<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knicks 2007 Report Card (A to Z): Channing Frye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: l.wallace</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/#comment-112558</link>
		<dc:creator>l.wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=512#comment-112558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fry will be a good back up thats it, he is not tough enough, i would of loved to see him stay but we need a starter now at that position, so i think it was a good move.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fry will be a good back up thats it, he is not tough enough, i would of loved to see him stay but we need a starter now at that position, so i think it was a good move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam F</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/#comment-109992</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=512#comment-109992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[re: stopmikelupica

good stuff, thats a really interesting observation. i really believe that frye is going to turn into a good player, maybe like a juwan howard with shot blocking, and unfortunately for his sake, without a ridiculous contract. i guess this has nothing to do with the post though, so whatever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: stopmikelupica</p>
<p>good stuff, thats a really interesting observation. i really believe that frye is going to turn into a good player, maybe like a juwan howard with shot blocking, and unfortunately for his sake, without a ridiculous contract. i guess this has nothing to do with the post though, so whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMACK</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/#comment-109983</link>
		<dc:creator>BMACK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=512#comment-109983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MANN YOU GUYS ARE WORRYING ABOUT ZACH AND THE KNICKS REAL PROBLEM IS TH SELF PROCLAIMED BEST PG IN THE LEAGUE.  MARBURY IS A BUM!  HE IS A CANCER AND EVERYONE ELSE KNOW THAT WHEN HE LEAVES A TEAM THEY GO TO THE PLAYOFFS.  TRADING HIM IS LIKE TAKING A WHOLE BOTTLE OF NYQUIL FOR A SMALL COUGH!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MANN YOU GUYS ARE WORRYING ABOUT ZACH AND THE KNICKS REAL PROBLEM IS TH SELF PROCLAIMED BEST PG IN THE LEAGUE.  MARBURY IS A BUM!  HE IS A CANCER AND EVERYONE ELSE KNOW THAT WHEN HE LEAVES A TEAM THEY GO TO THE PLAYOFFS.  TRADING HIM IS LIKE TAKING A WHOLE BOTTLE OF NYQUIL FOR A SMALL COUGH!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/#comment-109975</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=512#comment-109975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dude, you married Courtney Love, you really shouldn&#039;t be criticizing anyone else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude, you married Courtney Love, you really shouldn&#8217;t be criticizing anyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Cobain</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/#comment-109967</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Cobain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=512#comment-109967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Knicks are so stupid.  They traded for fat Zach Randolph who is by far the worst defender in the league, a ball hog, and gets his rebounding stats off his own misses.  Great combo, he and the other fat boy, Curry.  LET THE IMPLOSION BEGIN!!!!  Can you say, the next Jail Blazers, or I mean, Jail Knicks????????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Knicks are so stupid.  They traded for fat Zach Randolph who is by far the worst defender in the league, a ball hog, and gets his rebounding stats off his own misses.  Great combo, he and the other fat boy, Curry.  LET THE IMPLOSION BEGIN!!!!  Can you say, the next Jail Blazers, or I mean, Jail Knicks????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elibangkok</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/#comment-109617</link>
		<dc:creator>Elibangkok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=512#comment-109617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ted Nelson Said: 

&quot;Is it just me or is there a trend of guys confused about their roles or playing roles to which their skill set is not well suited?&quot;

Surely you don&#039;t mean to imply that Isiah is not an even finer coach than he is a GM? Blasphemy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Nelson Said: </p>
<p>&#8220;Is it just me or is there a trend of guys confused about their roles or playing roles to which their skill set is not well suited?&#8221;</p>
<p>Surely you don&#8217;t mean to imply that Isiah is not an even finer coach than he is a GM? Blasphemy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Lechecul</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/#comment-109301</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Lechecul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 03:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=512#comment-109301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;It seems that Isiah likes a certain roughness, or &gt;street credibility, to his players. 

Just say black for pete&#039;s sake!!
We know Zeke likes the blacks more than the euros and Im willing to bet there will never be a euro playing in the most cosmopolitan city in the NBA while he is GM/President/Coach.
Dan Dickau shouldnt make any plans unless he is planning a tan.

Thomas isnt the first &#039;black first&#039; NBAer weve seen, I just find it amazing that we have to talk in code.

Terry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;It seems that Isiah likes a certain roughness, or &gt;street credibility, to his players. </p>
<p>Just say black for pete&#8217;s sake!!<br />
We know Zeke likes the blacks more than the euros and Im willing to bet there will never be a euro playing in the most cosmopolitan city in the NBA while he is GM/President/Coach.<br />
Dan Dickau shouldnt make any plans unless he is planning a tan.</p>
<p>Thomas isnt the first &#8216;black first&#8217; NBAer weve seen, I just find it amazing that we have to talk in code.</p>
<p>Terry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stopmikelupica</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/#comment-109025</link>
		<dc:creator>stopmikelupica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=512#comment-109025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Answered my question, via 82games:

05-06 Frye: 10% of shots were dunks or tips.  26% were &quot;close&quot;, meaning 36% of his FGA were &quot;inside&quot;.  He hit those at 59%.  The 64% that was &quot;jump&quot; he only hit at 41.7%.

O6-07 Frye: 4% dunks/tips.  17% were &quot;close&quot;, hitting at 57 FG% (not too off from the prior year in FG%).  This year, though, 78% of his shots were &quot;jump&quot;, at 38.8 FG%.  So, yeah, his FG% decreased a bit, but the bigger factor seems to be that he was shooting a lot more jumpers from farther away, where is he is a lower % shooter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answered my question, via 82games:</p>
<p>05-06 Frye: 10% of shots were dunks or tips.  26% were &#8220;close&#8221;, meaning 36% of his FGA were &#8220;inside&#8221;.  He hit those at 59%.  The 64% that was &#8220;jump&#8221; he only hit at 41.7%.</p>
<p>O6-07 Frye: 4% dunks/tips.  17% were &#8220;close&#8221;, hitting at 57 FG% (not too off from the prior year in FG%).  This year, though, 78% of his shots were &#8220;jump&#8221;, at 38.8 FG%.  So, yeah, his FG% decreased a bit, but the bigger factor seems to be that he was shooting a lot more jumpers from farther away, where is he is a lower % shooter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stopmikelupica</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/#comment-109023</link>
		<dc:creator>stopmikelupica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=512#comment-109023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little late to this one, but here&#039;s my two cents:

I know how much you guys love the stats, but this one is purely observational... Frye shot was the 10-15 footer his rookie year.  In his second year, it seemed 18-20 footers (a little out of his high % range).  So, my question:  can anyone break down his scoring by distance for both his first and second year?  Is there even a reason for that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little late to this one, but here&#8217;s my two cents:</p>
<p>I know how much you guys love the stats, but this one is purely observational&#8230; Frye shot was the 10-15 footer his rookie year.  In his second year, it seemed 18-20 footers (a little out of his high % range).  So, my question:  can anyone break down his scoring by distance for both his first and second year?  Is there even a reason for that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claudia</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-2007-report-card-a-to-z-channing-frye/#comment-108980</link>
		<dc:creator>claudia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=512#comment-108980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Randolph&#039;s best moves are in the strip joints at 2:30am. Oh I forgot, also his live staged sex shows
in the finer hotels.And sometimes this is even on game night or a big game the next day.

You don&#039;t get it..
Portland just wanted to dump him and dump him good.
We could care less who we got in return.
It&#039;s a statement to Zach. This is what you&#039;re worth:
not much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Randolph&#8217;s best moves are in the strip joints at 2:30am. Oh I forgot, also his live staged sex shows<br />
in the finer hotels.And sometimes this is even on game night or a big game the next day.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t get it..<br />
Portland just wanted to dump him and dump him good.<br />
We could care less who we got in return.<br />
It&#8217;s a statement to Zach. This is what you&#8217;re worth:<br />
not much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
