<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ugh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:31:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDM</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/#comment-51230</link>
		<dc:creator>TDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=458#comment-51230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craw / Q combine for 1-11 from the field.  Nuff said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craw / Q combine for 1-11 from the field.  Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/#comment-51220</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=458#comment-51220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[they&#039;re instantly doubling on Curry, but they should try to isolate Frye and/or Lee on the other block more, agreed with that. but the Knicks don&#039;t exactly have the most disciplined offense in the league, in case you hadn&#039;t noticed.

whatever happens in the second half, pretty nice to see Curry pushing around Amare like he was a little girl, even playing some nice D on him, outscoring him 21-4. the other Knicks need to take better advantage of the doubleteams on Curry, as always.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they&#8217;re instantly doubling on Curry, but they should try to isolate Frye and/or Lee on the other block more, agreed with that. but the Knicks don&#8217;t exactly have the most disciplined offense in the league, in case you hadn&#8217;t noticed.</p>
<p>whatever happens in the second half, pretty nice to see Curry pushing around Amare like he was a little girl, even playing some nice D on him, outscoring him 21-4. the other Knicks need to take better advantage of the doubleteams on Curry, as always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/#comment-51218</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=458#comment-51218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#039;ve established that the Suns CANNOT guard them down low, so they keep going for jumpers.

ARGH!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve established that the Suns CANNOT guard them down low, so they keep going for jumpers.</p>
<p>ARGH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/#comment-51217</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=458#comment-51217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jumper, jumper, jumper, jumper - have they COMPLETELY forgotten how they GOT the lead in the FIRST place?!?

So aggravating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jumper, jumper, jumper, jumper &#8211; have they COMPLETELY forgotten how they GOT the lead in the FIRST place?!?</p>
<p>So aggravating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: np</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/#comment-51211</link>
		<dc:creator>np</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=458#comment-51211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[man, jeffries looked really godawful in the first!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man, jeffries looked really godawful in the first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDM</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/#comment-51209</link>
		<dc:creator>TDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=458#comment-51209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Knicks 123 Suns 114&quot;  Ha.  Yeah, what year?  1973?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Knicks 123 Suns 114&#8243;  Ha.  Yeah, what year?  1973?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: confucius</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/#comment-51201</link>
		<dc:creator>confucius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=458#comment-51201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Knicks 123 Suns 114]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knicks 123 Suns 114</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/#comment-51162</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=458#comment-51162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and we really need a new article up top, even some short dummy thing, so all of us can stop looking at this box score. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and we really need a new article up top, even some short dummy thing, so all of us can stop looking at this box score. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/#comment-51161</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=458#comment-51161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t say we were out of the playoffs, but we really needed to win more games over the past few weeks IMO. we&#039;re 18-25 with games against Phoenix and Miami (most likely with both Shaq and Wade) up next. if we manage to win one of those, then I&#039;ll be slightly more optimistic, but as of now we&#039;re closer in the loss column to Charlotte and Atlanta than we are to Toronto and NJ (we have played a few more games than those first two, but still).

seemingly sure things for the Eastern playoffs: Detroit, Cleveland, Chicago, Washington, Orlando

so three spots left, one to the Atlantic winner. so if we don&#039;t win the Atlantic (maybe still our best shot, hopefully NJ will have a brutal road trip and maybe Bosh will get hurt again), we&#039;re going against the lower of NJ/Toronto, Miami and Indiana for the last two spots, so we&#039;d have to finish ahead of two of those. so, no, I don&#039;t see us winning enough games this year to make it, but we&#039;ll see. clearly I&#039;d love to be wrong, just trying to be realistic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t say we were out of the playoffs, but we really needed to win more games over the past few weeks IMO. we&#8217;re 18-25 with games against Phoenix and Miami (most likely with both Shaq and Wade) up next. if we manage to win one of those, then I&#8217;ll be slightly more optimistic, but as of now we&#8217;re closer in the loss column to Charlotte and Atlanta than we are to Toronto and NJ (we have played a few more games than those first two, but still).</p>
<p>seemingly sure things for the Eastern playoffs: Detroit, Cleveland, Chicago, Washington, Orlando</p>
<p>so three spots left, one to the Atlantic winner. so if we don&#8217;t win the Atlantic (maybe still our best shot, hopefully NJ will have a brutal road trip and maybe Bosh will get hurt again), we&#8217;re going against the lower of NJ/Toronto, Miami and Indiana for the last two spots, so we&#8217;d have to finish ahead of two of those. so, no, I don&#8217;t see us winning enough games this year to make it, but we&#8217;ll see. clearly I&#8217;d love to be wrong, just trying to be realistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mase</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ugh-2/#comment-51115</link>
		<dc:creator>mase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=458#comment-51115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you can&#039;t say we&#039;re out of the playoffs half-way thru the season, if there were 10 games left maybe.  We also have a favorable schedule, plus Marbury is not out for the year!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can&#8217;t say we&#8217;re out of the playoffs half-way thru the season, if there were 10 games left maybe.  We also have a favorable schedule, plus Marbury is not out for the year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
