A lawyer who has had Knicks season tickets since the 1970s represents clients who are suing Madison Square Garden. So it barred all 60 of his firm’s lawyers from every game, concert and other event at its venues.

Is this even legal in america? In Portugal you can’t discriminate people just because it’s a private company, you must have reasons for that, most likely listed in the terms of service if you don’t want problems with the law about your decision to ban someone. I’d bet there’s no “Every lawyer, and related professionals, that work on cases suing MSG is warranted a ban from all our venues” on MSG’s terms of service. And even if it were, here people would contest the term and they’d be ordered to remove it from the terms of service.

I’m not fully perplexed, which is an improvement

Baby steps 😉

I mean I think a lot of people on this board would be upset if we signed a 30 year old all star but not top five player on our team but signing Nash at that age allowed the suns to put together one of the best teams ever.

Some of us were advocating to sign 36yo CP3, and a lot of the others were only pointing out that 36yo would be a high risk. I’m pretty sure everybody would be happy if we signed an all-star PG at age 30. What we don’t like is players that are not that good, at that age because there’s no potential to improve, or players that have clear flaws (bad defense, injury prone, etc).

Speaking of future picks, the Ringer article put the Bucks last (30th) in their young core status. The 2025 top four protected pick seems to have a lot of potential.

What do you mean? They’ll have under contract Giannis, Jrue and Portis. I’m guessing they’ll re-sign Middleton between now and then.

What else is new?

I’m not fully perplexed, which is an improvement