<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recap: I Believe the Word I&#8217;m Looking for is &#8216;Oof&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 07:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Silverman</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/#comment-328182</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=6789#comment-328182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Game thread is up, gents.

http://knickerblogger.net/2011-playoffs-celtics-at-knicks-game-four/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game thread is up, gents.</p>
<p><a href="http://knickerblogger.net/2011-playoffs-celtics-at-knicks-game-four/" rel="nofollow">http://knickerblogger.net/2011-playoffs-celtics-at-knicks-game-four/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/#comment-328181</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=6789#comment-328181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The celtics weren&#039;t coasting in game 2 but if they had lost game 1 they would go to another level. It&#039;s what the better teams do in the early rounds of the playoffs. The lakers did it after losing game 1 to the hornets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The celtics weren&#8217;t coasting in game 2 but if they had lost game 1 they would go to another level. It&#8217;s what the better teams do in the early rounds of the playoffs. The lakers did it after losing game 1 to the hornets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/#comment-328180</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=6789#comment-328180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-328173&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-328173&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
Yao will never be healthy again.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The same was said about Bill Walton and Antonio McDyess. You never know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-328173">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-328173" rel="nofollow">The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles</a></strong>:<br />
Yao will never be healthy again.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The same was said about Bill Walton and Antonio McDyess. You never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/#comment-328179</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=6789#comment-328179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-328174&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-328174&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: This implies that Boston wasn’t playing at max intensity during Game 2, which means that they were, in a sense, coasting. Does anyone think that’s true of ANY playoff team, much less the Celtics, who appear to be one of the most intense teams in the league?


Last year they were a few points shy of being the best in the league (Kobe, again: luckiest m.f. out) and Pierce actually improved this year. This is not a team that takes playoff games off.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, not saying that they took a game off, but you can&#039;t generate the same intensity for every game, the situation definitely matters.  If you know that if you lose game 2 at home you are in an 0-2 hole, rather than if you lose you are 1-1, that definitlly makes a difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-328174">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-328174" rel="nofollow">The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles</a></strong>: This implies that Boston wasn’t playing at max intensity during Game 2, which means that they were, in a sense, coasting. Does anyone think that’s true of ANY playoff team, much less the Celtics, who appear to be one of the most intense teams in the league?</p>
<p>Last year they were a few points shy of being the best in the league (Kobe, again: luckiest m.f. out) and Pierce actually improved this year. This is not a team that takes playoff games off.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>No, not saying that they took a game off, but you can&#8217;t generate the same intensity for every game, the situation definitely matters.  If you know that if you lose game 2 at home you are in an 0-2 hole, rather than if you lose you are 1-1, that definitlly makes a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK47</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/#comment-328178</link>
		<dc:creator>JK47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=6789#comment-328178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to bring Marcin Gortat in here; he was terrific for Phoenix after the trade and looks pretty similar on the stat sheet to the much-coveted Marc Gasol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to bring Marcin Gortat in here; he was terrific for Phoenix after the trade and looks pretty similar on the stat sheet to the much-coveted Marc Gasol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/#comment-328177</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=6789#comment-328177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@62

Billups for Nash and Frye/Gortat/Lopez works salary wise. Dumping Gortat or Frye would save Phoenix salary wise, but maybe not enough to entice them to give us Nash. Also, though Nash expires in 2012, Frye/Gortat would eat into our 2012 salary flexibility (although they can, presumably, be traded before that, after a year of &quot;exploding&quot; in D&#039;Antoni&#039;s offensive system).

Also, as Ess Dog mentioned yesterday, Ray Felton may be the best PG available this off-season. Billups for Felton and Chris Anderson saves Denver a few $ going forward. Plus, they owe us!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@62</p>
<p>Billups for Nash and Frye/Gortat/Lopez works salary wise. Dumping Gortat or Frye would save Phoenix salary wise, but maybe not enough to entice them to give us Nash. Also, though Nash expires in 2012, Frye/Gortat would eat into our 2012 salary flexibility (although they can, presumably, be traded before that, after a year of &#8220;exploding&#8221; in D&#8217;Antoni&#8217;s offensive system).</p>
<p>Also, as Ess Dog mentioned yesterday, Ray Felton may be the best PG available this off-season. Billups for Felton and Chris Anderson saves Denver a few $ going forward. Plus, they owe us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KnickInSeattle</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/#comment-328176</link>
		<dc:creator>KnickInSeattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=6789#comment-328176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@70, he was actually saying that Boston would have beat us more badly in game 2 if we&#039;d won game 1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@70, he was actually saying that Boston would have beat us more badly in game 2 if we&#8217;d won game 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/#comment-328175</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=6789#comment-328175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent #17 picks include: Jrue Holiday, Roy Hibbert, Extra E, Danny Granger, and Josh Smith. It&#039;s kind of a &quot;go-to&quot; spot for quality players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent #17 picks include: Jrue Holiday, Roy Hibbert, Extra E, Danny Granger, and Josh Smith. It&#8217;s kind of a &#8220;go-to&#8221; spot for quality players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Honorable Cock Jowles</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/#comment-328174</link>
		<dc:creator>The Honorable Cock Jowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=6789#comment-328174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-328159&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-328159&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Z&#045;man&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
We should have won game 1, but does anyone really think that if we did, game 2 would have been as close as it was? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

This implies that Boston wasn&#039;t playing at max intensity during Game 2, which means that they were, in a sense, coasting. Does anyone think that&#039;s true of ANY playoff team, much less the Celtics, who appear to be one of the most intense teams in the league?

Last year they were a few points shy of being the best in the league (Kobe, again: luckiest m.f. out) and Pierce actually improved this year. This is not a team that takes playoff games off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-328159"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-328159" rel="nofollow">Z&#045;man</a></strong>:<br />
We should have won game 1, but does anyone really think that if we did, game 2 would have been as close as it was? </p></blockquote>
<p>This implies that Boston wasn&#8217;t playing at max intensity during Game 2, which means that they were, in a sense, coasting. Does anyone think that&#8217;s true of ANY playoff team, much less the Celtics, who appear to be one of the most intense teams in the league?</p>
<p>Last year they were a few points shy of being the best in the league (Kobe, again: luckiest m.f. out) and Pierce actually improved this year. This is not a team that takes playoff games off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Honorable Cock Jowles</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/recap-i-believe-the-word-im-looking-for-is-oof/#comment-328173</link>
		<dc:creator>The Honorable Cock Jowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=6789#comment-328173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yao will never be healthy again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yao will never be healthy again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
