<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hawks 99, Knicks 90</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:05:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abasi</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/#comment-301977</link>
		<dc:creator>Abasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=5143#comment-301977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@18

Z,
The Honorable was joking, obviously. My response to him was clearly meant as a joke, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@18</p>
<p>Z,<br />
The Honorable was joking, obviously. My response to him was clearly meant as a joke, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-man</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/#comment-301974</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=5143#comment-301974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it me, or does the refereeing seem more inconsistent than usual, especially on no-calls for drivers?  I watched the replay of Stephen Jackson getting killed on his way to the hoop and can&#039;t blame him for going off (even though he is one of my least favorite NBA players.)

PS why waste time speculating on LeBron trades? He ain&#039;t going anywhere for at least the next 3 years, and Miami would never trade him here of all places.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it me, or does the refereeing seem more inconsistent than usual, especially on no-calls for drivers?  I watched the replay of Stephen Jackson getting killed on his way to the hoop and can&#8217;t blame him for going off (even though he is one of my least favorite NBA players.)</p>
<p>PS why waste time speculating on LeBron trades? He ain&#8217;t going anywhere for at least the next 3 years, and Miami would never trade him here of all places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d-mar</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/#comment-301973</link>
		<dc:creator>d-mar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=5143#comment-301973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brandon Jennings attempted a ridiculous 13 3-pointers last night. 6 of them went in and they did win the game vs. the Bobcats, but 13 attempts by one player, wow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon Jennings attempted a ridiculous 13 3-pointers last night. 6 of them went in and they did win the game vs. the Bobcats, but 13 attempts by one player, wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abasi</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/#comment-301972</link>
		<dc:creator>Abasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=5143#comment-301972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too much, Honorable. I&#039;d do Lebron &amp; Haslem (the Knicks always demand that at least one of the players is injured) straight up for Roger Mason &amp; Herb Williams (Riley -taking over soon - wants to be the first NBA coach to use 10 useless centers)


:-)
 
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-301970&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-301970&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: I’d give up Eddy Curry, Wilson Chandler, and a 1st-rounder for LeBron James. I mean, he’s obvious not a “winner,” so he can’t be worth that much.Right? ; )&#160;&#160;&lt;a title=&quot;Click here or select text to quote comment&quot; href=&quot;void(null)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(Quote)&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too much, Honorable. I&#8217;d do Lebron &amp; Haslem (the Knicks always demand that at least one of the players is injured) straight up for Roger Mason &amp; Herb Williams (Riley -taking over soon &#8211; wants to be the first NBA coach to use 10 useless centers)</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-301970">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-301970" rel="nofollow">The&#032;Honorable&#032;Cock&#032;Jowles</a></strong>: I’d give up Eddy Curry, Wilson Chandler, and a 1st-rounder for LeBron James. I mean, he’s obvious not a “winner,” so he can’t be worth that much.Right? ; )&nbsp;&nbsp;<a title="Click here or select text to quote comment" href="void(null)" rel="nofollow">(Quote)</a>
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abasi</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/#comment-301971</link>
		<dc:creator>Abasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=5143#comment-301971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Knicks are next to last in Opponent&#039;s Average Points in the Paint this year (next to Phoenix). Last year they were 28th worst (out of 30 teams).

Teams are just driving to the basket for layups and monster dunks.

Last year the team was  fairly different - but the defense was equally bad. I put the blame squarely on the coach&#039;s shoulders,  even though I know making D&#039;Antoni responsible for the Knicks play is not very popular in this blog. At some point, though, we won&#039;t be able to ignore the writing on the wall any longer. Hopefully it will happen sooner than later - as a Knicks fan, I don&#039;t want July 2011 to come with management talking about &quot;starting the re-building process&quot;, because it was supposed to have started 2 years ago,  but the bad coaching decisions has the Knicks playing no better that Isiah&#039;s teams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Knicks are next to last in Opponent&#8217;s Average Points in the Paint this year (next to Phoenix). Last year they were 28th worst (out of 30 teams).</p>
<p>Teams are just driving to the basket for layups and monster dunks.</p>
<p>Last year the team was  fairly different &#8211; but the defense was equally bad. I put the blame squarely on the coach&#8217;s shoulders,  even though I know making D&#8217;Antoni responsible for the Knicks play is not very popular in this blog. At some point, though, we won&#8217;t be able to ignore the writing on the wall any longer. Hopefully it will happen sooner than later &#8211; as a Knicks fan, I don&#8217;t want July 2011 to come with management talking about &#8220;starting the re-building process&#8221;, because it was supposed to have started 2 years ago,  but the bad coaching decisions has the Knicks playing no better that Isiah&#8217;s teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Honorable Cock Jowles</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/#comment-301970</link>
		<dc:creator>The Honorable Cock Jowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=5143#comment-301970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d give up Eddy Curry, Wilson Chandler, and a 1st-rounder for LeBron James. I mean, he&#039;s obvious not a &quot;winner,&quot; so he can&#039;t be worth that much.

Right? ; )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d give up Eddy Curry, Wilson Chandler, and a 1st-rounder for LeBron James. I mean, he&#8217;s obvious not a &#8220;winner,&#8221; so he can&#8217;t be worth that much.</p>
<p>Right? ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shad0wF0x</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/#comment-301969</link>
		<dc:creator>Shad0wF0x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=5143#comment-301969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTW, how do I put an avatar next to my screenname?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, how do I put an avatar next to my screenname?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shad0wF0x</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/#comment-301968</link>
		<dc:creator>Shad0wF0x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=5143#comment-301968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In any case, a loss to the Hawks, the supposed 4th best team in the east and currently ranked #4 in terms of conference wins isn&#039;t really a bad thing. A loss to the Pistons today would just piss me off though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In any case, a loss to the Hawks, the supposed 4th best team in the east and currently ranked #4 in terms of conference wins isn&#8217;t really a bad thing. A loss to the Pistons today would just piss me off though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shad0wF0x</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/#comment-301967</link>
		<dc:creator>Shad0wF0x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=5143#comment-301967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-301962&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-301962&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BigBlueAL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: ess-dog, the Knicks actually held the Hawks to 43.8% shooting today and shot 47.3% themselves.Like you said the difference in the game was 3pt shooting where the Hawks made 6 more 3?s than the Knicks.Abasi, the Knicks came into today 19th in defensive efficiency and actually played pretty good defense today.They lead the league in shot blocks and are 5th in forcing turnovers.Defense is still their biggest problem w/o question but there defense this season has been alot better than in the past few years.No need whatsoever to overreact to losing to the Hawks today.&#160;&#160;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Even though the Hawks were held to 43.8% FG%, I wonder sometimes about the effectiveness of the blocks and steals. A fairly high steal rate could possibly correlate with a high amount of steal attempts. This could mean that for every successful steal, a missed steal could give the opponent a small 5 on 4 advantage for a couple of seconds. 

The high number of blocks also have to be considered as to how many of them are effective in giving back the possession to the Knicks. Let&#039;s say you block a shot, only to have it blocked back to the opposing player for an easy shot. It&#039;s something that Tim Duncan in particular does very in that he tends to block the ball towards his own man. 

That being said, I like the blocking and steal attempts done by the team. Blocking makes the opponent think twice about running in for the layup. Steal attempts not only increase opponents turnovers (if the steal is successful anyway), but they also deflect balls often. This leads to a disruption in the offensive play of the opposing team. 

I didn&#039;t really see the game but from looking at the box score, the Knicks lost because they only shot 4-15 (26.7%) from the 3. 15 seems like a small amount of attempts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-301962">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-301962" rel="nofollow">BigBlueAL</a></strong>: ess-dog, the Knicks actually held the Hawks to 43.8% shooting today and shot 47.3% themselves.Like you said the difference in the game was 3pt shooting where the Hawks made 6 more 3?s than the Knicks.Abasi, the Knicks came into today 19th in defensive efficiency and actually played pretty good defense today.They lead the league in shot blocks and are 5th in forcing turnovers.Defense is still their biggest problem w/o question but there defense this season has been alot better than in the past few years.No need whatsoever to overreact to losing to the Hawks today.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Even though the Hawks were held to 43.8% FG%, I wonder sometimes about the effectiveness of the blocks and steals. A fairly high steal rate could possibly correlate with a high amount of steal attempts. This could mean that for every successful steal, a missed steal could give the opponent a small 5 on 4 advantage for a couple of seconds. </p>
<p>The high number of blocks also have to be considered as to how many of them are effective in giving back the possession to the Knicks. Let&#8217;s say you block a shot, only to have it blocked back to the opposing player for an easy shot. It&#8217;s something that Tim Duncan in particular does very in that he tends to block the ball towards his own man. </p>
<p>That being said, I like the blocking and steal attempts done by the team. Blocking makes the opponent think twice about running in for the layup. Steal attempts not only increase opponents turnovers (if the steal is successful anyway), but they also deflect balls often. This leads to a disruption in the offensive play of the opposing team. </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really see the game but from looking at the box score, the Knicks lost because they only shot 4-15 (26.7%) from the 3. 15 seems like a small amount of attempts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK47</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/hawks-99-knicks-90/#comment-301966</link>
		<dc:creator>JK47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 05:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=5143#comment-301966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heat fans are already starting with &quot;trade LeBron&quot; talk.  On some Heat blogs they&#039;re speculating about what he could fetch in a trade.

It&#039;s pretty glorious to watch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heat fans are already starting with &#8220;trade LeBron&#8221; talk.  On some Heat blogs they&#8217;re speculating about what he could fetch in a trade.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty glorious to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
