<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knicks Morning News (Friday, Dec 07 2012)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juany8</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/#comment-411354</link>
		<dc:creator>Juany8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 20:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10642#comment-411354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Johno,

It was a one year deal, I think he would have considered coming to the Knicks had they offered the minimum but who knows? Anyways, although you have some good points about Novak&#039;s advantages, you left out his weaknesses. He is easily the Knicks worst defender, and it is not close. That same height that makes him a mismatch on offense makes him a mismatch everywhere on defense. Delfino is at least an average defender. 

One thing that&#039;s also ignored far too often about Novak&#039;s offensive skills is his complete lack of ability to do anything but shoot. It&#039;s nice when all the looks are wide open, but if he has a defender closing out on him he doesn&#039;t make the extra pass, or pump and make a dribble inside, or drive past his out of control defender, all things Delfino is capable of doing. Instead, Novak has to sit there and essentially wait and waste precious shot clock time waiting for someone to come rescue him and take the ball away. That&#039;s a very underrated limitation for a 3 point specialist, in the playoffs especially those wide open looks tend to dry up and you have to be able to make a play other than shooting when the ball comes to you. Bonner, Korver, and even Novak last year were all useless in the playoffs, becoming black holes where a possession went to die, except for like once or twice a game in transition. If Amar&#039;e and Shump come back healthy somebody is getting squeezed our of the rotation, and I&#039;m pretty sure it&#039;s going to be Novak]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johno,</p>
<p>It was a one year deal, I think he would have considered coming to the Knicks had they offered the minimum but who knows? Anyways, although you have some good points about Novak&#8217;s advantages, you left out his weaknesses. He is easily the Knicks worst defender, and it is not close. That same height that makes him a mismatch on offense makes him a mismatch everywhere on defense. Delfino is at least an average defender. </p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s also ignored far too often about Novak&#8217;s offensive skills is his complete lack of ability to do anything but shoot. It&#8217;s nice when all the looks are wide open, but if he has a defender closing out on him he doesn&#8217;t make the extra pass, or pump and make a dribble inside, or drive past his out of control defender, all things Delfino is capable of doing. Instead, Novak has to sit there and essentially wait and waste precious shot clock time waiting for someone to come rescue him and take the ball away. That&#8217;s a very underrated limitation for a 3 point specialist, in the playoffs especially those wide open looks tend to dry up and you have to be able to make a play other than shooting when the ball comes to you. Bonner, Korver, and even Novak last year were all useless in the playoffs, becoming black holes where a possession went to die, except for like once or twice a game in transition. If Amar&#8217;e and Shump come back healthy somebody is getting squeezed our of the rotation, and I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s going to be Novak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnno</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/#comment-411351</link>
		<dc:creator>johnno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 19:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10642#comment-411351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-411337&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-411337&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Juany&#056;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;:  Hell I think the Knicks overpayed Novak, Carlos Delfino was out there and I like him better as a gunner on the team, he can actually do stuff with the ball in his hands and a defender nearby, while providing average defense.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
More than a few problems with your Delfino preference --
     - While he was &quot;out there,&quot; the Knicks couldn&#039;t have signed him.  He&#039;s making $3 million this year and the Knicks could have only offered him the vet minimum.  They were able to pay Novak what they did because they had his Bird rights.  They couldn&#039;t just take that money and use it to pay Delfino.
     - He&#039;s 6&#039;6&quot;.  Whose minutes do you want him to take -- Kidd, Felton, Shumpert, Brewer, Prigioni or JR?  If he took minutes from any of those guys, it would be a lateral move at best, not an improvement.
     - A Delfino-Novak comparison is not apples to apples.  Novak is 6&#039;10&quot;, which presents unique problems for the other team.  They can put a guard on him, in which case he&#039;ll shoot over him, or they can put a &quot;big&quot; on him, in which case he takes one of the big defenders/rebounders away from the lane.  Other teams can put a guard on Delfino, which doesn&#039;t space the floor as much as having a 6&#039;10&quot; sharpshooter.  Besides that, over the last two years, Novak has hit 46%v of his 3 pointers, while Delfino has hit 36%.  That is a huge difference.  A Delfino-JR comparison is much more apt, in which case you can say that, while Delfino is more consistent than JR, he is nowhere near as athletic and explosive.  If you want to compare Novak to Ryan Anderson, that is a much more reasonable comparison and I would agree with you that Anderson is better, but the Knicks had no way to get him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-411337">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-411337" rel="nofollow">Juany&#056;</a></strong>:  Hell I think the Knicks overpayed Novak, Carlos Delfino was out there and I like him better as a gunner on the team, he can actually do stuff with the ball in his hands and a defender nearby, while providing average defense.</p></blockquote>
<p>More than a few problems with your Delfino preference &#8211;<br />
     &#8211; While he was &#8220;out there,&#8221; the Knicks couldn&#8217;t have signed him.  He&#8217;s making $3 million this year and the Knicks could have only offered him the vet minimum.  They were able to pay Novak what they did because they had his Bird rights.  They couldn&#8217;t just take that money and use it to pay Delfino.<br />
     &#8211; He&#8217;s 6&#8217;6&#8243;.  Whose minutes do you want him to take &#8212; Kidd, Felton, Shumpert, Brewer, Prigioni or JR?  If he took minutes from any of those guys, it would be a lateral move at best, not an improvement.<br />
     &#8211; A Delfino-Novak comparison is not apples to apples.  Novak is 6&#8217;10&#8243;, which presents unique problems for the other team.  They can put a guard on him, in which case he&#8217;ll shoot over him, or they can put a &#8220;big&#8221; on him, in which case he takes one of the big defenders/rebounders away from the lane.  Other teams can put a guard on Delfino, which doesn&#8217;t space the floor as much as having a 6&#8217;10&#8243; sharpshooter.  Besides that, over the last two years, Novak has hit 46%v of his 3 pointers, while Delfino has hit 36%.  That is a huge difference.  A Delfino-JR comparison is much more apt, in which case you can say that, while Delfino is more consistent than JR, he is nowhere near as athletic and explosive.  If you want to compare Novak to Ryan Anderson, that is a much more reasonable comparison and I would agree with you that Anderson is better, but the Knicks had no way to get him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/#comment-411347</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 17:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10642#comment-411347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will say this, we have been a bit fortunate as well. The Melo injury gives him some rest at a good time, and winning the these last two games ensures that it won&#039;t cost us much in the standings. Kidd getting a rest is always a good thing. And after these two games, we don&#039;t have another back-to-back for a couple of weeks, and have lots of games at home and Brooklyn. We could separate ourselves from other EC teams a bit by New Year&#039;s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say this, we have been a bit fortunate as well. The Melo injury gives him some rest at a good time, and winning the these last two games ensures that it won&#8217;t cost us much in the standings. Kidd getting a rest is always a good thing. And after these two games, we don&#8217;t have another back-to-back for a couple of weeks, and have lots of games at home and Brooklyn. We could separate ourselves from other EC teams a bit by New Year&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/#comment-411346</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 16:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10642#comment-411346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gasol would be a nice piece (if healthy) but Sheed is a poor man&#039;s Gasol so there is no urgency there. My biggest issue with this team is that we don&#039;t have a guard who shoots consistently well coming off the bench. JR is amazing at times but very erratic, Felton is also hot and cold, Kidd really doesn&#039;t fit that role, Prigs, forget it. Shump and Brewer are similarly limited offensively. Obviously, any guy like that who isn&#039;t a serious liability in some way is not going to come on the cheap. Maybe with Melo and soon Amare this is less of a need, especially if we move and protect the ball as well as we have been. 

Overall, though, I&#039;m totally fine with finishing out the season with what we have, and have so much faith in Glen G that I feel he would only pull the trigger on a no-brainer type of deal. The team is playing the best ball in the EC by any objective standard, and has an impressive road record as well. I guarantee that every team in the league is taking notice. This next stretch of games will really test us, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gasol would be a nice piece (if healthy) but Sheed is a poor man&#8217;s Gasol so there is no urgency there. My biggest issue with this team is that we don&#8217;t have a guard who shoots consistently well coming off the bench. JR is amazing at times but very erratic, Felton is also hot and cold, Kidd really doesn&#8217;t fit that role, Prigs, forget it. Shump and Brewer are similarly limited offensively. Obviously, any guy like that who isn&#8217;t a serious liability in some way is not going to come on the cheap. Maybe with Melo and soon Amare this is less of a need, especially if we move and protect the ball as well as we have been. </p>
<p>Overall, though, I&#8217;m totally fine with finishing out the season with what we have, and have so much faith in Glen G that I feel he would only pull the trigger on a no-brainer type of deal. The team is playing the best ball in the EC by any objective standard, and has an impressive road record as well. I guarantee that every team in the league is taking notice. This next stretch of games will really test us, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/#comment-411345</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10642#comment-411345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, no reason to make a trade, especially since most of our role players don&#039;t have huge value for other teams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, no reason to make a trade, especially since most of our role players don&#8217;t have huge value for other teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnno</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/#comment-411344</link>
		<dc:creator>johnno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10642#comment-411344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-411343&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-411343&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Juany&#056;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: I will say that I’m coming around to Pau Gasol not being the right guy, I will agree with you guys on that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
But why make any trade at all?  We&#039;re not playing fantasy basketball, where you can just plug guys in statistically -- whether you&#039;re talking old school ppg and rpg, or &quot;advanced&quot; stuff like wins produced or win shares or efficiency or plus/minus, etc., etc.  Chemistry matters and right now the Knicks have great chemistry.  Why mess with it when things are going well?  Why not wait to see how Amare and Shump play out?  It&#039;s a loonnnngggg season.  It might work out really well, especially since neither is physically going to be able to jump right in and play 35 minutes a night anyway.  They will have to be slowly worked into the rotation.  If it doesn&#039;t work, then you think about a trade.  The deadline is almost three months away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-411343">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-411343" rel="nofollow">Juany&#056;</a></strong>: I will say that I’m coming around to Pau Gasol not being the right guy, I will agree with you guys on that.</p></blockquote>
<p>But why make any trade at all?  We&#8217;re not playing fantasy basketball, where you can just plug guys in statistically &#8212; whether you&#8217;re talking old school ppg and rpg, or &#8220;advanced&#8221; stuff like wins produced or win shares or efficiency or plus/minus, etc., etc.  Chemistry matters and right now the Knicks have great chemistry.  Why mess with it when things are going well?  Why not wait to see how Amare and Shump play out?  It&#8217;s a loonnnngggg season.  It might work out really well, especially since neither is physically going to be able to jump right in and play 35 minutes a night anyway.  They will have to be slowly worked into the rotation.  If it doesn&#8217;t work, then you think about a trade.  The deadline is almost three months away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juany8</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/#comment-411343</link>
		<dc:creator>Juany8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10642#comment-411343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I admit that Pau Gasol is not the ideal candidate, but as it stands it&#039;s going to be tough to find minutes for everyone on this team. They already have a full rotation, if the goal is winning a championship then it&#039;s better to concentrate your talent in your top 7 rather than on spots 8-11. I would prefer someone like Lamarcus Aldridge or Ryan Anderson, but getting Amar&#039;e and Shump back is going to squeeze productive players out of the rotation, and I honestly have no faith in someone like Novak actually producing anything in the playoffs. I really like Shump, but the reasons I like him are also why he&#039;s the only truly valuable trade chip on this team. 

I&#039;d rather a legit piece and give up Shump and Novak than just bench guys like Prigs or even Brewer because there&#039;s no minutes. Everyone risks injuries, if Wade just breaks down and Ray Allen tweaks his ankle in the playoffs, all of the sudden the Knicks would be the favorites to make the Finals. At this point, the Knicks aren&#039;t trying to win a bunch of games and look cool in the standings, they&#039;re looking straight at postseason strategy. Guys like Chandler, Kidd, and Sheed aren&#039;t here to get excited about a 60 win season. Sacrificing 15 minute players for a key rotation player makes perfect sense to me.

I will say that I&#039;m coming around to Pau Gasol not being the right guy, I will agree with you guys on that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit that Pau Gasol is not the ideal candidate, but as it stands it&#8217;s going to be tough to find minutes for everyone on this team. They already have a full rotation, if the goal is winning a championship then it&#8217;s better to concentrate your talent in your top 7 rather than on spots 8-11. I would prefer someone like Lamarcus Aldridge or Ryan Anderson, but getting Amar&#8217;e and Shump back is going to squeeze productive players out of the rotation, and I honestly have no faith in someone like Novak actually producing anything in the playoffs. I really like Shump, but the reasons I like him are also why he&#8217;s the only truly valuable trade chip on this team. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather a legit piece and give up Shump and Novak than just bench guys like Prigs or even Brewer because there&#8217;s no minutes. Everyone risks injuries, if Wade just breaks down and Ray Allen tweaks his ankle in the playoffs, all of the sudden the Knicks would be the favorites to make the Finals. At this point, the Knicks aren&#8217;t trying to win a bunch of games and look cool in the standings, they&#8217;re looking straight at postseason strategy. Guys like Chandler, Kidd, and Sheed aren&#8217;t here to get excited about a 60 win season. Sacrificing 15 minute players for a key rotation player makes perfect sense to me.</p>
<p>I will say that I&#8217;m coming around to Pau Gasol not being the right guy, I will agree with you guys on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d-mar</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/#comment-411342</link>
		<dc:creator>d-mar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10642#comment-411342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, as Knicks fans we are conditioned to expect the worst, even when things are going well. It can&#039;t be this good, something horrible has to happen, right? Well, the beauty of this team is we can afford to lose almost any player for a few games or even a few weeks and still survive. Even if Melo went out for a couple of weeks, this team could play .500 ball at a minimum. Tyson being out would hurt a lot, but with Sheed, and eventually Camby and STAT in the wings, we could survive that as well. So for those who say health is the critical issue for this team (and isn&#039;t it for every team?) I would disagree and point to our ridiculous depth. 

(Now health come playoff time, that&#039;s a whole other story!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, as Knicks fans we are conditioned to expect the worst, even when things are going well. It can&#8217;t be this good, something horrible has to happen, right? Well, the beauty of this team is we can afford to lose almost any player for a few games or even a few weeks and still survive. Even if Melo went out for a couple of weeks, this team could play .500 ball at a minimum. Tyson being out would hurt a lot, but with Sheed, and eventually Camby and STAT in the wings, we could survive that as well. So for those who say health is the critical issue for this team (and isn&#8217;t it for every team?) I would disagree and point to our ridiculous depth. </p>
<p>(Now health come playoff time, that&#8217;s a whole other story!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/#comment-411341</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10642#comment-411341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@40 The one thing we lack is an inside banger (e.g. Reggie Evans.) Our primary rebounders are long guys with high centers of gravity (Chandler, Sheed, Camby) and Thomas is too old and slow to fill this role. The Nets and Griz seemed to have their way with us on the boards at times. It&#039;s not a huge deal, and maybe a healthy Camby can mask this void even more, but just something I noticed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@40 The one thing we lack is an inside banger (e.g. Reggie Evans.) Our primary rebounders are long guys with high centers of gravity (Chandler, Sheed, Camby) and Thomas is too old and slow to fill this role. The Nets and Griz seemed to have their way with us on the boards at times. It&#8217;s not a huge deal, and maybe a healthy Camby can mask this void even more, but just something I noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-dec-07-2012/#comment-411340</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 14:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10642#comment-411340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I don&#039;t like that deal either but make the Amare straight up deal. Maybe throw in Camby now that Sheed has proven he can be a viable backup, or someone like White (lakers need backcourt depth) but not Shump, who is a potential star if his shooting continues to improve. I&#039;m not a big believer in Brewer&#039;s O but he made some incredible defensive plays vs. Heat. 

Kidd is indispensable, he is the brains of this team. Even if he only plays 5-10 mpg, his calming presence in the huddle is huge. Players listen to him, even Melo, Felton and JR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I don&#8217;t like that deal either but make the Amare straight up deal. Maybe throw in Camby now that Sheed has proven he can be a viable backup, or someone like White (lakers need backcourt depth) but not Shump, who is a potential star if his shooting continues to improve. I&#8217;m not a big believer in Brewer&#8217;s O but he made some incredible defensive plays vs. Heat. </p>
<p>Kidd is indispensable, he is the brains of this team. Even if he only plays 5-10 mpg, his calming presence in the huddle is huge. Players listen to him, even Melo, Felton and JR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
