<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Play Counts: Jamal Crawford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike K. (KnickerBlogger)</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/#comment-272565</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike K. (KnickerBlogger)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1085#comment-272565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;no game thread for Jamal’s return to the Garden? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the GS announcers said last night “he hit nine game-winning shots as a Knick”, they were so impressed. how many did he miss, 30? 40? 50?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Done. Game thread is up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>no game thread for Jamal’s return to the Garden? </p>
<p>the GS announcers said last night “he hit nine game-winning shots as a Knick”, they were so impressed. how many did he miss, 30? 40? 50?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Done. Game thread is up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben R</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/#comment-272563</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1085#comment-272563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IS - If the Knicks&#039; goal was to trade Marbury then having him play through preseason was an important way to increase his trade value. 

But if buying him out and saving the most possible money was the ultimate goal why not approach Stephan in June and simple say &quot;we are going in a different direction would you like us to buy you out now or would like a chance to showcase yourself in preseason to increase your value&quot;, then the Knicks could have a buyout prearranged and simply let Stephan play in preseason to audition for a job or buy him out earlier which ever he prefers. That way the Knicks are honest and straightforward, no one gets their pride hurt, and Marbury has an actual incentive to expediate the buy out process.

So if they were in fact looking to buy him out they went about it all wrong and if they were trying increase his trade value then paying more for a buy out is a reasonable price to pay for trying trade him before buying him out. The Knicks can&#039;t have it both ways keep him to trade, screw his chances of getting a long contract and still expect a bargin on the buyout.

On top of all that the Knicks failed to be honest with Marbury which is inexcusable even if there was logic behind the deception.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IS &#8211; If the Knicks&#8217; goal was to trade Marbury then having him play through preseason was an important way to increase his trade value. </p>
<p>But if buying him out and saving the most possible money was the ultimate goal why not approach Stephan in June and simple say &#8220;we are going in a different direction would you like us to buy you out now or would like a chance to showcase yourself in preseason to increase your value&#8221;, then the Knicks could have a buyout prearranged and simply let Stephan play in preseason to audition for a job or buy him out earlier which ever he prefers. That way the Knicks are honest and straightforward, no one gets their pride hurt, and Marbury has an actual incentive to expediate the buy out process.</p>
<p>So if they were in fact looking to buy him out they went about it all wrong and if they were trying increase his trade value then paying more for a buy out is a reasonable price to pay for trying trade him before buying him out. The Knicks can&#8217;t have it both ways keep him to trade, screw his chances of getting a long contract and still expect a bargin on the buyout.</p>
<p>On top of all that the Knicks failed to be honest with Marbury which is inexcusable even if there was logic behind the deception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/#comment-272562</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1085#comment-272562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no game thread for Jamal&#039;s return to the Garden? 

the GS announcers said last night &quot;he hit nine game-winning shots as a Knick&quot;, they were so impressed. how many did he miss, 30? 40? 50?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no game thread for Jamal&#8217;s return to the Garden? </p>
<p>the GS announcers said last night &#8220;he hit nine game-winning shots as a Knick&#8221;, they were so impressed. how many did he miss, 30? 40? 50?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gian Casimiro (SSoM)</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/#comment-272560</link>
		<dc:creator>Gian Casimiro (SSoM)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1085#comment-272560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second, what has Q done to justify either his contract or his spokemanship status, other than stink up the court 4 out of every 5 games?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;m curious to hear what you think Marbury has done to justify his contract during his time with the Knicks.

I&#039;d expect better production from someone with Q&#039;s contract but I&#039;d expect playoff wins from someone with Marbury&#039;s.

&lt;blockquote&gt;... he outplays every guard on the team in preseason within the system you are playing ...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
We don&#039;t know what he&#039;s done in scrimmages, but if you&#039;re judging from preseason, he disappeared when he started for Crawford against Boston and was outplayed by both Duhon and Nate throughout the preseason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Second, what has Q done to justify either his contract or his spokemanship status, other than stink up the court 4 out of every 5 games?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to hear what you think Marbury has done to justify his contract during his time with the Knicks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d expect better production from someone with Q&#8217;s contract but I&#8217;d expect playoff wins from someone with Marbury&#8217;s.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; he outplays every guard on the team in preseason within the system you are playing &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>We don&#8217;t know what he&#8217;s done in scrimmages, but if you&#8217;re judging from preseason, he disappeared when he started for Crawford against Boston and was outplayed by both Duhon and Nate throughout the preseason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5x5</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/#comment-272559</link>
		<dc:creator>5x5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1085#comment-272559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been a Marbury fan since his days at Lincoln High, but it might be time for him to move to Italy.  His reputation precedes him, so he&#039;s 100% wrong even if he&#039;s 33% right.

Thomas B. - totally appropriate analogy.  As another Brooklyn kid, I think it really sucks to see Steph fail; even though he&#039;d still be a snake, I thought he could shed his skin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a Marbury fan since his days at Lincoln High, but it might be time for him to move to Italy.  His reputation precedes him, so he&#8217;s 100% wrong even if he&#8217;s 33% right.</p>
<p>Thomas B. &#8211; totally appropriate analogy.  As another Brooklyn kid, I think it really sucks to see Steph fail; even though he&#8217;d still be a snake, I thought he could shed his skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/#comment-272558</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1085#comment-272558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q should keep his mouth shut.  First, he was one of the &quot;veterans&quot; who felt Steph should not be in the rotation in the first place, so he shouldn&#039;t be pissed that Steph does not want to play now. Second, what has Q done to justify either his contract or his spokemanship status, other than stink up the court 4 out of every 5 games?  The same goes for Malik.

The bottom line for me is, when you tell someone he has a clean slate, he comes in and does everything asked of him, he outplays every guard on the team in preseason within the system you are playing, and then you freeze him out completely (and spin it to look like it was based on the wishes of a bunch of scrubs you call veteran spokespeople,) and refuse to release him so he could qiuickly take his baggage elsewhere, you shouldn&#039;t be too surprised if he doesn&#039;t all of a sudden become a rah-rah team guy when the going gets rough.

I honestly cant imagine the Steph situation being butchered worse than it has been by D&#039;Antoni.  Again, I don&#039;t blame Walsh because he has appeared puzzled by D&#039;Antoni&#039;s decisions on more than one occasion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q should keep his mouth shut.  First, he was one of the &#8220;veterans&#8221; who felt Steph should not be in the rotation in the first place, so he shouldn&#8217;t be pissed that Steph does not want to play now. Second, what has Q done to justify either his contract or his spokemanship status, other than stink up the court 4 out of every 5 games?  The same goes for Malik.</p>
<p>The bottom line for me is, when you tell someone he has a clean slate, he comes in and does everything asked of him, he outplays every guard on the team in preseason within the system you are playing, and then you freeze him out completely (and spin it to look like it was based on the wishes of a bunch of scrubs you call veteran spokespeople,) and refuse to release him so he could qiuickly take his baggage elsewhere, you shouldn&#8217;t be too surprised if he doesn&#8217;t all of a sudden become a rah-rah team guy when the going gets rough.</p>
<p>I honestly cant imagine the Steph situation being butchered worse than it has been by D&#8217;Antoni.  Again, I don&#8217;t blame Walsh because he has appeared puzzled by D&#8217;Antoni&#8217;s decisions on more than one occasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackriderx</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/#comment-272556</link>
		<dc:creator>blackriderx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1085#comment-272556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a waste of time discussing Marbury. This is a look into how Knicks management handle things. 

I side with Marbury and that&#039;s mainly because management has been handling things so poorly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a waste of time discussing Marbury. This is a look into how Knicks management handle things. </p>
<p>I side with Marbury and that&#8217;s mainly because management has been handling things so poorly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Italian Stallion</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/#comment-272554</link>
		<dc:creator>Italian Stallion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1085#comment-272554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For what it&#039;s worth, Walsh is supposed to address the media on the Marbury issue before the start of today&#039;s game. 

So perhaps he&#039;ll talk about whether or not he and D&#039;Antoni have been and remain on the same page all along, the status of any potential buyout, etc...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, Walsh is supposed to address the media on the Marbury issue before the start of today&#8217;s game. </p>
<p>So perhaps he&#8217;ll talk about whether or not he and D&#8217;Antoni have been and remain on the same page all along, the status of any potential buyout, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Italian Stallion</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/#comment-272553</link>
		<dc:creator>Italian Stallion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1085#comment-272553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I think the argument that Marbury needed to come into training camp in shape is a flawed one. The point at which the Knicks had the most leverage in buying out Marbury was before training camp while he could still get real money from another team&quot;

Ben, 

I can&#039;t agree with this. Marbury hardly played at all last year because of personal issues (death etc...) and then had season ending surgery. 

Why would another team trade anything of value for him or pay him more before seeing how much (if any) game he still had left?  

He was scouted throughout pre season because a lot of teams knew he was likely to be bought out or become available via trade. I read multiple newpaper reports where team scouts said they were looking at him and were impressed that he hadn&#039;t lost a step. I think his pre season performance almost certainly enhanced his marketability (for himself and the Knicks). 

IMO, it&#039;s how things were handled afterwards that&#039;s debateable. Of course if you think trying to maximize his value was a mistake to begin with and that they should have just worked something out beforehand just avoid this kind of thing, that&#039;s another story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think the argument that Marbury needed to come into training camp in shape is a flawed one. The point at which the Knicks had the most leverage in buying out Marbury was before training camp while he could still get real money from another team&#8221;</p>
<p>Ben, </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t agree with this. Marbury hardly played at all last year because of personal issues (death etc&#8230;) and then had season ending surgery. </p>
<p>Why would another team trade anything of value for him or pay him more before seeing how much (if any) game he still had left?  </p>
<p>He was scouted throughout pre season because a lot of teams knew he was likely to be bought out or become available via trade. I read multiple newpaper reports where team scouts said they were looking at him and were impressed that he hadn&#8217;t lost a step. I think his pre season performance almost certainly enhanced his marketability (for himself and the Knicks). </p>
<p>IMO, it&#8217;s how things were handled afterwards that&#8217;s debateable. Of course if you think trying to maximize his value was a mistake to begin with and that they should have just worked something out beforehand just avoid this kind of thing, that&#8217;s another story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben R</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/one-play-counts-jamal-crawford/#comment-272551</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1085#comment-272551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Eat shit and die, Patrick Henry!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Awesome. That was great.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Eat shit and die, Patrick Henry!</p></blockquote>
<p>Awesome. That was great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
