Yesterday, I didn’t check Twitter. I didn’t go online, or turn on the TV. I had to work early and was sporting a hefty hangover from the Super Bowl (I’m a University of Tennessee alum, so Peyton Manning is essentially a deity for me and most of my college buddies, and him winning the Super Bowl was cause for great celebration. WAY too much celebration). After work I got home and fell promptly asleep, as my body demanded. So the news of Derek Fisher’s firing didn’t reach me until this morning.
Like all of you who have had a sizable jump on the sports news cycle on me, I’ve read and thought a lot about it today. All the quotes, the Phil Jackson-isms, the comments on both threads on Knickerblogger. At first I thought there wasn’t much to add, so far as original thoughts go, because reading through all the comments reminded me again of how attuned to the organization so many of you are. We all criticized Fisher this year, and Lord knows that he deserved it. I didn’t think he was a long-term solution as head coach, and obviously the season was beginning to slip away, but this just seems so… desperate. Right?
I’ve been as guilty of it as anyone, preaching the importance of getting into the playoffs this year, but is this move really going to salvage the season? The Knicks have been a roller coaster of winning and losing streaks this year, owing to the schedule imbalances mostly, and sure, they’ve been caving lately, but I think the right move is to play out the season and then let Fisher go. Let the chips fall where they may, as the cliche goes. For one, this franchise has been a picture of instability for about 15 years now, and firing a coach mid-season is no way to clear that damaging reputation. Maybe they’re thinking of free agents this summer, guys who quietly went through back channels to criticize Fisher and see if the Knicks might make themselves a more attractive situation by changing the coach. But that couldn’t have waited until April?
I also think it’s a bad message to send to Porzingis. He has been up and down this year like any rookie, but I think when you have a superstar in the making, you have to give them a model for consistency. They can’t be about to hit the All-Star Break and decide, okay, now we’re making a major change. In professional sports, it’s a reality and something Taps will have to acclimate to, but I don’t see why the decision was made right now. It could have waited two months, because let’s be frank here, the Knicks aren’t going anywhere this season. Even if they could salvage a playoff spot, a possibility that grows increasingly unlikely the further along in the season that we get, they have no chance to make a run at the teams at the top of the East.
At least Rambis provides some stability as he slides into the interim coach position, but I still feel like this is all-around a bad idea for Kristaps’ sake. I wonder what he thinks about it, what he really feels about Fisher. Maybe they weren’t getting along, I have no idea, but to me, when you start a new job and your boss is fired a few months later, it can be a culture shock. So many things are likely to change, and this is simply poor timing to ask this team to adjust to a major change. In my mind, the right move was to get through the year, then address Fisher, and work on your cap situation and who may realistically come to New York to improve the team going forward. But now the Knicks are right back to making panic moves, and as Zen as Phil is, it strikes me as an impatient and not completely thought-out move.
Maybe you think I’m completely wrong here and want to defend the decision, and I can see there being a myriad of good reasons to excuse Fisher from duty now instead of later, and I’m sure that Phil isn’t being as near-sighted as I’m accusing him of being because he’s one of the most respected basketball minds to ever walk this Earth, but it seems like a knee-jerk reaction to a poor stretch of games that could have been solved during the All-Star Break, or at least cleaned up a little bit.
This is a fresh start for the team; the post-break schedule softens quite a bit and maybe they can get some confidence back with a decent finish to the year. But I can’t help but sit back and wonder what Carmelo and Kristaps thinks, or RoLo or Afflalo. I mean, it’s easy to see that there are better coaching options out there right now than Fisher, who often looked lost as a head coach. But lost people find their way all the damn time in this world, and maybe giving him the rest of the year as an honest evaluation before making the final decision would have been better for the franchise and the players.
I’m of the mind that good franchises don’t fire head coaches or general managers in-season. I can rarely think of a situation where that worked out well. Pat Riley forcing Van Gundy to step down mid-season when the Heat won the title in 2006? I guess? And that was a fishy (pun SO intended) situation anyways, how that went down, seeing as the Heat were already basically the best team in the East, right there with Detroit at the time. I mean, hell, even the Kings backed off the idea of a mid-season firing, and that franchise is a dumpster fire fueled by wet cow manure.
It’s a strange day in Knicks land. And they have a (winnable) game tonight against the Wizards at home. I’m interested to see how the team reacts, the energy they play with, how the feeling is. It’s going to be very telling to see the body language tonight. I suppose we will see, won’t we?