<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Draft Prospects, Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:08:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/#comment-102467</link>
		<dc:creator>caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=541#comment-102467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I didn&#039;t read the article closely enough. It&#039;s a pretty good description of JC... he is a creative passer, but neither fish nor fowl as a guard... and it&#039;s too soon to tell if he will develop a more mature, efficient game. He&#039;s a solid prospect but to my mind, the risk-reward ratio isn&#039;t good enough for the lottery.  

Big picture, at #23 it will be hard to find anyone at any position who&#039;s immediately better than the top 8 or 9 guys in our rotation - maybe one of the shooting guards. I know I&#039;ve mentioned it before, but I would either take a long-range, big-potential prospect, or try and trade multiple assets for a lottery pick or young, established vet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I didn&#8217;t read the article closely enough. It&#8217;s a pretty good description of JC&#8230; he is a creative passer, but neither fish nor fowl as a guard&#8230; and it&#8217;s too soon to tell if he will develop a more mature, efficient game. He&#8217;s a solid prospect but to my mind, the risk-reward ratio isn&#8217;t good enough for the lottery.  </p>
<p>Big picture, at #23 it will be hard to find anyone at any position who&#8217;s immediately better than the top 8 or 9 guys in our rotation &#8211; maybe one of the shooting guards. I know I&#8217;ve mentioned it before, but I would either take a long-range, big-potential prospect, or try and trade multiple assets for a lottery pick or young, established vet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave crockett</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/#comment-102424</link>
		<dc:creator>dave crockett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=541#comment-102424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Caleb

point of clarification: True shooter is a reference to the &quot;True Shooting&quot; stat that adjusts regular FG% for the effects of 3pt. shooting as well as getting to the free throw line. On that stat, Francis was one of NY&#039;s as well as the league&#039;s most efficient or &quot;true&quot; scores--even though his stroke isn&#039;t the most pleasant thing in the world to look at.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caleb</p>
<p>point of clarification: True shooter is a reference to the &#8220;True Shooting&#8221; stat that adjusts regular FG% for the effects of 3pt. shooting as well as getting to the free throw line. On that stat, Francis was one of NY&#8217;s as well as the league&#8217;s most efficient or &#8220;true&#8221; scores&#8211;even though his stroke isn&#8217;t the most pleasant thing in the world to look at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattinDC</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/#comment-102422</link>
		<dc:creator>MattinDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=541#comment-102422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Francis trade was one of the worst decisions EVER...but I blame Larry Brown for that. I subscribe to the idea that Francis move was Larry&#039;s way of de-legitamizing Zeke in a power play within the Knicks organization. Except for the fact that Dolan has a man crush on Isiah.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Francis trade was one of the worst decisions EVER&#8230;but I blame Larry Brown for that. I subscribe to the idea that Francis move was Larry&#8217;s way of de-legitamizing Zeke in a power play within the Knicks organization. Except for the fact that Dolan has a man crush on Isiah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caleb</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/#comment-102418</link>
		<dc:creator>caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=541#comment-102418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not crazy about any of them. Law and Crittenden will be gone, and none of the others will provide an immediate impact. Short-term, the next two years, I don&#039;t think they&#039;d be any better than the Knicks current point guards.By then, the Marbury and Francis deals will be up, anyway. Bottom line: I think we&#039;ll have better chances to nab our point guard of the future. 

On the other hand, I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing us trade for a young veteran. I think Frye for Jarrett Jack would be a good swap - JJ plays smart, can shoot and plays very good D. 

More of a longshot, Dallas might listen to offers for Devin Harris - say, Frye plus this year&#039;s draft pick. More likely Dallas tries to move Jason Terry, but either way they don&#039;t seem thrilled with their double-headed point guard, and they might consider a 1 for 2 swap - they could really use an extra scorer.

btw I saw Crittenden a lot, and while he may be worth it at 23, I don&#039;t think he&#039;s a super prospect. I missed the Carolina game (which put him on everyone&#039;s radar) but in many others he just looked raw. He&#039;s not much of a shooter, he&#039;s not super-quick like Francis and his decisions with the ball are still erratic. 

btw, I respectfully differ with the description of Francis as a &quot;true&quot; shooter. His outside shot is below average; he&#039;s been able to score mainly because he gets to the line as well as anyone not named Dwyane Wade (Though at Stevie&#039;s age I expect that part of his game to fall off soon, and fast...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not crazy about any of them. Law and Crittenden will be gone, and none of the others will provide an immediate impact. Short-term, the next two years, I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;d be any better than the Knicks current point guards.By then, the Marbury and Francis deals will be up, anyway. Bottom line: I think we&#8217;ll have better chances to nab our point guard of the future. </p>
<p>On the other hand, I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing us trade for a young veteran. I think Frye for Jarrett Jack would be a good swap &#8211; JJ plays smart, can shoot and plays very good D. </p>
<p>More of a longshot, Dallas might listen to offers for Devin Harris &#8211; say, Frye plus this year&#8217;s draft pick. More likely Dallas tries to move Jason Terry, but either way they don&#8217;t seem thrilled with their double-headed point guard, and they might consider a 1 for 2 swap &#8211; they could really use an extra scorer.</p>
<p>btw I saw Crittenden a lot, and while he may be worth it at 23, I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s a super prospect. I missed the Carolina game (which put him on everyone&#8217;s radar) but in many others he just looked raw. He&#8217;s not much of a shooter, he&#8217;s not super-quick like Francis and his decisions with the ball are still erratic. </p>
<p>btw, I respectfully differ with the description of Francis as a &#8220;true&#8221; shooter. His outside shot is below average; he&#8217;s been able to score mainly because he gets to the line as well as anyone not named Dwyane Wade (Though at Stevie&#8217;s age I expect that part of his game to fall off soon, and fast&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/#comment-102366</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=541#comment-102366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, Jordan is an interesting case. I think he&#039;s a reach at #23, but the Knicks do not have a second-rounder, and if Jordan manages to make it past the second round, he will be invited to camp by basically every team in the NBA, as there&#039;s not a single team in the NBA that wouldn&#039;t want to give a guy like Jordan a shot at their team. 

So I might take the shot with him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Jordan is an interesting case. I think he&#8217;s a reach at #23, but the Knicks do not have a second-rounder, and if Jordan manages to make it past the second round, he will be invited to camp by basically every team in the NBA, as there&#8217;s not a single team in the NBA that wouldn&#8217;t want to give a guy like Jordan a shot at their team. </p>
<p>So I might take the shot with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/#comment-102300</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=541#comment-102300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2 things:

1) I don&#039;t think AL4 will be available that late in the draft.

2) There&#039;s 0 chance Isiah will take Josh McRoberts. I nearly fell out of my seat when he drafted David Lee. Other than Lee, when was the last time Isiah was interested in a white player?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 things:</p>
<p>1) I don&#8217;t think AL4 will be available that late in the draft.</p>
<p>2) There&#8217;s 0 chance Isiah will take Josh McRoberts. I nearly fell out of my seat when he drafted David Lee. Other than Lee, when was the last time Isiah was interested in a white player?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrandonM</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/#comment-102294</link>
		<dc:creator>BrandonM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=541#comment-102294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read an article about Jordan on ESPN.com and although he is not athletic, he is a &quot;magician&quot; with the basketball.  But, I do not think we should draft him so early b/c he could be a smart player but could be completely out &quot;Everythinged&quot; on the court.  But, we can not forget those guys like him who made it (Skiles, Scotty Brooks, Legler, Kerr)  I think if he does not get drafted (if teams are scared of his lack of athletic ability), we should pick him up for the summer league, see who he does running the show, and sign him as a FA for this year by either letting him sit and learn or by putting him into the DLeague (which would mean we would have to dump some type of contract or two for one trades. Francis anyone?  Oh, Thanks Cleveland).  If we did that, we really would not lose much.  He has been given comparisons of Stockton-esque player, but if he fails, it is not a big gamble.  It would be a gamble if we drafted him at 23 though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article about Jordan on ESPN.com and although he is not athletic, he is a &#8220;magician&#8221; with the basketball.  But, I do not think we should draft him so early b/c he could be a smart player but could be completely out &#8220;Everythinged&#8221; on the court.  But, we can not forget those guys like him who made it (Skiles, Scotty Brooks, Legler, Kerr)  I think if he does not get drafted (if teams are scared of his lack of athletic ability), we should pick him up for the summer league, see who he does running the show, and sign him as a FA for this year by either letting him sit and learn or by putting him into the DLeague (which would mean we would have to dump some type of contract or two for one trades. Francis anyone?  Oh, Thanks Cleveland).  If we did that, we really would not lose much.  He has been given comparisons of Stockton-esque player, but if he fails, it is not a big gamble.  It would be a gamble if we drafted him at 23 though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/#comment-102041</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=541#comment-102041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isiah did say that he&#039;s willing to take a guy we didn&#039;t expect...so couldn&#039;t Jared Jordan be in the running if we do take a point guard? From the sound of things, he might be the only one of these guys that&#039;s a true PG.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isiah did say that he&#8217;s willing to take a guy we didn&#8217;t expect&#8230;so couldn&#8217;t Jared Jordan be in the running if we do take a point guard? From the sound of things, he might be the only one of these guys that&#8217;s a true PG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave crockett</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/#comment-101946</link>
		<dc:creator>dave crockett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=541#comment-101946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a fan of Pruitt&#039;s. He went from a guy who really didn&#039;t defend at all under Henry Bibby his freshman year to a pretty good defender under Tim Floyd. My comment about him not getting to the line was more or less to find something wrong.

I like all the guys on this list. The only no doubt about it reach would be Aaron Brooks (and I think Brooks will play in the league). Crittenton has some upside but also has big-time bust potential. I really didn&#039;t see him much until the tournament this year when they got waxed by UNLV and he turned the ball over like he was angry with it. Boy, I wish for his sake he&#039;d stayed one more year at Tech. Unless he had eligibility issues,  didn&#039;t like his coach, or just didn&#039;t want to compete with OJ Mayo next June I don&#039;t see why he didn&#039;t stay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a fan of Pruitt&#8217;s. He went from a guy who really didn&#8217;t defend at all under Henry Bibby his freshman year to a pretty good defender under Tim Floyd. My comment about him not getting to the line was more or less to find something wrong.</p>
<p>I like all the guys on this list. The only no doubt about it reach would be Aaron Brooks (and I think Brooks will play in the league). Crittenton has some upside but also has big-time bust potential. I really didn&#8217;t see him much until the tournament this year when they got waxed by UNLV and he turned the ball over like he was angry with it. Boy, I wish for his sake he&#8217;d stayed one more year at Tech. Unless he had eligibility issues,  didn&#8217;t like his coach, or just didn&#8217;t want to compete with OJ Mayo next June I don&#8217;t see why he didn&#8217;t stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transcend</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/draft-prospects-part-i/#comment-101871</link>
		<dc:creator>transcend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=541#comment-101871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think the bulls can offer a better package than that.  It&#039;s going to be really hard for us to compete with their offer.  And god knows the last thing i want to see is MJ back in a bulls uni....  it&#039;s sad, as much as i really want kobe to dawn our jersey, i think we&#039;re better off if he stays in la, cause if not, chances are he goes to the bulls.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the bulls can offer a better package than that.  It&#8217;s going to be really hard for us to compete with their offer.  And god knows the last thing i want to see is MJ back in a bulls uni&#8230;.  it&#8217;s sad, as much as i really want kobe to dawn our jersey, i think we&#8217;re better off if he stays in la, cause if not, chances are he goes to the bulls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
