A tweener is a guy that’s too small to play the position he’s best suited for at the highest level, even though he was dominant at a lower level. It used a s a reason for concluding that a player isn’t good. Pretty simple concept for most.

I have the idea of “tweener” the other way round. A tweener is someone (usually a SF) too slow to defend the position he is supposed to defend, and therefore slids to another one (to PF) where he is undersized and also a poor defender (But perhaps he’s got a mismatch on the other end). All in all, tweeners are usually poor defenders. In the case PG-SG, you usually have an undersized SG sliding to PG, but then I hear more the words “combo guard”.

Lebron now has made as many buzzer beaters in the playoffs as Kobe and MJ combined.

I remember half this board saying that anyone could do what Chandler did because “it’s just catching lobs!” Enjoy the “common-sense” circle jerk.

You certainly didn’t hear that from me.

So… do you agree that we should take athleticism in consideration and that a tweener could be a real disadvantage?

It’s a simples question. No need for another passive-agressive answer.