<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knicks Morning News (Friday, Aug 17 2012)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:56:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidestep</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/#comment-403186</link>
		<dc:creator>sidestep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10222#comment-403186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, even if we presume that a player is equally efficient regardless of the minutes played, a split based on minutes played will probably be biased in favor of showing higher efficiency for more minutes because players get more playing time when they are on a hot streak, or are getting a favorable match up against the opposing team. The fact that the actual split shows otherwise further enforces the conclusion that Harden is less efficient with more minutes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, even if we presume that a player is equally efficient regardless of the minutes played, a split based on minutes played will probably be biased in favor of showing higher efficiency for more minutes because players get more playing time when they are on a hot streak, or are getting a favorable match up against the opposing team. The fact that the actual split shows otherwise further enforces the conclusion that Harden is less efficient with more minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidestep</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/#comment-403185</link>
		<dc:creator>sidestep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10222#comment-403185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For last season, Harden had 35 games in which he played 30-39 min (33min avg):
.469 	FG%, .375 3P%, averaging 17.1 pts per game.

He had 22 games in which he played 20-29 min (27min avg):
.527 	FG%, .438 3P%, averaging 16.3 pts per game.

Those numbers seem to bear out that Harden is less efficient with more minutes. Sorry, I don&#039;t have TS stats, but the correlation would look the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For last season, Harden had 35 games in which he played 30-39 min (33min avg):<br />
.469 	FG%, .375 3P%, averaging 17.1 pts per game.</p>
<p>He had 22 games in which he played 20-29 min (27min avg):<br />
.527 	FG%, .438 3P%, averaging 16.3 pts per game.</p>
<p>Those numbers seem to bear out that Harden is less efficient with more minutes. Sorry, I don&#8217;t have TS stats, but the correlation would look the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruruland</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/#comment-403184</link>
		<dc:creator>ruruland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10222#comment-403184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THCJ working knowledge of the game operates under the fallacy that there is no limitation to the most efficient shot types other than horrible coaching( which is apparently ubiquitous at all levels) and poor player decision making..as usual, he is missing the greatest factors of causality, which are the defense aided by the shot clock and the relative defeciencies of teammates and their ability to aid the shot making process]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THCJ working knowledge of the game operates under the fallacy that there is no limitation to the most efficient shot types other than horrible coaching( which is apparently ubiquitous at all levels) and poor player decision making..as usual, he is missing the greatest factors of causality, which are the defense aided by the shot clock and the relative defeciencies of teammates and their ability to aid the shot making process</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruruland</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/#comment-403183</link>
		<dc:creator>ruruland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10222#comment-403183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-403182&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-403182&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Where do the shots come from? You seem to imply that Harden will be tasked to “create” his own shot. Yet there are several times during the course of an NBA game when a player receives no opportunity to “make a play.” Consider a coach-called iso for Westbrook. Is this done because a play cannot be &lt;i&gt;called&lt;/i&gt; for Durant or Ibaka or Harden? Is it indicative of their ability, or is it simply a call to “shake things up,” or whatever? 


To argue that Harden cannot increase his usage without his efficiency dropping is to say that his team simply cannot give a few of Westbrook’s opportunities to Harden and reasonably ask for the same level of efficiency. This would imply that Westbrook MUST use the possessions because no one else can. And that, I believe, is bullshit.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;
let&#039;s extend the logic. Can the Knicks get Chandler a dunk every possession, or a Novak open 3 every possession? What are Hardens most efficient plays? Transition and spot-ups... Can the Thunder offense get those shots for Harden every possession, or does the defense intentionally limit these kinds of opportunities in the same way they attempt to limit Westbrook basket attempts. Its very difficult to substantially increase usage without increasing ball-handling shot types....most of hardens attempts come off of decisions he or his teammates make on open shots, by asking Harden to carry a larger burden of the offense,  you are confining a higher percentage of his decision making into less efficient opportunities...highly efficient scorers are primarily opportunity scorers, who take advantage of the best opportunity most frequently.... The higher the usage, the proportion of optimal opportunities decrease. Michael Jordan, Lebron James, Kevin Durant, Carmelo Anthony do not take a high percentage of open opportunity shots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-403182">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-403182" rel="nofollow">The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles</a></strong>: Where do the shots come from? You seem to imply that Harden will be tasked to “create” his own shot. Yet there are several times during the course of an NBA game when a player receives no opportunity to “make a play.” Consider a coach-called iso for Westbrook. Is this done because a play cannot be <i>called</i> for Durant or Ibaka or Harden? Is it indicative of their ability, or is it simply a call to “shake things up,” or whatever? </p>
<p>To argue that Harden cannot increase his usage without his efficiency dropping is to say that his team simply cannot give a few of Westbrook’s opportunities to Harden and reasonably ask for the same level of efficiency. This would imply that Westbrook MUST use the possessions because no one else can. And that, I believe, is bullshit.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>let&#8217;s extend the logic. Can the Knicks get Chandler a dunk every possession, or a Novak open 3 every possession? What are Hardens most efficient plays? Transition and spot-ups&#8230; Can the Thunder offense get those shots for Harden every possession, or does the defense intentionally limit these kinds of opportunities in the same way they attempt to limit Westbrook basket attempts. Its very difficult to substantially increase usage without increasing ball-handling shot types&#8230;.most of hardens attempts come off of decisions he or his teammates make on open shots, by asking Harden to carry a larger burden of the offense,  you are confining a higher percentage of his decision making into less efficient opportunities&#8230;highly efficient scorers are primarily opportunity scorers, who take advantage of the best opportunity most frequently&#8230;. The higher the usage, the proportion of optimal opportunities decrease. Michael Jordan, Lebron James, Kevin Durant, Carmelo Anthony do not take a high percentage of open opportunity shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Honorable Cock Jowles</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/#comment-403182</link>
		<dc:creator>The Honorable Cock Jowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10222#comment-403182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-403181&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-403181&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ruruland&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
To reiterate, say Harden has a ten percent increase in usage asa No.1… Where are those shots going to come from, will he play with someone who can create for him, and how many of those new shots come against set defense? How does a defense change if Harden is the priority primo, and how much more frequently does he play against elite defenders?


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Where do the shots come from? You seem to imply that Harden will be tasked to &quot;create&quot; his own shot. Yet there are several times during the course of an NBA game when a player receives no opportunity to &quot;make a play.&quot; Consider a coach-called iso for Westbrook. Is this done because a play cannot be &lt;i&gt;called&lt;/i&gt; for Durant or Ibaka or Harden? Is it indicative of their ability, or is it simply a call to &quot;shake things up,&quot; or whatever? 

To argue that Harden cannot increase his usage without his efficiency dropping is to say that his team simply cannot give a few of Westbrook&#039;s opportunities to Harden and reasonably ask for the same level of efficiency. This would imply that Westbrook MUST use the possessions because no one else can. And that, I believe, is bullshit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-403181">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-403181" rel="nofollow">ruruland</a></strong>:<br />
To reiterate, say Harden has a ten percent increase in usage asa No.1… Where are those shots going to come from, will he play with someone who can create for him, and how many of those new shots come against set defense? How does a defense change if Harden is the priority primo, and how much more frequently does he play against elite defenders?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Where do the shots come from? You seem to imply that Harden will be tasked to &#8220;create&#8221; his own shot. Yet there are several times during the course of an NBA game when a player receives no opportunity to &#8220;make a play.&#8221; Consider a coach-called iso for Westbrook. Is this done because a play cannot be <i>called</i> for Durant or Ibaka or Harden? Is it indicative of their ability, or is it simply a call to &#8220;shake things up,&#8221; or whatever? </p>
<p>To argue that Harden cannot increase his usage without his efficiency dropping is to say that his team simply cannot give a few of Westbrook&#8217;s opportunities to Harden and reasonably ask for the same level of efficiency. This would imply that Westbrook MUST use the possessions because no one else can. And that, I believe, is bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruruland</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/#comment-403181</link>
		<dc:creator>ruruland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10222#comment-403181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To reiterate, say Harden has a ten percent increase in usage asa No.1... Where are those shots going to come from, will he play with someone who can create for him, and how many of those new shots come against set defense? How does a defense change if Harden is the priority primo, and how much more frequently does he play against elite defenders?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To reiterate, say Harden has a ten percent increase in usage asa No.1&#8230; Where are those shots going to come from, will he play with someone who can create for him, and how many of those new shots come against set defense? How does a defense change if Harden is the priority primo, and how much more frequently does he play against elite defenders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruruland</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/#comment-403180</link>
		<dc:creator>ruruland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10222#comment-403180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question shouldn&#039;t be framed as an equal choice. Naturally, no teams want to allow open jump shots to excellent shooters like Harden. And Hardens ability to score on transition both as a spot up shooter and driver is not something that would go away as a top option.He&#039;s great at that.. But what would happen is that more of Hardens shots would come against the teeth of a defense, while a smaller percentage of his shots would be clean in the half- court....Nearly All number one options are primarily creators, not primarily beneficiaries of creation around them. And THCJ has already acknowledged that not all perimeter defenders are equal.... Harden rarely plays against the opponents top defender like Durant does.......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question shouldn&#8217;t be framed as an equal choice. Naturally, no teams want to allow open jump shots to excellent shooters like Harden. And Hardens ability to score on transition both as a spot up shooter and driver is not something that would go away as a top option.He&#8217;s great at that.. But what would happen is that more of Hardens shots would come against the teeth of a defense, while a smaller percentage of his shots would be clean in the half- court&#8230;.Nearly All number one options are primarily creators, not primarily beneficiaries of creation around them. And THCJ has already acknowledged that not all perimeter defenders are equal&#8230;. Harden rarely plays against the opponents top defender like Durant does&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massive</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/#comment-403179</link>
		<dc:creator>massive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10222#comment-403179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on, defenses do not leave any of those guys wide open. And why are you comparing Westbrook to Carmelo Anthony? Carmelo Anthony is the number 1 scoring option on his team, and Westbrook is the #2 behind Kevin Durant. Teams don&#039;t double team Russell Westbrook because he plays on court with three other guys who will score if left wide open (did you see what Serge Ibaka did to the Spurs when they left him open)? Carmelo Anthony sees a double much more regularly than Harden.

Nobody is saying Russell Westbrook is a bad basketball player. He&#039;s just overrated (offensively). But for those of you questioning if Harden would be as efficient on another team, how efficient would Westbrook be if he was traded to a team like Sacramento tomorrow? Westbrook, Durant, Harden, and Ibaka all benefit tremendously by playing with each other, and they would all see a decline in efficiency if they were asked to play with a less talented group of players. None of those guys are LeBron, CP3, or Dwight Howard, so singling out Harden isn&#039;t fair. Can you imagine if Westbrook played for Sacramento, Cleveland, or Washington? Where would he be in terms of scoring efficiency?

Another thing is that James Harden is NOT a one trick pony like Novak, Landry Fields, Tyson Chandler, or Ryan Anderson. He can score from anywhere on court and create his own offense. Now I&#039;m not saying that James Harden can be a team&#039;s #1 scorer. To me, James Harden is best off playing as a #2 scoring option. But he is not limited to just one thing; he can play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, defenses do not leave any of those guys wide open. And why are you comparing Westbrook to Carmelo Anthony? Carmelo Anthony is the number 1 scoring option on his team, and Westbrook is the #2 behind Kevin Durant. Teams don&#8217;t double team Russell Westbrook because he plays on court with three other guys who will score if left wide open (did you see what Serge Ibaka did to the Spurs when they left him open)? Carmelo Anthony sees a double much more regularly than Harden.</p>
<p>Nobody is saying Russell Westbrook is a bad basketball player. He&#8217;s just overrated (offensively). But for those of you questioning if Harden would be as efficient on another team, how efficient would Westbrook be if he was traded to a team like Sacramento tomorrow? Westbrook, Durant, Harden, and Ibaka all benefit tremendously by playing with each other, and they would all see a decline in efficiency if they were asked to play with a less talented group of players. None of those guys are LeBron, CP3, or Dwight Howard, so singling out Harden isn&#8217;t fair. Can you imagine if Westbrook played for Sacramento, Cleveland, or Washington? Where would he be in terms of scoring efficiency?</p>
<p>Another thing is that James Harden is NOT a one trick pony like Novak, Landry Fields, Tyson Chandler, or Ryan Anderson. He can score from anywhere on court and create his own offense. Now I&#8217;m not saying that James Harden can be a team&#8217;s #1 scorer. To me, James Harden is best off playing as a #2 scoring option. But he is not limited to just one thing; he can play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will the Thrill</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/#comment-403178</link>
		<dc:creator>Will the Thrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 16:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10222#comment-403178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they knew the Hardens, Chandlers, and Andersons would shoot at a .660 TS%, why would they leave them open instead of letting Melo and Westbrook take their men on 1 on 1? Do you really think that Melo can possibly be more efficient if he wasn&#039;t double teamed and just guarded straight up (we aren&#039;t talking about being open like Harden here)? 
I have no idea why a defense wouldn&#039;t take their chances on guarding Melo/Westbrook 1 on 1 instead of leaving Harden open anywhere on the floor.
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-403176&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-403176&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Juany&#056;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: You also seem to be willingly ignoring that even though every NBA player is amazing when left open, defenses CONSTANTLY leave guys like Harden, Tyson Chandler, and Ryan Anderson open, knowing exactly how efficient those guys are, to prevent guys like Westbrook and Melo from shitting on them 1 on 1. Now Harden is good enough to get shots on his own, I just doubt at a .660 TS%&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they knew the Hardens, Chandlers, and Andersons would shoot at a .660 TS%, why would they leave them open instead of letting Melo and Westbrook take their men on 1 on 1? Do you really think that Melo can possibly be more efficient if he wasn&#8217;t double teamed and just guarded straight up (we aren&#8217;t talking about being open like Harden here)?<br />
I have no idea why a defense wouldn&#8217;t take their chances on guarding Melo/Westbrook 1 on 1 instead of leaving Harden open anywhere on the floor.</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-403176">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-403176" rel="nofollow">Juany&#056;</a></strong>: You also seem to be willingly ignoring that even though every NBA player is amazing when left open, defenses CONSTANTLY leave guys like Harden, Tyson Chandler, and Ryan Anderson open, knowing exactly how efficient those guys are, to prevent guys like Westbrook and Melo from shitting on them 1 on 1. Now Harden is good enough to get shots on his own, I just doubt at a .660 TS%</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ephus</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-morning-news-friday-aug-17-2012/#comment-403177</link>
		<dc:creator>ephus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 16:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10222#comment-403177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a few players, like Biedrins, Reggie Evans and Asik, who can be left alone on the perimeter.  I do not put Jared Jeffries in that category, because he will shoot the perimeter jumper and occasionally take the ball to the rim.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few players, like Biedrins, Reggie Evans and Asik, who can be left alone on the perimeter.  I do not put Jared Jeffries in that category, because he will shoot the perimeter jumper and occasionally take the ball to the rim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
