<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Ricks 114, Knicks 111</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Honorable Cock Jowles</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/#comment-409060</link>
		<dc:creator>The Honorable Cock Jowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10569#comment-409060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-409053&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-409053&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;maxwell&#095;&#051;g&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
OK, stat heads, I have a challenge for you.What is the scoring pct (or shooting pct) around the league on “last shot” offensive sets.I bet its extremely low, as teams always run down the clock and end up with a iso, fall-away, turnaround, 20 foot heave.I always think the team with the last shot is better of just running their offense, trying their best to score through normal offense, and then letting the other team run the “last shot heave” play.
I bring this up because I HATED the stretegy (and the result too) of our last possession last night.itstead of just running our normal good offense, which could lead to a tyson pick and roll oop, a Kidd 3 point (lay-up), a melo open j, a felton floater, etc.Instead, we change our offensive mindset and revert to our worst offensive strategy when we need points the most, all in the name of letting our best player have the last shot and holding for the last shot.This strategy is not only employed by the Knicks, but that doesn’t make is acceptable, IMO.I hope next time, we just try to score in the same way that we see fit for the other 47:30 of the game, becasue thats our best shot


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think that this kind of thinking is worth looking into. Why not simply go for a regular possession&#039;s type of scoring play, and if it fails, to foul immediately and run another play for a three-point attempt?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-409053">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-409053" rel="nofollow">maxwell&#095;&#051;g</a></strong>:<br />
OK, stat heads, I have a challenge for you.What is the scoring pct (or shooting pct) around the league on “last shot” offensive sets.I bet its extremely low, as teams always run down the clock and end up with a iso, fall-away, turnaround, 20 foot heave.I always think the team with the last shot is better of just running their offense, trying their best to score through normal offense, and then letting the other team run the “last shot heave” play.<br />
I bring this up because I HATED the stretegy (and the result too) of our last possession last night.itstead of just running our normal good offense, which could lead to a tyson pick and roll oop, a Kidd 3 point (lay-up), a melo open j, a felton floater, etc.Instead, we change our offensive mindset and revert to our worst offensive strategy when we need points the most, all in the name of letting our best player have the last shot and holding for the last shot.This strategy is not only employed by the Knicks, but that doesn’t make is acceptable, IMO.I hope next time, we just try to score in the same way that we see fit for the other 47:30 of the game, becasue thats our best shot</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think that this kind of thinking is worth looking into. Why not simply go for a regular possession&#8217;s type of scoring play, and if it fails, to foul immediately and run another play for a three-point attempt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxwell_3g</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/#comment-409053</link>
		<dc:creator>maxwell_3g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10569#comment-409053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, stat heads, I have a challenge for you.  What is the scoring pct (or shooting pct) around the league on &quot;last shot&quot; offensive sets.  I bet its extremely low, as teams always run down the clock and end up with a iso, fall-away, turnaround, 20 foot heave.  I always think the team with the last shot is better of just running their offense, trying their best to score through normal offense, and then letting the other team run the &quot;last shot heave&quot; play.
I bring this up because I HATED the stretegy (and the result too) of our last possession last night.  itstead of just running our normal good offense, which could lead to a tyson pick and roll oop, a Kidd 3 point (lay-up), a melo open j, a felton floater, etc.  Instead, we change our offensive mindset and revert to our worst offensive strategy when we need points the most, all in the name of letting our best player have the last shot and holding for the last shot.  This strategy is not only employed by the Knicks, but that doesn&#039;t make is acceptable, IMO.  I hope next time, we just try to score in the same way that we see fit for the other 47:30 of the game, becasue thats our best shot]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, stat heads, I have a challenge for you.  What is the scoring pct (or shooting pct) around the league on &#8220;last shot&#8221; offensive sets.  I bet its extremely low, as teams always run down the clock and end up with a iso, fall-away, turnaround, 20 foot heave.  I always think the team with the last shot is better of just running their offense, trying their best to score through normal offense, and then letting the other team run the &#8220;last shot heave&#8221; play.<br />
I bring this up because I HATED the stretegy (and the result too) of our last possession last night.  itstead of just running our normal good offense, which could lead to a tyson pick and roll oop, a Kidd 3 point (lay-up), a melo open j, a felton floater, etc.  Instead, we change our offensive mindset and revert to our worst offensive strategy when we need points the most, all in the name of letting our best player have the last shot and holding for the last shot.  This strategy is not only employed by the Knicks, but that doesn&#8217;t make is acceptable, IMO.  I hope next time, we just try to score in the same way that we see fit for the other 47:30 of the game, becasue thats our best shot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK47</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/#comment-409048</link>
		<dc:creator>JK47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10569#comment-409048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-409046&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-409046&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sekou&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
On thing very obvious to me last night was the poor on ball defense.Neither Felton nor Kidd could honestly stay in front of their man.The pnr defense was even worse.I wish we would trap more on the pnr.The strength of our defense thus far has been getting in the passing lanes and rotating to the open man.I think this would work better for us, especially with teams with quick guards.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

JR Smith also had a poor defensive game-- he was slow on several rotations and ended up at -21 for the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-409046">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-409046" rel="nofollow">sekou</a></strong>:<br />
On thing very obvious to me last night was the poor on ball defense.Neither Felton nor Kidd could honestly stay in front of their man.The pnr defense was even worse.I wish we would trap more on the pnr.The strength of our defense thus far has been getting in the passing lanes and rotating to the open man.I think this would work better for us, especially with teams with quick guards.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>JR Smith also had a poor defensive game&#8211; he was slow on several rotations and ended up at -21 for the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sekou</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/#comment-409046</link>
		<dc:creator>sekou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10569#comment-409046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On thing very obvious to me last night was the poor on ball defense.  Neither Felton nor Kidd could honestly stay in front of their man.  The pnr defense was even worse.  I wish we would trap more on the pnr.  The strength of our defense thus far has been getting in the passing lanes and rotating to the open man.  I think this would work better for us, especially with teams with quick guards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On thing very obvious to me last night was the poor on ball defense.  Neither Felton nor Kidd could honestly stay in front of their man.  The pnr defense was even worse.  I wish we would trap more on the pnr.  The strength of our defense thus far has been getting in the passing lanes and rotating to the open man.  I think this would work better for us, especially with teams with quick guards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ephus</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/#comment-409045</link>
		<dc:creator>ephus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10569#comment-409045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;Melo gets absolutely no respect from the refs when he takes it to the rim.  In the last two minutes, Kaman literally hit &#039;Melo in the face (inadvertently, it seemed) which blew the layup and sent &#039;Melo reeling, but no call.  If &#039;Melo gets to the line there, the Knick almost certainly tie it and might have taken the lead.

Knicks need to send a compilation reel to the league office.

Finally, probably best to limit each recap to one fart joke/mention.  Less is more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Melo gets absolutely no respect from the refs when he takes it to the rim.  In the last two minutes, Kaman literally hit &#8216;Melo in the face (inadvertently, it seemed) which blew the layup and sent &#8216;Melo reeling, but no call.  If &#8216;Melo gets to the line there, the Knick almost certainly tie it and might have taken the lead.</p>
<p>Knicks need to send a compilation reel to the league office.</p>
<p>Finally, probably best to limit each recap to one fart joke/mention.  Less is more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK47</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/#comment-409042</link>
		<dc:creator>JK47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10569#comment-409042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For much of the 3rd and 4th quarters the Knicks got a lot less aggressive in terms of pressuring ballhandlers and getting into passing lanes.  They were allowing the Mavs to get upcourt quickly, make a few passes and take easy jumpers.  When they turned up the heat again later in the 4th quarter they got right back into the game.

The Knicks slipped all the way to 9th in defensive rating after this game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For much of the 3rd and 4th quarters the Knicks got a lot less aggressive in terms of pressuring ballhandlers and getting into passing lanes.  They were allowing the Mavs to get upcourt quickly, make a few passes and take easy jumpers.  When they turned up the heat again later in the 4th quarter they got right back into the game.</p>
<p>The Knicks slipped all the way to 9th in defensive rating after this game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/#comment-409039</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10569#comment-409039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JR Smith worries me, I hope we don&#039;t have to depend on him too much in the playoffs.

Novak is following in Lin&#039;s footsteps, he seems to have regressed in all areas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR Smith worries me, I hope we don&#8217;t have to depend on him too much in the playoffs.</p>
<p>Novak is following in Lin&#8217;s footsteps, he seems to have regressed in all areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yellowboy90</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/#comment-409036</link>
		<dc:creator>yellowboy90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10569#comment-409036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can I give the refs a F. I&#039;m sorry I am still not over the bad calls. What happen to the pre-season refs when Melo was getting to line 12 times(exaggeration) a game. Seriously wasn&#039;t he leading the pre-season in FTAs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I give the refs a F. I&#8217;m sorry I am still not over the bad calls. What happen to the pre-season refs when Melo was getting to line 12 times(exaggeration) a game. Seriously wasn&#8217;t he leading the pre-season in FTAs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruruland</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/#comment-409035</link>
		<dc:creator>ruruland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 07:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10569#comment-409035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transition was the difference... Knicks had pretty good floor balance and Mavs still managed to get wide open looks. Some half cout problems, but nothing that won&#039;t get fixed.

Every time Knicks were about to pull away in first three quarters Mayo or Carter hit a bad shot. 

That&#039;s going to be a very tough out . 

...Also, there is really no apparent way I can see an opponent slowing down Knicks igh pnr with Felton, especially when Chandler is etting the screen. 

Pretty clear to me Felton is a system quarterback, and he has the system that is only asking him to do things he can do well. If you actually looked at him in Synergy he&#039;s been a good uncontested jump shooter last three years. 

 Damn he is good in the high pnr, Paul-eque at times. Everything but the incredible handle and ability to use it to get shots off in traffic and the body to create the contact fouls. 

But the quickness, vision, and passing skill is all there. 

The match-up zone may have been mistaken for some really poor help defense when the Knicks got mismatched after bad transition sequences and were confused on who to guard. Maybe not. A night like that it&#039;s hard to tell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transition was the difference&#8230; Knicks had pretty good floor balance and Mavs still managed to get wide open looks. Some half cout problems, but nothing that won&#8217;t get fixed.</p>
<p>Every time Knicks were about to pull away in first three quarters Mayo or Carter hit a bad shot. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s going to be a very tough out . </p>
<p>&#8230;Also, there is really no apparent way I can see an opponent slowing down Knicks igh pnr with Felton, especially when Chandler is etting the screen. </p>
<p>Pretty clear to me Felton is a system quarterback, and he has the system that is only asking him to do things he can do well. If you actually looked at him in Synergy he&#8217;s been a good uncontested jump shooter last three years. </p>
<p> Damn he is good in the high pnr, Paul-eque at times. Everything but the incredible handle and ability to use it to get shots off in traffic and the body to create the contact fouls. </p>
<p>But the quickness, vision, and passing skill is all there. </p>
<p>The match-up zone may have been mistaken for some really poor help defense when the Knicks got mismatched after bad transition sequences and were confused on who to guard. Maybe not. A night like that it&#8217;s hard to tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/ricks-114-knicks-111/#comment-409034</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 07:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10569#comment-409034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I really don&#039;t get the shortened roster on the second night of a back-to-back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I really don&#8217;t get the shortened roster on the second night of a back-to-back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
