<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Knicks Morning News (2024.12.13)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/</link>
	<description>Knicks, Stats, Humor, Analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 02:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/#comment-934576</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 02:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://knickerblogger.net/?p=21637#comment-934576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Imagine if we went all in on Jalens and had Brunson, Johnson, and Williams.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine if we went all in on Jalens and had Brunson, Johnson, and Williams.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="934576" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lil' Penny		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/#comment-934575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lil' Penny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 00:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://knickerblogger.net/?p=21637#comment-934575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For the pick that could have been Jalen Williams?  No chance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the pick that could have been Jalen Williams?  No chance.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="934575" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rama		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/#comment-934574</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 00:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://knickerblogger.net/?p=21637#comment-934574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s also possible that iHart&#039;s agent wouldn&#039;t agree to a 3 year deal for the exact reason it worked out for him. In that scenario, should we not have signed him? I&#039;m going with no. (That is, we should still have signed him!)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also possible that iHart&#8217;s agent wouldn&#8217;t agree to a 3 year deal for the exact reason it worked out for him. In that scenario, should we not have signed him? I&#8217;m going with no. (That is, we should still have signed him!)</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="934574" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lil' Penny		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/#comment-934573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lil' Penny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 00:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://knickerblogger.net/?p=21637#comment-934573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The blunder, and it was a huge one, was trading out of the 2022 lottery to create room for i-Hart and then not giving him a three-year deal to get full Bird rights.  (If he wasn&#039;t going to sign one at that price point, they should have known that in the planning process, too.)

This FO has done some good things, but they&#039;ve also blundered more than you&#039;d like.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blunder, and it was a huge one, was trading out of the 2022 lottery to create room for i-Hart and then not giving him a three-year deal to get full Bird rights.  (If he wasn&#8217;t going to sign one at that price point, they should have known that in the planning process, too.)</p>
<p>This FO has done some good things, but they&#8217;ve also blundered more than you&#8217;d like.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="934573" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ptmilo		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/#comment-934572</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ptmilo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 00:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://knickerblogger.net/?p=21637#comment-934572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Logistically, let’s say that the Knicks had not picked up Bogdanovic’s option for this season, would they have had the cap room to keep both OG and iHart?&lt;/em&gt;

no they were still way too high with og&#039;s cap hold, which was like $30mm.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Logistically, let’s say that the Knicks had not picked up Bogdanovic’s option for this season, would they have had the cap room to keep both OG and iHart?</em></p>
<p>no they were still way too high with og&#8217;s cap hold, which was like $30mm.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="934572" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian Cronin		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/#comment-934571</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Cronin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://knickerblogger.net/?p=21637#comment-934571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Right, but if they had the cap room, then obviously they could have signed him with cap room. I&#039;m asking whether they would have had enough cap room to sign him and OG had they not guaranteed Bogdanovic&#039;s money. What was OG&#039;s cap hold? Could they have created enough space under the cap to offer iHart more? Were they already over the cap from just OG&#039;s cap hold whether they brought back Bogdanovic or not? If so, then there was nothing they could ever do to bring iHart back.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, but if they had the cap room, then obviously they could have signed him with cap room. I&#8217;m asking whether they would have had enough cap room to sign him and OG had they not guaranteed Bogdanovic&#8217;s money. What was OG&#8217;s cap hold? Could they have created enough space under the cap to offer iHart more? Were they already over the cap from just OG&#8217;s cap hold whether they brought back Bogdanovic or not? If so, then there was nothing they could ever do to bring iHart back.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="934571" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: gkhenman		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/#comment-934570</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gkhenman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://knickerblogger.net/?p=21637#comment-934570</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They lost IHart because of CBA rules that limited the amount they could pay him, not cap room. The most the Knicks could offer him was 4/72.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They lost IHart because of CBA rules that limited the amount they could pay him, not cap room. The most the Knicks could offer him was 4/72.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="934570" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian Cronin		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/#comment-934569</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Cronin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://knickerblogger.net/?p=21637#comment-934569</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Logistically, let&#039;s say that the Knicks had not picked up Bogdanovic&#039;s option for this season, would they have had the cap room to keep both OG and iHart?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logistically, let&#8217;s say that the Knicks had not picked up Bogdanovic&#8217;s option for this season, would they have had the cap room to keep both OG and iHart?</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="934569" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Knick fan not in NJ		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/#comment-934568</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knick fan not in NJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 22:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://knickerblogger.net/?p=21637#comment-934568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Honestly, given that we lost iHart for nothing, the fact that we have as good a team as last year means the front office did something right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, given that we lost iHart for nothing, the fact that we have as good a team as last year means the front office did something right.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="934568" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Early Bird Writes		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2024/12/knicks-morning-news-2024-12-13/#comment-934567</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Early Bird Writes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 22:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://knickerblogger.net/?p=21637#comment-934567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s perhaps worth noting that Minnesota led the league with a 109.0 Drtg last year. This year that figure would be 7th (slightly behind this year&#039;s Minnesota team).

OKC: 104.0
HOU: 105.4
ORL: 106.6
GSW: 107.9
MEM: 108.4
MIN: 108.7

Some of these will fade. Offenses get better league-wide as the season progresses point. Three point luck could also dry up as 5 of those 6 are 1-5 in opponent 3p%, Orlando is the outlier all the way down at 20th. Regardless, several teams seem to have broken new ground on what&#039;s possible on the defensive end of the court. 

We&#039;ve talked a bit about Denver&#039;s championship run when they were 16th in defensive rating, exactly where we are now. Their 114.2 Drtg was 3.6pts behind the league leader. By comparison, we&#039;re at 114.6 and 10.6pts behind OKC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s perhaps worth noting that Minnesota led the league with a 109.0 Drtg last year. This year that figure would be 7th (slightly behind this year&#8217;s Minnesota team).</p>
<p>OKC: 104.0<br />
HOU: 105.4<br />
ORL: 106.6<br />
GSW: 107.9<br />
MEM: 108.4<br />
MIN: 108.7</p>
<p>Some of these will fade. Offenses get better league-wide as the season progresses point. Three point luck could also dry up as 5 of those 6 are 1-5 in opponent 3p%, Orlando is the outlier all the way down at 20th. Regardless, several teams seem to have broken new ground on what&#8217;s possible on the defensive end of the court. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve talked a bit about Denver&#8217;s championship run when they were 16th in defensive rating, exactly where we are now. Their 114.2 Drtg was 3.6pts behind the league leader. By comparison, we&#8217;re at 114.6 and 10.6pts behind OKC.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="934567" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
