That’s what I simply cannot understand about libertarianism’s defense of free speech. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism. A person is allowed to say whatever they want, and I’m equally allowed to think their opinions are fucking shit and to voice that point of view vehemently in answer to what I think it’s shit.

I’ll explain this one to you.

Every libertarian I know would defend your right to criticize whatever idea or speech you choose to (and in most cases they would probably agree with you on the issue).

The problem is the attempted imposition of those values on others and the effort to silence opposition.

In other words, imagine some anti immigration conservative wants to make a speech on immigration at a certain college. He could very well be a racist! However, he could very well have data on local school and hospital capacity and budgets, crime statistics, first generation tax revenue vs. expenditures etc.. that support limiting immigration to a level that our resources can handle.

The idea should be to allow him to speak. Where people disagree with his interpretation of the data or otherwise, counter him. Then after both sides make their case, people should decide what is in the best interests of their community.

If however that more rational conservative voice is not given a chance to make his case and is instead automatically called a racist, bigot, and xenophobe in an effort to discredit him and bar him from speaking, libertarians will have a major problem.

His value system may reflect the short term economics and quality of service issues in his community while others may place more value on the human cost of turning good people away. Still others may not give crap about any of that and just want cheap labor for their farm or new people that will vote for democrats. haha

As long as they all get their say and the market decides fairly, libertarians are fine with it.

I love Westbrook’s fire but he can’t keep doing this sort of shit. There’s no way a guy that shoots his percentages should take 43 shots ever in any situation. I get that George was bricking everything but why the hell didn’t they involve Adams more in the game? Why not go with shooters like Abrines or even Felton or Grant and try to get better shots? This sort of hero ball is just bound to fail.

He took 19 threes! He’s a career .311 three-point shooter!!

George played incredibly bad this game, didn’t seem like he wanted to shoot at all in the end. If I’m a team looking at him in free agency I’m very wary.