<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knicks Morning News (Tuesday, Feb 19 2013)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:37:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/#comment-420597</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11040#comment-420597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The weird thing is that soooooo much depends on where the Knicks are seeded but that seed doesn&#039;t really tell us anything yet.

If they&#039;re the #2 seed, they could get the Bucks, Celtics or Hawks. 
If they&#039;re the #3 seed, they could get...the Bucks, Celtics or Hawks. 

It is killer, since we can&#039;t even root for a particular seed, since we don&#039;t know if the Celtics will be the #7 seed or the #6 seed. The Knicks will beat the Hawks or the Bucks (and likely the Celtics, it&#039;ll just be more difficult).

All we can really say is that the Knicks really have to remain either the #2 or #3 seed, since #4 means a match-up against either the Bulls, Pacers or Nets (and while the Knicks should be able to beat the Nets and could certainly hold their own against the Pacers and Bulls, you don&#039;t want to play them in the first round) and then a brutal second round match-up against you know who.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The weird thing is that soooooo much depends on where the Knicks are seeded but that seed doesn&#8217;t really tell us anything yet.</p>
<p>If they&#8217;re the #2 seed, they could get the Bucks, Celtics or Hawks.<br />
If they&#8217;re the #3 seed, they could get&#8230;the Bucks, Celtics or Hawks. </p>
<p>It is killer, since we can&#8217;t even root for a particular seed, since we don&#8217;t know if the Celtics will be the #7 seed or the #6 seed. The Knicks will beat the Hawks or the Bucks (and likely the Celtics, it&#8217;ll just be more difficult).</p>
<p>All we can really say is that the Knicks really have to remain either the #2 or #3 seed, since #4 means a match-up against either the Bulls, Pacers or Nets (and while the Knicks should be able to beat the Nets and could certainly hold their own against the Pacers and Bulls, you don&#8217;t want to play them in the first round) and then a brutal second round match-up against you know who.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBlueAL</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/#comment-420596</link>
		<dc:creator>BigBlueAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11040#comment-420596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-420595&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-420595&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jon&#032;abbey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: no, because I have watched them all against the Knicks, which is the only thing that will matter in the first round.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Knicks aint playing the Bulls or Pacers in the 1st round if they stay a Top 3 seed.  Nets would most likely be their opponent in a 4/5 series.  Celtics are a very likely opponent if the Knicks drop to the 3 seed but again w/o Rondo not sure how worried Id be of playing them.

2nd round will be tough and I certainly could see them lose then but if they at least hold on to a Top 3 seed I would be shocked if they lose in the 1st round.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-420595">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-420595" rel="nofollow">jon&#032;abbey</a></strong>: no, because I have watched them all against the Knicks, which is the only thing that will matter in the first round.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Knicks aint playing the Bulls or Pacers in the 1st round if they stay a Top 3 seed.  Nets would most likely be their opponent in a 4/5 series.  Celtics are a very likely opponent if the Knicks drop to the 3 seed but again w/o Rondo not sure how worried Id be of playing them.</p>
<p>2nd round will be tough and I certainly could see them lose then but if they at least hold on to a Top 3 seed I would be shocked if they lose in the 1st round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/#comment-420595</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11040#comment-420595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-420568&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-420568&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BigBlueAL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: If you want to feel better about the Knicks chances in the playoffs just watch all non-Heat East teams consistently.The Pacers who everyone fears because they dominated the Heat at home lose their next 2 home games to the Raptors and Nets w/o DWil.Bulls w/o Rose are inconsistent as hell and nobody is sure how healthy Rose will be when he returns.Celtics??Sorry w/o Rondo no matter how good they look (mostly against crap teams) I dont fear them anywhere near as much as I did before.I dont care about the Nets.

Feel better now :-)

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

no, because I have watched them all against the Knicks, which is the only thing that will matter in the first round.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-420568">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-420568" rel="nofollow">BigBlueAL</a></strong>: If you want to feel better about the Knicks chances in the playoffs just watch all non-Heat East teams consistently.The Pacers who everyone fears because they dominated the Heat at home lose their next 2 home games to the Raptors and Nets w/o DWil.Bulls w/o Rose are inconsistent as hell and nobody is sure how healthy Rose will be when he returns.Celtics??Sorry w/o Rondo no matter how good they look (mostly against crap teams) I dont fear them anywhere near as much as I did before.I dont care about the Nets.</p>
<p>Feel better now :-)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>no, because I have watched them all against the Knicks, which is the only thing that will matter in the first round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/#comment-420594</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11040#comment-420594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to see Boston lose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see Boston lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yellowboy90</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/#comment-420593</link>
		<dc:creator>yellowboy90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11040#comment-420593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wallace back with his protege my my.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallace back with his protege my my.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d-mar</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/#comment-420592</link>
		<dc:creator>d-mar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11040#comment-420592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-420590&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-420590&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;d&#045;mar&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
Wow, Jermaine O’Neal. We could have a devastating lineup, circa 1999 – Thomas, Camby, O’Neal, Wallace, Kidd… wait, need a PG, is Baron Davis still on the team?


&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Oops, Kidd circa 1999 could run the point, how about T-Mac for shooting guard?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-420590">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-420590" rel="nofollow">d&#045;mar</a></strong>:<br />
Wow, Jermaine O’Neal. We could have a devastating lineup, circa 1999 – Thomas, Camby, O’Neal, Wallace, Kidd… wait, need a PG, is Baron Davis still on the team?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oops, Kidd circa 1999 could run the point, how about T-Mac for shooting guard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/#comment-420591</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11040#comment-420591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For O&#039;Neal&#039;s sake, I hope a good team &lt;b&gt;does&lt;/b&gt; pick him up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For O&#8217;Neal&#8217;s sake, I hope a good team <b>does</b> pick him up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d-mar</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/#comment-420590</link>
		<dc:creator>d-mar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11040#comment-420590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, Jermaine O&#039;Neal. We could have a devastating lineup, circa 1999 - Thomas, Camby, O&#039;Neal, Wallace, Kidd... wait, need a PG, is Baron Davis still on the team?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Jermaine O&#8217;Neal. We could have a devastating lineup, circa 1999 &#8211; Thomas, Camby, O&#8217;Neal, Wallace, Kidd&#8230; wait, need a PG, is Baron Davis still on the team?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBlueAL</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/#comment-420589</link>
		<dc:creator>BigBlueAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11040#comment-420589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-420588&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-420588&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Frank&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
Ah, the trade deadline. Chris Broussard tweeting that the Knicks are interested in jermaine o’Neal. For what I can’t imagine. Cope?I’d make that trade in &lt;1second.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah I saw that too, forgot to mention it here.  He said the Knicks have strong interest in him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-420588">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-420588" rel="nofollow">Frank</a></strong>:<br />
Ah, the trade deadline. Chris Broussard tweeting that the Knicks are interested in jermaine o’Neal. For what I can’t imagine. Cope?I’d make that trade in &lt;1second.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah I saw that too, forgot to mention it here.  He said the Knicks have strong interest in him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-tuesday-feb-19-2013/#comment-420588</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11040#comment-420588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, the trade deadline. Chris Broussard tweeting that the Knicks are interested in jermaine o&#039;Neal. For what I can&#039;t imagine. Cope?  I&#039;d make that trade in &lt;1second.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the trade deadline. Chris Broussard tweeting that the Knicks are interested in jermaine o&#8217;Neal. For what I can&#8217;t imagine. Cope?  I&#8217;d make that trade in &lt;1second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
