<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Curry&#8217;s Recent Play Mean He&#8217;s Turned the Corner?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:49:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/#comment-40605</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=437#comment-40605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re not switching picks. If we do, you&#039;ll get crap for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re not switching picks. If we do, you&#8217;ll get crap for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaBullz</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/#comment-40578</link>
		<dc:creator>DaBullz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=437#comment-40578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enjoy Eddy - you got him for awhile.  Eddy is a good guy, very likable, a gentle giant if you will.

We get to exchange picks this year - enjoy your pick in the twenties.  I am a bit worried as you might sneak in the playoffs this year.  That would be a bummer for us.

BTW, Wallace had 15 pts, 20 boards, and 5 blocks last night.  Tyrus isn&#039;t playing much, but when he does, he makes himself known.  Refreshingly, he actually works at his craft.  Couple of years, 20 pounds, and tutelage from one of the best in the business, Ben Wallace, and you are looking at a straight up bitch.

Again, enjoy Jamal and Eddy - the best $120,000,000 we never spent!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy Eddy &#8211; you got him for awhile.  Eddy is a good guy, very likable, a gentle giant if you will.</p>
<p>We get to exchange picks this year &#8211; enjoy your pick in the twenties.  I am a bit worried as you might sneak in the playoffs this year.  That would be a bummer for us.</p>
<p>BTW, Wallace had 15 pts, 20 boards, and 5 blocks last night.  Tyrus isn&#8217;t playing much, but when he does, he makes himself known.  Refreshingly, he actually works at his craft.  Couple of years, 20 pounds, and tutelage from one of the best in the business, Ben Wallace, and you are looking at a straight up bitch.</p>
<p>Again, enjoy Jamal and Eddy &#8211; the best $120,000,000 we never spent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mase</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/#comment-40465</link>
		<dc:creator>mase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=437#comment-40465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DaBullz,
 ...your welcome.
and thx. for the best scoring low post big man in the east for Tyrus. Hows he working out for you guys(get back to us in a few years, no prob)?Also I almost forgot, thx. for your first round pick in this years draft too!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaBullz,<br />
 &#8230;your welcome.<br />
and thx. for the best scoring low post big man in the east for Tyrus. Hows he working out for you guys(get back to us in a few years, no prob)?Also I almost forgot, thx. for your first round pick in this years draft too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaBullz</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/#comment-40458</link>
		<dc:creator>DaBullz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=437#comment-40458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eddy Curry is one of the most uniquely talented players in the NBA.  His hands are unbelievably soft, he has great touch, and is literally unstoppable in the low block.

I have watched him since his Thornwood High days, and certainly saw a majority of his games as a Bulls fan.

Eddy will never be a force.  He has never had to work and he simply refuses to do so now.  The Knicks run their offense through him?  Good luck.  His numbers, mostly when it doesn&#039;t count, will rise a bit.

Those who know around the Bulls knew these things not just about Eddy, but Tyson and Jamal as well.  Very talented, very lazy, and in Jamals case, very self-centered.  I waited for years for Jamal to start winnig games for the Bulls and now I have the pleasure of watching it happen everytime the Bulls play the Knicks. 

Thanks for Tyrus - and a lottery pick in the decades&#039; deepest draft!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddy Curry is one of the most uniquely talented players in the NBA.  His hands are unbelievably soft, he has great touch, and is literally unstoppable in the low block.</p>
<p>I have watched him since his Thornwood High days, and certainly saw a majority of his games as a Bulls fan.</p>
<p>Eddy will never be a force.  He has never had to work and he simply refuses to do so now.  The Knicks run their offense through him?  Good luck.  His numbers, mostly when it doesn&#8217;t count, will rise a bit.</p>
<p>Those who know around the Bulls knew these things not just about Eddy, but Tyson and Jamal as well.  Very talented, very lazy, and in Jamals case, very self-centered.  I waited for years for Jamal to start winnig games for the Bulls and now I have the pleasure of watching it happen everytime the Bulls play the Knicks. </p>
<p>Thanks for Tyrus &#8211; and a lottery pick in the decades&#8217; deepest draft!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thepalerider</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/#comment-40428</link>
		<dc:creator>thepalerider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=437#comment-40428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;or Yoda and a tinier Yoda. &quot;  

That&#039;s great.  AI would bring a much needed element of intensity.  No matter what people say about him everyone agrees he plays hard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;or Yoda and a tinier Yoda. &#8221;  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s great.  AI would bring a much needed element of intensity.  No matter what people say about him everyone agrees he plays hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Panorama</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/#comment-40411</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Panorama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=437#comment-40411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also can you imagine Iverson mentoring Nate, one of the most Iverson-esque players in the league and a huge fan of his game? It would be like Obi Wan and Luke, or Yoda and a tinier Yoda.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also can you imagine Iverson mentoring Nate, one of the most Iverson-esque players in the league and a huge fan of his game? It would be like Obi Wan and Luke, or Yoda and a tinier Yoda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Panorama</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/#comment-40410</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Panorama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=437#comment-40410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Francis is addition by subtraction, Q is at a good point to sell high, Frye hurts but Lee, Jeffries, and Curry look like the future, and Rose is a throw in. C-Webb has more left in him than you think - ironically we&#039;ll never see it because his biggest problem is being stuck with Iverson. That would be some cruel irony to be trade WITH the guy he hates so much and wants to see gone. I&#039;d think there&#039;d be a significant chance of Dolan buying out C-Webb after a season or so since he&#039;s proven he really doesn&#039;t mind doing it.

As for the rest
A) Marbury looks like he wants someone else to be the star right now. Look at him during Curry&#039;s streak - does he appear to be sulking about Curry taking all the heat off him and becoming the face of the team? Quite the opposite - his game has improved as well as his demeanor and several posters here have mentioned how the Knicks suddenly look best with him on the court running the offense.

B) AI would become the instant first option instead of Curry, but he has literally never, not once in his entire 10 year career had an offensive minded big man to play the inside-out game with. I think Curry and AI could in theory make a killer duo ala Shaq and Kobe, with Curry drawing doubles and kicking it to AI, the two running pick and rolls, and AI drawing doubles and triples in the lane to throw it to Curry in the paint. The point is there&#039;s no precedent for AI and a good scoring big man. Mutombo was a defender first and foremost and scored on garbage baskets, Dalembert is a big guy with minimal offense as well, and that&#039;s pretty much the history of the Sixers centers aside from eh players like Todd Maculloch and Nazr Mohammed. How&#039;d AI do with the bigs on the international squads?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francis is addition by subtraction, Q is at a good point to sell high, Frye hurts but Lee, Jeffries, and Curry look like the future, and Rose is a throw in. C-Webb has more left in him than you think &#8211; ironically we&#8217;ll never see it because his biggest problem is being stuck with Iverson. That would be some cruel irony to be trade WITH the guy he hates so much and wants to see gone. I&#8217;d think there&#8217;d be a significant chance of Dolan buying out C-Webb after a season or so since he&#8217;s proven he really doesn&#8217;t mind doing it.</p>
<p>As for the rest<br />
A) Marbury looks like he wants someone else to be the star right now. Look at him during Curry&#8217;s streak &#8211; does he appear to be sulking about Curry taking all the heat off him and becoming the face of the team? Quite the opposite &#8211; his game has improved as well as his demeanor and several posters here have mentioned how the Knicks suddenly look best with him on the court running the offense.</p>
<p>B) AI would become the instant first option instead of Curry, but he has literally never, not once in his entire 10 year career had an offensive minded big man to play the inside-out game with. I think Curry and AI could in theory make a killer duo ala Shaq and Kobe, with Curry drawing doubles and kicking it to AI, the two running pick and rolls, and AI drawing doubles and triples in the lane to throw it to Curry in the paint. The point is there&#8217;s no precedent for AI and a good scoring big man. Mutombo was a defender first and foremost and scored on garbage baskets, Dalembert is a big guy with minimal offense as well, and that&#8217;s pretty much the history of the Sixers centers aside from eh players like Todd Maculloch and Nazr Mohammed. How&#8217;d AI do with the bigs on the international squads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count Zero</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/#comment-40404</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=437#comment-40404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That makes a perverted sort of sense Dan, gotta admit. :-)

So you&#039;re saying you would definitely give up Francis, Q, Frye and Rose (granted only Q and Frye matter) for AI? Because in essence, that&#039;s what you&#039;re doing -- since I think we can all agree that C-Webb is a below average PF at this point and we already have Jeffries and Lee. 

My bigger questions would be:
a) Could Marbury deal (I think AI could) with AI?
b) Would AI being on the floor kill the surging Curry&#039;s game?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes a perverted sort of sense Dan, gotta admit. :-)</p>
<p>So you&#8217;re saying you would definitely give up Francis, Q, Frye and Rose (granted only Q and Frye matter) for AI? Because in essence, that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re doing &#8212; since I think we can all agree that C-Webb is a below average PF at this point and we already have Jeffries and Lee. </p>
<p>My bigger questions would be:<br />
a) Could Marbury deal (I think AI could) with AI?<br />
b) Would AI being on the floor kill the surging Curry&#8217;s game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Panorama</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/#comment-40400</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Panorama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=437#comment-40400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the crazy thing - C-Webb&#039;s contract with two years left is shorter than Marbury or Francis, making us about the only team in the league that wouldn&#039;t lose much cap space on it. Ridiculous, I know. I still wouldn&#039;t want him but AI...it&#039;s tough to say no to that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the crazy thing &#8211; C-Webb&#8217;s contract with two years left is shorter than Marbury or Francis, making us about the only team in the league that wouldn&#8217;t lose much cap space on it. Ridiculous, I know. I still wouldn&#8217;t want him but AI&#8230;it&#8217;s tough to say no to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count Zero</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/does-currys-recent-play-mean-hes-turned-the-corner/#comment-40396</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=437#comment-40396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ammad -- valid question. Although, as long as Marbury remains a Knick, no one else is going to get significant minutes at PG no matter how well they play. Watson would be no exception.

Let me also say that I would be the first to admit, Curry is making me eat crow right now. I never said we should write him off at age 23, but I did say (quite frequently) that he wasn&#039;t showing me any reason to hope he would get better. He has been very impressive over the last 10 -- almost All-Star impressive over an albeit limited run. It would be nice to see him keep it up. 

No to AI -- especially since I deem it unlikely he goes without C-Webb...and C-Webb is a dog contract of epic proportions. That would in fact be the reason they are being bundled -- to get AI, you have to take the dog C-Webb contract.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ammad &#8212; valid question. Although, as long as Marbury remains a Knick, no one else is going to get significant minutes at PG no matter how well they play. Watson would be no exception.</p>
<p>Let me also say that I would be the first to admit, Curry is making me eat crow right now. I never said we should write him off at age 23, but I did say (quite frequently) that he wasn&#8217;t showing me any reason to hope he would get better. He has been very impressive over the last 10 &#8212; almost All-Star impressive over an albeit limited run. It would be nice to see him keep it up. </p>
<p>No to AI &#8212; especially since I deem it unlikely he goes without C-Webb&#8230;and C-Webb is a dog contract of epic proportions. That would in fact be the reason they are being bundled &#8212; to get AI, you have to take the dog C-Webb contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
