Comments on: What’s the deal with Knicks in 60? http://KnickerBlogger.Net/whats-the-deal-with-knicks-in-60/ The NBA's indispensible, premier analytical blog. Sun, 19 May 2013 18:00:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: frank lee http://KnickerBlogger.Net/whats-the-deal-with-knicks-in-60/#comment-39695 frank lee Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:37:37 +0000 http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=436#comment-39695 here’s the guy to read for the best knicks coverage:

http://www.sportsmediaguide.com/12112006-WendellMaxeyJr.asp

]]> By: Cips http://KnickerBlogger.Net/whats-the-deal-with-knicks-in-60/#comment-39350 Cips Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:30:18 +0000 http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=436#comment-39350 We have to be the only fan base of a basketball team whose team’s network’s color commentator makes William Wordsworth puns during the course of a game. I love Clyde. He’s like my best friend / English class loving buddy.

]]> By: Alex http://KnickerBlogger.Net/whats-the-deal-with-knicks-in-60/#comment-39318 Alex Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:17:00 +0000 http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=436#comment-39318 hmmmm. MSG putting together footage of a game that ends sometimes minutes before knicks in 60 begins… What would you expect? I’m pretty certain there are times that they’re editing the END of Knicks in 60 while the beginning is being broadcast. If they had hours to edit it, I’m sure it would be a lot better.

What would make the program absolutely EXCELLENT would be to simply edit in all the clock running footage(48 minutes). Exclude free throws and subtitle that info during game action something like…”Curry makes 1 of 2″. I don’t need to see the refs explanation of a call. That would leave 12 minutes for commercials. But, there just isn’t enough time for the editing. Sad.

Walt uses splendor on the glass semi-regularly.

]]> By: Brian Cronin http://KnickerBlogger.Net/whats-the-deal-with-knicks-in-60/#comment-39274 Brian Cronin Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:27:44 +0000 http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=436#comment-39274 Hehe…I like that you came back two hours after the reference to make sure people got it. :)

]]> By: mase http://KnickerBlogger.Net/whats-the-deal-with-knicks-in-60/#comment-39260 mase Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:48:44 +0000 http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=436#comment-39260 ‘splendor on the glass’ is a play on
‘splendor in the grass’…get it?
literature reference for Walt!

]]> By: Dan Panorama http://KnickerBlogger.Net/whats-the-deal-with-knicks-in-60/#comment-39250 Dan Panorama Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:26:02 +0000 http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=436#comment-39250 I think Curry “mauling and apalling” the Bucks defense was my fave for the night.

]]> By: mase http://KnickerBlogger.Net/whats-the-deal-with-knicks-in-60/#comment-39197 mase Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:02:15 +0000 http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=436#comment-39197 MSG is a disjointed network always has been….YES network is much better. The Nets game against Phoenix had zero commercials from the 2 minute mark thru the overtme period, ZERO! Marv’s substitute didnt berate the audience with stats or his views on the state of professional sports everytime someone made a ill-advised play(ahem, Mike Breen)…Side note, anyone hear Walt say “Spledor on the Glass!” last night after a Curry rebound?
First time I heard that one, funny.

]]> By: Mike H http://KnickerBlogger.Net/whats-the-deal-with-knicks-in-60/#comment-38903 Mike H Sat, 09 Dec 2006 23:47:36 +0000 http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=436#comment-38903 YES!!! I saw this once, and just ended up disoriented and confused.

]]> By: Seth http://KnickerBlogger.Net/whats-the-deal-with-knicks-in-60/#comment-38898 Seth Sat, 09 Dec 2006 23:08:54 +0000 http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=436#comment-38898 Totally agree. It’s a great idea gone horribly wrong. As someone who often misses weekend games (including tonights, foreseeably), this could be a very useful tool, but really isn’t. It would take about 5 minutes to put together a solid hour-long summary of the game, but the people at MSG are too damn lazy. I’m glad someone else notices this.

]]>