<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celtics 105, Knicks 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:33:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Nelson</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/#comment-297423</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=4831#comment-297423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-297420&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-297420&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iserp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: deciding to bring a new center.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would call Thompson a PF...

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-297420&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-297420&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iserp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: i am more worried about outside shooting than rebounding right now.  
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Randolph is a better rebounder than Thompson... But I wouldn&#039;t put too much into such a small sample of outside shooting. The Knicks have guys who can shoot the ball from outside. Douglas and Danilo are not going to shoot a combined 22% from 3 for the whole season. Those guys and Walker are not going to combine for 26%. Those are probably the Knicks 3 best outside shooters. They&#039;ll get it together. 

I do think running an offense rather than letting Amare and WC do whatever they want in isolation would also probably help the 3-pt shooting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-297420">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-297420" rel="nofollow">iserp</a></strong>: deciding to bring a new center.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I would call Thompson a PF&#8230;</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-297420">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-297420" rel="nofollow">iserp</a></strong>: i am more worried about outside shooting than rebounding right now.  
</p></blockquote>
<p>Randolph is a better rebounder than Thompson&#8230; But I wouldn&#8217;t put too much into such a small sample of outside shooting. The Knicks have guys who can shoot the ball from outside. Douglas and Danilo are not going to shoot a combined 22% from 3 for the whole season. Those guys and Walker are not going to combine for 26%. Those are probably the Knicks 3 best outside shooters. They&#8217;ll get it together. </p>
<p>I do think running an offense rather than letting Amare and WC do whatever they want in isolation would also probably help the 3-pt shooting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Nelson</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/#comment-297422</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=4831#comment-297422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-297403&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-297403&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ben&#032;R&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: As for Amare, teams have decided they are not going to be beat by Amare on the pick and roll. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know that the Knicks are making any effort to pick-and-roll with him. He sets a pick and stands there, Felton hands him the ball, Amare drives towards the basket. That&#039;s almost the default offense at this point... Maybe teams are taking it away, but so far I have seen little effort to &quot;roll&quot; by either one of them. It doesn&#039;t look anything like a pnr to me, just a hand-off iso thing.

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-297403&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-297403&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ben&#032;R&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Why did we give the ball to amare 25 feet from the basket on an iso when we’re looking for the gametying shot. He’s our star but you would not give the ball to Ewing, Howard, Shaq, etc 25 feet from the basket just becasue teams are packing the paint. You would just find other ways to score.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Great point.

My feeling is also that if there were a little more motion teams would have a harder time defending the Knicks and they would be able to find more open men (including Amare in better spots probably). The offense is so stagnant. Everyone stands around. One guy has the ball and dribbles around, 4 guys stand around and watch him. That&#039;s what I expect from a Larry Brown or JVG, I thought D&#039;Antoni was a better offensive coach than that. Sure you can kick the ball around and find an open man (which I also would say the Knicks aren&#039;t doing enough), but you can also get open by you know... moving yourself. Force guys to chase you, force defenses to switch or lose a step on their man, move the ball. I guess maybe it&#039;s the whole 7 Seconds or Less thing, but the half-court offense is usually one pass and shoot. Make that extra pass and you&#039;ll often find an open man.

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-297411&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-297411&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ben&#032;R&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: but instead of rolling anyway and getting someone else an open look he stops and gets the ball 25 feet from the basket.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think it&#039;s got to be by design: D&#039;Atoni&#039;s call. Maybe not, but at some point if you&#039;re the coach and your best dive man hasn&#039;t run pnr for the entire pre-season and 3 games in the regular season... that&#039;s on you. I don&#039;t know if D&#039;Antoni doesn&#039;t want him pnring, he can&#039;t manage Amare, or what...
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-297418&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-297418&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SeeWhyDee&#055;&#055;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Is it 2 early to give up on AR at this point? If he were healthy, would he have made much of a difference in the 1st 3 games? More than Jason Thompson would? 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, I would say it&#039;s too early. I&#039;m more worried about the future than these 3 games. The Knicks are not one 8th man away from anything. And of course it&#039;s impossible to say what he would or would not have done in the 3 games. 

Thompson, by the way, is not necessarily a better scorer than AR. Last season he had about 14 pts/36 (usage of 19.6) on a .518 TS%, while AR had over 18 pts/36 (usage of 24) on a .521 TS%. Where I think AR can differentiate himself from Thompson, though, is defense. Defense is about a lot more than blocked shots. AR is not there yet, but besides cleaning up with blocks and rebounds he has the potential to be a versatile lock-down defender with his length and athleticism.

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-297418&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-297418&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SeeWhyDee&#055;&#055;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: unless AR plays the 5, then I think we can afford to move him. What do you guys think?  
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I also think the Knicks can afford to move him, but I don&#039;t think Jason Thompson is the guy to move him for. Thompson is a marginal improvement at best (one could argue he&#039;s actually worse) and already 24. Move him for a pick come draft time (arguably more upside) or an established veteran who is clearly better (more certainty).

I also think the Knicks exact rotation today is not necessarily their long-term rotation. Anthony Randolph can be a valuable piece going forward, even if he doesn&#039;t end up being one this season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-297403">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-297403" rel="nofollow">Ben&#032;R</a></strong>: As for Amare, teams have decided they are not going to be beat by Amare on the pick and roll.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that the Knicks are making any effort to pick-and-roll with him. He sets a pick and stands there, Felton hands him the ball, Amare drives towards the basket. That&#8217;s almost the default offense at this point&#8230; Maybe teams are taking it away, but so far I have seen little effort to &#8220;roll&#8221; by either one of them. It doesn&#8217;t look anything like a pnr to me, just a hand-off iso thing.</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-297403">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-297403" rel="nofollow">Ben&#032;R</a></strong>: Why did we give the ball to amare 25 feet from the basket on an iso when we’re looking for the gametying shot. He’s our star but you would not give the ball to Ewing, Howard, Shaq, etc 25 feet from the basket just becasue teams are packing the paint. You would just find other ways to score.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Great point.</p>
<p>My feeling is also that if there were a little more motion teams would have a harder time defending the Knicks and they would be able to find more open men (including Amare in better spots probably). The offense is so stagnant. Everyone stands around. One guy has the ball and dribbles around, 4 guys stand around and watch him. That&#8217;s what I expect from a Larry Brown or JVG, I thought D&#8217;Antoni was a better offensive coach than that. Sure you can kick the ball around and find an open man (which I also would say the Knicks aren&#8217;t doing enough), but you can also get open by you know&#8230; moving yourself. Force guys to chase you, force defenses to switch or lose a step on their man, move the ball. I guess maybe it&#8217;s the whole 7 Seconds or Less thing, but the half-court offense is usually one pass and shoot. Make that extra pass and you&#8217;ll often find an open man.</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-297411">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-297411" rel="nofollow">Ben&#032;R</a></strong>: but instead of rolling anyway and getting someone else an open look he stops and gets the ball 25 feet from the basket.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I think it&#8217;s got to be by design: D&#8217;Atoni&#8217;s call. Maybe not, but at some point if you&#8217;re the coach and your best dive man hasn&#8217;t run pnr for the entire pre-season and 3 games in the regular season&#8230; that&#8217;s on you. I don&#8217;t know if D&#8217;Antoni doesn&#8217;t want him pnring, he can&#8217;t manage Amare, or what&#8230;</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-297418">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-297418" rel="nofollow">SeeWhyDee&#055;&#055;</a></strong>: Is it 2 early to give up on AR at this point? If he were healthy, would he have made much of a difference in the 1st 3 games? More than Jason Thompson would?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I would say it&#8217;s too early. I&#8217;m more worried about the future than these 3 games. The Knicks are not one 8th man away from anything. And of course it&#8217;s impossible to say what he would or would not have done in the 3 games. </p>
<p>Thompson, by the way, is not necessarily a better scorer than AR. Last season he had about 14 pts/36 (usage of 19.6) on a .518 TS%, while AR had over 18 pts/36 (usage of 24) on a .521 TS%. Where I think AR can differentiate himself from Thompson, though, is defense. Defense is about a lot more than blocked shots. AR is not there yet, but besides cleaning up with blocks and rebounds he has the potential to be a versatile lock-down defender with his length and athleticism.</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-297418">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-297418" rel="nofollow">SeeWhyDee&#055;&#055;</a></strong>: unless AR plays the 5, then I think we can afford to move him. What do you guys think?  
</p></blockquote>
<p>I also think the Knicks can afford to move him, but I don&#8217;t think Jason Thompson is the guy to move him for. Thompson is a marginal improvement at best (one could argue he&#8217;s actually worse) and already 24. Move him for a pick come draft time (arguably more upside) or an established veteran who is clearly better (more certainty).</p>
<p>I also think the Knicks exact rotation today is not necessarily their long-term rotation. Anthony Randolph can be a valuable piece going forward, even if he doesn&#8217;t end up being one this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iserp</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/#comment-297420</link>
		<dc:creator>iserp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=4831#comment-297420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SeeWhyDee77, I think Jason Thompson would be a nice pickup, but I&#039;d rather wait and see what can we get out of Mozgov and Turiaf; and I also would like to see Stoudemire playing in a more conventional way before deciding to bring a new center. And actually, i am more worried about outside shooting than rebounding right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SeeWhyDee77, I think Jason Thompson would be a nice pickup, but I&#8217;d rather wait and see what can we get out of Mozgov and Turiaf; and I also would like to see Stoudemire playing in a more conventional way before deciding to bring a new center. And actually, i am more worried about outside shooting than rebounding right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeeWhyDee77</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/#comment-297418</link>
		<dc:creator>SeeWhyDee77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=4831#comment-297418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well...I suppose there are a few things to be encouraged about so far considering things have been so abnormal for our knicks for so long. But rite now, and I&#039;m not saying this becuz I&#039;m down on the team, the only bright side to the start of the season is that we&#039;ve lost to 2 great teams. That said, we had a chance to win in both losses and we kinda let it slip through our fingers. Add that to the fact that we BARELY got past a weak Raptors team, and u have as much to be discouraged about as u do to be encouraged about. Now, i&#039;m not gonna harshly critique the team becuz it&#039;s only game 3 and even tho the guys have had a whole training camp together-they still haven&#039;t gelled yet. After years of disappointment, I can be patient enough to reserve judgement til at least..umm..say december. If the team is still playing the same way with the same results, then i&#039;ll get worried. But all in all, the team is showing things that have been missing since Van Gundy coached..hustle, passion, and defense. I mean those guys out there are active and engaged! Come december, if those &quot;intangibles&quot; havent translated into better results then we have a problem.
Now, I have a question. What say ye (or ye&#039;s) about goin after a guy like Jason Thompson? He&#039;s been leapfrogged in Sacramento because of the additions of Dalembert and Cousins. He would provide more scoring on that second unit and some more rebounding-which by the way we rebounded surprisingly well last nite. I&#039;m intrigued by the thought of adding him, but with the way Chandler is playing, we&#039;d problee hafta send SAC AR or Chandler to pull that one off. So, do u package Chandler and AR with Curry&#039;s deal for Melo? Or do u roll the dice and wait for the offseason to add Melo and trade problee AR for Thompson rite now? Is it 2 early to give up on AR at this point? If he were healthy, would he have made much of a difference in the 1st 3 games? More than Jason Thompson would? AR brings blocking and rebounding to the table, and a tremendous upside. But unless he bulks up and plays the 5, I don&#039;t see much need for him now..especially if Turiaf stays healthy. Why? Between Turi, Stat, Moz, and Chandler- we are getting enough blocks. Thompson would add more scoring and just about the same as AR in rebounding. To me it&#039;s a toss up. But like I said, seeing what the healthy players are giving us right now, unless AR plays the 5, then I think we can afford to move him. What do you guys think?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;I suppose there are a few things to be encouraged about so far considering things have been so abnormal for our knicks for so long. But rite now, and I&#8217;m not saying this becuz I&#8217;m down on the team, the only bright side to the start of the season is that we&#8217;ve lost to 2 great teams. That said, we had a chance to win in both losses and we kinda let it slip through our fingers. Add that to the fact that we BARELY got past a weak Raptors team, and u have as much to be discouraged about as u do to be encouraged about. Now, i&#8217;m not gonna harshly critique the team becuz it&#8217;s only game 3 and even tho the guys have had a whole training camp together-they still haven&#8217;t gelled yet. After years of disappointment, I can be patient enough to reserve judgement til at least..umm..say december. If the team is still playing the same way with the same results, then i&#8217;ll get worried. But all in all, the team is showing things that have been missing since Van Gundy coached..hustle, passion, and defense. I mean those guys out there are active and engaged! Come december, if those &#8220;intangibles&#8221; havent translated into better results then we have a problem.<br />
Now, I have a question. What say ye (or ye&#8217;s) about goin after a guy like Jason Thompson? He&#8217;s been leapfrogged in Sacramento because of the additions of Dalembert and Cousins. He would provide more scoring on that second unit and some more rebounding-which by the way we rebounded surprisingly well last nite. I&#8217;m intrigued by the thought of adding him, but with the way Chandler is playing, we&#8217;d problee hafta send SAC AR or Chandler to pull that one off. So, do u package Chandler and AR with Curry&#8217;s deal for Melo? Or do u roll the dice and wait for the offseason to add Melo and trade problee AR for Thompson rite now? Is it 2 early to give up on AR at this point? If he were healthy, would he have made much of a difference in the 1st 3 games? More than Jason Thompson would? AR brings blocking and rebounding to the table, and a tremendous upside. But unless he bulks up and plays the 5, I don&#8217;t see much need for him now..especially if Turiaf stays healthy. Why? Between Turi, Stat, Moz, and Chandler- we are getting enough blocks. Thompson would add more scoring and just about the same as AR in rebounding. To me it&#8217;s a toss up. But like I said, seeing what the healthy players are giving us right now, unless AR plays the 5, then I think we can afford to move him. What do you guys think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/#comment-297417</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=4831#comment-297417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was at the game last night - great crowd, louder than it has been in the last few years except maybe for that game where Gallo and Melo went at each other last year.

Thought Felton played great, his last shot which got blocked notwithstanding. No one else seemed to be particularly engaged at the offensive end in the 4th quarter.

Few wishes:
- Chandler - you&#039;re playing great, but STOP SHOOTING 3s.
- Gallo - sit for a week until your wrist is better, or just the drive the ball every single time instead.
- Amare - if we wanted a big man to iso 1-on-1 and have 6 TOs and 6 rebounds, we already have an $11M black hole on the inactive list.  Someone has got to figure out how to get him the ball on the move to the basket.  I can&#039;t believe for a minute that they can&#039;t run the pick and roll because of the defense. They ran it every play in Phoenix and teams couldn&#039;t stop it even though they knew it was coming. I&#039;m no basketball coach but that would be priority #1 for me if I was D&#039;Antoni.
- FREE THROWS!!!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was at the game last night &#8211; great crowd, louder than it has been in the last few years except maybe for that game where Gallo and Melo went at each other last year.</p>
<p>Thought Felton played great, his last shot which got blocked notwithstanding. No one else seemed to be particularly engaged at the offensive end in the 4th quarter.</p>
<p>Few wishes:<br />
- Chandler &#8211; you&#8217;re playing great, but STOP SHOOTING 3s.<br />
- Gallo &#8211; sit for a week until your wrist is better, or just the drive the ball every single time instead.<br />
- Amare &#8211; if we wanted a big man to iso 1-on-1 and have 6 TOs and 6 rebounds, we already have an $11M black hole on the inactive list.  Someone has got to figure out how to get him the ball on the move to the basket.  I can&#8217;t believe for a minute that they can&#8217;t run the pick and roll because of the defense. They ran it every play in Phoenix and teams couldn&#8217;t stop it even though they knew it was coming. I&#8217;m no basketball coach but that would be priority #1 for me if I was D&#8217;Antoni.<br />
- FREE THROWS!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/#comment-297416</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=4831#comment-297416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;My grumpy comment: We talked about this team all summer long, turning over each possible move with thread after thread. Why is it so hard to get fresh game threads for each game? This one is called “Celtics 105, Knicks 101.” That’s odd. (Sorry, just feeling bitchy after that game.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nah, it&#039;s a fair enough point. Let me assure you - we&#039;ll have game threads up for the next 78 games, I&#039;ll make a point of it (if no one else beats me to posting them, of course).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My grumpy comment: We talked about this team all summer long, turning over each possible move with thread after thread. Why is it so hard to get fresh game threads for each game? This one is called “Celtics 105, Knicks 101.” That’s odd. (Sorry, just feeling bitchy after that game.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Nah, it&#8217;s a fair enough point. Let me assure you &#8211; we&#8217;ll have game threads up for the next 78 games, I&#8217;ll make a point of it (if no one else beats me to posting them, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/#comment-297415</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=4831#comment-297415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s maddening to me is that D&#039;Antoni seems to pretty clearly be doing an approach of &quot;Let&#039;s see if Gallo healthy. No? Okay, to the bench with him for the rest of the half,&quot; which doesn&#039;t really make any sense. Why not just give him a &lt;b&gt;full&lt;/b&gt; game off instead of &quot;Is he healthy yet? No, okay, we&#039;ll try again at the start of the second half&quot;?

All it does it put the Knicks at a disadvantage since Gallo can&#039;t hit outside shots and that frustration looks like it is affecting the rest of his game. Just start Walker next game (which would allow Chandler to play the same role he has gotten quite used to).

Also, I think Fields should be involved in the offense more - for a little while there he and Chandler really had something going on. It was nice to see. I was pleased to see very little of Mason, by the way. I can&#039;t wait until Azubuike makes him completely useless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s maddening to me is that D&#8217;Antoni seems to pretty clearly be doing an approach of &#8220;Let&#8217;s see if Gallo healthy. No? Okay, to the bench with him for the rest of the half,&#8221; which doesn&#8217;t really make any sense. Why not just give him a <b>full</b> game off instead of &#8220;Is he healthy yet? No, okay, we&#8217;ll try again at the start of the second half&#8221;?</p>
<p>All it does it put the Knicks at a disadvantage since Gallo can&#8217;t hit outside shots and that frustration looks like it is affecting the rest of his game. Just start Walker next game (which would allow Chandler to play the same role he has gotten quite used to).</p>
<p>Also, I think Fields should be involved in the offense more &#8211; for a little while there he and Chandler really had something going on. It was nice to see. I was pleased to see very little of Mason, by the way. I can&#8217;t wait until Azubuike makes him completely useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveoh</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/#comment-297414</link>
		<dc:creator>steveoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=4831#comment-297414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with benching Gallinari if his wrist is bothering him. He&#039;s not really contributing anything else. Even tonight, he got caught looking on defense, and that&#039;s really indefensible, sore wrist or not.

What I wouldn&#039;t do is start Chandler in his place. The nice thing about his game so far is that he&#039;s been, in Clyde&#039;s words, ubiquitous. And I think much of that has been because he hasn&#039;t been labeled to a specific position, where he might feel he has to play within a job description. He&#039;s just been filling in where there&#039;s a need, and it&#039;s freed him up to just play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with benching Gallinari if his wrist is bothering him. He&#8217;s not really contributing anything else. Even tonight, he got caught looking on defense, and that&#8217;s really indefensible, sore wrist or not.</p>
<p>What I wouldn&#8217;t do is start Chandler in his place. The nice thing about his game so far is that he&#8217;s been, in Clyde&#8217;s words, ubiquitous. And I think much of that has been because he hasn&#8217;t been labeled to a specific position, where he might feel he has to play within a job description. He&#8217;s just been filling in where there&#8217;s a need, and it&#8217;s freed him up to just play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cronin</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/#comment-297413</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=4831#comment-297413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get that the Knicks bench is kind of thin right now, but seriously, Gallo is useless if his wrist is keeping him from making shots, so just give him a couple of games off to let the wrist heal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get that the Knicks bench is kind of thin right now, but seriously, Gallo is useless if his wrist is keeping him from making shots, so just give him a couple of games off to let the wrist heal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/celtics-105-knicks-101/#comment-297412</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/?p=4831#comment-297412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if Gallo isn&#039;t hurt, maybe he&#039;s playing like this because he knows there&#039;s a very good chance he&#039;s going to end up in Denver soon and he really doesn&#039;t want that. 

to spin it in a good way, how cool would it be if that deal went down with Chandler instead of Gallo because of how they&#039;re playing now, and then Gallo turned it back on once Carmelo got here? anyway, that&#039;s my hope...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if Gallo isn&#8217;t hurt, maybe he&#8217;s playing like this because he knows there&#8217;s a very good chance he&#8217;s going to end up in Denver soon and he really doesn&#8217;t want that. </p>
<p>to spin it in a good way, how cool would it be if that deal went down with Chandler instead of Gallo because of how they&#8217;re playing now, and then Gallo turned it back on once Carmelo got here? anyway, that&#8217;s my hope&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
