<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2011 Game Thread: Knicks @ Hawks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/</link>
	<description>The NBA&#039;s indispensible, premier analytical blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:59:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kburt8</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312754</link>
		<dc:creator>kburt8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update on Azubuike from the NY Post: D&#039;Antoni was nonplussed at Kelenna Azubuike &#039;s return to scrimmaging yesterday and Azubuike saying he feels different now because he can push better off his knee. &quot;Good for him,&quot; D&#039;Antoni said. &quot;Watching practice and seeing if he can play, it&#039;s going to be a while. It&#039;s not going to be next week.&quot; 

Good for him...funny stuff from D&#039;antoni.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update on Azubuike from the NY Post: D&#8217;Antoni was nonplussed at Kelenna Azubuike &#8216;s return to scrimmaging yesterday and Azubuike saying he feels different now because he can push better off his knee. &#8220;Good for him,&#8221; D&#8217;Antoni said. &#8220;Watching practice and seeing if he can play, it&#8217;s going to be a while. It&#8217;s not going to be next week.&#8221; </p>
<p>Good for him&#8230;funny stuff from D&#8217;antoni.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312749</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@143 Udrih has a player option of almost $8 million for the 2012-13 season. Unless you&#039;re sure that Cassipi is going to become a bona fide star, I think that&#039;s the deal-breaker of your trade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@143 Udrih has a player option of almost $8 million for the 2012-13 season. Unless you&#8217;re sure that Cassipi is going to become a bona fide star, I think that&#8217;s the deal-breaker of your trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massive</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312747</link>
		<dc:creator>massive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any way D&#039;Antoni will play Dalembert. We&#039;d be better off trading for Melo and placing him at the stretch 4 to let him grab 9 rebounds a game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any way D&#8217;Antoni will play Dalembert. We&#8217;d be better off trading for Melo and placing him at the stretch 4 to let him grab 9 rebounds a game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: latke</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312746</link>
		<dc:creator>latke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-312745&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-312745&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Why on earth would Sacramento give up Dalembert, a rotation player for Curry?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They want to lose. They are only 4 games out of the worst record. They also don&#039;t want to take on long term salaries. I imagine they&#039;d take the first offer that included expirings and &quot;young player of marginal value.&quot;  The sooner they ditch him, the sooner they can start losing. &lt;a href=&quot;http://espn.go.com/nba/dailydime/_/page/dime-110128-30/stein-all-star-reserves&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;According ESPN&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
The Kings, sources say, are open to moving big man Samuel Dalembert during the next 27 days before the deadline, but they remain unwilling to take back anything other than expiring contracts to preserve maximum flexibility on the other side of a new collective bargaining agreement&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The article also claims they&#039;d give up Udrih for nothing too. It makes sense. Udrih, Dalembert, Garcia and Landry can&#039;t fit into their long term plans -- by the time Evans and Cousins are in their primes, those guys will be in decline (and in the mean time, they youth will get fewer minutes to develop, and they&#039;ll get more wins [and worse draft picks]).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-312745">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-312745" rel="nofollow">DS</a></strong>: Why on earth would Sacramento give up Dalembert, a rotation player for Curry?
</p></blockquote>
<p>They want to lose. They are only 4 games out of the worst record. They also don&#8217;t want to take on long term salaries. I imagine they&#8217;d take the first offer that included expirings and &#8220;young player of marginal value.&#8221;  The sooner they ditch him, the sooner they can start losing. <a href="http://espn.go.com/nba/dailydime/_/page/dime-110128-30/stein-all-star-reserves" rel="nofollow">According ESPN</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The Kings, sources say, are open to moving big man Samuel Dalembert during the next 27 days before the deadline, but they remain unwilling to take back anything other than expiring contracts to preserve maximum flexibility on the other side of a new collective bargaining agreement</p></blockquote>
<p>The article also claims they&#8217;d give up Udrih for nothing too. It makes sense. Udrih, Dalembert, Garcia and Landry can&#8217;t fit into their long term plans &#8212; by the time Evans and Cousins are in their primes, those guys will be in decline (and in the mean time, they youth will get fewer minutes to develop, and they&#8217;ll get more wins [and worse draft picks]).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DS</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312745</link>
		<dc:creator>DS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 05:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why on earth would Sacramento give up Dalembert, a rotation player for Curry?

Speaking of the Kings, their wins against the Lakers and Hornets on consecutive nights makes me feel better about the Knicks&#039; loss to them. DeMarcus looks like he&#039;s starting to kill it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on earth would Sacramento give up Dalembert, a rotation player for Curry?</p>
<p>Speaking of the Kings, their wins against the Lakers and Hornets on consecutive nights makes me feel better about the Knicks&#8217; loss to them. DeMarcus looks like he&#8217;s starting to kill it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: latke</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312744</link>
		<dc:creator>latke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 05:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[would you trade azuibuike straight up for yi jianlian? Big enough to put up a fight in the post, range out to the 3pt line, might really benefit from the fact that the offense would make him exclusively into a spot up shooter. He doesn&#039;t play much for Washington, and WAS would save about $5 million between luxury tax relief and buke&#039;s insured contract. He is still only 23 years old. He averages about 8 rebounds and a block per 36.

You could also try something like this if you wanted to add a big and a guard: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=4lvohgv

Hinrich, IMO, is everything we want douglas to be: a smart defender who can still run the offense. IMO he&#039;s better than Udrih (due to defense and passing), and Jianlian has the potential to be for us what Channing Frye is for Phoenix.

BTW, Nick Young is an RFA at the end of this season. I think he could be the next rip hamilton except with better range (somewhere between hamilton and Kevin Martin). The numbers compare pretty well: http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&amp;sum=1&amp;p1=youngni01&amp;y1=2011&amp;p2=martike02&amp;y2=2008&amp;p3=hamilri01&amp;y3=2003

Do you think Washington will match any offer? What do you think his market value is? He&#039;s a player I&#039;d love to have here who could grow with our young core. I know he doesn&#039;t match our needs biggest needs (although he&#039;s a better scorer than any other Knick wing IMO), but if Nene or Gasol fall through, I think he is definitely worth looking at. We can always make other moves to balance our roster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would you trade azuibuike straight up for yi jianlian? Big enough to put up a fight in the post, range out to the 3pt line, might really benefit from the fact that the offense would make him exclusively into a spot up shooter. He doesn&#8217;t play much for Washington, and WAS would save about $5 million between luxury tax relief and buke&#8217;s insured contract. He is still only 23 years old. He averages about 8 rebounds and a block per 36.</p>
<p>You could also try something like this if you wanted to add a big and a guard: <a href="http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=4lvohgv" rel="nofollow">http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=4lvohgv</a></p>
<p>Hinrich, IMO, is everything we want douglas to be: a smart defender who can still run the offense. IMO he&#8217;s better than Udrih (due to defense and passing), and Jianlian has the potential to be for us what Channing Frye is for Phoenix.</p>
<p>BTW, Nick Young is an RFA at the end of this season. I think he could be the next rip hamilton except with better range (somewhere between hamilton and Kevin Martin). The numbers compare pretty well: <a href="http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&#038;sum=1&#038;p1=youngni01&#038;y1=2011&#038;p2=martike02&#038;y2=2008&#038;p3=hamilri01&#038;y3=2003" rel="nofollow">http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&#038;sum=1&#038;p1=youngni01&#038;y1=2011&#038;p2=martike02&#038;y2=2008&#038;p3=hamilri01&#038;y3=2003</a></p>
<p>Do you think Washington will match any offer? What do you think his market value is? He&#8217;s a player I&#8217;d love to have here who could grow with our young core. I know he doesn&#8217;t match our needs biggest needs (although he&#8217;s a better scorer than any other Knick wing IMO), but if Nene or Gasol fall through, I think he is definitely worth looking at. We can always make other moves to balance our roster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon abbey</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312743</link>
		<dc:creator>jon abbey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 01:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-312741&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-312741&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JK&#052;&#055;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: He’d be the best rebounder on the team.&#160;&#160;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would be the best rebounder on the team. OK, second best behind Fields.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-312741">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-312741" rel="nofollow">JK&#052;&#055;</a></strong>: He’d be the best rebounder on the team.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I would be the best rebounder on the team. OK, second best behind Fields.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312742</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 01:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I too would approve of turning Curry into Dalembert. If we were going to trade Curry alone (or Curry + small change) for somebody, he&#039;s probably the best we could get, all things considered.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too would approve of turning Curry into Dalembert. If we were going to trade Curry alone (or Curry + small change) for somebody, he&#8217;s probably the best we could get, all things considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK47</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312741</link>
		<dc:creator>JK47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still think Mozgov is in NYK&#039;s long-term plans.  I think we might see him get some run in this game against the Pistons tomorrow.  

I, for one, like the idea of Dalembert, who is a true impact rebounder.  11.4 rebounds per 36 minutes over his career.  He&#039;d be the best rebounder on the team.  He&#039;s been awful this year for Sacto but I bet we could get 20 decent minutes out of him per game.  His TS% numbers are usually at least tolerable and I think his offensive performance this year with Sacto is an aberration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think Mozgov is in NYK&#8217;s long-term plans.  I think we might see him get some run in this game against the Pistons tomorrow.  </p>
<p>I, for one, like the idea of Dalembert, who is a true impact rebounder.  11.4 rebounds per 36 minutes over his career.  He&#8217;d be the best rebounder on the team.  He&#8217;s been awful this year for Sacto but I bet we could get 20 decent minutes out of him per game.  His TS% numbers are usually at least tolerable and I think his offensive performance this year with Sacto is an aberration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GHenman</title>
		<link>http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312740</link>
		<dc:creator>GHenman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KnickerBlogger.Net/2011-game-thread-knicks-hawks/#comment-312740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=5r8ms9d
If Sacremento is looking to dump salary, how about this one?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=5r8ms9d" rel="nofollow">http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=5r8ms9d</a><br />
If Sacremento is looking to dump salary, how about this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
