<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Draft Prospects, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattinDC</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/#comment-103613</link>
		<dc:creator>MattinDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=542#comment-103613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Ted Nelson, in part. Isiah has constructed this Knicks team based on potential; unfulfilled potential! Crawford and Curry, his two young cornerstones, have &quot;upside&quot; and was part of the reason he traded 2 years of draft picks for Curry. However, these players might never realize that potential. I think their other young studs (Lee, Balkman, maybe Frye) could develop into reliable starters soon; we don&#039;t need alot of players with upside right now. 

I think we should get a player with a proven skill, with perhaps less &quot;upside.&quot; We won&#039;t get a player at pick #23 with lots of &quot;upside&quot; unless he also has gaping holes in his game. Go with Almond!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Ted Nelson, in part. Isiah has constructed this Knicks team based on potential; unfulfilled potential! Crawford and Curry, his two young cornerstones, have &#8220;upside&#8221; and was part of the reason he traded 2 years of draft picks for Curry. However, these players might never realize that potential. I think their other young studs (Lee, Balkman, maybe Frye) could develop into reliable starters soon; we don&#8217;t need alot of players with upside right now. </p>
<p>I think we should get a player with a proven skill, with perhaps less &#8220;upside.&#8221; We won&#8217;t get a player at pick #23 with lots of &#8220;upside&#8221; unless he also has gaping holes in his game. Go with Almond!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Nelson</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/#comment-103492</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=542#comment-103492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave-

 As far as the European Jamal Crawford, Rudy Fernandez&#039;s your man. A rail thin 6-5 combo guard whose favorite offensive play is to dribble around on the perimeter for 10 seconds and then throw up a fade away three pointer with a hand or two in his face.
That said, he&#039;s already one of the best players in the Spanish league, a better shooter and less selfish/clueless than Crawford, and definitely has NBA talent. I&#039;m not saying the Knicks should take him at #23-although I wouldn&#039;t be against it either-and in the long run there may be a couple better players available there, but Rudy&#039;s already showing that he can play in the world&#039;s second best league. If he falls to the late first/early second he very well might be another Euro guard steal for the Suns (29) or Spurs (28 &amp; 33).


I agree with everyone that the Knicks aren&#039;t exactly one shooter away from contention (unless that shooter is a top 5 or 10 player in the league), as some might lead you to believe, and that said shooter might not even get many looks with the current Knicks roster. But given the corner that Isiah seems to have painted himself into, with Curry and Crawford as &quot;franchise players,&quot; maybe drafting (Almond) or trading for (Lewis) a dead-eye shooter isn&#039;t such a bad move (if he&#039;s also a good basketball player in other respects). If the guy can play significant minutes right away Isiah might be able to convince Eddy that passing is worth it because he&#039;s gone out and gotten a dead-eye shooter just for Eddy, and maybe said shooter can replace some of Jamal&#039;s 32% 3-pters with 40% 3-pters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave-</p>
<p> As far as the European Jamal Crawford, Rudy Fernandez&#8217;s your man. A rail thin 6-5 combo guard whose favorite offensive play is to dribble around on the perimeter for 10 seconds and then throw up a fade away three pointer with a hand or two in his face.<br />
That said, he&#8217;s already one of the best players in the Spanish league, a better shooter and less selfish/clueless than Crawford, and definitely has NBA talent. I&#8217;m not saying the Knicks should take him at #23-although I wouldn&#8217;t be against it either-and in the long run there may be a couple better players available there, but Rudy&#8217;s already showing that he can play in the world&#8217;s second best league. If he falls to the late first/early second he very well might be another Euro guard steal for the Suns (29) or Spurs (28 &amp; 33).</p>
<p>I agree with everyone that the Knicks aren&#8217;t exactly one shooter away from contention (unless that shooter is a top 5 or 10 player in the league), as some might lead you to believe, and that said shooter might not even get many looks with the current Knicks roster. But given the corner that Isiah seems to have painted himself into, with Curry and Crawford as &#8220;franchise players,&#8221; maybe drafting (Almond) or trading for (Lewis) a dead-eye shooter isn&#8217;t such a bad move (if he&#8217;s also a good basketball player in other respects). If the guy can play significant minutes right away Isiah might be able to convince Eddy that passing is worth it because he&#8217;s gone out and gotten a dead-eye shooter just for Eddy, and maybe said shooter can replace some of Jamal&#8217;s 32% 3-pters with 40% 3-pters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hudson River</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/#comment-103344</link>
		<dc:creator>Hudson River</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=542#comment-103344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About Belinelli, I have heard that his jumpshot might be his greatest asset. He seems like the best prospect, espiceally because the Knicks reside in the single most internationally populated in the world. The Knicks are catching on to the foreign born players trend too late. Look at the Western conference, in terms of local talent they are level with the East, but in terms of international talent they are head and shoulders ahead of the East. 

Its no Coincidence the MVP, and the Finals MVP, and last years 1st Overall pick were all from Europe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About Belinelli, I have heard that his jumpshot might be his greatest asset. He seems like the best prospect, espiceally because the Knicks reside in the single most internationally populated in the world. The Knicks are catching on to the foreign born players trend too late. Look at the Western conference, in terms of local talent they are level with the East, but in terms of international talent they are head and shoulders ahead of the East. </p>
<p>Its no Coincidence the MVP, and the Finals MVP, and last years 1st Overall pick were all from Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/#comment-103038</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 06:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=542#comment-103038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Belinelli. Forget Lewis &amp; pursue smaller investments with similar or better results. Artest &amp; Rasheed Wallace.  Short term solution leaving the golden year of free agency still open as a plan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belinelli. Forget Lewis &amp; pursue smaller investments with similar or better results. Artest &amp; Rasheed Wallace.  Short term solution leaving the golden year of free agency still open as a plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonk</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/#comment-102987</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 03:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=542#comment-102987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Petteri Koponen is a just turned 19 yo pure pg that needs to develop for a year or two-til Stevie and Stephon&#039;s contracts expire. Koponen. He&#039;s an athletic 6&#039;&#039;5&quot;. You all know Isaiah is going to try to top Balkman&#039;s surprise factor. Even though Koponen is making his way up the boards, what could possibly top Isaiah drafting a white pg in terms of surprise? (Which would make it easier for him to trade Lee.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Petteri Koponen is a just turned 19 yo pure pg that needs to develop for a year or two-til Stevie and Stephon&#8217;s contracts expire. Koponen. He&#8217;s an athletic 6&#8221;5&#8243;. You all know Isaiah is going to try to top Balkman&#8217;s surprise factor. Even though Koponen is making his way up the boards, what could possibly top Isaiah drafting a white pg in terms of surprise? (Which would make it easier for him to trade Lee.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/#comment-102847</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=542#comment-102847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Main9,

The Knicks are only about $40,000,000 over the salary cap. 

Unless Lewis signs for the midlevel exception, it will take a sign and trade to get him on the Knicks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Main9,</p>
<p>The Knicks are only about $40,000,000 over the salary cap. </p>
<p>Unless Lewis signs for the midlevel exception, it will take a sign and trade to get him on the Knicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave crockett</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/#comment-102825</link>
		<dc:creator>dave crockett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=542#comment-102825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Belinelli is the most intriguing,&quot;

Sorry, I got cut off before finishing that thought. What I meant to say was Belinelli is the most intriguing but there are some questions about him. I don&#039;t know what kind of shooter or defender he is. Of course, you&#039;re not getting players with no question marks at #23. But for all the grief Jamal Crawford takes in this forum Belinelli looks like and reads like the Euro version of him.

With Young, obviously the key is the upside. You look at that body combined with the fact that he&#039;s already a decent mid-range shooter and say &quot;we can work with this.&quot; If there&#039;s one nit to pick it&#039;s that I hate it when guys have bodies out of a catalog but don&#039;t rebound.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Belinelli is the most intriguing,&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry, I got cut off before finishing that thought. What I meant to say was Belinelli is the most intriguing but there are some questions about him. I don&#8217;t know what kind of shooter or defender he is. Of course, you&#8217;re not getting players with no question marks at #23. But for all the grief Jamal Crawford takes in this forum Belinelli looks like and reads like the Euro version of him.</p>
<p>With Young, obviously the key is the upside. You look at that body combined with the fact that he&#8217;s already a decent mid-range shooter and say &#8220;we can work with this.&#8221; If there&#8217;s one nit to pick it&#8217;s that I hate it when guys have bodies out of a catalog but don&#8217;t rebound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave crockett</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/#comment-102798</link>
		<dc:creator>dave crockett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 12:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=542#comment-102798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Belinelli is the most intriguing,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belinelli is the most intriguing,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: main9</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/#comment-102746</link>
		<dc:creator>main9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 07:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=542#comment-102746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just want Rashard Lewis,but I don&#039;t want to give up Jamal or David Lee! Isn&#039;t he a free agent? Why do we have to sign and trade?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want Rashard Lewis,but I don&#8217;t want to give up Jamal or David Lee! Isn&#8217;t he a free agent? Why do we have to sign and trade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian M</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-ii/#comment-102719</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 03:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=542#comment-102719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be doubly leery of Almond given that he seems to be quite turnover prone as well. We need shooters, true, but even more than that we need to cut down on TOs and play better team defense. Drafting Almond might be a bit like plunging your arm into quicksand to rescue your sinking foot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be doubly leery of Almond given that he seems to be quite turnover prone as well. We need shooters, true, but even more than that we need to cut down on TOs and play better team defense. Drafting Almond might be a bit like plunging your arm into quicksand to rescue your sinking foot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
