<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Knicks Morning News (2018.12.01)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/</link>
	<description>Knicks, Stats, Humor, Analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 21:08:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruno Almeida		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639323</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruno Almeida]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 21:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639323</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@27

I agree that he’s overrated and he’s definitely not suited to being the star of a team, but I think it’s fair to say that Aldridge isn’t the problem per se like Jowles was arguing, the problem was not being able to replace the guys ahead of him in BPM, which were Duncan, Ginobili, Boban, David West and Danny Green. Duncan and Ginobili are obviously irreplaceable, and Boban is not so relevant as he only played 500 minutes in the entire season. West was easily replaced by Pau Gasol in a similar role, but he’s been injured this entire season almost; and Green declined heavily last season and is only now regaining his form.

I generally agree with what you’re saying, I just think what they had to do was extremely hard and was bound to fail. How exactly do you replace guys like Duncan or Manu? When you’re forced to part with Kawhi, you either tank or go for a replacement, they went with the replacement offer and it has clearly backfired, which in my opinion was the pivotal mistake. Extending Aldridge was a lesser mistake in that sense and somewhat justifiable because it was done in a situation where they expected Kawhi to stay.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@27</p>
<p>I agree that he’s overrated and he’s definitely not suited to being the star of a team, but I think it’s fair to say that Aldridge isn’t the problem per se like Jowles was arguing, the problem was not being able to replace the guys ahead of him in BPM, which were Duncan, Ginobili, Boban, David West and Danny Green. Duncan and Ginobili are obviously irreplaceable, and Boban is not so relevant as he only played 500 minutes in the entire season. West was easily replaced by Pau Gasol in a similar role, but he’s been injured this entire season almost; and Green declined heavily last season and is only now regaining his form.</p>
<p>I generally agree with what you’re saying, I just think what they had to do was extremely hard and was bound to fail. How exactly do you replace guys like Duncan or Manu? When you’re forced to part with Kawhi, you either tank or go for a replacement, they went with the replacement offer and it has clearly backfired, which in my opinion was the pivotal mistake. Extending Aldridge was a lesser mistake in that sense and somewhat justifiable because it was done in a situation where they expected Kawhi to stay.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="639323" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ProjectKnicks		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639322</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ProjectKnicks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 20:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s only half the truth. Trump is a big middle finger from people who feel, correctly for the most part, the game is rigged and they’re not important. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don’t think Trump is a middle finger - his followers (being overwhelmingly dishonest, nasty and ignorant) truly think that he will mold the country according to their wishes. They side with him because they still expect him to deliver on his promise of a USA that will never exist. If they were not as ignorant and obtuse as they are, they would realize he won’t deliver. But they are not, so they still wait for the magical moment...

In the end, focusing on Trump (or any other president) is politically naive and ignores the fact that the real problem lies with our absolutely corrupt Congress. That’s where change needs to happen. Then, social infections like Trump would never develop into the plague he is.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That’s only half the truth. Trump is a big middle finger from people who feel, correctly for the most part, the game is rigged and they’re not important. </p></blockquote>
<p>I don’t think Trump is a middle finger &#8211; his followers (being overwhelmingly dishonest, nasty and ignorant) truly think that he will mold the country according to their wishes. They side with him because they still expect him to deliver on his promise of a USA that will never exist. If they were not as ignorant and obtuse as they are, they would realize he won’t deliver. But they are not, so they still wait for the magical moment&#8230;</p>
<p>In the end, focusing on Trump (or any other president) is politically naive and ignores the fact that the real problem lies with our absolutely corrupt Congress. That’s where change needs to happen. Then, social infections like Trump would never develop into the plague he is.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="639322" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Z-man		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Z-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 20:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In &#039;15-&#039;16, LMA was 7th on the team in BPM; in the pl;ayoffs, and 9th in the playoffs. The next year, he was 10th and 14th, respectively. Last year he was 3rd and 2nd respectively. Notice the pattern?

He&#039;s one of the most overrated players in the league. So long as he&#039;s surrounded by smart, efficient players, you can mask his weaknesses, but last year it became apparent that he would lead the Spurs into decline.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In &#8217;15-&#8217;16, LMA was 7th on the team in BPM; in the pl;ayoffs, and 9th in the playoffs. The next year, he was 10th and 14th, respectively. Last year he was 3rd and 2nd respectively. Notice the pattern?</p>
<p>He&#8217;s one of the most overrated players in the league. So long as he&#8217;s surrounded by smart, efficient players, you can mask his weaknesses, but last year it became apparent that he would lead the Spurs into decline.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="639321" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MBunge		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639320</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MBunge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 20:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Trump has exposed a simple truth that few will publicly admit: most people are willing to gloss shit over when they feel some reward is in store for them.&quot;

That&#039;s only half the truth.  Trump is a big middle finger from people who feel, correctly for the most part, the game is rigged and they&#039;re not important.  Whether it&#039;s Romney calling 47% of Americans worthless parasites or Hillary calling millions of Americans &quot;irredeemable,&quot; people have figured out how the elite truly feel about them and they&#039;re responding in kind.

Mike]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Trump has exposed a simple truth that few will publicly admit: most people are willing to gloss shit over when they feel some reward is in store for them.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s only half the truth.  Trump is a big middle finger from people who feel, correctly for the most part, the game is rigged and they&#8217;re not important.  Whether it&#8217;s Romney calling 47% of Americans worthless parasites or Hillary calling millions of Americans &#8220;irredeemable,&#8221; people have figured out how the elite truly feel about them and they&#8217;re responding in kind.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="639320" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Honorable Cock Jowles		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639319</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Honorable Cock Jowles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 20:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Spurs won 67 games in 2016 with LMA as the #2 minutes player on the team, then 61 the following year. Why would anyone point to the Kawhi era as a sign that the Spurs model had then failed? They lost a guy who put up 13.6 and 13.7 win shares the previous two seasons and still won 47 last year.

Again, the Spurs dynasty is essentially over now (like it would have been had Duncan gone to the Magic in 2000), but the argument that LMA was a limiting factor is simply ridiculous when you&#039;ve got the league&#039;s #1 defense for like three straight years and setting a franchise SRS record by a country mile with him playing that much. He&#039;s 33, so the decline phase is in full effect. I wouldn&#039;t criticize them for having him back in the late Duncan years, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Spurs won 67 games in 2016 with LMA as the #2 minutes player on the team, then 61 the following year. Why would anyone point to the Kawhi era as a sign that the Spurs model had then failed? They lost a guy who put up 13.6 and 13.7 win shares the previous two seasons and still won 47 last year.</p>
<p>Again, the Spurs dynasty is essentially over now (like it would have been had Duncan gone to the Magic in 2000), but the argument that LMA was a limiting factor is simply ridiculous when you&#8217;ve got the league&#8217;s #1 defense for like three straight years and setting a franchise SRS record by a country mile with him playing that much. He&#8217;s 33, so the decline phase is in full effect. I wouldn&#8217;t criticize them for having him back in the late Duncan years, though.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="639319" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruno Almeida		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639318</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruno Almeida]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 19:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree that it’s not a simple transition, Z-Man, but we’re not really sure if it would be just smoke and mirrors, they would have a top 5 player in his prime re-signed with a west that could be opened if Durant leaves next season. I agree that now that they botched the Kawhi situation and got DeRozan, they’re completely done, but there was a moment where it was realistic to think a Kawhi led core could contend, before the injury, and the Spurs jumped on the opportunity and it backfired hard.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it’s not a simple transition, Z-Man, but we’re not really sure if it would be just smoke and mirrors, they would have a top 5 player in his prime re-signed with a west that could be opened if Durant leaves next season. I agree that now that they botched the Kawhi situation and got DeRozan, they’re completely done, but there was a moment where it was realistic to think a Kawhi led core could contend, before the injury, and the Spurs jumped on the opportunity and it backfired hard.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="639318" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ProjectKnicks		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639316</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ProjectKnicks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 19:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Not totally sure what to think about these Ntilikina rumors.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Odds are they are totally fake. People see what we see: a meaningless player.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Not totally sure what to think about these Ntilikina rumors.</p></blockquote>
<p>Odds are they are totally fake. People see what we see: a meaningless player.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="639316" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ProjectKnicks		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639315</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ProjectKnicks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 19:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639315</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, maybe it’s time for Fox News to tell their marks what Michael Cohen told us last night.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You’re being naive. Trump followers know exactly who Trump is. They just think they are getting a good return on their moral investment. That’s all.

Trump has exposed a simple truth that few will publicly admit: most people are willing to gloss shit over when they feel some reward is in store for them. And Trump is a typical snake oil salesman, who knows this truth better than anyone.

I would be shocked if he has anything other than disdain and contempt for his followers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, maybe it’s time for Fox News to tell their marks what Michael Cohen told us last night.</p></blockquote>
<p>You’re being naive. Trump followers know exactly who Trump is. They just think they are getting a good return on their moral investment. That’s all.</p>
<p>Trump has exposed a simple truth that few will publicly admit: most people are willing to gloss shit over when they feel some reward is in store for them. And Trump is a typical snake oil salesman, who knows this truth better than anyone.</p>
<p>I would be shocked if he has anything other than disdain and contempt for his followers.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="639315" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639314</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 18:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639314</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not totally sure what to think about these Ntilikina rumors.
I actually buy that the team has soured somewhat on him, and remember also that he is not a Mills/Perry guy but Phil draft pick.

And trading him is not just getting a pick back, but also moving his contract. For example we could trade him to PHX for that Milwaukee pick plus Troy Daniels who expires this summer. Move his 4.8MM number plus Courtney Lee somehow and we would have full max room +.  

I&#039;m a Frank optimist but even I am starting get disheartened a bit.  It is amazing how little statistical impact he has on the game.  And even his on/off defensive numbers are not special anymore.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not totally sure what to think about these Ntilikina rumors.<br />
I actually buy that the team has soured somewhat on him, and remember also that he is not a Mills/Perry guy but Phil draft pick.</p>
<p>And trading him is not just getting a pick back, but also moving his contract. For example we could trade him to PHX for that Milwaukee pick plus Troy Daniels who expires this summer. Move his 4.8MM number plus Courtney Lee somehow and we would have full max room +.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Frank optimist but even I am starting get disheartened a bit.  It is amazing how little statistical impact he has on the game.  And even his on/off defensive numbers are not special anymore.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="639314" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Z-man		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/12/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639313</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Z-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2018 18:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-12-01/#comment-639313</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@19 It seems that your premise is that going from a Duncan-centric team to a Kawhi-centric team is something of a wash, when Kawhi had his own teammates souring on him while Duncan was a Bill Russell-level leader. Even if I stipulate that the Spurs win 50 this year had they kept Kawhi, it would be a smoke-and-mirrors accomplishment. Aldridge is not a winning player, never has been. Neither is Gay. And the Kawhi fiasco did not have to happen, they could have held out for a better deal than tie up so much cap room in another non-winning player like DeRozan and his untradeable contract. 

I guess what I&#039;m saying is that the Spurs used to prioritize high-IQ players and seemed to have moved away from that into more of a rich man&#039;s Isiah Thomas &quot;I can coach them up&quot; philosophy. It wouldn&#039;t surprise me if Pop retires after this year, unless they hit the draft lottery. There&#039;s very little success in the future for this team.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@19 It seems that your premise is that going from a Duncan-centric team to a Kawhi-centric team is something of a wash, when Kawhi had his own teammates souring on him while Duncan was a Bill Russell-level leader. Even if I stipulate that the Spurs win 50 this year had they kept Kawhi, it would be a smoke-and-mirrors accomplishment. Aldridge is not a winning player, never has been. Neither is Gay. And the Kawhi fiasco did not have to happen, they could have held out for a better deal than tie up so much cap room in another non-winning player like DeRozan and his untradeable contract. </p>
<p>I guess what I&#8217;m saying is that the Spurs used to prioritize high-IQ players and seemed to have moved away from that into more of a rich man&#8217;s Isiah Thomas &#8220;I can coach them up&#8221; philosophy. It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if Pop retires after this year, unless they hit the draft lottery. There&#8217;s very little success in the future for this team.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="639313" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
