<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Knicks Morning News (2018.02.19)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/</link>
	<description>Knicks, Stats, Humor, Analysis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Stratomatic "It's tough being us"		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613476</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stratomatic "It's tough being us"]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe the only way they could get him to come to NY for 10 days was to tell his agent that if he looked really good they would sign him to something more than the minimum.  Maybe without that added upside, he would not have chosen to come to NY.  We are hardly a prime destination given that a young player asked to leave, a veteran player has been exiled for an altercation with the coach, we suck, and we are owned by Dolan.  

I doubt he&#039;s going to look good enough to sign for more than the minimum.  I think he&#039;s probably going to be one of a series of players we take a look at and maybe eventually invite to camp or give a spot to in the G league if he doesn&#039;t end up somewhere else.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the only way they could get him to come to NY for 10 days was to tell his agent that if he looked really good they would sign him to something more than the minimum.  Maybe without that added upside, he would not have chosen to come to NY.  We are hardly a prime destination given that a young player asked to leave, a veteran player has been exiled for an altercation with the coach, we suck, and we are owned by Dolan.  </p>
<p>I doubt he&#8217;s going to look good enough to sign for more than the minimum.  I think he&#8217;s probably going to be one of a series of players we take a look at and maybe eventually invite to camp or give a spot to in the G league if he doesn&#8217;t end up somewhere else.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="613476" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian Cronin		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613473</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Cronin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613470&quot;&gt;The Glass Half Rebuilt&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;There is no downside to this move. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

If he plays well and doesn&#039;t want to re-sign for the minimum, then they will be unable to re-sign him without tapping into their MLE, as they&#039;ll be capped out.

Now if they had just claimed his contract, they would have him under contract for two more years, both of which were unguaranteed, so they could cut him after the season if he sucked and not owe him anything (heck, I believe he could even come to training camp under contract and then be cut right before the season if they wanted to).

The only thing they gained from this move is the ability to cut him &lt;em&gt;this&lt;/em&gt; year, which isn&#039;t much of a benefit. They just wooed the guy from four different teams trying to sign him. Why would they do that not to let him prove himself for the rest of the season?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613470">The Glass Half Rebuilt</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>There is no downside to this move. </p></blockquote>
<p>If he plays well and doesn&#8217;t want to re-sign for the minimum, then they will be unable to re-sign him without tapping into their MLE, as they&#8217;ll be capped out.</p>
<p>Now if they had just claimed his contract, they would have him under contract for two more years, both of which were unguaranteed, so they could cut him after the season if he sucked and not owe him anything (heck, I believe he could even come to training camp under contract and then be cut right before the season if they wanted to).</p>
<p>The only thing they gained from this move is the ability to cut him <em>this</em> year, which isn&#8217;t much of a benefit. They just wooed the guy from four different teams trying to sign him. Why would they do that not to let him prove himself for the rest of the season?</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="613473" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian Cronin		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613472</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Cronin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613471&quot;&gt;english_knick&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Pretty sure you can’t waive a guy on more than a min contact without cap space. If he’s on min salary but with more years, even non guaranteed, i don’t think it’s technically a minimum deal.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

While you&#039;re absolutely correct that you need to be able to fit a player into your cap if you claim a waived player, the Knicks had cap space due to the trade exceptions from both the Willy trade and the Melo trade. So they had more than enough to claim Williams off of waivers (I believe the smaller Willy trade exception would have been enough). ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613471">english_knick</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Pretty sure you can’t waive a guy on more than a min contact without cap space. If he’s on min salary but with more years, even non guaranteed, i don’t think it’s technically a minimum deal.</p></blockquote>
<p>While you&#8217;re absolutely correct that you need to be able to fit a player into your cap if you claim a waived player, the Knicks had cap space due to the trade exceptions from both the Willy trade and the Melo trade. So they had more than enough to claim Williams off of waivers (I believe the smaller Willy trade exception would have been enough). </p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="613472" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: english_knick		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613471</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[english_knick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613471</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pretty sure you can’t waive a guy on more than a min contact without cap space. If he’s on min salary but with more years, even non guaranteed, i don’t think it’s technically a minimum deal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure you can’t waive a guy on more than a min contact without cap space. If he’s on min salary but with more years, even non guaranteed, i don’t think it’s technically a minimum deal.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="613471" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Glass Half Rebuilt		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613470</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Glass Half Rebuilt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613470</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I understand there’s an idea of how things should be done by an NBA team around here, but this front office appears to have a methodology that rewards things like effort. Signing a 10 day contract is not going to get this guy playing time if he doesn’t impress the coaches in practice. I probably hate Lance Thomas’ presence on the roster more than anybody here, but to think a 10 day contract player is going to eat up all of a team captain’s minutes is unrealistic to say the least. They want to see if he’s a fit with our team culture, if he’s a competitor, and if he’s a guy they want to sign to another non-guaranteed deal. There is no downside to this move. Not picking up his contract saves the roster spot and if they want to keep him, he gets a summer league invite. If he sucks you get the next guy in here on a 10 day contract. You don’t let Troy Williams keep you from finding the next Robert Covington or Hassan Whiteside. I know people would rather we cut Jarret Jack, but that goes against this organizations valuing of veteran leadership.

Again, probably stupid to a lot of you, but the Knicks have to establish themselves as a first class organization amongst the players. You don’t cut the guy who stabilized the position for you for over half a season when your rookie wasn’t ready and Sessions ended up flopping, especially not for a guy with 34 games played over 3 seasons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand there’s an idea of how things should be done by an NBA team around here, but this front office appears to have a methodology that rewards things like effort. Signing a 10 day contract is not going to get this guy playing time if he doesn’t impress the coaches in practice. I probably hate Lance Thomas’ presence on the roster more than anybody here, but to think a 10 day contract player is going to eat up all of a team captain’s minutes is unrealistic to say the least. They want to see if he’s a fit with our team culture, if he’s a competitor, and if he’s a guy they want to sign to another non-guaranteed deal. There is no downside to this move. Not picking up his contract saves the roster spot and if they want to keep him, he gets a summer league invite. If he sucks you get the next guy in here on a 10 day contract. You don’t let Troy Williams keep you from finding the next Robert Covington or Hassan Whiteside. I know people would rather we cut Jarret Jack, but that goes against this organizations valuing of veteran leadership.</p>
<p>Again, probably stupid to a lot of you, but the Knicks have to establish themselves as a first class organization amongst the players. You don’t cut the guy who stabilized the position for you for over half a season when your rookie wasn’t ready and Sessions ended up flopping, especially not for a guy with 34 games played over 3 seasons.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="613470" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Silky Johnson, Fleet Admiral of the Tank Armada		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613469</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silky Johnson, Fleet Admiral of the Tank Armada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 05:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613469</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re doing this so we can sign him to a two year contract at 7 million a year with a player option and an NTC in the off-season]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re doing this so we can sign him to a two year contract at 7 million a year with a player option and an NTC in the off-season</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="613469" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dtrickey		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613468</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dtrickey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 04:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613468</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I kind of figured it was to potentially look at others, but with a glut of guards and bigs, who else are they likely to give a run on a 10 day contract if not another wing? Pretty cheap contract that could be used as trade filler if necessary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of figured it was to potentially look at others, but with a glut of guards and bigs, who else are they likely to give a run on a 10 day contract if not another wing? Pretty cheap contract that could be used as trade filler if necessary.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="613468" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thenoblefacehumper		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613467</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thenoblefacehumper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 04:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I seriously still don’t get it. It kind of irritates me really. If they’re interested in Williams, then just pick him off of waivers and get his last two non-guaranteed contract years for nothing! All this does is keep them from having to commit to him for the rest of the year, but who cares at this point? I just don’t get it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They probably want to use the roster spot for other 10 day contracts if they don&#039;t like what they see. I think it&#039;s very dumb--the potential reward of two guaranteed years from a productive player is well worth the risk of losing a roster spot for 23 games. Especially considering Noah seems three-quarters of the way out the door and we could always cut Jack.

I do support taking a look at Williams though. Definitely had relatively intriguing college numbers, more so than Dotson. Please please please give him all of Lance&#039;s minutes and plenty of Beasley&#039;s so we can actually get a good look.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I seriously still don’t get it. It kind of irritates me really. If they’re interested in Williams, then just pick him off of waivers and get his last two non-guaranteed contract years for nothing! All this does is keep them from having to commit to him for the rest of the year, but who cares at this point? I just don’t get it.</p></blockquote>
<p>They probably want to use the roster spot for other 10 day contracts if they don&#8217;t like what they see. I think it&#8217;s very dumb&#8211;the potential reward of two guaranteed years from a productive player is well worth the risk of losing a roster spot for 23 games. Especially considering Noah seems three-quarters of the way out the door and we could always cut Jack.</p>
<p>I do support taking a look at Williams though. Definitely had relatively intriguing college numbers, more so than Dotson. Please please please give him all of Lance&#8217;s minutes and plenty of Beasley&#8217;s so we can actually get a good look.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="613467" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian Cronin		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Cronin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 03:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613465&quot;&gt;kevin5318&lt;/a&gt;.

I seriously still don&#039;t get it. It kind of irritates me really. If they&#039;re interested in Williams, then just pick him off of waivers and get his last two non-guaranteed contract years for nothing! All this does is keep them from having to commit to him for the rest of the year, but who cares at this point? I just don&#039;t get it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613465">kevin5318</a>.</p>
<p>I seriously still don&#8217;t get it. It kind of irritates me really. If they&#8217;re interested in Williams, then just pick him off of waivers and get his last two non-guaranteed contract years for nothing! All this does is keep them from having to commit to him for the rest of the year, but who cares at this point? I just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="613466" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kevin5318		</title>
		<link>https://knickerblogger.net/2018/02/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613465</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin5318]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 03:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-2018-02-19/#comment-613465</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;@ShamsCharania
Free agent Troy Williams is signing a 10-day contract with the New York Knicks, league sources said. Williams decided among several interested teams since release from Houston last week.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>@ShamsCharania<br />
Free agent Troy Williams is signing a 10-day contract with the New York Knicks, league sources said. Williams decided among several interested teams since release from Houston last week.</p></blockquote>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-1">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="613465" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="user" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="fas fa-thumbs-up"></i>
                </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
