<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knicks Morning News (Sunday, Sep 30 2012)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:11:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/#comment-404303</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 03:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10328#comment-404303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Wow so you think Chandler. Asik, Ibaka, Garnett, Noah and Duncan (when healthy) are all better than Andrew Bynum? How come.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Have you seen Bynum take control of a team defensively the way all of those guys have? I mean, Bynum is fine, like i said, I have him just a tier below those guys, but he doesn&#039;t dominate on defense like those guys do. There&#039;s a reason why everyone is freaking out over the impact of the addition of Howard to the Lakers&#039; defense. Partially, yes, it is that Howard is one of the most amazing defenders out there, but also a good chunk is that Bynum is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a dominant defender in the middle so adding a dominant defender greatly improves the Lakers&#039; D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wow so you think Chandler. Asik, Ibaka, Garnett, Noah and Duncan (when healthy) are all better than Andrew Bynum? How come.</p></blockquote>
<p>Have you seen Bynum take control of a team defensively the way all of those guys have? I mean, Bynum is fine, like i said, I have him just a tier below those guys, but he doesn&#8217;t dominate on defense like those guys do. There&#8217;s a reason why everyone is freaking out over the impact of the addition of Howard to the Lakers&#8217; defense. Partially, yes, it is that Howard is one of the most amazing defenders out there, but also a good chunk is that Bynum is <em>not</em> a dominant defender in the middle so adding a dominant defender greatly improves the Lakers&#8217; D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeeWhyDee77</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/#comment-404302</link>
		<dc:creator>SeeWhyDee77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 03:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10328#comment-404302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-404266&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-404266&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
Tyson Chandler is so obviously our best player that it hurts my brain to think that people think otherwise. There is absolutely no contest between him and Melo.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Agreed..but maybe not our best in the truest sense..but by far our most indispensible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-404266">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-404266" rel="nofollow">The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles</a></strong>:<br />
Tyson Chandler is so obviously our best player that it hurts my brain to think that people think otherwise. There is absolutely no contest between him and Melo.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Agreed..but maybe not our best in the truest sense..but by far our most indispensible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knicknyk</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/#comment-404298</link>
		<dc:creator>knicknyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10328#comment-404298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-404294&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-404294&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brian&#032;Cronin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: A tier below those guys. I think that the next tier is actually not that big. Guys that can definitely affect a game from a defensive standpoint, but not game-changers like Garnett. Camby likely falls into this category (he used to be a second tier guy but likely not any more).


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow so you think Chandler. Asik, Ibaka, Garnett, Noah and Duncan (when healthy) are all better than Andrew Bynum? How come.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-404294">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-404294" rel="nofollow">Brian&#032;Cronin</a></strong>: A tier below those guys. I think that the next tier is actually not that big. Guys that can definitely affect a game from a defensive standpoint, but not game-changers like Garnett. Camby likely falls into this category (he used to be a second tier guy but likely not any more).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wow so you think Chandler. Asik, Ibaka, Garnett, Noah and Duncan (when healthy) are all better than Andrew Bynum? How come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/#comment-404295</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 00:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10328#comment-404295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;LeBron has to be on that second tier&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, I was just ranking big men defensively. Lebron is so amazing that he can at least passably defend the post, but that&#039;s not his game. He&#039;s a dominant perimeter defender, though. I&#039;d say he&#039;s a top tier perimeter defender (I don&#039;t think there is a single player who dominates the perimeter like Howard dominates the paint, so that top tier has a lot of guys on it, like Allen and Iggy and soon Bradley and Shump).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>LeBron has to be on that second tier</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, I was just ranking big men defensively. Lebron is so amazing that he can at least passably defend the post, but that&#8217;s not his game. He&#8217;s a dominant perimeter defender, though. I&#8217;d say he&#8217;s a top tier perimeter defender (I don&#8217;t think there is a single player who dominates the perimeter like Howard dominates the paint, so that top tier has a lot of guys on it, like Allen and Iggy and soon Bradley and Shump).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/#comment-404294</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 00:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10328#comment-404294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Wait where does Bynum fall in on your ranking Brian?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A tier below those guys. I think that the next tier is actually not that big. Guys that can definitely affect a game from a defensive standpoint, but not game-changers like Garnett. Camby likely falls into this category (he used to be a second tier guy but likely not any more).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wait where does Bynum fall in on your ranking Brian?</p></blockquote>
<p>A tier below those guys. I think that the next tier is actually not that big. Guys that can definitely affect a game from a defensive standpoint, but not game-changers like Garnett. Camby likely falls into this category (he used to be a second tier guy but likely not any more).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EB</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/#comment-404292</link>
		<dc:creator>EB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 00:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10328#comment-404292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d probably take Chandler over Melo but a lot of that has to do with the fact I think it would be easier to get a useful small forward than it is to get a useful center.

Also, earlier I wasn&#039;t really advocating  for WP, but if it is even close to accurate we got a steal with those two and at worse they&#039;re probably average. Its better than basically anyone else available on the market we could have gotten, low risk high reward assuming WP gives us at least some useful information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d probably take Chandler over Melo but a lot of that has to do with the fact I think it would be easier to get a useful small forward than it is to get a useful center.</p>
<p>Also, earlier I wasn&#8217;t really advocating  for WP, but if it is even close to accurate we got a steal with those two and at worse they&#8217;re probably average. Its better than basically anyone else available on the market we could have gotten, low risk high reward assuming WP gives us at least some useful information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sideQuest</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/#comment-404291</link>
		<dc:creator>sideQuest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 23:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10328#comment-404291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LeBron has to be on that second tier]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LeBron has to be on that second tier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knicknyk</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/#comment-404290</link>
		<dc:creator>knicknyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10328#comment-404290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait where does Bynum fall in on your ranking Brian?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait where does Bynum fall in on your ranking Brian?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/#comment-404289</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10328#comment-404289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fair enough, so sure, put &#039;em on the tier.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, so sure, put &#8216;em on the tier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicos</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-sunday-sep-30-2012/#comment-404288</link>
		<dc:creator>nicos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10328#comment-404288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gibson has been a good defender since he came into the league- he was excellent in 2010-2011 when Asik didn&#039;t play much so I don&#039;t think he&#039;s been overly dependent on Asik.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gibson has been a good defender since he came into the league- he was excellent in 2010-2011 when Asik didn&#8217;t play much so I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s been overly dependent on Asik.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
