<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knicks Morning News (Saturday, Feb 16 2013)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:38:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Honorable Cock Jowles</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/#comment-420365</link>
		<dc:creator>The Honorable Cock Jowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11031#comment-420365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-420364&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-420364&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Owen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
Millsap doesn’t look so average defensively by one measure. Although, yeah, rapm isn’t my thing. 


He has always looked like a great defender to me….


PAUL MILLSAP, JAZZ POWER FORWARD, +221.00: He is an underrated rebounder, offensive performer and most definitely an unsung defensive star, posting a +3.0 defensive RAPM, like he seemingly does every season. His nimbleness could be used to even greater effect as a small forward in Utah’s potential go-big lineups.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Whoever wrote that obviously hasn&#039;t watched him, like you, Owen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-420364">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-420364" rel="nofollow">Owen</a></strong>:<br />
Millsap doesn’t look so average defensively by one measure. Although, yeah, rapm isn’t my thing. </p>
<p>He has always looked like a great defender to me….</p>
<p>PAUL MILLSAP, JAZZ POWER FORWARD, +221.00: He is an underrated rebounder, offensive performer and most definitely an unsung defensive star, posting a +3.0 defensive RAPM, like he seemingly does every season. His nimbleness could be used to even greater effect as a small forward in Utah’s potential go-big lineups.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whoever wrote that obviously hasn&#8217;t watched him, like you, Owen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/#comment-420364</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11031#comment-420364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Millsap doesn&#039;t look so average defensively by one measure. Although, yeah, rapm isn&#039;t my thing. 

He has always looked like a great defender to me....

PAUL MILLSAP, JAZZ POWER FORWARD, +221.00: He is an underrated rebounder, offensive performer and most definitely an unsung defensive star, posting a +3.0 defensive RAPM, like he seemingly does every season. His nimbleness could be used to even greater effect as a small forward in Utah&#039;s potential go-big lineups.



&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-420351&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-420351&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ruruland&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
It’s interesting how a player always looks better on defense to fans who never watch him play. Milsap is average defensively. Excellent rebounder and crafty scorer, good lefties always have an advantage. Obviously you have to make that trade.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millsap doesn&#8217;t look so average defensively by one measure. Although, yeah, rapm isn&#8217;t my thing. </p>
<p>He has always looked like a great defender to me&#8230;.</p>
<p>PAUL MILLSAP, JAZZ POWER FORWARD, +221.00: He is an underrated rebounder, offensive performer and most definitely an unsung defensive star, posting a +3.0 defensive RAPM, like he seemingly does every season. His nimbleness could be used to even greater effect as a small forward in Utah&#8217;s potential go-big lineups.</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-420351">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-420351" rel="nofollow">ruruland</a></strong>:<br />
It’s interesting how a player always looks better on defense to fans who never watch him play. Milsap is average defensively. Excellent rebounder and crafty scorer, good lefties always have an advantage. Obviously you have to make that trade.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Honorable Cock Jowles</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/#comment-420358</link>
		<dc:creator>The Honorable Cock Jowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11031#comment-420358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-420355&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-420355&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ruruland&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Why did Battier and Miller become so much better by WS/WP later on, in your estimation?


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://www.thenbageek.com/players/358-shane-battier

Battier posted the best WP48 of his career while on those Memphis teams.

Wrong. 

http://www.thenbageek.com/players/165-mike-miller

Mike Miller would go on to post his best WP48 on the Wizards in &#039;09-&#039;10, but I know you&#039;re quick to attribute his .118 WP48 in &#039;07 to Gasol, even though it was bookended by .190 and .186 seasons.

What, dude? What?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-420355">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-420355" rel="nofollow">ruruland</a></strong>: Why did Battier and Miller become so much better by WS/WP later on, in your estimation?</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.thenbageek.com/players/358-shane-battier" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenbageek.com/players/358-shane-battier</a></p>
<p>Battier posted the best WP48 of his career while on those Memphis teams.</p>
<p>Wrong. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.thenbageek.com/players/165-mike-miller" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenbageek.com/players/165-mike-miller</a></p>
<p>Mike Miller would go on to post his best WP48 on the Wizards in &#8217;09-&#8217;10, but I know you&#8217;re quick to attribute his .118 WP48 in &#8217;07 to Gasol, even though it was bookended by .190 and .186 seasons.</p>
<p>What, dude? What?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/#comment-420357</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11031#comment-420357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For what it is worth, the Millsap/Shump rumors seem to be completely unsourced. That&#039;s not to say that they&#039;re not true, but when you don&#039;t have a single source for a story, it seems kind of sketchy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it is worth, the Millsap/Shump rumors seem to be completely unsourced. That&#8217;s not to say that they&#8217;re not true, but when you don&#8217;t have a single source for a story, it seems kind of sketchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/#comment-420356</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 06:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11031#comment-420356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think he meant negative in the playoffs.....

Battier was pretty consistent in his time in Memphis....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he meant negative in the playoffs&#8230;..</p>
<p>Battier was pretty consistent in his time in Memphis&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruruland</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/#comment-420355</link>
		<dc:creator>ruruland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 05:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11031#comment-420355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-420354&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-420354&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: And Kobe has never won a playoff series without having a top-flight center to back him up. So his TEAM won a four games in two playoff series (and failed to make the playoffs in ’05). Am I supposed to think that Gasol was responsible for Mike Miller and Shane Battier’s shitty play? 


Look, I’m not denying that Kobe had some amazing playoff runs. ’09 was an incredible postseason (the low TOV% is exceptional even at his usage), but Pau Gasol was an All-NBA player whether his team won in the postseason or not. Miller and Battier were AWFUL (negative WS/48) in one of those years. Even LeBron would have trouble winning with his teammates playing that badly.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Why did Battier and Miller become so much better by WS/WP later on, in your estimation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-420354">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-420354" rel="nofollow">The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles</a></strong>: And Kobe has never won a playoff series without having a top-flight center to back him up. So his TEAM won a four games in two playoff series (and failed to make the playoffs in ’05). Am I supposed to think that Gasol was responsible for Mike Miller and Shane Battier’s shitty play? </p>
<p>Look, I’m not denying that Kobe had some amazing playoff runs. ’09 was an incredible postseason (the low TOV% is exceptional even at his usage), but Pau Gasol was an All-NBA player whether his team won in the postseason or not. Miller and Battier were AWFUL (negative WS/48) in one of those years. Even LeBron would have trouble winning with his teammates playing that badly.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Why did Battier and Miller become so much better by WS/WP later on, in your estimation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Honorable Cock Jowles</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/#comment-420354</link>
		<dc:creator>The Honorable Cock Jowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 05:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11031#comment-420354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-420336&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-420336&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;flossy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: He had literally never won a game in the &lt;i&gt;playoffs&lt;/i&gt;, period.That’s a far cry from putting a talent-deficient Cavs team on your back and dragging it to the finals.People give Melo shit for not having gone farther in the playoffs, but Gasol had never won a &lt;i&gt;single postseason game&lt;/i&gt; before becoming Kobe’s wingman.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And Kobe has never won a playoff series without having a top-flight center to back him up. So his TEAM won a four games in two playoff series (and failed to make the playoffs in &#039;05). Am I supposed to think that Gasol was responsible for Mike Miller and Shane Battier&#039;s shitty play? 

Look, I&#039;m not denying that Kobe had some amazing playoff runs. &#039;09 was an incredible postseason (the low TOV% is exceptional even at his usage), but Pau Gasol was an All-NBA player whether his team won in the postseason or not. Miller and Battier were AWFUL (negative WS/48) in one of those years. Even LeBron would have trouble winning with his teammates playing that badly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-420336">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-420336" rel="nofollow">flossy</a></strong>: He had literally never won a game in the <i>playoffs</i>, period.That’s a far cry from putting a talent-deficient Cavs team on your back and dragging it to the finals.People give Melo shit for not having gone farther in the playoffs, but Gasol had never won a <i>single postseason game</i> before becoming Kobe’s wingman.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And Kobe has never won a playoff series without having a top-flight center to back him up. So his TEAM won a four games in two playoff series (and failed to make the playoffs in &#8217;05). Am I supposed to think that Gasol was responsible for Mike Miller and Shane Battier&#8217;s shitty play? </p>
<p>Look, I&#8217;m not denying that Kobe had some amazing playoff runs. &#8217;09 was an incredible postseason (the low TOV% is exceptional even at his usage), but Pau Gasol was an All-NBA player whether his team won in the postseason or not. Miller and Battier were AWFUL (negative WS/48) in one of those years. Even LeBron would have trouble winning with his teammates playing that badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruruland</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/#comment-420353</link>
		<dc:creator>ruruland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11031#comment-420353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sloan and Williams were what, a month apart? Pretty sure that makes anything possible with that franchise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sloan and Williams were what, a month apart? Pretty sure that makes anything possible with that franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flossy</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/#comment-420352</link>
		<dc:creator>flossy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11031#comment-420352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-420351&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-420351&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ruruland&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
It’s interesting how a player always looks better on defense to fans who never watch him play. Milsap is average defensively. Excellent rebounder and crafty scorer, good lefties always have an advantage. Obviously you have to make that trade.



&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do you think it&#039;s even remotely within the realm of possibility?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-420351">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-420351" rel="nofollow">ruruland</a></strong>:<br />
It’s interesting how a player always looks better on defense to fans who never watch him play. Milsap is average defensively. Excellent rebounder and crafty scorer, good lefties always have an advantage. Obviously you have to make that trade.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Do you think it&#8217;s even remotely within the realm of possibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruruland</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-saturday-feb-16-2013/#comment-420351</link>
		<dc:creator>ruruland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=11031#comment-420351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting how a player always looks better on defense to fans who never watch him play. Milsap is average defensively. Excellent rebounder and crafty scorer, good lefties always have an advantage. Obviously you have to make that trade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting how a player always looks better on defense to fans who never watch him play. Milsap is average defensively. Excellent rebounder and crafty scorer, good lefties always have an advantage. Obviously you have to make that trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
