<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York 100 Boston 114</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/new-york-100-boston-114/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/new-york-100-boston-114/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammad</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/new-york-100-boston-114/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Ammad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 17:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=306#comment-491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bring in Channing Frye and have Jerome Hames as a dnp coaches decision.

Frye is good for 8 boards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring in Channing Frye and have Jerome Hames as a dnp coaches decision.</p>
<p>Frye is good for 8 boards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kenney</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/new-york-100-boston-114/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=306#comment-490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Quintin, I think, is not playing full minutes because of his hamstring, which can&#039;t be avoided.  And I don&#039;t see a problem with Brown working the rookies in, slowly --it didn&#039;t hurt Tayshaun Prince -- Robinson certainly was as wild as advertised, and I&#039;m sure Frye will get in there somewhere -- Taylor played well last night, so he wasn&#039;t the problem...

-- I don&#039;t quite get the mad rush to get Butler in there-- he had a good enough preseason to make the team, which is good, but I don&#039;t see him being very effective (at this point) in the heat of real battle...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Quintin, I think, is not playing full minutes because of his hamstring, which can&#8217;t be avoided.  And I don&#8217;t see a problem with Brown working the rookies in, slowly &#8211;it didn&#8217;t hurt Tayshaun Prince &#8212; Robinson certainly was as wild as advertised, and I&#8217;m sure Frye will get in there somewhere &#8212; Taylor played well last night, so he wasn&#8217;t the problem&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8211; I don&#8217;t quite get the mad rush to get Butler in there&#8211; he had a good enough preseason to make the team, which is good, but I don&#8217;t see him being very effective (at this point) in the heat of real battle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hoffa</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/new-york-100-boston-114/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hoffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=306#comment-489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We got murdered on the glass, I think it was 57-41. That is especially bad considering its not like the Celtics really have big-time rebounders. Imagine playing the Pistons or San Antonio, we&#039;ll hardly get a board! I think we need a Reggie Evans or Danny Fortson or someone who doesn&#039;t need to score, just focus on grabbing the boards. Or even a certain Mike Sweetney would be good - not to say instead of Curry, but he&#039;d probably do really nicely right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got murdered on the glass, I think it was 57-41. That is especially bad considering its not like the Celtics really have big-time rebounders. Imagine playing the Pistons or San Antonio, we&#8217;ll hardly get a board! I think we need a Reggie Evans or Danny Fortson or someone who doesn&#8217;t need to score, just focus on grabbing the boards. Or even a certain Mike Sweetney would be good &#8211; not to say instead of Curry, but he&#8217;d probably do really nicely right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Fella</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/new-york-100-boston-114/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Fella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=306#comment-488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lee is not on the active roster, so you won&#039;t see him for now. Defensive rebouding and missed free throws without a doubt killed us. But I agree that on the ball defense certainly improved. I hope we start getting more from Q Richardson. We need his scoring and size at the 2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee is not on the active roster, so you won&#8217;t see him for now. Defensive rebouding and missed free throws without a doubt killed us. But I agree that on the ball defense certainly improved. I hope we start getting more from Q Richardson. We need his scoring and size at the 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYKnickLIFEr</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/new-york-100-boston-114/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>NYKnickLIFEr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=306#comment-487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, starting Barnes was a shocker, but not a game changer. too many loose balls, the Celtics had balls rolling into their hands all night. Delonte West??? seven 1st half boards? Our defense on the ball was good/great all night. Celts shot 42% for the game, But the celts got second chances on offense, and it would kill us all night. Lastly, not enough q-rich, no Frye???
Jerome James, 4 fouls in less than 20 minutes, as advertised.

now on to the celts, the league has got to stop letting Paul Peirce getaway with this bump-and- fall- foul called on your team nonsense, most of the time he goes to the line, he&#039;s not even in shooting motion. He lived at the free throw last night. Ricky Davis got hot and Blount is still swishing 20 footers as I write this. good game from them, and we, the knicks, have now lost 15 of the last 17 games we&#039;ve played against the Celtics.

Please Put #3 back at PG, It wasn&#039;t pretty last night watching Crawford self destruct. A more conventional lineup would&#039;ve suited us better last night. I didnt see where having marbury off the ball helped anything. And Crawford has a fast break handle not a half court handle. And barnes did nothing special with the starting position.

Hopefully we&#039;ll give the same defensive effort and correct the correctibles for fridays home opener.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, starting Barnes was a shocker, but not a game changer. too many loose balls, the Celtics had balls rolling into their hands all night. Delonte West??? seven 1st half boards? Our defense on the ball was good/great all night. Celts shot 42% for the game, But the celts got second chances on offense, and it would kill us all night. Lastly, not enough q-rich, no Frye???<br />
Jerome James, 4 fouls in less than 20 minutes, as advertised.</p>
<p>now on to the celts, the league has got to stop letting Paul Peirce getaway with this bump-and- fall- foul called on your team nonsense, most of the time he goes to the line, he&#8217;s not even in shooting motion. He lived at the free throw last night. Ricky Davis got hot and Blount is still swishing 20 footers as I write this. good game from them, and we, the knicks, have now lost 15 of the last 17 games we&#8217;ve played against the Celtics.</p>
<p>Please Put #3 back at PG, It wasn&#8217;t pretty last night watching Crawford self destruct. A more conventional lineup would&#8217;ve suited us better last night. I didnt see where having marbury off the ball helped anything. And Crawford has a fast break handle not a half court handle. And barnes did nothing special with the starting position.</p>
<p>Hopefully we&#8217;ll give the same defensive effort and correct the correctibles for fridays home opener.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/new-york-100-boston-114/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=306#comment-484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free throw shooting really hurt them. 

I fully expected to be disappointed by Jerome James but 4 fouls in 8 minutes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free throw shooting really hurt them. </p>
<p>I fully expected to be disappointed by Jerome James but 4 fouls in 8 minutes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Fleisher</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/new-york-100-boston-114/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Fleisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 03:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=306#comment-483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the looks of things, it appears the Knicks were discouraged when Ricky Davis made that 3-pointer in overtime despite a decent attempt at defense from Marbury.  It seemed after that play, there was hardly any fluidity to the offensive side due to frustration and panic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the looks of things, it appears the Knicks were discouraged when Ricky Davis made that 3-pointer in overtime despite a decent attempt at defense from Marbury.  It seemed after that play, there was hardly any fluidity to the offensive side due to frustration and panic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
