<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Knicks Morning News (2018.08.24)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/</link>
	<description>Knicks, Stats, Humor, Analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 03:08:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Z-man		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629677</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Z-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 03:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629677</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://clutchpoints.com/knicks-news-advanced-stat-shows-trey-burke-gary-payton-chris-paul-like-potential/


&quot;As pointed out by Beer, Burke’s per-36 figures last season was at 21.1 points, 7.8 assists, and 2.0 turnovers.

Burke’s per-36 stats makes him only one of three players in the entire history of the league that has successfully averaged more than 20.0 points, more than 7.0 assists, and less than 2.5 turnovers while logging at least 500 minutes.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://clutchpoints.com/knicks-news-advanced-stat-shows-trey-burke-gary-payton-chris-paul-like-potential/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://clutchpoints.com/knicks-news-advanced-stat-shows-trey-burke-gary-payton-chris-paul-like-potential/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;As pointed out by Beer, Burke’s per-36 figures last season was at 21.1 points, 7.8 assists, and 2.0 turnovers.</p>
<p>Burke’s per-36 stats makes him only one of three players in the entire history of the league that has successfully averaged more than 20.0 points, more than 7.0 assists, and less than 2.5 turnovers while logging at least 500 minutes.&#8221;</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="629677" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Z-man		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629676</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Z-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 02:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By projection I was referring to your attempt to ascertain whether it is worth signing Kyrie based on what else we will have. I think that guys &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; improve at age 26, but you shouldn&#039;t make any moves on the assumption that they &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; improve.  That&#039;s why I think TH2&#039;s year is so important.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By projection I was referring to your attempt to ascertain whether it is worth signing Kyrie based on what else we will have. I think that guys <em>can</em> improve at age 26, but you shouldn&#8217;t make any moves on the assumption that they <em>will</em> improve.  That&#8217;s why I think TH2&#8217;s year is so important.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="629676" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thenoblefacehumper		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629675</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thenoblefacehumper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 02:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
 
It’s hard to put lot of stock in your specific predictions, tnfh, or anyone else’s. I think that all bets are off regarding any future moves until we see what we have. Putting my general fanboi optimism aside, there are a bunch of guys with an enormous range between their upside and downside…starting with KP. But your putting TH2 as a possible -0.1 VORP makes a very good point….he may be the most important player to watch this year in determining whether to go for a max FA next year. If he plays like you suggest and is on board for 2 more years of dead weight, then why bother? OTOH, if he stays healthy and plays like a top 15 SG with some leadership ability, then you might move the argument on to the next player.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree with all of this, but I didn&#039;t project THJ&#039;s VORP--I wanted to use his exact figure from last season, and mistook it for his BPM. His actual VORP for last season, and the season before that in Atlanta, was 0.9. That brings the total number up to 17.6, and the team WAR up to 47.52. Not an insignificant difference, but not large enough to change my assessment of the situation.

Basically, I do not think THJ becomes a markedly better player at age 26. If he does, then yes, things could change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>It’s hard to put lot of stock in your specific predictions, tnfh, or anyone else’s. I think that all bets are off regarding any future moves until we see what we have. Putting my general fanboi optimism aside, there are a bunch of guys with an enormous range between their upside and downside…starting with KP. But your putting TH2 as a possible -0.1 VORP makes a very good point….he may be the most important player to watch this year in determining whether to go for a max FA next year. If he plays like you suggest and is on board for 2 more years of dead weight, then why bother? OTOH, if he stays healthy and plays like a top 15 SG with some leadership ability, then you might move the argument on to the next player.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree with all of this, but I didn&#8217;t project THJ&#8217;s VORP&#8211;I wanted to use his exact figure from last season, and mistook it for his BPM. His actual VORP for last season, and the season before that in Atlanta, was 0.9. That brings the total number up to 17.6, and the team WAR up to 47.52. Not an insignificant difference, but not large enough to change my assessment of the situation.</p>
<p>Basically, I do not think THJ becomes a markedly better player at age 26. If he does, then yes, things could change.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="629675" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Z-man		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629674</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Z-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 02:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629674</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s hard to put lot of stock in your specific predictions, tnfh, or anyone else&#039;s. I think that all bets are off regarding any future moves until we see what we have. Putting my general fanboi optimism aside, there are a bunch of guys with an enormous range between their upside and downside...starting with KP. But your putting TH2 as a possible -0.1 VORP makes a very good point....he may be the most important player to watch this year in determining whether to go for a max FA next year. If he plays like you suggest and is on board for 2 more years of dead weight, then why bother? OTOH, if he stays healthy and plays like a top 15 SG with some leadership ability, then you might move the argument on to the next player.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to put lot of stock in your specific predictions, tnfh, or anyone else&#8217;s. I think that all bets are off regarding any future moves until we see what we have. Putting my general fanboi optimism aside, there are a bunch of guys with an enormous range between their upside and downside&#8230;starting with KP. But your putting TH2 as a possible -0.1 VORP makes a very good point&#8230;.he may be the most important player to watch this year in determining whether to go for a max FA next year. If he plays like you suggest and is on board for 2 more years of dead weight, then why bother? OTOH, if he stays healthy and plays like a top 15 SG with some leadership ability, then you might move the argument on to the next player.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="629674" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thenoblefacehumper		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629673</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thenoblefacehumper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629673</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s use VORP to try to project that team. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s infallible by any means but it&#039;s likely the best offhand tool. For guys who we reasonably expect some improvement from, I&#039;ll try to account for that. For more established players, I&#039;ll go with their 2017-2018 figures despite possible age related decline:

Kyrie: 4.0
Burke: 1.0
Frank: 2.0 (on the optimistic side)
Lee: 0.0 (thanks, Phil!)
THJ: -0.1 (thanks, Steve!)
Dotson: 0.5
Knox: 1.0 (who the hell knows)
Carroll: 1.2
KP: 3.0
Robinson: 2.5
Kornet: 0.5
Contribution from minimum players, future draft picks, etc: 1.0

We get 16.6 VORP, which translate to right around 45 wins above replacement. I honestly have no idea how many games a team of replacement level NBA players would be projected to win, but it can&#039;t be all that high. Maybe 10?

Conclusion: I dunno, seems like we&#039;d be pushing a lot of chips to the center of the table, incurring a lot of risk, and projecting a lot of improvement all to max out at a team that still probably falls short of contender status. I leave this exercise still on #TeamWait.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s use VORP to try to project that team. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s infallible by any means but it&#8217;s likely the best offhand tool. For guys who we reasonably expect some improvement from, I&#8217;ll try to account for that. For more established players, I&#8217;ll go with their 2017-2018 figures despite possible age related decline:</p>
<p>Kyrie: 4.0<br />
Burke: 1.0<br />
Frank: 2.0 (on the optimistic side)<br />
Lee: 0.0 (thanks, Phil!)<br />
THJ: -0.1 (thanks, Steve!)<br />
Dotson: 0.5<br />
Knox: 1.0 (who the hell knows)<br />
Carroll: 1.2<br />
KP: 3.0<br />
Robinson: 2.5<br />
Kornet: 0.5<br />
Contribution from minimum players, future draft picks, etc: 1.0</p>
<p>We get 16.6 VORP, which translate to right around 45 wins above replacement. I honestly have no idea how many games a team of replacement level NBA players would be projected to win, but it can&#8217;t be all that high. Maybe 10?</p>
<p>Conclusion: I dunno, seems like we&#8217;d be pushing a lot of chips to the center of the table, incurring a lot of risk, and projecting a lot of improvement all to max out at a team that still probably falls short of contender status. I leave this exercise still on #TeamWait.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="629673" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thenoblefacehumper		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629672</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thenoblefacehumper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Pelicans quite clearly like the current iteration of their team (for better or worse, FWIW I think there are good arguments on both sides) and I will be shocked if they even entertain the idea of moving Davis before his contract year. He seems happy there too for now. It&#039;s an idea that isn&#039;t even worth bandying about.

For shits and giggles, let&#039;s try to project the Knicks if they sign Kyrie Irving and no one else. I&#039;m doing this on the spot so I actually don&#039;t have any preconceived notion as I type this besides a guttural instinct that it feels like a bad idea. Anywho:

-If we renounce every FA except Porzingis, Kornet, and Burke (you can renounce one or both of the latter two also if you want but doesn&#039;t do much for you), we&#039;ll have right around $34,800,000 assuming Noah is stretched and THJ and Lee remain.

- We then sign Kyrie Irving to a contract that starts at $32.4m with the 5% annual increases that bring it up to 4/$139m. We still have around $3.3m in space before resigning our own guys. The roster as it stands assuming Porzingis, Burke, and Kornet are brought back:

PGs: Irving, Frank, Burke
SGs: Lee, THJ, Frank I guess, Dotson
SFs: uh Knox kind of
PFs: KP, Knox
Cs: Robinson, KP, Kornet

-It&#039;s important to remember that a hopefully high draft pick is in there somewhere too, so some of the depth charts might not be as bad as they look. Let&#039;s say we can get a somewhat useful wing with the remaining cap space. DeMarre Carroll maybe (other doubtful options are Bogdanovic, KCP, Darius Miller, Aminu).

-We max KP, resign Burke for 2/$14m, and Kornet for 2/$6m. The team is:

PGs: Kyrie, Frank, Burke
SGs: THJ, Lee, Frank, Dotson
SFs: Knox, Carroll
PFs: KP, Knox
Cs: Robinson, KP, Kornet

+ one draft pick. This is pretty much the team + minimum signings for 2019-2020 and 2020-2021. Some cap space opens up after that with Lee and THJ coming off.

Continued...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pelicans quite clearly like the current iteration of their team (for better or worse, FWIW I think there are good arguments on both sides) and I will be shocked if they even entertain the idea of moving Davis before his contract year. He seems happy there too for now. It&#8217;s an idea that isn&#8217;t even worth bandying about.</p>
<p>For shits and giggles, let&#8217;s try to project the Knicks if they sign Kyrie Irving and no one else. I&#8217;m doing this on the spot so I actually don&#8217;t have any preconceived notion as I type this besides a guttural instinct that it feels like a bad idea. Anywho:</p>
<p>-If we renounce every FA except Porzingis, Kornet, and Burke (you can renounce one or both of the latter two also if you want but doesn&#8217;t do much for you), we&#8217;ll have right around $34,800,000 assuming Noah is stretched and THJ and Lee remain.</p>
<p>&#8211; We then sign Kyrie Irving to a contract that starts at $32.4m with the 5% annual increases that bring it up to 4/$139m. We still have around $3.3m in space before resigning our own guys. The roster as it stands assuming Porzingis, Burke, and Kornet are brought back:</p>
<p>PGs: Irving, Frank, Burke<br />
SGs: Lee, THJ, Frank I guess, Dotson<br />
SFs: uh Knox kind of<br />
PFs: KP, Knox<br />
Cs: Robinson, KP, Kornet</p>
<p>-It&#8217;s important to remember that a hopefully high draft pick is in there somewhere too, so some of the depth charts might not be as bad as they look. Let&#8217;s say we can get a somewhat useful wing with the remaining cap space. DeMarre Carroll maybe (other doubtful options are Bogdanovic, KCP, Darius Miller, Aminu).</p>
<p>-We max KP, resign Burke for 2/$14m, and Kornet for 2/$6m. The team is:</p>
<p>PGs: Kyrie, Frank, Burke<br />
SGs: THJ, Lee, Frank, Dotson<br />
SFs: Knox, Carroll<br />
PFs: KP, Knox<br />
Cs: Robinson, KP, Kornet</p>
<p>+ one draft pick. This is pretty much the team + minimum signings for 2019-2020 and 2020-2021. Some cap space opens up after that with Lee and THJ coming off.</p>
<p>Continued&#8230;</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="629672" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Z-man		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629671</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Z-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629671</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jowles, this is definitely an opportune time for the Celts in the east, but not as much as you suggest. I agree that they did well to take the Cavs to 7, but that was a truly terrible LeCavs team. Let&#039;s not forget that the Bucks took the Celts to 7 games and Philly choked away a critical game 3. If Kawhi is healthy, the Bucks continue to develop, and the Sixers mature and maybe make a shrewd mid-season deal, I would question whether the Celts w/o Kyrie get past any of them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jowles, this is definitely an opportune time for the Celts in the east, but not as much as you suggest. I agree that they did well to take the Cavs to 7, but that was a truly terrible LeCavs team. Let&#8217;s not forget that the Bucks took the Celts to 7 games and Philly choked away a critical game 3. If Kawhi is healthy, the Bucks continue to develop, and the Sixers mature and maybe make a shrewd mid-season deal, I would question whether the Celts w/o Kyrie get past any of them.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="629671" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruno Almeida		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629670</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruno Almeida]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That makes zero sense. Davis is under contract until 2021. If they want him before that they would have to trade for him and then they only have to match his contract (which can be easily done with Horford’s 30 million deal plus whatever they give the Pelicans for him). If they want to sign him as a free agent it still doesn’t make sense to let Kyrie go, as they would have only Hayward, Tatum, Smart and Brown if they re-sign him as guaranteed contracts for 2020-21 and it’s much better to let go of either Smart or Brown.

I’m 100% sure the only way Kyrie leaves is if he wants to or actively asks for a trade. Unless his health is completely screwed he’s a far superior player to Rozier in every way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes zero sense. Davis is under contract until 2021. If they want him before that they would have to trade for him and then they only have to match his contract (which can be easily done with Horford’s 30 million deal plus whatever they give the Pelicans for him). If they want to sign him as a free agent it still doesn’t make sense to let Kyrie go, as they would have only Hayward, Tatum, Smart and Brown if they re-sign him as guaranteed contracts for 2020-21 and it’s much better to let go of either Smart or Brown.</p>
<p>I’m 100% sure the only way Kyrie leaves is if he wants to or actively asks for a trade. Unless his health is completely screwed he’s a far superior player to Rozier in every way.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="629670" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cock Jowles, #1 Purveyor of Wanton Chuckery		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629669</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cock Jowles, #1 Purveyor of Wanton Chuckery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 00:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t think Rozier is their vision of a true starting PG. Maybe Ainge and Boy Genius figure out how to keep masking his issues, but as long as he’s their starter they will have trouble competing with the best teams in the WC.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He made a considerable stride last season, and he just hit his athletic prime. He may never be as good as Irving was last year, but the Celtics are so deep and good I don&#039;t think they&#039;d lose much by shedding $20M of salary for a drop of 20-30% in production from their starting PG position. Again, they took LeGoat to 7 without their two max players -- that is an incredible feat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t think Rozier is their vision of a true starting PG. Maybe Ainge and Boy Genius figure out how to keep masking his issues, but as long as he’s their starter they will have trouble competing with the best teams in the WC.</p></blockquote>
<p>He made a considerable stride last season, and he just hit his athletic prime. He may never be as good as Irving was last year, but the Celtics are so deep and good I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;d lose much by shedding $20M of salary for a drop of 20-30% in production from their starting PG position. Again, they took LeGoat to 7 without their two max players &#8212; that is an incredible feat.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="629669" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cock Jowles, #1 Purveyor of Wanton Chuckery		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/08/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629668</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cock Jowles, #1 Purveyor of Wanton Chuckery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 00:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-08-24/#comment-629668</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder if Irving will even be a C past Feb 1st. I could see them moving him for a big haul, and then rolling the dice on the postseason. They came within one game of the Finals, and with or without Irving, they&#039;re still not ready to end the Warriors&#039; streak. With Davis, and the expected decline of the Dubs, they could be a frontrunner for a chip in 2020.

LeBron&#039;s dumb decision has really left a power vacuum in the East, but the West is still owned by GSW. Houston won&#039;t contend this year, and no one&#039;s really close to the 2017-18 Rockets among the rest of the field. If HOU couldn&#039;t get it done (albeit without their 2nd-best player), I don&#039;t see any other team having a chance in hell against a healthy Warriors squad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Irving will even be a C past Feb 1st. I could see them moving him for a big haul, and then rolling the dice on the postseason. They came within one game of the Finals, and with or without Irving, they&#8217;re still not ready to end the Warriors&#8217; streak. With Davis, and the expected decline of the Dubs, they could be a frontrunner for a chip in 2020.</p>
<p>LeBron&#8217;s dumb decision has really left a power vacuum in the East, but the West is still owned by GSW. Houston won&#8217;t contend this year, and no one&#8217;s really close to the 2017-18 Rockets among the rest of the field. If HOU couldn&#8217;t get it done (albeit without their 2nd-best player), I don&#8217;t see any other team having a chance in hell against a healthy Warriors squad.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="629668" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
