<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knicks 2008-09 Schedule Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:28:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: danvt</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/#comment-259275</link>
		<dc:creator>danvt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=819#comment-259275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The point that Zach got a lot of cheap rebounds while leaving his man is an interesting and subtle one.&quot;

Mike K had a great post on this recently.

&quot;It just seems to me that the guy has a bunch of skills and yet we view him as not just a bad player but as someone who absolutely wrecks the team. Maaaaaaybe a new coach can alter this.&quot;

Hubie Brown had success with not a lot of talent outside of Bernard King.  He did it by slowing the game way down.  Seems as if D&#039;Antoni is going to try to do the opposite.  That could be a recipe for disaster.  We take more shots and give our opponents more possessions per game.  If we don&#039;t shoot a better percentage we could be even worse than last year.  

I mean, it&#039;s almost funny.  If it was the Celtics it would be really funny.  It&#039;s like curing a hangover with a shot of tequila.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The point that Zach got a lot of cheap rebounds while leaving his man is an interesting and subtle one.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mike K had a great post on this recently.</p>
<p>&#8220;It just seems to me that the guy has a bunch of skills and yet we view him as not just a bad player but as someone who absolutely wrecks the team. Maaaaaaybe a new coach can alter this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hubie Brown had success with not a lot of talent outside of Bernard King.  He did it by slowing the game way down.  Seems as if D&#8217;Antoni is going to try to do the opposite.  That could be a recipe for disaster.  We take more shots and give our opponents more possessions per game.  If we don&#8217;t shoot a better percentage we could be even worse than last year.  </p>
<p>I mean, it&#8217;s almost funny.  If it was the Celtics it would be really funny.  It&#8217;s like curing a hangover with a shot of tequila.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renaldo Balkman's Agent</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/#comment-259230</link>
		<dc:creator>Renaldo Balkman's Agent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=819#comment-259230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;So here’s the heresy: Maybe it’s a bad rap. Maybe new coaching can use 10 bounds and 20 points so that it helps us win as opposed to having Balkman shoot airballs from the foul line. Maybe he’ll defend. Slow footed guys can, consider Oakley. He certainly won’t have the problem of high expectations for this season.&quot;

If Mike D&#039;Antoni can turn Zach Randolph into Charles Oakley he&#039;d be worth Eddy Curry&#039;s weight in gold.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So here’s the heresy: Maybe it’s a bad rap. Maybe new coaching can use 10 bounds and 20 points so that it helps us win as opposed to having Balkman shoot airballs from the foul line. Maybe he’ll defend. Slow footed guys can, consider Oakley. He certainly won’t have the problem of high expectations for this season.&#8221;</p>
<p>If Mike D&#8217;Antoni can turn Zach Randolph into Charles Oakley he&#8217;d be worth Eddy Curry&#8217;s weight in gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Panorama</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/#comment-259221</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Panorama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=819#comment-259221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That China game was great but the US team does worry me a bit. If their 3 pt shooting is consistently as terrible as the China game they could get knocked out by a team with a hot hand and some decent defense. They&#039;re passing looked great, but too often the players just couldn&#039;t follow through on their jumpers. They won the game almost entirely on fast breaks and Lebron&#039;s ridiculous blocks (that 2-handed one where he grabbed it out of the air was INSANE).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That China game was great but the US team does worry me a bit. If their 3 pt shooting is consistently as terrible as the China game they could get knocked out by a team with a hot hand and some decent defense. They&#8217;re passing looked great, but too often the players just couldn&#8217;t follow through on their jumpers. They won the game almost entirely on fast breaks and Lebron&#8217;s ridiculous blocks (that 2-handed one where he grabbed it out of the air was INSANE).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/#comment-259220</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=819#comment-259220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice game by Team usa vs. China. LeBron was impressive and so was Bosh. Anyone know when they are going to play Span? That game is gonna be a HUMDINGER!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice game by Team usa vs. China. LeBron was impressive and so was Bosh. Anyone know when they are going to play Span? That game is gonna be a HUMDINGER!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Italian Stallion</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/#comment-259196</link>
		<dc:creator>Italian Stallion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=819#comment-259196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Cook, 

I agreee with you on Randolph.

The ultimate question is whether a new coach can get through to guys like Randolph and Crawford and create a way of using them more efficiently even though previous coaches have failed. 

The first step is getting playmakers and better outside shooters so the alternatives to their bad shot selection is actually the superior option. We are moving in that direction. 

Personally, I would be shocked of Crawford and Randolph don&#039;t increase their FG% this year based on what has already been done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Cook, </p>
<p>I agreee with you on Randolph.</p>
<p>The ultimate question is whether a new coach can get through to guys like Randolph and Crawford and create a way of using them more efficiently even though previous coaches have failed. </p>
<p>The first step is getting playmakers and better outside shooters so the alternatives to their bad shot selection is actually the superior option. We are moving in that direction. </p>
<p>Personally, I would be shocked of Crawford and Randolph don&#8217;t increase their FG% this year based on what has already been done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Cook</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/#comment-259192</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=819#comment-259192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Bob Cook,Guys on this site will throw numbers at you ad infinitum but I’ll give you the summary.
Zach and Jamal both get twenty points a game by taking way too many shots. They get points, but not efficiently, and thus the team loses. On defense they were two fifths of a unit that was close to the worst in the league. In terms of rebounding there is some thought that Zach’s lack of positioning on defense, that is, not being out on his man, gave him position for more defensive rebounds. As an offensive rebounder his numbers are not that good.
Neither player creates much for anyone else, thus the ball stops moving and someone needs to chuck it. Then the long carom and the transition basket the other way…. We’ve seen too many thirty point quarters. Hopefully, D’Antoni can make a difference in the teams efficiency but are you really optimistic that these guys are going to beat Garnett or Brand or anyone else?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Dan:
You have perfectly and knowledgably described what was going on last year.  I&#039;m just hoping or dreaming that it could be changed with regard to Zach.  The point that Zach got a lot of cheap rebounds while leaving his man is an interesting and subtle one.  Barkly used to be that way and having watched a bunch of games, I think you&#039;re right.  But suppose the coach tells him to cut it out.  Z does not get a lot of offensive bounds.  Well, he&#039;s out there firing away from 20 ft.  You can say he had a somewhat low shooting percentage but with the teammates he had out there, someone has to take a shot.  Ewing also didn&#039;t O-board much because he also loved the J and he was a center.  On defense, Ewing liked blocked shots and that&#039;s great but it was why he never got many D-boards compared to say, an Unseld.  He was jumping away from the basket trying for the block.  

It just seems to me that the guy has a bunch of skills and yet we view him as not just a bad player but as someone who absolutely wrecks the team.  Maaaaaaybe a new coach can alter this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bob Cook,Guys on this site will throw numbers at you ad infinitum but I’ll give you the summary.<br />
Zach and Jamal both get twenty points a game by taking way too many shots. They get points, but not efficiently, and thus the team loses. On defense they were two fifths of a unit that was close to the worst in the league. In terms of rebounding there is some thought that Zach’s lack of positioning on defense, that is, not being out on his man, gave him position for more defensive rebounds. As an offensive rebounder his numbers are not that good.<br />
Neither player creates much for anyone else, thus the ball stops moving and someone needs to chuck it. Then the long carom and the transition basket the other way…. We’ve seen too many thirty point quarters. Hopefully, D’Antoni can make a difference in the teams efficiency but are you really optimistic that these guys are going to beat Garnett or Brand or anyone else?</p></blockquote>
<p>Dan:<br />
You have perfectly and knowledgably described what was going on last year.  I&#8217;m just hoping or dreaming that it could be changed with regard to Zach.  The point that Zach got a lot of cheap rebounds while leaving his man is an interesting and subtle one.  Barkly used to be that way and having watched a bunch of games, I think you&#8217;re right.  But suppose the coach tells him to cut it out.  Z does not get a lot of offensive bounds.  Well, he&#8217;s out there firing away from 20 ft.  You can say he had a somewhat low shooting percentage but with the teammates he had out there, someone has to take a shot.  Ewing also didn&#8217;t O-board much because he also loved the J and he was a center.  On defense, Ewing liked blocked shots and that&#8217;s great but it was why he never got many D-boards compared to say, an Unseld.  He was jumping away from the basket trying for the block.  </p>
<p>It just seems to me that the guy has a bunch of skills and yet we view him as not just a bad player but as someone who absolutely wrecks the team.  Maaaaaaybe a new coach can alter this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gorky</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/#comment-259082</link>
		<dc:creator>Gorky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=819#comment-259082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guys, there&#039;s no way to predict which games we will win. We don&#039;t know which teams will be bad or good. Trades, injuries, random improvewment/steps back by teams. All of those are unpredictable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, there&#8217;s no way to predict which games we will win. We don&#8217;t know which teams will be bad or good. Trades, injuries, random improvewment/steps back by teams. All of those are unpredictable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas B.</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/#comment-259081</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=819#comment-259081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Starting five
Mardy CollinsQ. RichardsonJared JeffriesMalik RoseJerome James
I call it Denny’s five star, no All-Star, starter special. Its three scrabbled goose eggs (MC,Q,Jared), a piece of stale toast (Rose), and a side of bacon (James). All for just 29.6 million dollars. What a bargin!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My wit is wasted on you people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Starting five<br />
Mardy CollinsQ. RichardsonJared JeffriesMalik RoseJerome James<br />
I call it Denny’s five star, no All-Star, starter special. Its three scrabbled goose eggs (MC,Q,Jared), a piece of stale toast (Rose), and a side of bacon (James). All for just 29.6 million dollars. What a bargin!</p></blockquote>
<p>My wit is wasted on you people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComboGuard</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/#comment-259040</link>
		<dc:creator>ComboGuard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=819#comment-259040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s is a rest days breakdown for NBA teams

http://www.nbastuffer.com/2008-2009_Schedule_Rest_Days_Analysis.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s is a rest days breakdown for NBA teams</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nbastuffer.com/2008-2009_Schedule_Rest_Days_Analysis.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nbastuffer.com/2008-2009_Schedule_Rest_Days_Analysis.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danvt</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2008-09-schedule-released/#comment-259035</link>
		<dc:creator>danvt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=819#comment-259035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Cook,
Guys on this site will throw numbers at you ad infinitum but I&#039;ll give you the summary.

Zach and Jamal both get twenty points a game by taking way too many shots.  They get points, but not efficiently, and thus the team loses.  On defense they were two fifths of a unit that was close to the worst in the league.  In terms of rebounding there is some thought that Zach&#039;s lack of positioning on defense, that is, not being out on his man, gave him position for more defensive rebounds.  As an offensive rebounder his numbers are not that good.

Neither player creates much for anyone else, thus the ball stops moving and someone needs to chuck it.  Then the long carom and the transition basket the other way....  We&#039;ve seen too many thirty point quarters.  Hopefully, D&#039;Antoni can make a difference in the teams efficiency but are you really optimistic that these guys are going to beat Garnett or Brand or anyone else?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Cook,<br />
Guys on this site will throw numbers at you ad infinitum but I&#8217;ll give you the summary.</p>
<p>Zach and Jamal both get twenty points a game by taking way too many shots.  They get points, but not efficiently, and thus the team loses.  On defense they were two fifths of a unit that was close to the worst in the league.  In terms of rebounding there is some thought that Zach&#8217;s lack of positioning on defense, that is, not being out on his man, gave him position for more defensive rebounds.  As an offensive rebounder his numbers are not that good.</p>
<p>Neither player creates much for anyone else, thus the ball stops moving and someone needs to chuck it.  Then the long carom and the transition basket the other way&#8230;.  We&#8217;ve seen too many thirty point quarters.  Hopefully, D&#8217;Antoni can make a difference in the teams efficiency but are you really optimistic that these guys are going to beat Garnett or Brand or anyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
