<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Knicks Morning News (2019.05.27)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/</link>
	<description>Knicks, Stats, Humor, Analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 10:56:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MSA		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659475</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MSA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 10:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Minnesota Spree.

Golden State Spree was an all-defensive second team player. I would be very impressed if Barrett reach something like this on his second year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota Spree.</p>
<p>Golden State Spree was an all-defensive second team player. I would be very impressed if Barrett reach something like this on his second year.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="659475" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Totes McGoats as Totes McGoats		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659474</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Totes McGoats as Totes McGoats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 10:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659474</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@28..I would say Golden State Spree because of the shooting numbers and the way he attacks. When Spree became a Knick he actually expanded his game and became a 2 way player. Of course Barrett is NOWHERE near as good as Sprewell was though]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@28..I would say Golden State Spree because of the shooting numbers and the way he attacks. When Spree became a Knick he actually expanded his game and became a 2 way player. Of course Barrett is NOWHERE near as good as Sprewell was though</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="659474" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bobneptune		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659473</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobneptune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 09:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; If they trade down, it would depend on what we get and who we draft with the lower pick. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

The only trades I want to see are either as part of a deal for an established star, or for another young yet cheap established &quot;good&quot; player that preserves cap space (like Sabonis/Collins). If someone thinks Barrett is a super star in the making fine. Maybe he is.... but a bird in the hand.... something....something.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> If they trade down, it would depend on what we get and who we draft with the lower pick. </p></blockquote>
<p>The only trades I want to see are either as part of a deal for an established star, or for another young yet cheap established &#8220;good&#8221; player that preserves cap space (like Sabonis/Collins). If someone thinks Barrett is a super star in the making fine. Maybe he is&#8230;. but a bird in the hand&#8230;. something&#8230;.something.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="659473" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Infamous Cdiggy		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659472</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Infamous Cdiggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 03:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Golden State Spree or NYK Spree?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Golden State Spree or NYK Spree?</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="659472" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pagliacci		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659471</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pagliacci]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 03:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659471</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been telling y&#039;all, the comp is Tyreke Evans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been telling y&#8217;all, the comp is Tyreke Evans</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="659471" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Z-man		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659470</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Z-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 03:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659470</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[None of them are good comps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of them are good comps.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="659470" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Totes McGoats as Totes McGoats		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659469</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Totes McGoats as Totes McGoats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 02:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659469</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RE: Barrett comps

Does anyone see more Spree in Barrett than the Harden or Wade comps that folks in the media have been throwing around? Personally,  I think the Harden and Wade comps are just silly. He doesn&#039;t have Harden&#039;s handle or craftiness,  nor does he have Wade&#039;s defense, length,  or quickness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Barrett comps</p>
<p>Does anyone see more Spree in Barrett than the Harden or Wade comps that folks in the media have been throwing around? Personally,  I think the Harden and Wade comps are just silly. He doesn&#8217;t have Harden&#8217;s handle or craftiness,  nor does he have Wade&#8217;s defense, length,  or quickness.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="659469" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Z-man		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659468</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Z-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 01:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659468</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I realize that Knox was a very risky and probably bad pick last year (I still hold out hope for him, but looks bad for now) and there&#039;s all that nonsense about the 3-on-3 stuff, but landing Mitch and Trier seem to suggest that we should trust Perry to make a well-researched and logical pick. I think Barrett&#039;s the guy and will not be upset if they pick him there. If they trade down, it would depend on what we get and who we draft with the lower pick. My hope is that someone likes either Barrett, Culver or Hunter enough to make a lopsided in our favor trade to move up. Barrett would be a fine pick at #3. I&#039;m ambivalent about the guys from #4-#10.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize that Knox was a very risky and probably bad pick last year (I still hold out hope for him, but looks bad for now) and there&#8217;s all that nonsense about the 3-on-3 stuff, but landing Mitch and Trier seem to suggest that we should trust Perry to make a well-researched and logical pick. I think Barrett&#8217;s the guy and will not be upset if they pick him there. If they trade down, it would depend on what we get and who we draft with the lower pick. My hope is that someone likes either Barrett, Culver or Hunter enough to make a lopsided in our favor trade to move up. Barrett would be a fine pick at #3. I&#8217;m ambivalent about the guys from #4-#10.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="659468" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Honorable Cock Jowles		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659467</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Honorable Cock Jowles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 01:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Technically a prospect with a lower floor and a lower ceiling can be considered a better prospect than one with a higher floor and a higher ceiling if you think the probability distributions of prospect productivity are different; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course. I was confused by the &quot;but&quot; in the passage: &quot;...Barrett having a higher ceiling, but Clarke a lower floor.&quot; Seemed like the sentence was set up to praise one&#039;s floor and the other&#039;s ceiling.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Technically a prospect with a lower floor and a lower ceiling can be considered a better prospect than one with a higher floor and a higher ceiling if you think the probability distributions of prospect productivity are different; </p></blockquote>
<p>Of course. I was confused by the &#8220;but&#8221; in the passage: &#8220;&#8230;Barrett having a higher ceiling, but Clarke a lower floor.&#8221; Seemed like the sentence was set up to praise one&#8217;s floor and the other&#8217;s ceiling.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="659467" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Silky Johnson, Fleet Admiral of the Tank Armada		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2019/05/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silky Johnson, Fleet Admiral of the Tank Armada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 23:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2019-05-27/#comment-659466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@20,

Technically a prospect with a lower floor and a lower ceiling can be considered a better prospect than one with a higher floor and a higher ceiling if you think the probability distributions of prospect productivity are different; eg if prospect 1 has an extremely high chance of obtaining a median outcome, whereas Prospect 2 has a middling or low chance and the productivity differences between their respective floors and ceilings aren&#039;t too great. Clarke seems pretty guaranteed to stick in the league, even if his floor is someone who&#039;s out of the league after two years because he&#039;s been feasting on younger competition. But yeah, I don&#039;t see a lot of situations in which the prospect with a lower floor and a lower ceiling are better prospects than one with a higher floor and a higher ceiling. But it&#039;s not conceptually impossible, I think. Fwiw I think Clarke also has a pretty high floor--hes gonna be league average at least over his career.

That said I still take Barrett over Clarke in a vacuum but the trade down scenario makes it a much more interesting debate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@20,</p>
<p>Technically a prospect with a lower floor and a lower ceiling can be considered a better prospect than one with a higher floor and a higher ceiling if you think the probability distributions of prospect productivity are different; eg if prospect 1 has an extremely high chance of obtaining a median outcome, whereas Prospect 2 has a middling or low chance and the productivity differences between their respective floors and ceilings aren&#8217;t too great. Clarke seems pretty guaranteed to stick in the league, even if his floor is someone who&#8217;s out of the league after two years because he&#8217;s been feasting on younger competition. But yeah, I don&#8217;t see a lot of situations in which the prospect with a lower floor and a lower ceiling are better prospects than one with a higher floor and a higher ceiling. But it&#8217;s not conceptually impossible, I think. Fwiw I think Clarke also has a pretty high floor&#8211;hes gonna be league average at least over his career.</p>
<p>That said I still take Barrett over Clarke in a vacuum but the trade down scenario makes it a much more interesting debate.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="659466" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
