<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knicks’ Week in Advance 11/24/2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%E2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%e2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:27:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%e2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/#comment-272162</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1100#comment-272162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Duhon, too - and he is a better fit - but if Marbury were playing those minutes, I don&#039;t think it would be a big difference. (More likely - if Marbury were getting some of the Nate/Crawford/Q minutes) If Curry were playing in place of Lee/Randolph/Chandler, though... 

Benching Curry is one of those moves that looks obvious in retrospect, but wasn&#039;t. Less than a year ago people (here, and around the league) still talked him up as a potential All-Star. 

Similar thing in Phoenix -- how many coaches would have played Stoudamire at the 4, Marion at the 3, used a bad but traditional center like Steven Hunter or Pat Burke, and had Q or Joe Johnson come off the bench? Most NBA coaches, I think... but D&#039;Antoni went with the less traditional lineup. Obvious now -- but I remember some raised eyebrows when he first put Stoudamire &amp; Marion at the 4 &amp; 5.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Duhon, too &#8211; and he is a better fit &#8211; but if Marbury were playing those minutes, I don&#8217;t think it would be a big difference. (More likely &#8211; if Marbury were getting some of the Nate/Crawford/Q minutes) If Curry were playing in place of Lee/Randolph/Chandler, though&#8230; </p>
<p>Benching Curry is one of those moves that looks obvious in retrospect, but wasn&#8217;t. Less than a year ago people (here, and around the league) still talked him up as a potential All-Star. </p>
<p>Similar thing in Phoenix &#8212; how many coaches would have played Stoudamire at the 4, Marion at the 3, used a bad but traditional center like Steven Hunter or Pat Burke, and had Q or Joe Johnson come off the bench? Most NBA coaches, I think&#8230; but D&#8217;Antoni went with the less traditional lineup. Obvious now &#8212; but I remember some raised eyebrows when he first put Stoudamire &#038; Marion at the 4 &#038; 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%e2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/#comment-272160</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1100#comment-272160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s not just Marbury&#039;s subtraction, it&#039;s Duhon&#039;s addition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s not just Marbury&#8217;s subtraction, it&#8217;s Duhon&#8217;s addition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%e2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/#comment-272159</link>
		<dc:creator>caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1100#comment-272159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

&lt;blockquote&gt;Marbury for Duhon, I’d say that’s an even bigger component. &lt;/blockquote&gt;



For practical purposes, Marbs did get hit by a bus last Christmas -- as he went from 74 games played to 24, the Knicks went from 33 wins 5o 23. I don&#039;t think his absence is the key to our improvement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Marbury for Duhon, I’d say that’s an even bigger component. </p></blockquote>
<p>For practical purposes, Marbs did get hit by a bus last Christmas &#8212; as he went from 74 games played to 24, the Knicks went from 33 wins 5o 23. I don&#8217;t think his absence is the key to our improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Nelson</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%e2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/#comment-272122</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1100#comment-272122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Harrington&#039;s ego was all in a twist in GS because he wasn&#039;t playing 40 mpg and wasn&#039;t allowed to &quot;do anything I want&quot; (I really saw a quote where he said more or less that). If you bring him in here and don&#039;t start him he&#039;s not going to be too happy. WC is a 2nd year guy who wasn&#039;t even playing last season, so he&#039;s more likely to suck it up. D&#039;Antoni might have a more strategical reason than that, but I just think Harrington is the new &quot;franchise player.&quot; It is a little bit of a cheap shot to sit someone who has been working hard for you in favor of a new guy...

-----------------------------------------------------

I don&#039;t know how many wins the Knicks would have ended up with (not making the trade), but I do think D&#039;Antoni&#039;s impact goes beyond personnel decisions (assigning playing time). You have to also think that Isiah won 33 games with a very similar roster 2 seasons ago (and a lot of people would argue they would have won several more if not for injuries). So I think 23 wins was an outlier. The Knicks were basically playing laid back pick-up games against NBA teams last season with absolutely no structure on either side of the ball.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Harrington&#8217;s ego was all in a twist in GS because he wasn&#8217;t playing 40 mpg and wasn&#8217;t allowed to &#8220;do anything I want&#8221; (I really saw a quote where he said more or less that). If you bring him in here and don&#8217;t start him he&#8217;s not going to be too happy. WC is a 2nd year guy who wasn&#8217;t even playing last season, so he&#8217;s more likely to suck it up. D&#8217;Antoni might have a more strategical reason than that, but I just think Harrington is the new &#8220;franchise player.&#8221; It is a little bit of a cheap shot to sit someone who has been working hard for you in favor of a new guy&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how many wins the Knicks would have ended up with (not making the trade), but I do think D&#8217;Antoni&#8217;s impact goes beyond personnel decisions (assigning playing time). You have to also think that Isiah won 33 games with a very similar roster 2 seasons ago (and a lot of people would argue they would have won several more if not for injuries). So I think 23 wins was an outlier. The Knicks were basically playing laid back pick-up games against NBA teams last season with absolutely no structure on either side of the ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBlueAL</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%e2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/#comment-272107</link>
		<dc:creator>BigBlueAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1100#comment-272107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I prefer &quot;Addicted to Love&quot; when it comes to Robert Palmer hits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer &#8220;Addicted to Love&#8221; when it comes to Robert Palmer hits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%e2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/#comment-272104</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1100#comment-272104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;when we analyze why the Knicks got better on the court, it will be because D’Antoni had the balls to sit Curry altogether. &quot;

and Marbury for Duhon, I&#039;d say that&#039;s an even bigger component. 

Owen was a year ahead of me in fully realizing Curry&#039;s myriad limitations, but I&#039;d like to give myself some credit for showing D&#039;Antoni the way, from the &quot;How Many Games Will The Knicks Win?&quot; thread going into LAST season:

&quot;I’m going with the pessimistic approach this year, 31-51. if Marbury and Curry get hit by a bus this afternoon, 38-44.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;when we analyze why the Knicks got better on the court, it will be because D’Antoni had the balls to sit Curry altogether. &#8221;</p>
<p>and Marbury for Duhon, I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s an even bigger component. </p>
<p>Owen was a year ahead of me in fully realizing Curry&#8217;s myriad limitations, but I&#8217;d like to give myself some credit for showing D&#8217;Antoni the way, from the &#8220;How Many Games Will The Knicks Win?&#8221; thread going into LAST season:</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m going with the pessimistic approach this year, 31-51. if Marbury and Curry get hit by a bus this afternoon, 38-44.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%e2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/#comment-272100</link>
		<dc:creator>caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1100#comment-272100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q certainly has his limitations at the 2 (especially foot speed) but I don&#039;t know that Mobley is better, all in all. It might not matter - Nate will play a lot of minutes at the 2, and Q will play minutes at the 3, but I don&#039;t think D&#039;Antoni is wed to small-ball -- his modus operandi has always been to get the best players on the floor. It just happened that in Phoenix and here, that meant undersized power forwards and centers. 

re: coaching impact - there is a big difference between terrible coaches and pretty good coaches, because terrible coaches (IT) don&#039;t know who their best players are... but once the best players are getting most of the minutes, the coach has only a small impact. Jackson vs. Rivers won&#039;t decide the Finals, unless it&#039;s very, very close. 

WHen we look back at this year, the big story will be clearing salary for 2010... but when we analyze why the Knicks got better on the court, it will be because D&#039;Antoni had the balls to sit Curry altogether. Don&#039;t know how many coaches would have done that, &quot;bad knee&quot; and all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q certainly has his limitations at the 2 (especially foot speed) but I don&#8217;t know that Mobley is better, all in all. It might not matter &#8211; Nate will play a lot of minutes at the 2, and Q will play minutes at the 3, but I don&#8217;t think D&#8217;Antoni is wed to small-ball &#8212; his modus operandi has always been to get the best players on the floor. It just happened that in Phoenix and here, that meant undersized power forwards and centers. </p>
<p>re: coaching impact &#8211; there is a big difference between terrible coaches and pretty good coaches, because terrible coaches (IT) don&#8217;t know who their best players are&#8230; but once the best players are getting most of the minutes, the coach has only a small impact. Jackson vs. Rivers won&#8217;t decide the Finals, unless it&#8217;s very, very close. </p>
<p>WHen we look back at this year, the big story will be clearing salary for 2010&#8230; but when we analyze why the Knicks got better on the court, it will be because D&#8217;Antoni had the balls to sit Curry altogether. Don&#8217;t know how many coaches would have done that, &#8220;bad knee&#8221; and all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gian Casimiro (SSoM)</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%e2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/#comment-272099</link>
		<dc:creator>Gian Casimiro (SSoM)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1100#comment-272099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, what’s the over/under on how many minutes Mardy Collins will play tonight?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Neither Zach or Mardy will play tonight.

http://www.presstelegram.com/clippers/ci_11064860]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, what’s the over/under on how many minutes Mardy Collins will play tonight?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Neither Zach or Mardy will play tonight.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.presstelegram.com/clippers/ci_11064860" rel="nofollow">http://www.presstelegram.com/clippers/ci_11064860</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDM</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%e2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/#comment-272096</link>
		<dc:creator>TDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1100#comment-272096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, what&#039;s the over/under on how many minutes Mardy Collins will play tonight?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what&#8217;s the over/under on how many minutes Mardy Collins will play tonight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gian Casimiro (SSoM)</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/knicks%e2%80%99-week-in-advance-11242008/#comment-272091</link>
		<dc:creator>Gian Casimiro (SSoM)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1100#comment-272091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Men&#039;s journal with a lengthy interview with D&#039;Antoni about his coaching philosophy:
http://www.mensjournal.com/mike-dantoni]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men&#8217;s journal with a lengthy interview with D&#8217;Antoni about his coaching philosophy:<br />
<a href="http://www.mensjournal.com/mike-dantoni" rel="nofollow">http://www.mensjournal.com/mike-dantoni</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
