<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They Said It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:18:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/#comment-104013</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=537#comment-104013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[p.s. sorry for any confusion, meant to post that under Draft Prospects Part II.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. sorry for any confusion, meant to post that under Draft Prospects Part II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/#comment-104011</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=537#comment-104011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the big picture, Rasheed is no superstar and would not turn us into a title contender... BUT there are several advantages to the trade that was thrown out there earlier. 

- Crawford shouldn&#039;t even be in the rotation, and unless Frye bounces back, he shouldn&#039;t either. So adding Rasheed would be a significant upgrade. 

- Like David Lee, Rasheed doesn&#039;t need the ball in his hands to make an impact. His usage rate is only 17.6, 64th in the league, i.e. he has a low &quot;usage rate.&quot; (17.6, 64th in the league). That&#039;s important on a team with Curry, Marbury &amp; Francis, who need the ball ALL THE TIME. They ain&#039;t in there for defense.  

- The personality thing is overrated. Teams that do well/exceed expectations become happy teams, not vice-versa. Based on all the trade rumors that have been floated over the years, it looks like Rashweed would love to play in New York - so he wouldn&#039;t grumble, at least for a while. 

- Worst-case, the deal is up in two years and we could re-assess.

- From Detroit&#039;s perspective, it&#039;s not an overwhelming deal, but it&#039;s not a lowball offer either. It dpends how highly you think of Frye, or if a player you like is available at 23. Plus, Crawford would be an upgrade as a backup, for a team that wants to make a title run. On a team that&#039;s treading water, like NYK - he&#039;s just taking minutes from Nate (or this year&#039;s pick), who might develop into a real player. 

- Most important, the deal would put us in shouting range of being able to sign David Lee to an extension and still be under the cap at the end of 2009. As of now, Curry/Crawford/Richardson/James/Jeffries eat up about $50 million... another few million for Balkman/Colins and this year&#039;s draft pick... and we&#039;re already pushing it. Any deal that dumps one of the above contracts, for a deal expiring in 2009 or 2008, would be a fantastic move. To get a player like Rasheed in the bargain...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the big picture, Rasheed is no superstar and would not turn us into a title contender&#8230; BUT there are several advantages to the trade that was thrown out there earlier. </p>
<p>- Crawford shouldn&#8217;t even be in the rotation, and unless Frye bounces back, he shouldn&#8217;t either. So adding Rasheed would be a significant upgrade. </p>
<p>- Like David Lee, Rasheed doesn&#8217;t need the ball in his hands to make an impact. His usage rate is only 17.6, 64th in the league, i.e. he has a low &#8220;usage rate.&#8221; (17.6, 64th in the league). That&#8217;s important on a team with Curry, Marbury &amp; Francis, who need the ball ALL THE TIME. They ain&#8217;t in there for defense.  </p>
<p>- The personality thing is overrated. Teams that do well/exceed expectations become happy teams, not vice-versa. Based on all the trade rumors that have been floated over the years, it looks like Rashweed would love to play in New York &#8211; so he wouldn&#8217;t grumble, at least for a while. </p>
<p>- Worst-case, the deal is up in two years and we could re-assess.</p>
<p>- From Detroit&#8217;s perspective, it&#8217;s not an overwhelming deal, but it&#8217;s not a lowball offer either. It dpends how highly you think of Frye, or if a player you like is available at 23. Plus, Crawford would be an upgrade as a backup, for a team that wants to make a title run. On a team that&#8217;s treading water, like NYK &#8211; he&#8217;s just taking minutes from Nate (or this year&#8217;s pick), who might develop into a real player. </p>
<p>- Most important, the deal would put us in shouting range of being able to sign David Lee to an extension and still be under the cap at the end of 2009. As of now, Curry/Crawford/Richardson/James/Jeffries eat up about $50 million&#8230; another few million for Balkman/Colins and this year&#8217;s draft pick&#8230; and we&#8217;re already pushing it. Any deal that dumps one of the above contracts, for a deal expiring in 2009 or 2008, would be a fantastic move. To get a player like Rasheed in the bargain&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gman</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/#comment-103792</link>
		<dc:creator>Gman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 01:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=537#comment-103792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the knicks can do several things to help improve our current roster without completely destroying our future which we all know we are capable of doing.

Ig I am correct the Knicks will be under the cap and have the resources to go out and sign a free agent 2 summers from now.  With that being said why not try and aquire a player that has a similiar contract, via Rasheed Wallace or Ron Artest (who would both LOVE to come to NY).  If that happens we become an instant playoff team, maybe not a contender, but who knows in the eat and leaves room to sign any player we want in free agency 2 years from now bc we all know if we have the can everyone from kobe to grandmama would love to suite up the blue, white and orange.

On the other hand I wouldnt be totaly upset with NO move at all.  I see us as a playoff team right now.  Maybe not competing for a title, but atleast I can enjoy Bball in JUNE.

What do u guys thnk?????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the knicks can do several things to help improve our current roster without completely destroying our future which we all know we are capable of doing.</p>
<p>Ig I am correct the Knicks will be under the cap and have the resources to go out and sign a free agent 2 summers from now.  With that being said why not try and aquire a player that has a similiar contract, via Rasheed Wallace or Ron Artest (who would both LOVE to come to NY).  If that happens we become an instant playoff team, maybe not a contender, but who knows in the eat and leaves room to sign any player we want in free agency 2 years from now bc we all know if we have the can everyone from kobe to grandmama would love to suite up the blue, white and orange.</p>
<p>On the other hand I wouldnt be totaly upset with NO move at all.  I see us as a playoff team right now.  Maybe not competing for a title, but atleast I can enjoy Bball in JUNE.</p>
<p>What do u guys thnk?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/#comment-103674</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=537#comment-103674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol, hunt me down and kill me? Hee hee. You&#039;re the best Jon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, hunt me down and kill me? Hee hee. You&#8217;re the best Jon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/#comment-103673</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=537#comment-103673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Curry piece hasn&#039;t gone up yet? Weird.

It&#039;s totally written.

KB just must have it being posted a little later in the day than usual.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Curry piece hasn&#8217;t gone up yet? Weird.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s totally written.</p>
<p>KB just must have it being posted a little later in the day than usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/#comment-103668</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=537#comment-103668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope Curry&#039;s people hunt you down and kill you before next season, just so we don&#039;t have to hear a whole &#039;nother season of this. he&#039;s not going anywhere, deal with it or go root for another team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Curry&#8217;s people hunt you down and kill you before next season, just so we don&#8217;t have to hear a whole &#8216;nother season of this. he&#8217;s not going anywhere, deal with it or go root for another team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/#comment-103658</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=537#comment-103658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s going on here, has a fight broken out at Knickerblogger Central over Eddy Curry&#039;s grade?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s going on here, has a fight broken out at Knickerblogger Central over Eddy Curry&#8217;s grade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lefty</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/#comment-103552</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=537#comment-103552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone have a sense on how serious Lee&#039;s injury really is/was. The reports I read say he&#039;s not even  pushing it yet and that seems a little suspicious. It would suck if cause of bad medical advice we lose Lee for an extended period this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have a sense on how serious Lee&#8217;s injury really is/was. The reports I read say he&#8217;s not even  pushing it yet and that seems a little suspicious. It would suck if cause of bad medical advice we lose Lee for an extended period this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/#comment-103412</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=537#comment-103412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who in the heck calls players (every player, at that) by their first initial/last name and expects to be taken seriously? Really. Oh, and &#039;JCraw&#039; shot 40%, not 33%. 41% for his career. He&#039;s not improving. Big difference. Who cares? If he doesn&#039;t learn what a good shot is, he&#039;s worthless. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who in the heck calls players (every player, at that) by their first initial/last name and expects to be taken seriously? Really. Oh, and &#8216;JCraw&#8217; shot 40%, not 33%. 41% for his career. He&#8217;s not improving. Big difference. Who cares? If he doesn&#8217;t learn what a good shot is, he&#8217;s worthless. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xduckshoex</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/they-said-it/#comment-103410</link>
		<dc:creator>xduckshoex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=537#comment-103410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There definitely is a reason the teams record collapsed after Crawford went down: the injury to Lee a week earlier.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There definitely is a reason the teams record collapsed after Crawford went down: the injury to Lee a week earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
