<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knicks 102, Bucks 88</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:11:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxwell_3g</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/#comment-409893</link>
		<dc:creator>maxwell_3g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 05:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10604#comment-409893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-409820&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-409820&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ruruland&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Amare and Melo are both good passers for their respective positions when they are out on the wings and can see the defense. Neither of them are good passers on the drive, both guys force shots into the paint, which is good and bad. 


Neither guy is long or tall enough to pass over the top of the defense. 


That said, this will be the year they become a dominant offensive combination because there is always going to be playmaking, passing and shooting around them. 


They will each get sections of the game to themselves with optimal spacing. 


Melo at the 4 with Amare as the dive man is basically the most unstoppable play in the league. Melos efficiency either catching and shooting or driving from the slot is off the charts. And Amare might be the best in the league at finishing as a dive man even against the extra help defender. While Chandler might technically be the best dive man in the game, there’s a lot he can’t do that Amare can. 


Remember, we’ve seen very little of Amare and Melo with a true penetrating pg making the puzzle fit. 


IAmare gives the Knicks a chance at the best half-court offense in the league, and there’s not only evidence that Amare is capable of playing solid defense as he did under Woodson, but that he’s actually been much better than his reputation…


&lt;/blockquote&gt;
ruru.  no offense, but this is just crazy talk to me.  its like saying, &quot;If we can convince all of our oponents to agree to a dunk contest to determine who wins the game, James White will be MVP of the league.&quot;  Yes, running pick and rolls with amare as the screener at the 5 and melo as the ball handler at the 4 sounds like a great plan....in a vacuum.  however, as is always the conundrum with amare, if we had a 5 in with him, he could not dive to the hoop, as the lane will be occupied.  if he is the 5 (as you proffer), then our defense is going to...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-409820">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-409820" rel="nofollow">ruruland</a></strong>: Amare and Melo are both good passers for their respective positions when they are out on the wings and can see the defense. Neither of them are good passers on the drive, both guys force shots into the paint, which is good and bad. </p>
<p>Neither guy is long or tall enough to pass over the top of the defense. </p>
<p>That said, this will be the year they become a dominant offensive combination because there is always going to be playmaking, passing and shooting around them. </p>
<p>They will each get sections of the game to themselves with optimal spacing. </p>
<p>Melo at the 4 with Amare as the dive man is basically the most unstoppable play in the league. Melos efficiency either catching and shooting or driving from the slot is off the charts. And Amare might be the best in the league at finishing as a dive man even against the extra help defender. While Chandler might technically be the best dive man in the game, there’s a lot he can’t do that Amare can. </p>
<p>Remember, we’ve seen very little of Amare and Melo with a true penetrating pg making the puzzle fit. </p>
<p>IAmare gives the Knicks a chance at the best half-court offense in the league, and there’s not only evidence that Amare is capable of playing solid defense as he did under Woodson, but that he’s actually been much better than his reputation…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>ruru.  no offense, but this is just crazy talk to me.  its like saying, &#8220;If we can convince all of our oponents to agree to a dunk contest to determine who wins the game, James White will be MVP of the league.&#8221;  Yes, running pick and rolls with amare as the screener at the 5 and melo as the ball handler at the 4 sounds like a great plan&#8230;.in a vacuum.  however, as is always the conundrum with amare, if we had a 5 in with him, he could not dive to the hoop, as the lane will be occupied.  if he is the 5 (as you proffer), then our defense is going to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juany8</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/#comment-409858</link>
		<dc:creator>Juany8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10604#comment-409858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-409830&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-409830&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jon&#032;abbey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
those 6 defensive rebounds a game look better once you see that Chandler has only been getting 4.8 so far this year.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ha! To be fair Chandler hasn&#039;t been consistently good this year, but he looked great the past 2 games, overtime loss and all. And I Don&#039;t mean that he got a high percentage of putbacks in, his defense was a lot better than it has been. The rebounding is becoming a serious issue though]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-409830">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-409830" rel="nofollow">jon&#032;abbey</a></strong>:<br />
those 6 defensive rebounds a game look better once you see that Chandler has only been getting 4.8 so far this year.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ha! To be fair Chandler hasn&#8217;t been consistently good this year, but he looked great the past 2 games, overtime loss and all. And I Don&#8217;t mean that he got a high percentage of putbacks in, his defense was a lot better than it has been. The rebounding is becoming a serious issue though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max fisher-cohen</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/#comment-409837</link>
		<dc:creator>max fisher-cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10604#comment-409837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Johnno, I agree there. If the Woodson really carefully orchestrates things so that Melo, Chandler and Amare (particularly amare and chandler) don&#039;t spend a lot of time together, I could see Amar&#039;e being a help to the team. Big if though, especially if all three start and close the game together, the two things most players get worked up about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Johnno, I agree there. If the Woodson really carefully orchestrates things so that Melo, Chandler and Amare (particularly amare and chandler) don&#8217;t spend a lot of time together, I could see Amar&#8217;e being a help to the team. Big if though, especially if all three start and close the game together, the two things most players get worked up about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnno</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/#comment-409835</link>
		<dc:creator>johnno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10604#comment-409835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-409823&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-409823&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;daJudge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: I still think he would be more effective off the bench, limiting his time with Melo&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I think that there is waaayy too much emphasis on whether Amare starts or comes off the bench.  Let&#039;s say that, once he is in game shape, he plays 30 minutes a night (either starting or off the bench) and Melo plays 35 minutes a night.  Woodson will always have one of them on the floor (just like D&#039;Antoni did), so that means that Amare will get 13 minutes without Melo, and Melo will get 18 minutes without Amare.  They will be on the court together for 17 minutes.  I think that they will be able to work together for 17 minutes, especially if Chandler is sitting for part of the time and Amare is playing the 5.  You don&#039;t think that a lineup of Amare, Melo, Novak, Kidd and Felton will space the floor enough for both of them to be effective?  Don&#039;t forget -- for the 25 or so games that they played together after the trade, Melo averaged 26 points and Amare averaged 24 on 50% shooting.  The problem then was defense, not offense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-409823">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-409823" rel="nofollow">daJudge</a></strong>: I still think he would be more effective off the bench, limiting his time with Melo</p></blockquote>
<p>I think that there is waaayy too much emphasis on whether Amare starts or comes off the bench.  Let&#8217;s say that, once he is in game shape, he plays 30 minutes a night (either starting or off the bench) and Melo plays 35 minutes a night.  Woodson will always have one of them on the floor (just like D&#8217;Antoni did), so that means that Amare will get 13 minutes without Melo, and Melo will get 18 minutes without Amare.  They will be on the court together for 17 minutes.  I think that they will be able to work together for 17 minutes, especially if Chandler is sitting for part of the time and Amare is playing the 5.  You don&#8217;t think that a lineup of Amare, Melo, Novak, Kidd and Felton will space the floor enough for both of them to be effective?  Don&#8217;t forget &#8212; for the 25 or so games that they played together after the trade, Melo averaged 26 points and Amare averaged 24 on 50% shooting.  The problem then was defense, not offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC Knickfan</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/#comment-409833</link>
		<dc:creator>JC Knickfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10604#comment-409833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I concur with Juany, Amare is one of the worst team rebounder I&#039;ve ever seen at PF.   His PNR defense also leaves very little room for desire.   I think you can find several video&#039;s on youtube highlighting where he let guard drive by him after a pick and he provides no help defense. 

If Woodson can correct, he better be coach of year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with Juany, Amare is one of the worst team rebounder I&#8217;ve ever seen at PF.   His PNR defense also leaves very little room for desire.   I think you can find several video&#8217;s on youtube highlighting where he let guard drive by him after a pick and he provides no help defense. </p>
<p>If Woodson can correct, he better be coach of year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/#comment-409830</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10604#comment-409830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[those 6 defensive rebounds a game look better once you see that Chandler has only been getting 4.8 so far this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those 6 defensive rebounds a game look better once you see that Chandler has only been getting 4.8 so far this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juany8</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/#comment-409828</link>
		<dc:creator>Juany8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10604#comment-409828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simply looking at the facts, I agree with Ruru that while this is the most consistently well Melo has ever played through a season, he&#039;s played just as well before. Nothing I&#039;m seeing is surprising me, other than the fact that he is making the right play 85%+ of the time whereas before it was closer to 60-70%. I&#039;ve seen Melo make all these passes, all these plays, and playing defense this hard. Amar&#039;e.... I&#039;ve seen him actually hustle on defense occasionally but never at an elite level, and never for even an entire game. He doesn&#039;t seem to understand that he has to box out, and for the life of me I don&#039;t see how he would have suddenly picked up a fundamental skill like team rebounding principles over the summer. He can be a fantastic offensive player, but there is no getting around the fact that he can&#039;t shoot 3&#039;s, has never been a serious post player, and can&#039;t pass well enough to work with Chandler from the high post or pass it when he&#039;s cutting after his man leaves to stop a diving Amar&#039;e.

Melo and JR just needed to buy into a team concept and consistently play at the level they had showed they were capable of. Harder to hope for Amar&#039;e to magically transform into something he&#039;s never been. Even if he plays the best offense of his career it only really helps the bench scoring, when Chandler and Amar&#039;e are both on the floor it simply makes more sense to run pick and rolls with Chandler since Amar&#039;e is actually capable of spacing the floor and keeping a man out of the paint, Chandler isn&#039;t. If you&#039;re mostly going to be using Amar&#039;e for spacing and cutting in any lineups with Chandler, what the hell is the point of playing him instead of JR at the end of games? Amar&#039;e is NOT a better rebounder at the 4 than Melo, he gets 6 defensive rebounds a game to Melo&#039;s 5, and since he doesn&#039;t box out his rebounds actually overstate his impact. Just like shot creation exists, rebound creation exists too]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply looking at the facts, I agree with Ruru that while this is the most consistently well Melo has ever played through a season, he&#8217;s played just as well before. Nothing I&#8217;m seeing is surprising me, other than the fact that he is making the right play 85%+ of the time whereas before it was closer to 60-70%. I&#8217;ve seen Melo make all these passes, all these plays, and playing defense this hard. Amar&#8217;e&#8230;. I&#8217;ve seen him actually hustle on defense occasionally but never at an elite level, and never for even an entire game. He doesn&#8217;t seem to understand that he has to box out, and for the life of me I don&#8217;t see how he would have suddenly picked up a fundamental skill like team rebounding principles over the summer. He can be a fantastic offensive player, but there is no getting around the fact that he can&#8217;t shoot 3&#8242;s, has never been a serious post player, and can&#8217;t pass well enough to work with Chandler from the high post or pass it when he&#8217;s cutting after his man leaves to stop a diving Amar&#8217;e.</p>
<p>Melo and JR just needed to buy into a team concept and consistently play at the level they had showed they were capable of. Harder to hope for Amar&#8217;e to magically transform into something he&#8217;s never been. Even if he plays the best offense of his career it only really helps the bench scoring, when Chandler and Amar&#8217;e are both on the floor it simply makes more sense to run pick and rolls with Chandler since Amar&#8217;e is actually capable of spacing the floor and keeping a man out of the paint, Chandler isn&#8217;t. If you&#8217;re mostly going to be using Amar&#8217;e for spacing and cutting in any lineups with Chandler, what the hell is the point of playing him instead of JR at the end of games? Amar&#8217;e is NOT a better rebounder at the 4 than Melo, he gets 6 defensive rebounds a game to Melo&#8217;s 5, and since he doesn&#8217;t box out his rebounds actually overstate his impact. Just like shot creation exists, rebound creation exists too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d-mar</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/#comment-409827</link>
		<dc:creator>d-mar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10604#comment-409827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Woody gets one of the game balls for this one. We all agreed beforehand that this was going to be a tough game coming off the Brooklyn loss, and he recognized that he needed to make in-game adjustments to keep the Bucks at bay. Yanking Thomas early and starting Novak in the 3rd quarter were really smart moves that paid dividends. That&#039;s what coaches are paid to do, but I like that Woodson isn&#039;t afraid to pull the trigger when necessary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Woody gets one of the game balls for this one. We all agreed beforehand that this was going to be a tough game coming off the Brooklyn loss, and he recognized that he needed to make in-game adjustments to keep the Bucks at bay. Yanking Thomas early and starting Novak in the 3rd quarter were really smart moves that paid dividends. That&#8217;s what coaches are paid to do, but I like that Woodson isn&#8217;t afraid to pull the trigger when necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/#comment-409826</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10604#comment-409826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, one thing is that Amar&#039;e has always been needed on the floor for his offense, so he&#039;s spent his career trying to stay out of foul trouble which can quickly lead to sieve-like defense. with this team, he doesn&#039;t have to worry about that, since he&#039;s not going to be playing huge minutes and if he does get into foul trouble, it&#039;s not a big issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, one thing is that Amar&#8217;e has always been needed on the floor for his offense, so he&#8217;s spent his career trying to stay out of foul trouble which can quickly lead to sieve-like defense. with this team, he doesn&#8217;t have to worry about that, since he&#8217;s not going to be playing huge minutes and if he does get into foul trouble, it&#8217;s not a big issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hubert Davis</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks-102-bucks-88/#comment-409825</link>
		<dc:creator>Hubert Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=10604#comment-409825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surprising use of &quot;tit&quot; as an adjective in the Melo write up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprising use of &#8220;tit&#8221; as an adjective in the Melo write up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
