<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heat 100, Knicks 67</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:08:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: errkgolub</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/#comment-388188</link>
		<dc:creator>errkgolub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=9794#comment-388188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a few days of brewing over a horribly officiated Game 1 of what should have been a competitive series, I emailed to league about it. Some of you may want to as well.
http://www.nba.com/email_us/contact_us.html
I highly doubt they&#039;ll do anything about it, but it is 1) a good way to vend frustrations and 2) a great way to let the league know that it hasn&#039;t gone unnoticed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a few days of brewing over a horribly officiated Game 1 of what should have been a competitive series, I emailed to league about it. Some of you may want to as well.<br />
<a href="http://www.nba.com/email_us/contact_us.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nba.com/email_us/contact_us.html</a><br />
I highly doubt they&#8217;ll do anything about it, but it is 1) a good way to vend frustrations and 2) a great way to let the league know that it hasn&#8217;t gone unnoticed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ognyc</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/#comment-388136</link>
		<dc:creator>ognyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=9794#comment-388136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is probably more important to this sports blog than most...but for the NYC water supply, the fracking doesnt have to occur in heavily populated areas to contaminate water for 12-16 mil. people (if you include surrounding areas), fracking has to happen where the water comes from, which in this case is the countries (worlds?) largest UNFILTERED water supply, and unless you like the taste of radioactivity and/or benzene in your tap water, and the increase (yes, increase) in GHGs as a result of fracking, look for the source of the funding producing your infotainment 
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-387696&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-387696&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Owen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
Robert – Fracking is actually something I know a fair amount about. While I have reservations about fracking in heavily populated areas, I think the concerns about it, while having merit in some cases,overall are highly exaggerated. 


If it were a choice between fracking and not fracking I might agree with you. But it’s not. It’s a choice between getting base load power from coal or from natural. gas.And that is a very very very easy choice from an economic, environmental, and public health perspective.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is probably more important to this sports blog than most&#8230;but for the NYC water supply, the fracking doesnt have to occur in heavily populated areas to contaminate water for 12-16 mil. people (if you include surrounding areas), fracking has to happen where the water comes from, which in this case is the countries (worlds?) largest UNFILTERED water supply, and unless you like the taste of radioactivity and/or benzene in your tap water, and the increase (yes, increase) in GHGs as a result of fracking, look for the source of the funding producing your infotainment </p>
<blockquote cite="comment-387696">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-387696" rel="nofollow">Owen</a></strong>:<br />
Robert – Fracking is actually something I know a fair amount about. While I have reservations about fracking in heavily populated areas, I think the concerns about it, while having merit in some cases,overall are highly exaggerated. </p>
<p>If it were a choice between fracking and not fracking I might agree with you. But it’s not. It’s a choice between getting base load power from coal or from natural. gas.And that is a very very very easy choice from an economic, environmental, and public health perspective.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ognyc</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/#comment-388130</link>
		<dc:creator>ognyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=9794#comment-388130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah...except the ones that are defending the practice also are lining their pockets with natural gas company cash...which makes them less scientist and more...shill...in order to keep this polite, I won&#039;t use the appropriate term...and now back to your regularly scheduled ref bashing...
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-387678&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-387678&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#050;FOR&#049;&#056;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: It’s become a politicized so I won’t discuss it here either.Side A has their scientists saying one thing and side B has their scientists, and if you disagree with side A/side B then you’re a knuckledragging mouthbreather.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah&#8230;except the ones that are defending the practice also are lining their pockets with natural gas company cash&#8230;which makes them less scientist and more&#8230;shill&#8230;in order to keep this polite, I won&#8217;t use the appropriate term&#8230;and now back to your regularly scheduled ref bashing&#8230;</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-387678">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-387678" rel="nofollow">&#050;FOR&#049;&#056;</a></strong>: It’s become a politicized so I won’t discuss it here either.Side A has their scientists saying one thing and side B has their scientists, and if you disagree with side A/side B then you’re a knuckledragging mouthbreather.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ognyc</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/#comment-388127</link>
		<dc:creator>ognyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=9794#comment-388127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this.
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-387663&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-387663&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Robert&#032;Silverman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
I LOATHE Oklahoma City. I don’t know how they’ve escaped backlash for one, screwing Seattle, and two, being owned by Natural Gas Barons that are destroying the country’s water supply


&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this.</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-387663">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-387663" rel="nofollow">Robert&#032;Silverman</a></strong>:<br />
I LOATHE Oklahoma City. I don’t know how they’ve escaped backlash for one, screwing Seattle, and two, being owned by Natural Gas Barons that are destroying the country’s water supply</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Infamous Cdiggy</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/#comment-387753</link>
		<dc:creator>The Infamous Cdiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=9794#comment-387753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-387729&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-387729&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Thomas&#032;B&#046;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: ... you hear “Kevin Durant is on fire.” It either means he is shooting the ball well, or he just took a sip of West Virginia tap water.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-387710&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-387710&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#050;FOR&#049;&#056;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Too bad we can’t burn bricks for fuel

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It takes a irrefutable EPIC FAIL of a loss- and I mean EPIC as in feeling like you got hit with every Street Fighter character&#039;s special move ALL AT ONCE + Goku&#039;s Kamehameha Wave + Ichigo&#039;s Getsoga Tencho - for you guys to come up with your best writeups and material of the year.  Talk about laughing off your pain.

I think this season is a wrap. I hope I&#039;m wrong. 

Go Knicks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-387729">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-387729" rel="nofollow">Thomas&#032;B&#046;</a></strong>: &#8230; you hear “Kevin Durant is on fire.” It either means he is shooting the ball well, or he just took a sip of West Virginia tap water.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote cite="comment-387710">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-387710" rel="nofollow">&#050;FOR&#049;&#056;</a></strong>: Too bad we can’t burn bricks for fuel</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It takes a irrefutable EPIC FAIL of a loss- and I mean EPIC as in feeling like you got hit with every Street Fighter character&#8217;s special move ALL AT ONCE + Goku&#8217;s Kamehameha Wave + Ichigo&#8217;s Getsoga Tencho &#8211; for you guys to come up with your best writeups and material of the year.  Talk about laughing off your pain.</p>
<p>I think this season is a wrap. I hope I&#8217;m wrong. </p>
<p>Go Knicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ephus</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/#comment-387744</link>
		<dc:creator>ephus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=9794#comment-387744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-387726&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-387726&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brian&#032;Cronin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Brian Cronin
April 29, 2012 at 4:24 am
So anyway. Do we have any chance of keeping any of Lin/Novak/Smith next season? We might as well talk about their chances in 2013.

I’d say roughly a 30% chance.

There’s a 100% chance Lin will be back (maybe 99%).
I’d give Smith a 60% chance.
And Novak a 55% chance.

All together that comes out to roughly a 30% chance.

I’m probably too high on Smith and Novak, though. I just get a good feeling about both (and “feeling” is all we have to go on, since logic dictates they both leave).

  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I hope that you are correct, but there is nothing but hope behind your analysis.  If the Knicks use the MLE on Lin (as they must), then they would only have the Bi-annual Exception ($2 million/year) for Novak and to hope that JR Smith exercises his $2.5 million option for next year.  Novak would have to walk away from the mini-MLE (at least), which would be $3 million/year.  Smith should expect a full MLE offer ($5 million/year).    Most importantly, they would have to take the hit for at least two years before the Knicks could gain full Bird rights (and be able to bid above the MLE).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-387726">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-387726" rel="nofollow">Brian&#032;Cronin</a></strong>: Brian Cronin<br />
April 29, 2012 at 4:24 am<br />
So anyway. Do we have any chance of keeping any of Lin/Novak/Smith next season? We might as well talk about their chances in 2013.</p>
<p>I’d say roughly a 30% chance.</p>
<p>There’s a 100% chance Lin will be back (maybe 99%).<br />
I’d give Smith a 60% chance.<br />
And Novak a 55% chance.</p>
<p>All together that comes out to roughly a 30% chance.</p>
<p>I’m probably too high on Smith and Novak, though. I just get a good feeling about both (and “feeling” is all we have to go on, since logic dictates they both leave).</p>
<p>  </p></blockquote>
<p>I hope that you are correct, but there is nothing but hope behind your analysis.  If the Knicks use the MLE on Lin (as they must), then they would only have the Bi-annual Exception ($2 million/year) for Novak and to hope that JR Smith exercises his $2.5 million option for next year.  Novak would have to walk away from the mini-MLE (at least), which would be $3 million/year.  Smith should expect a full MLE offer ($5 million/year).    Most importantly, they would have to take the hit for at least two years before the Knicks could gain full Bird rights (and be able to bid above the MLE).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cavan</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/#comment-387740</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cavan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=9794#comment-387740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-387729&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-387729&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Thomas&#032;B&#046;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;:  If you hear “Kevin Durant is on fire.” It either means he is shooting the ball well, or he just took a sip of West Virginia tap water.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Dude, I just laughed so hard it made my dog cower in the corner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-387729">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-387729" rel="nofollow">Thomas&#32;B&#46;</a></strong>:  If you hear “Kevin Durant is on fire.” It either means he is shooting the ball well, or he just took a sip of West Virginia tap water.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dude, I just laughed so hard it made my dog cower in the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duck d'Anjou</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/#comment-387735</link>
		<dc:creator>Duck d'Anjou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=9794#comment-387735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert, I concur that rooting for a team owned by child abusers would be sinful; however, the Dolans earn high marks for detestable behavior, which for me rank with child abuse and fracking. I feel as the Girondists must have felt, when they were trying to save France; how to do it without killing the king.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I concur that rooting for a team owned by child abusers would be sinful; however, the Dolans earn high marks for detestable behavior, which for me rank with child abuse and fracking. I feel as the Girondists must have felt, when they were trying to save France; how to do it without killing the king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Almeida</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/#comment-387734</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno Almeida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=9794#comment-387734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-387651&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-387651&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ruruland&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
Harden gets an unbelievable whistle. I don’t understand how these things work sometimes.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

you do realize that Carmelo averages 7 fta per 36 and Harden averages 6.8?

stop the whistle whining, for god&#039;s sake, it makes no sense at all.

nice recap Robert... as for the game, well, nothing out of the ordinary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-387651">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-387651" rel="nofollow">ruruland</a></strong>:<br />
Harden gets an unbelievable whistle. I don’t understand how these things work sometimes.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>you do realize that Carmelo averages 7 fta per 36 and Harden averages 6.8?</p>
<p>stop the whistle whining, for god&#8217;s sake, it makes no sense at all.</p>
<p>nice recap Robert&#8230; as for the game, well, nothing out of the ordinary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/heat-100-knicks-67/#comment-387730</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=9794#comment-387730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, methane is a legitimate issue. But again, far from a dealbreaker.

I can&#039;t believe we are having a conversation that makes Dolan look good. 

He is still the antichrist people, get a grip....

And go Knicks!!!



&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-387718&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-387718&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Robert&#032;Silverman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: It’s not an alternative. When methane escapes from fracking operations unburned, that CH4 is a far more potent greenhouse gas than CO2 – and the early science indicates that lots and lots of methane escapes from fracking operations, enough to make them worse than coal mines over time.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, methane is a legitimate issue. But again, far from a dealbreaker.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe we are having a conversation that makes Dolan look good. </p>
<p>He is still the antichrist people, get a grip&#8230;.</p>
<p>And go Knicks!!!</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-387718">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-387718" rel="nofollow">Robert&#32;Silverman</a></strong>: It’s not an alternative. When methane escapes from fracking operations unburned, that CH4 is a far more potent greenhouse gas than CO2 – and the early science indicates that lots and lots of methane escapes from fracking operations, enough to make them worse than coal mines over time.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
