<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knicks Draft Josh Harrellson With Hornets Second Round Pick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:46:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Nelson</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/#comment-332445</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=7521#comment-332445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-332432&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-332432&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ben&#032;R&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: I wouldn’t be shocked if Shumpert is no more than a slightly more athletic Mardy Collins but I would say that is his floor.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think that&#039;s a fair point. And I&#039;ll take that as a &quot;worst case&quot; from #17. 


&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-332441&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-332441&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Truitt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Just for the record, I wanted Marshon Brooks…I guess I was alone though.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think he looks like a solid-ish prospect. He wasn&#039;t my first choice, but I wouldn&#039;t have been upset if the Knicks drafted him. 


&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-332387&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-332387&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ess&#045;dog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: I wanted Faried too based on his body of work, but he could just as easily be the next Malik Rose as the next Dennis Rodman.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or the next Lasme or the next Dorsey or the next Balkman or the next... Come on ess-dog, you&#039;re arbitrarily picking and choosing strong comparisons for Faried and weak ones for Shumpert. This is why I&#039;m not a big fan of comparisons. It&#039;s fun to compare them, but I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s in anyway useful. Good players are good players regardless of who they&#039;re compared to, and same for bad players. Shumpert definitely has the skills to be good, though like any pick he could be bad. 


&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-332387&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-332387&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ess&#045;dog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Shumpert could easily be Larry friggin Hughes&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is that a problem? Shumpert has like 40 lbs on Hughes, so I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a perfect comparison anyway. Hughes was an alright player, though. The mistake was paying him so much $. Drafting him #17 wouldn&#039;t have been a problem. And like Stuckey, Hughes is a guy who didn&#039;t reach his own potential. Shumpert might never reach his, but he might.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-332432">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-332432" rel="nofollow">Ben&#032;R</a></strong>: I wouldn’t be shocked if Shumpert is no more than a slightly more athletic Mardy Collins but I would say that is his floor.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think that&#8217;s a fair point. And I&#8217;ll take that as a &#8220;worst case&#8221; from #17. </p>
<blockquote cite="comment-332441">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-332441" rel="nofollow">Truitt</a></strong>: Just for the record, I wanted Marshon Brooks…I guess I was alone though.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think he looks like a solid-ish prospect. He wasn&#8217;t my first choice, but I wouldn&#8217;t have been upset if the Knicks drafted him. </p>
<blockquote cite="comment-332387">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-332387" rel="nofollow">ess&#045;dog</a></strong>: I wanted Faried too based on his body of work, but he could just as easily be the next Malik Rose as the next Dennis Rodman.</p></blockquote>
<p>Or the next Lasme or the next Dorsey or the next Balkman or the next&#8230; Come on ess-dog, you&#8217;re arbitrarily picking and choosing strong comparisons for Faried and weak ones for Shumpert. This is why I&#8217;m not a big fan of comparisons. It&#8217;s fun to compare them, but I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s in anyway useful. Good players are good players regardless of who they&#8217;re compared to, and same for bad players. Shumpert definitely has the skills to be good, though like any pick he could be bad. </p>
<blockquote cite="comment-332387">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-332387" rel="nofollow">ess&#045;dog</a></strong>: Shumpert could easily be Larry friggin Hughes</p></blockquote>
<p>Is that a problem? Shumpert has like 40 lbs on Hughes, so I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a perfect comparison anyway. Hughes was an alright player, though. The mistake was paying him so much $. Drafting him #17 wouldn&#8217;t have been a problem. And like Stuckey, Hughes is a guy who didn&#8217;t reach his own potential. Shumpert might never reach his, but he might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truitt</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/#comment-332441</link>
		<dc:creator>Truitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=7521#comment-332441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just for the record, I wanted Marshon Brooks...I guess I was alone though. By the end of the year, the knicks could not play Billups and Fields at the same time because neither could stay in front of a pg (and Fields&#039; shooting slumped). I thought they needed a SG who could play some PG (or at least defend PGs) just as much as they needed a paint-clogging-rebound-devouring Goliath.

When I when I saw Brooks&#039; combine measurements I thought that his athleticism and length would help him cover up for Chauncey&#039;s age. I thought that his wet shot and fearlessness would make him a perfect fit for SSOL. Needless to say, I was very disappointed when we drafted Shumpert (because of last years Favors over Cousins rationale and his poor shooting ability).

Since then, I have been talking myself into Shumpert &amp; found some solace in that he reminds me quite a bit of Billups&#039;s old teammate, Rodney Stuckey. Shumpert is .5&quot; taller, has 2&quot; more wingspan, with about the same speed, but stronger and can leap about half a foot higher. Neither were great shooters or pure point guards. Stuckey out of college gets the edge on offense, but Shumpert has it with D. 

While Stuckey still has trouble with his outside shot; he is a decent player, he even looks like a starting PG some nights. Stuckey was a great compliment to Billups in Detroit.  I would take him on the Knicks if he was offered. If Shumpert&#039;s game can grow under Billups and D&#039;antoni into something resembling Stuckey&#039;s he will be a great pick considering the options available. If he can do better, he will probably be considered the steal of the draft. If he can&#039;t we will still have a super athletic 2 who can help play d and throw down some crazy dunks in garbage time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, I wanted Marshon Brooks&#8230;I guess I was alone though. By the end of the year, the knicks could not play Billups and Fields at the same time because neither could stay in front of a pg (and Fields&#8217; shooting slumped). I thought they needed a SG who could play some PG (or at least defend PGs) just as much as they needed a paint-clogging-rebound-devouring Goliath.</p>
<p>When I when I saw Brooks&#8217; combine measurements I thought that his athleticism and length would help him cover up for Chauncey&#8217;s age. I thought that his wet shot and fearlessness would make him a perfect fit for SSOL. Needless to say, I was very disappointed when we drafted Shumpert (because of last years Favors over Cousins rationale and his poor shooting ability).</p>
<p>Since then, I have been talking myself into Shumpert &amp; found some solace in that he reminds me quite a bit of Billups&#8217;s old teammate, Rodney Stuckey. Shumpert is .5&#8243; taller, has 2&#8243; more wingspan, with about the same speed, but stronger and can leap about half a foot higher. Neither were great shooters or pure point guards. Stuckey out of college gets the edge on offense, but Shumpert has it with D. </p>
<p>While Stuckey still has trouble with his outside shot; he is a decent player, he even looks like a starting PG some nights. Stuckey was a great compliment to Billups in Detroit.  I would take him on the Knicks if he was offered. If Shumpert&#8217;s game can grow under Billups and D&#8217;antoni into something resembling Stuckey&#8217;s he will be a great pick considering the options available. If he can do better, he will probably be considered the steal of the draft. If he can&#8217;t we will still have a super athletic 2 who can help play d and throw down some crazy dunks in garbage time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/#comment-332440</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=7521#comment-332440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see some similarities between Shumpert and Collins as well with the big difference being Shumpert has showed some semblance of shooting ability with his free throws that Collins never did.  Looking at Shumpert&#039;s shot, there doesn&#039;t seem to be anything wrong it in terms of balance or release.  He just tends to clank them but biggest of all in my opinion, it&#039;s been the tough shot selection that have affected his numbers the most.  The advent of the stepback jumper has been to his detriment.  He tries to be too much of a stylish shooter.  The kinds of shots he took are difficult for anyone to hit at a high percentage but he also didn&#039;t balance them by attacking the rim.

As far as skills and size, there really isn&#039;t a big difference between Shumpert and Alec Burks.  Both are athletic, 6&#039;5-6&#039;6 guards with long arms, who can handle and pass but whose outside shots are suspect.  Whereas Shumpert shot in the high 30s to low 40s from the field, Burks shot a very good percentage because he didn&#039;t settle for tough outside jumpers time after time like Shumpert did but also attacked the basket and got a boatload of baskets in transition.  

The lack of drives for a guy with his athleticism and handle is what mystified me most.  He should have been a penetrating force in college.  I suppose it&#039;s possible he puts it all together in the nba because he has the tools.  The stroke is good, the ballhandling is very good, the first step is fast, the explosiveness is there; it&#039;s not farfetched to see him one day putting it all together and becoming a core player.   It seems more likely that he could be a Ronnie Brewer type player, a defensive role player but one who handles the ball better and contributes with some playmaking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see some similarities between Shumpert and Collins as well with the big difference being Shumpert has showed some semblance of shooting ability with his free throws that Collins never did.  Looking at Shumpert&#8217;s shot, there doesn&#8217;t seem to be anything wrong it in terms of balance or release.  He just tends to clank them but biggest of all in my opinion, it&#8217;s been the tough shot selection that have affected his numbers the most.  The advent of the stepback jumper has been to his detriment.  He tries to be too much of a stylish shooter.  The kinds of shots he took are difficult for anyone to hit at a high percentage but he also didn&#8217;t balance them by attacking the rim.</p>
<p>As far as skills and size, there really isn&#8217;t a big difference between Shumpert and Alec Burks.  Both are athletic, 6&#8217;5-6&#8217;6 guards with long arms, who can handle and pass but whose outside shots are suspect.  Whereas Shumpert shot in the high 30s to low 40s from the field, Burks shot a very good percentage because he didn&#8217;t settle for tough outside jumpers time after time like Shumpert did but also attacked the basket and got a boatload of baskets in transition.  </p>
<p>The lack of drives for a guy with his athleticism and handle is what mystified me most.  He should have been a penetrating force in college.  I suppose it&#8217;s possible he puts it all together in the nba because he has the tools.  The stroke is good, the ballhandling is very good, the first step is fast, the explosiveness is there; it&#8217;s not farfetched to see him one day putting it all together and becoming a core player.   It seems more likely that he could be a Ronnie Brewer type player, a defensive role player but one who handles the ball better and contributes with some playmaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/#comment-332437</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=7521#comment-332437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dare you not to like Shumpert after watching his draft night reaction

http://www.twitvid.com/F4CRP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dare you not to like Shumpert after watching his draft night reaction</p>
<p><a href="http://www.twitvid.com/F4CRP" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitvid.com/F4CRP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/#comment-332433</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=7521#comment-332433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-332404&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-332404&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;citizen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
THCJ,
Would you care to post a quick list of citations of Berri’s most important academic papers (in which he discusses his methodology) as well as the “comments” in journals publishing his work? And of course some of the “academic responses” of which you speak? (Not just the laudatory ones but the critical ones as well, which should go without speaking…) 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would actually/seriously be interested in seeing these too. THCJ would you mind posting a few of them? I&#039;ve googled for stuff like this but have trouble finding it.

Re: Mardy Collins - one needed only to watch him play for 5 minutes to realize he was clearly a below-average NBA athlete.  One only needs to watch Shumpert play for 5 minutes to realize that he&#039;s a great athlete.  Shumpert needs COACHING and to be on a team where he&#039;s not the offensive focus.  If anything, D&#039;Antoni+staff are good at offensive coaching, and he definitely won&#039;t be the offensive focus. Would be interesting to see his stats as a spot-up jump shooter, since my hope would be the only shots he would take would be those + transition hoops + drives to the hoop. Leave the pull-ups and isos to the big boys.

Re: Josh Harrellson - my lord do his advanced stats look prettier than he does.  Check out this link - 

http://blogs.courier-journal.com/ericcrawford/2011/02/28/mr-efficiency-uk-version-josh-harrellson/

which leads to this link:

http://kenpom.com/team.php?team=Kentucky

At the bottom are Harrellson&#039;s numbers.  His ORtg was 7th in the nation at over 130. He&#039;s also an offensive rebounding monster. If that can even partially carry over to the pros, and if he can stay on the floor for 10-15 min/game, he could be very valuable. His 15% body fat tells me he needs to do lots of running this summer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-332404">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-332404" rel="nofollow">citizen</a></strong>:<br />
THCJ,<br />
Would you care to post a quick list of citations of Berri’s most important academic papers (in which he discusses his methodology) as well as the “comments” in journals publishing his work? And of course some of the “academic responses” of which you speak? (Not just the laudatory ones but the critical ones as well, which should go without speaking…)
</p></blockquote>
<p>I would actually/seriously be interested in seeing these too. THCJ would you mind posting a few of them? I&#8217;ve googled for stuff like this but have trouble finding it.</p>
<p>Re: Mardy Collins &#8211; one needed only to watch him play for 5 minutes to realize he was clearly a below-average NBA athlete.  One only needs to watch Shumpert play for 5 minutes to realize that he&#8217;s a great athlete.  Shumpert needs COACHING and to be on a team where he&#8217;s not the offensive focus.  If anything, D&#8217;Antoni+staff are good at offensive coaching, and he definitely won&#8217;t be the offensive focus. Would be interesting to see his stats as a spot-up jump shooter, since my hope would be the only shots he would take would be those + transition hoops + drives to the hoop. Leave the pull-ups and isos to the big boys.</p>
<p>Re: Josh Harrellson &#8211; my lord do his advanced stats look prettier than he does.  Check out this link &#8211; </p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.courier-journal.com/ericcrawford/2011/02/28/mr-efficiency-uk-version-josh-harrellson/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.courier-journal.com/ericcrawford/2011/02/28/mr-efficiency-uk-version-josh-harrellson/</a></p>
<p>which leads to this link:</p>
<p><a href="http://kenpom.com/team.php?team=Kentucky" rel="nofollow">http://kenpom.com/team.php?team=Kentucky</a></p>
<p>At the bottom are Harrellson&#8217;s numbers.  His ORtg was 7th in the nation at over 130. He&#8217;s also an offensive rebounding monster. If that can even partially carry over to the pros, and if he can stay on the floor for 10-15 min/game, he could be very valuable. His 15% body fat tells me he needs to do lots of running this summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben R</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/#comment-332432</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=7521#comment-332432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mardy Collins actually posted very good numbers at the combine. He had similar size and a 37.5&quot; vertical which isn&#039;t off the charts like Shumpert&#039;s 42 inches but is still very good. Looking at Collins&#039; RSB40 and his combine measurements suggest a player that easily has NBA athleticism. 

Overall the stats are very very similar but Shumpert has a couple things in his favor. The improving ft% suggest someone who has a developing jumpshot, Collins on the other hand shot 59.6%, the lowest in his college career, from the line his last year of college. Shumpert averaged 6.3 asts/40 his freshman season and 5.3/40 his sophmore which suggests that he can run the point when he needs to, Collins never averaged over 5/40. 

I wouldn&#039;t be shocked if Shumpert is no more than a slightly more athletic Mardy Collins but I would say that is his floor. Mardy Collins was a good defender and had a couple flashes just never developed. It will all depend on whether Shumpert develops or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mardy Collins actually posted very good numbers at the combine. He had similar size and a 37.5&#8243; vertical which isn&#8217;t off the charts like Shumpert&#8217;s 42 inches but is still very good. Looking at Collins&#8217; RSB40 and his combine measurements suggest a player that easily has NBA athleticism. </p>
<p>Overall the stats are very very similar but Shumpert has a couple things in his favor. The improving ft% suggest someone who has a developing jumpshot, Collins on the other hand shot 59.6%, the lowest in his college career, from the line his last year of college. Shumpert averaged 6.3 asts/40 his freshman season and 5.3/40 his sophmore which suggests that he can run the point when he needs to, Collins never averaged over 5/40. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be shocked if Shumpert is no more than a slightly more athletic Mardy Collins but I would say that is his floor. Mardy Collins was a good defender and had a couple flashes just never developed. It will all depend on whether Shumpert develops or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicos</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/#comment-332429</link>
		<dc:creator>nicos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=7521#comment-332429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walker&#039;s career assist per 36 was 6.3- Biilups&#039; is 6.2.  He wasn&#039;t a great point guard by any stretch but he definitely fell on the point side of the combo guard equation.  Shumpert seems a lot closer to Walker in terms of distribution ability than he does to MMR who I think led the league in assists one year.  His shooting form is much better than Walker&#039;s and as I said he&#039;s bigger and a lot more athletic and I hope he winds up being a whole lot better.  But like Walker he&#039;s coming in as a rangy, ball-hawking, low TS%, combo guard who probably shades more to the point than to the 2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walker&#8217;s career assist per 36 was 6.3- Biilups&#8217; is 6.2.  He wasn&#8217;t a great point guard by any stretch but he definitely fell on the point side of the combo guard equation.  Shumpert seems a lot closer to Walker in terms of distribution ability than he does to MMR who I think led the league in assists one year.  His shooting form is much better than Walker&#8217;s and as I said he&#8217;s bigger and a lot more athletic and I hope he winds up being a whole lot better.  But like Walker he&#8217;s coming in as a rangy, ball-hawking, low TS%, combo guard who probably shades more to the point than to the 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/#comment-332428</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=7521#comment-332428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Micheal Ray Richardson? Hmmm..I&#039;ll have to think about that one.  He was more Westbrook-like than Evans-like, but might be a good comp.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Micheal Ray Richardson? Hmmm..I&#8217;ll have to think about that one.  He was more Westbrook-like than Evans-like, but might be a good comp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/#comment-332427</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=7521#comment-332427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t like the Darrell Walker comparison, Walker really wasn&#039;t anything like a point guard, had terrible shooting form.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t like the Darrell Walker comparison, Walker really wasn&#8217;t anything like a point guard, had terrible shooting form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: art vandelay</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-draft-josh-harrellson-with-hornets-second-round-pick/#comment-332418</link>
		<dc:creator>art vandelay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 04:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=7521#comment-332418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think saying so-and-so (in this cash Shumpert) had similar stats one particular NCAA season to another former player his same college season really serves to buttress an argument in favor of them being comparable, particularly when the players physically and stylistically are not likenesses of one another...I am sure if I were to go back and look at MJ&#039;s stats one of his college seasons at UNC they would look startingly similar to some other also-ran player who clearly had little to nothing in common with him. I don&#039;t have the exact details on Mardy Collins&#039; combine numbers (not even sure if they had invoked the combine back then already), but in his very brief stint in NY I remember him not be all that athletic and a little awkward as a PG, sort of in the way that Charlie Ward was actually (surprisingly) athletically awkward for someone who was also a Heisman award winner....no idea if Shumpert will pan out, but he looks like an athletic freak and on a completely different level athletically from that of Collins.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think saying so-and-so (in this cash Shumpert) had similar stats one particular NCAA season to another former player his same college season really serves to buttress an argument in favor of them being comparable, particularly when the players physically and stylistically are not likenesses of one another&#8230;I am sure if I were to go back and look at MJ&#8217;s stats one of his college seasons at UNC they would look startingly similar to some other also-ran player who clearly had little to nothing in common with him. I don&#8217;t have the exact details on Mardy Collins&#8217; combine numbers (not even sure if they had invoked the combine back then already), but in his very brief stint in NY I remember him not be all that athletic and a little awkward as a PG, sort of in the way that Charlie Ward was actually (surprisingly) athletically awkward for someone who was also a Heisman award winner&#8230;.no idea if Shumpert will pan out, but he looks like an athletic freak and on a completely different level athletically from that of Collins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
