<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knicks 2010 Season Preview Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2010-season-preview-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2010-season-preview-part-2/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ess-dog</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2010-season-preview-part-2/#comment-279793</link>
		<dc:creator>ess-dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=2472#comment-279793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My bad.  If I remember, there was a lot of campaigning for Christmas around, no?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad.  If I remember, there was a lot of campaigning for Christmas around, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2010-season-preview-part-2/#comment-279792</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=2472#comment-279792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Recent draftees Jerel McNeal and Dionte Christmas have been cut by their respective teams. Any interest in taking a look at either of these guards?&quot;

Both those guys went undrafted.

Besides, we still need to cut a player before next week. Are either of those guys any better than the three fungo bats we already have?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Recent draftees Jerel McNeal and Dionte Christmas have been cut by their respective teams. Any interest in taking a look at either of these guards?&#8221;</p>
<p>Both those guys went undrafted.</p>
<p>Besides, we still need to cut a player before next week. Are either of those guys any better than the three fungo bats we already have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ess-dog</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2010-season-preview-part-2/#comment-279790</link>
		<dc:creator>ess-dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=2472#comment-279790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent draftees Jerel McNeal and Dionte Christmas have been cut by their respective teams.  Any interest in taking a look at either of these guards?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent draftees Jerel McNeal and Dionte Christmas have been cut by their respective teams.  Any interest in taking a look at either of these guards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2010-season-preview-part-2/#comment-279789</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=2472#comment-279789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any chance of trading Larry Hughes for Quentin Richardson?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance of trading Larry Hughes for Quentin Richardson?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas B.</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2010-season-preview-part-2/#comment-279786</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=2472#comment-279786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dejuan Blair&#039;s nintendo numbers continue... 17 pts 10 boards in 14 minutes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dejuan Blair&#8217;s nintendo numbers continue&#8230; 17 pts 10 boards in 14 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2010-season-preview-part-2/#comment-279785</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=2472#comment-279785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[knicks looked better tonight, nice team effort.  The 3 was falling and the Celts played their bench in the 4th quarter, but the intensity on D was beyond anything we saw last year.

Jeffries had a very solid game on both ends.  He continues to look more tradable every game.

Nate was tremendous again, as was Lee.

The Knicks went big for a stretch and it definitely was a change from last year when we were defenseless vs. a big lineup.  Darko was a factor again defensively.

Harrington had a very solid game, looked like an all-star at times.

Not Chandler&#039;s best game, but he was still pretty solid all around.

Danilo was feisty tonight.  Daniels and Pierce took it right to him at times, but he responded on the offensive end better than he had all preseason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>knicks looked better tonight, nice team effort.  The 3 was falling and the Celts played their bench in the 4th quarter, but the intensity on D was beyond anything we saw last year.</p>
<p>Jeffries had a very solid game on both ends.  He continues to look more tradable every game.</p>
<p>Nate was tremendous again, as was Lee.</p>
<p>The Knicks went big for a stretch and it definitely was a change from last year when we were defenseless vs. a big lineup.  Darko was a factor again defensively.</p>
<p>Harrington had a very solid game, looked like an all-star at times.</p>
<p>Not Chandler&#8217;s best game, but he was still pretty solid all around.</p>
<p>Danilo was feisty tonight.  Daniels and Pierce took it right to him at times, but he responded on the offensive end better than he had all preseason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Silverman</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2010-season-preview-part-2/#comment-279784</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=2472#comment-279784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hah! Good one Merlin. I&quot;d like to think allmy semi-unecessary sub-dependent clauses are merely an homage to David Foster Wallace, but alas, I probably just need to be a better self-editor.

PS - I too pine for the halcyon days of the Sugar Ray/Ray Williams &quot;Dynamic Duo&quot; backcourt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah! Good one Merlin. I&#8221;d like to think allmy semi-unecessary sub-dependent clauses are merely an homage to David Foster Wallace, but alas, I probably just need to be a better self-editor.</p>
<p>PS &#8211; I too pine for the halcyon days of the Sugar Ray/Ray Williams &#8220;Dynamic Duo&#8221; backcourt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Merlin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2010-season-preview-part-2/#comment-279783</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Merlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=2472#comment-279783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very well penned analysis of these three fellows, however it would have and easily could&#039;ve have been much more concisely put--perhaps leaving out a few of the players&#039; attributes of which the mercilessly masochistic, though quite upstanding, regular, blog readers and/or contributors like myself who are so infected with that cancerous hope for the future that keeps us reading as if we were, well, upstanding fans of and upstanding team--ha upstanding, that may fit this sect of knick fans, and others on occasion, but is not so much fitting for the focus of our woes and rooting interest, at least of late--I digress, and have momentarily lost my train of thought in the the tangents....Ah, here. Through participating in this blog dedicated to such blind wishing, praying, potion brewing, or what have you, I have arrived at but one potential remedy--one I ought to have arrived at when they first began sucking--engingeer a 10-15 year temporal shift in either direction to either prevent the cap debacle or pray for a brighter tomorrow(no 2010 plan particularly thaws my carbonite frozen Knickerbocker optimism at this juncture)--well i believe that&#039;s enough rant for today....when are me resigning michael ray?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well penned analysis of these three fellows, however it would have and easily could&#8217;ve have been much more concisely put&#8211;perhaps leaving out a few of the players&#8217; attributes of which the mercilessly masochistic, though quite upstanding, regular, blog readers and/or contributors like myself who are so infected with that cancerous hope for the future that keeps us reading as if we were, well, upstanding fans of and upstanding team&#8211;ha upstanding, that may fit this sect of knick fans, and others on occasion, but is not so much fitting for the focus of our woes and rooting interest, at least of late&#8211;I digress, and have momentarily lost my train of thought in the the tangents&#8230;.Ah, here. Through participating in this blog dedicated to such blind wishing, praying, potion brewing, or what have you, I have arrived at but one potential remedy&#8211;one I ought to have arrived at when they first began sucking&#8211;engingeer a 10-15 year temporal shift in either direction to either prevent the cap debacle or pray for a brighter tomorrow(no 2010 plan particularly thaws my carbonite frozen Knickerbocker optimism at this juncture)&#8211;well i believe that&#8217;s enough rant for today&#8230;.when are me resigning michael ray?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
