries. Should Cato make his way into the rotation, he’ll add a defensive presence as well. Unfortunately those three won’t be enough to make up for a lack of defense from the rest of the roster.

The Outlook

Knick fans are looking forward to this season, because it couldn’t possibly be worse than last year’s fiasco. With a promising core of young players in Frye, Lee, Robinson, and Balkman, New York should generate some excitement on the court this year. The results are mixed on Isiah’s coaching tenure in Indiana, so it’s hard to judge how much of an effect he’ll have on the team. On offense the Knicks lack a true superstar, but they do have a few guys that can contribute in a positive fashion. While most pundits are keying on the development of Eddy Curry, the key might be on the improvement of the Knicks other young big man, Channing Frye. If Marbury can return to his pre-Brown form (very likely), Frye can improve on his first season (likely), Francis can give the production somewhere between his 2005 & 2006 season (possible), and Curry can cut down on his fouls and turnovers (not outside the realm of possibility) then the Knicks should have a good offense. Throw in the continuing development of the bench (Crawford, Robinson, and Lee) and they’ll overcome the lacking of a scoring superpower.

But before Knick fans start readying their tents for an outdoor overnight playoff ticket sale party, there is still the matter of the weak Knicks defense. New York is going to have to outscore their opponents every night, because I don’t see this team shutting down their opponents for extended periods of time. With just about the same roster, the Knicks only won 23 games last year. I don’t care if Larry Brown had a pin filled voodoo doll of each of his players, ultimately it’s the players that earned that record. History shows that teams don’t just all of a sudden win 15-20 more games without a massive talent overhaul.

A realistic estimate for New York’s win total is in the 30-something range, which is still a large improvement. While there will be a lot of talk surrounding the Knicks offense and how the different players mesh with each other, pay attention to the Knicks’ defense. That’ll be the key for their 2007 season.

Liked it? Take a second to support Mike Kurylo on Patreon!

Mike Kurylo

Mike Kurylo is the founder and editor of His book on the 2012 Knicks, "We’ll Always Have Linsanity," is on sale now. Follow him on twitter (@KnickerBlogger).

11 thoughts to “Knicks 2007 Season Preview”

  1. Great preview — loved it!

    I’m a little more optimistic — maybe 40 wins. But being that what I would actually like to see is a team that has a shot of winning an NBA title, this season is actually something I’m not looking forward to. I would rather see 20 wins and a real plan that results in eventually being able to get a stop when you need one.

  2. I agree with Count Zero. Mid-30s seems pretty accurate. I just hope they don’t back into the playoffs or a false sense of contention. I’ll be watching every game, hoping that they lose so that the Isiah era will finally, finally end. (But not lose so badly that the Bulls get Oden or Noah.)

    I’m very encouraged by the recent cost-cutting moves, although maybe it would have been smarter to hold onto our expiring contracts to trade them for future draft picks…

  3. Great preview. I agree that Richardson is damn important to a succesful season. If he ain’t bringing it, we’re gonna need some seriously help behind the arc.

  4. I actually believe the Knicks are going to surprise everyone and end up around 45 wins. I think that too much weight has been put on the results of last year. That year was tainted by turmoil and injury. They started the year with too many new players, out of shape players and no chemistry or cohesiveness. That situation has been totally turned around this year. The only key injury is that of Jared. The team shows that they have a clear understanding of what they’re doing and we haven’t seen the best of them yet. They’re going to improve as the season goes along and they jell more and start to master this new system.

    Isiah is a huge factor, cuz he’s a great communicator and he has done a great job of selling his vision to the players. They like him and they like the system. Don’t underestimate that. I think this team is actually setup very nicely for the future. WE have depth and talent and most of it is young enough to be around for a nice run.

  5. I would just love missing the top ten draft picks.

    That is enough for me this year. 8 seed would be good, too.

    Oh, as an aside, let me point out something I read on Yahoo! today by Santosh Venkataraman – “They are all part of a crowded backcourt situation that includes Jamal Crawford — the Knicks’ best player last season — and Nate Robinson.”

    Jamal Crawford was good last year, but the Knicks’ best player!??

  6. Watching the game now. Steve Francis fouled out with two points, after dribbling the ball off his foot in crunch time. I needed a forum simply to say, he sucks…

    thanks for providing me with an outlet…

  7. Watching the game now. Steve Francis fouled out with two points, after dribbling the ball off his foot in crunch time. I needed a forum simply to say, he sucks…

    thanks for providing me with an outlet…

    oh yeah, jamal crawford is 3 of 20

  8. Jeeeeez. Did Isiah really call for Crawford to shoot two 22 footers to win the game? Did he really call for Frye to shoot a quick three out of a timeout? What the shit?

  9. The Frye thing I SORTA understand. They obviously think (whether it’s true or not) that Frye can make the open three, so he devised a game plan that would get Frye wide open for a look at a tying three.

    The play was executed perfectly, the question just is, “CAN Channing Frye seriously make three pointers?”

    If the answer is no, then the play is dumb.

    If the answer is yes, then the play makes sense.

  10. “Knick fans are looking forward to this season”

    wow, wasn’t expecting to see that line. These are dark days.

    I”m surprised at how rah-rah it is in here. almost like this is the blog of zek’s administrative staff.

    but yeah we should improve. Curry and Frye are our frontcourt, and we’ll be as good as they allow us to be.

    we might win a few more games, but paying to get rid of larry brown, that was when we cut the rope. our previews are irrelevant for at least the next five years. barring some unforseen miracle.

    and miracles do happen …

  11. Cronin, I agree. I just do not want the Bulls getting Oden or any other high draft pick on account of the Knicks. Then, next year they can suck and start rebuilding the real way. By shedding salary and rebuilding through the draft and free agency.

Comments are closed.