Either things in the universe happen at random and eschew causality or causality happens but can happen from far away, imagine playing pool , missing the cue ball with the stick and seeing the 8 ball drop into the corner pocket anyways.

Moses Brown’s three-year, $5.5 million deal (with a team option for the last season) is also more cost-efficient than the rookie-scale salary for a No. 16 pick.

He did show promise on the 2nd half of this season, with 6 games of 15+ PTS and 12+ TRB, even putting up a display of 20+ PTS and 20+ TRB. Could Stevens get a better player with the 16th pick, maybe yes, maybe not. This way it’s a known comodity and a better cap alocation.

TheClashFan: Just for the record, my nickname was “Space Cadet.”

There is probably a multi entanglement with reversed expected measurement results here in this board as I’m pretty sure if one reveals their nickname and it turns out to be space cadet everyone else on this board regardless of locality or even time gets the very same one!

geo:
That, or I have mixed a porn film argument somewhere in the middle.

ha, too funny 🙂

aside from the whole entanglement thing over possibly an infinite distance, i forgot where i saw it, but, i remember the first time i had heard that something could exist in two places at the same time, totally blew my mind, and yet, seemed to make perfect sense…

yeah..just like in Avenger’s Endgame…

ha, too funny 🙂

aside from the whole entanglement thing over possibly an infinite distance, i forgot where i saw it, but, i remember the first time i had heard that something could exist in two places at the same time, totally blew my mind, and yet, seemed to make perfect sense…

ptmilo:
Bell’s inequalities prove that the randomness is real, and not an illusion in front of a deterministic theory.

i promise last post on this but this isn’t right.bell’s inequality just eliminates potential hidden variables that obey locality as explanations for entanglement.it doesn’t prove anything about “reality” of quantum probabilities or randomness.you could have a deterministic nonlocal theory consistent with bell’s inequality.

It has been a while since I studied quantum information, so that is probably right.

geo the big picture here is locality.in the classical world it is impossible for the outcome of a coin flip in seattle to instantaneously (ie fast than light speed) determine the outcome of a coin flip in okc, unless there is some hidden variable connecting the two coins.but not in the quantum world.particles can be “entangled” such that if a coin lands heads in seattle it literally determines what will be observed from its entangled buddy flipping in okc.some people thing the very big picture of this is an indicator that space itself (ie “locality”) is emergent.

Well, I always thought that it depends on your interpretation. In a more ‘parallel worlds’ interpretation where Alice, instead of collapsing the quantum wavefunction, becomes entangled with the photon measurement, then Alice and Bob become entangled, and only when they share information locally we see that both made correlated measurements. That, or I have mixed a porn film argument somewhere in the middle.

Sorry for derailing the thread.

TheClashFan: Just for the record, my nickname was “Space Cadet.”

Space Cadet is a very cool name, the only reason i don’t suggest you change your username is that i’m a The Clash fan myself, so your username is one of the best here. 😉
But SpaceCadet would also be higher on the list, maybe you can use it for your burner account. LOL

middle-agedish

um yeah, if i live to almost a 120, maybe…ugh…